Thanks for being honest, joeker.

It was Wilky - in reference to her calling Amy naive, and Amy's thoroughly appropriate response.

That's honest. Unlike Joeker's reference to me "assuming" people know things, when in fact there was no need to assume. I won't carry the argument from Joeker's blog over to here and explain what that means.

Drop it, people! And just to help this is my final post on this thread.

Joeker I have always had a lot of time for you, and enjoyed chatting with you on the AFF chat. I respect the fact that you have conviction and a cause you feel worth pursuing. I also had no problem with the way you held and debated your opinions on this thread. It is a shame you are keeping bad company. I hope for your sake you are able to distance yourself from association, it won't do you or your cause any benefit in the long term. I am sure you probably realise this already.
Take care mate

Rossco

Thank goodness!

Speaking of Fore, or Droopy?

I answer to no puppeteer, I speak my mind openly and with conviction and honesty.
Suffice to say, if there is an ignorance, it is not to be assumed that they're being belligerent.

As for you, Phil, this is absolute hypocrisy on your part.
You should be ashamed for pushing a "Get Over It" here, while cruelly and basely using it to attack and insult a lady's integrity.
You are as bad as Fore these days.

In esponse to timelord's statements

So has Hulk Hogan, but I doubt either of them will win.

Generation rescue faces almost constant criticism from numerous sources both in academia and in news. Whatever power they may have, I believe that it will wane in the near future.
And all panics subside eventually, maybe not in an individual level, but on a society level for sure.

I just said that was typical of the way paranoid schizophrenics thought, implying that he thought in similar ways to them. I didn't mean to imply that he had paranoid schizophrenia. And if I did... I probably should've reworded that.
If anything I'd say he's narcissistic.

The comparison to hitler is something I've seen WAY too often, and not once had it ever been valid.
John Best might have similar views but he is NOT in a similar situation nor do I think he has similar leadership, or manipulative skills.
What you've just done are two things called argumentum ad metam and argumentum ad comparo, which mean "appeal to fear" and "appeal of comparison", neither of which are valid arguments.

and right there is the is the godson theory in all its glory...

i have signed the petition (a while back but i signed it)

I urge every one here who considers the Hating Autism blog to be a blight on the understanding of ASD's to sign this petition - set up by fellow ASD person, Joeker (who is a member here).

Maybe ask Phil the Hating Autism Crusader what happened to his "partner" Joeker "the member here". This petition is as dead as Timelord's trustworthiness and alliance to his partner.

Ask on matters concern Mental Health professionals and service provider internet disconnections. I am sure you will get an "interesting" perspective.

....why,WHY dredge up this again rossco?

and everything had just settled down,too

Sorry Pikajedi . Did I err?
Seriously, Joeker was just as fired up as this young Flardox. I don't want Timelord terrorising other teenage males as he did Joker. I am trying to ward Flardox away from Timelord.
Irrespective of the merits of the petition I think, not knowing the history, it is prudent to give this young bloke opportunity to slowly raise his hands and step back from Timelord very quietly and slowly with no undue sudden movements.
Personally I think Flardox comes across as militant and hostile but I would not trust his well being with Timelord. I can't think of any members presently on this forum I would.

well,personally,I would have done so via PM,so as not to stir up bad blood once more.

i can,however ,see where you are coming from,but as you well know,i like to stay strictly neutral.

thank you for this post rossco
i did lose it a bit on fore-sams blog because of his words but i should have kept my temper i did for some reason get this Pm from timelord not sure if it is anything to worry about though but anyway thanks for thinking of me and i will be more cautious

Flardox, just touching base with you to let you know a few facts.

Joeker harrassed me on a thread at Hating Autism - calling me "weak" and jumping to a number of false conclusions about me. This was getting out of hand and I mentioned it to a bunch of real life friends who were keen to help. I agreed and gave them the full details.

It worked out well except that one of them (screen name Borusa) went too far and called on Joeker to take his own life. That got him into trouble with the others - and also with me when I found out.

Two wrongs may not make a right - but this has got to the point where Joeker just will not listen to reason anymore. He never wiped the slate clean - as his statement to you about me on Best's blog proved. The warning BTW is unfounded.

I can be nasty - but ONLY when provoked. Joeker has definitely provoked me. Whilst I distance myself from Borusa's comments, the others were fine because they told the truth and expressed their views quite well if a little forcefully. But Joeker doesn't understand just how much angst and anger he is responsible for and won't admit to it either.

It would be best if you stayed away from Joeker. He's on a psychological knife edge at the moment and is too stubborn to admit it. It doesn't really matter what your view of me is to be honest - and I'm not trying to be rude saying that. I'm saying it would be best if you just withdrew from this dispute completely. If you are seen to be talking to me, Joeker will flip his lid for sure. He shouldn't even be here on AFF because he was banned back in August - for pursuing me and not ceasing when Amy and Gareth told him not to.

I might not respond for some time here because I'm taking a break from AFF at present. I only dropped back now because of a post on Joeker's blog that I wanted to follow up on regarding Wilky. And I saw it, and I can tell you I saw this coming back in July. Back then - I told her to get out for defending John Best. Now a lot more members (without realising it) are seeing I was right.

Yup I have responded to this already. Basically you have every right to feel that you should be able to be safe posting here. I have not always agreed with you and may sometimes come off as grumpy or whatever. I do however, do my best to nurture and protect members here. I would not willingly throw you to the wolves and so............

no thats fine you are not a grumpy person you are more experienced and me well lets just say im a bit hot-headed! besides what do you mean by "so................." ?