I did see that lawsuit mentioned in the forum. I haven't looked at the link yet though and that will be of interest.

At a guess, it's possible that the raging Aspie is also claiming defamation (which would fall flat on it's face because that can only work if it's personal and this is not). But no matter whether it's defamation or stalking, the precedent that was set was where the offence took place. There the raging Aspie is right. If they saw it on the Internet, the offence took place where he or she saw it. Therefore, local law would apply. I'll try and get a link for you while I'm online.

Good move with the forum. I'll be interested to see what the raging Aspie does next. They won't let it go - not if what I saw yesterday is anything to go by.

Oh - just on that issue of what could happen if an Aspie was offended by it, I'd be looking at the stabbing at McDonalds thread. I'm not trying to back the raging Aspie up (what did you lot call them again?) but it does make for some interesting discussion.