|
Declaring ourselves a minority group
|
| Author |
Message |
anne-grace
Posts: 143
Group: Registered
Joined: May 2010
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
skyblue1- There are many forms of oppression, and I can attest to the fact that its at work throughout all levels of society.
First, you've the media, which tends to paint Autistics in an unfavorable light, usually as people who are unable to help themselves or speak for themselves. They also do massive coverage when an Autistic commits a crime, but they do a quick blurb if an Autistic does something great for mankind.
Second, you've got the governments of various nations passing legislation that will, in effect, limit the freedoms of Autistics in the near-future. They're trickling it in slowly, so as not to raise suspicions, but one can see the pattern as one looks down through the various legislations.
Third, you've got the educational system. Yes, some Autistics manage to get through the system without detection, as it were, but many more are officially diagnosed and forced into Resource/Special Ed. programs. in these programs, the information is dumbed down as though teaching to a five year old. The Autistics and others in the Resource classes can attempt to leave them via their regular counselor, but their Case Manager normally blocks any such actions. I know this because I personally had it happen, which was the final straw for me. This was my third week in 11th grade. I left the school and went for my GED.
Fourth, the police in general will be suspicious of Autistics because we generally act in a manner they consider guilty due to their training in finding the guilty among NT criminals. This is truly bad, since an Autistic could be brought in for questioning of a violent crime they had nothing to do with, but their actions during the questioning would say otherwise to the police.
Fifth, the oppression within the home itself is particularly bad for Autistics who are underage. In two-parent homes, its common for one parent (usually the mother) to be supportive of the Autistic and be their defender with others. The father, of course, tends to either be neutral or aggressive in their dislike of the fact that their child isn't 'normal'. I've experienced this personally, and seen it occur in other homes where a child is 'not normal'. In single-parent homes, one of the extremes above is the usual case. Either supportive or not. There are, of course, cases where both parents enable their child to be worse and therefore the child becomes one the previous mentioned negative headlines.
Sixth, many religions end up considering some of the more 'severe' forms of autism to be 'signs of the devil' and attempt to 'cast it out'. These people, in particular, have earned my personal ire.
Just some food for thought, if you think that the Autistic Community doesn't seem to be oppressed.
JDBentz: Just found a link to your post in my email. Sometimes I'm slow getting the email account into a decent state. I agree with the things you have said, and also I can attest from only my own experience to subtle forms of oppression I've experienced from "friends", boyfriends, landlords, neighbors.
middle-aged atheist aspie
|
|
| 07-19-2010 08:13 PM |
|
 |
raew
Posts: 967
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2009
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
I have never viewed us as being oppressed
Well, I have my own perspective on that issue. There are different types of oppression, and many are subtle. I think blacks and gays would have an idea of the many different types of oppression that can exist when human psyches are at work.
I agree, and if a medical doctor or clinic encourages Autistic children to be aborted based solely on their Autism, then we are beyond "oppressed". If you told the press a child was aborted because it was Black or had Jewish parents (etc, etc) then there would be a firestorm of controversy. There would be no controversy "out there" if doctors told a parent "we can abort this (Autistic embryo) and you can try again for a (typical) child."
If you think parents wouldn't fall for this, and accept it, then remember that tests for Down's Syndrome are commonplace in nearly every pre-natal clinic in the free world. I refused to have these tests, but most parents do have them, and many children with a chromosome difference are aborted. If scientists are working hard, night and day, to find a way to dx us in the womb, so they can provide "information" to parents, that would allow parents to make (at least in the US) a legal choice to terminate based on Autistic tendencies, then isn't that legal genocide?
Another example: I have a close friend with high functioning Autism. She and her husband have been married for thirty-four years, have a business and a home, but they do not have children because her mother took her to a doctor and had her steralized when she was a child because she was labeled "re-d" and her mother had an "obligation" according to the doctors, to prevent more "re-d" children from coming into the world. They would be wonderful parents, but they aren't, and it breaks my heart.
If we were NOT oppressed, there would not be people making money off the enslavement of parents to the idea that we need to be "fixed" or even "terminated"?
People out there, please DO NOT get on your self-righteous soapbox and make this into a right to life, get rid of abortion thread and waste the point of what I am saying. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do NOT do that. This is a not the place for that. (Start your own thread for that, so I can ignore it easier )
The point...
The oppression comes, not in the abortion clinic or hospital, but in the minds of doctors and therapists that promote the idea that we are not worthy of life... or that our lives as they are do not matter.
"Once you can accept the universe as matter expanding into nothing that is something, wearing stripes with plaid comes easy."
--Albert Einstein
|
|
| 07-19-2010 08:58 PM |
|
 |
Magneto
Posts: 439
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2010
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
Grrr. Our live's are worth no more than NT ones, get over it. I refuse to believe killing someone for being Autistic is any worse than killing them for any other reason.
Anyway, how about we rerwrite the diagnostic criteria as a description? For example, we'll take [URL=http://www.aspergers.com/aspcrit.htm]Gillberg's criteria[URL] for a rewrite...
1.Severe impairment in reciprocal social interaction
(at least two of the following)
(a) inability to interact with peers
(b) lack of desire to interact with peers
© lack of appreciation of social cues
(d) socially and emotionally inappropriate behavior
becomes
Our people have historically focused more on independent pursuits, rather than social pursuits. Due to our independent nature, and differences in ways of thinking, we have found it difficult to understand non-verbal methods of communication, prefering to state clearly how we are feeling.
Etc.
http://needsmoremarshmallows.blogspot.co.uk/
|
|
| 06-01-2011 06:43 PM |
|
 |
larslolxz
Posts: 72
Group: Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
I love the idea of being recognized as minority group. There is too much misunderstanding about ASD... 
I am rather afraid i won't be able to help though, at least not for now. I'm only 14 years old ;s
Anyhow, I'm for the suggestion on the first page that we need a "lawyer code" document and a "human text" document.
Keep up the good work for everyone.
“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter and those who matter don’t mind.” -Dr. Seuss
|
|
| 08-02-2011 05:05 PM |
|
 |
Magneto
Posts: 439
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2010
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
2.All-absorbing narrow interest
(at least one of the following)
(a) exclusion of other activities
(b) repetitive adherence
© more rote than meaning
We have a tendency to focus on a single subject, to the exclusion of others. While this can lead to problems, our exclusive focus on a single interest often results in the development of the person into an expert in their interest.
3.Imposition of routines and interests
(at least one of the following)
(a) on self, in aspects of life
(b) on others
Furthermore, we often seek a stable routine, and can get rather distressed if this is disrupted.
4.Speech and language problems
(at least three of the following)
(a) delayed development
(b) superficially perfect expressive language
© formal, pedantic language
(d) odd prosody, peculiar voice characteristics
(e) impairment of comprehension including misinterpretations of literal/implied meanings
Often, our development of language is delayed. Due to our natures, we find it difficult to understand non-verbal, vocal cues whilest listening, requiring the speaker to state the what they mean exactly, so that there is no confusion.
5.Non-verbal communication problems
(at least one of the following)
(a) limited use of gestures
(b) clumsy/gauche body language
© limited facial expression
(d) inappropriate expression
(e) peculiar, stiff gaze
Our people are a very verbal people, and find non-verbal cues (body language) difficult to understand, as it does not come naturally to us.
Etc etc. It's a start...
http://needsmoremarshmallows.blogspot.co.uk/
|
|
| 08-17-2011 01:27 AM |
|
 |
Shenmue654
Posts: 16
Group: Registered
Joined: Oct 2011
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
I'm of the general opinion that we do appear to be some kind of minority, whether or not they acknowledge us as one. We:
(1). Prefer hanging out and intermarrying with those of our own group due to cultural similarities and clarity of speech. That is, it is often far easier to comprehend the actions of another person on the autistic spectrum than it is someone who is not.
(2). Many of us are incredibly verbal, even going so far as to put Internet communication and in-person communication on equal terms. After all, to many an Aspergian the only difference is the added tone of voice. This and other aspects of the diagnosis reflect a shared set of values and beliefs.
(3). We view ourselves as a "we" without even thinking about it. Most people with an illness or disorder do not self-identify with it. This alone implies a kind of shared consciousness or group identity. We see injustices as being done to "us".
There is a great deal of resistance to the idea of us being a political/social entity, but wouldn't it be interesting if these types of communications were exposed to the NT world? They'd be pretty hard-pressed to deny the existence of the minority.
|
|
| 11-02-2011 01:23 AM |
|
 |
Magneto
Posts: 439
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2010
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
(1). Prefer hanging out and intermarrying with those of our own group due to cultural similarities and clarity of speech. That is, it is often far easier to comprehend the actions of another person on the autistic spectrum than it is someone who is not.
Do we? Really? As for comprehension... not really. My friend is rather impulsive and will do things without any clear reasoning behind them, and he's an Aspie, while my Entie friends are generally more reasonable. As for intermarrying... is this actually the case? Could we crowdsource some information on this?
http://needsmoremarshmallows.blogspot.co.uk/
|
|
| 11-02-2011 11:21 AM |
|
 |
Shenmue654
Posts: 16
Group: Registered
Joined: Oct 2011
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
Hmm. Maybe intermarrying isn't the case. ;3 All I know for sure is that in my case, it'd be pretty hard for a NT person to deal with certain aspects of my personality (If we were that close, anyway). And know what they represent. My moods tend to be misinterpreted due to the tone of my voice. ;P "Mild Irritation" and "anger" do not always go together, for instance. Apparently people think I'm more "angry" than I really am for some reason. In fact, "anger" usually only comes into play when I perceive a "cruel" misinterpretation of something I did or said. It also happens to be the emotion I'm most likely to try and hide at this age. I can't prevent it from emerging, but I can prevent people from seeing it.
But to be frank, it's no coincidence that my closest friends are all Aspies. They catch on to what I mean far faster in Roleplay and otherwise. And vice versa. It'd be interesting to get a forum-wide poll on the subject.
This post was last modified: 11-03-2011 11:12 PM by Shenmue654.
|
|
| 11-03-2011 11:10 PM |
|
 |
OrangeCloud
Posts: 38
Group: Registered
Joined: Oct 2011
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
raew wrote:
Another example: I have a close friend with high functioning Autism. She and her husband have been married for thirty-four years, have a business and a home, but they do not have children because her mother took her to a doctor and had her steralized when she was a child because she was labeled "re-d" and her mother had an "obligation" according to the doctors, to prevent more "re-d" children from coming into the world. They would be wonderful parents, but they aren't, and it breaks my heart.
Reading this made me absolutely furious! Not only should this sort of thing be banned, but she should be able to sue her stupid mother and the doctors for violating her human rights. (I would put an angry face here but I can't work out how to do it, so I'll post a sad one istead )
|
|
| 11-18-2011 12:44 PM |
|
 |
OrangeCloud
Posts: 38
Group: Registered
Joined: Oct 2011
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
Below is a quote from an article Published on Friday, July 21, 2000 in Neue Zuricher Zeitung (Switzerland.) I don't know if the information is still in date. http://www.commondreams.org/views/072100-106.htm
In 1996, Aslin requested his files (to which he was entitled under the Public Information Act) and learned for the first time how the authorities had justified the forced sterilizations. "They termed us feeble-minded idiots, and wrote that our children would be like us or even worse," he declares. He was so infuriated at the insult that he filed suit against the state of Michigan, seeking compensation. His claim was turned down last March because the statute of limitations had expired. But Aslin intends to fight on. If a higher court accepts his appeal, the consequences could be far-reaching. For Fred Aslin and his siblings were not an isolated case.
From 1907 onward, at least 60,000 Americans were sterilized against their will. The legal basis for these forced sterilizations was provided by so-called eugenics laws. Most compulsory sterilizations occurred in the 1930s and '40s, but some states, such as Virginia, continued the practice until the late 1970s. Most of the victims were poor and members of minorities, and none of them received compensation, according to Paul Lombardo, professor of law and bioethics at the University of Virginia.
I'm guessing that the friend mentioned in the quote may be a victim of this appalling episode in Americas history. I don't know how accurate it is or if the information is still relevant. But the fact that none of the victims have been able to claim back compensation is very disturbing. I guess the states that are the target of any compensation claim are just hoping that the victims will just die off and lose the will to fight them in court. This is a clear and frightening example of minority group oppression.
|
|
| 11-18-2011 01:05 PM |
|
 |
mels8780
Posts: 1,331
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2009
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
I don't agree with just abort all the autistic fetuses either, :/ but I also admit you can't just equate it to killing it for any other reason. The reasons for killing a black fetus would be *different*. You just don't like the ethnicity or skin color there. Killing a fetus because it's black is different, that is just race, now if black somehow came with potential issues or struggles it would be a different reason. Also, since it isn't like the reasons for aborting a black fetus (just cos you don't like black people and that's it), the whole thing about your life being worth no more than someone without any issues doesn't make sense, since they aren't saying 'we hate you and your life isn't worth much'. It isn't just some weird thing people have, thinking the reasons for aborting a black fetus is totally wrong but less so with an autistic one, there's a difference and you have to admit that. I know I might be shot down just for speaking the truth because it seems it's some protection to say it is all the same (any reason for killing a fetus) and not different at all, but whatever.
I always wonder why
When you look down into my eyes
My feeling swiftly changed between happiness and sorrow
And tears begin to fall
I’m not you and you are not me
But your pain becomes my pain
When you are sad, I’m the one who foolish cry
When you are wounded, my heart is hurt more
|
|
| 11-18-2011 09:15 PM |
|
 |
mels8780
Posts: 1,331
Group: Registered
Joined: Dec 2009
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
Oh, and I didn't mean tangible protection for the fetuses, I meant protection for you, mentally. more like extra protection since you could already say you shouldn't just abort them even without trying to ignore that there is no difference between killing a fetus for it's skin color or killing a fetus for having autism.
I always wonder why
When you look down into my eyes
My feeling swiftly changed between happiness and sorrow
And tears begin to fall
I’m not you and you are not me
But your pain becomes my pain
When you are sad, I’m the one who foolish cry
When you are wounded, my heart is hurt more
This post was last modified: 11-18-2011 09:40 PM by mels8780.
|
|
| 11-18-2011 09:38 PM |
|
 |
Magneto
Posts: 439
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2010
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
I don't really think it's possible to justify abortion for one reason and not for another. Either they're human, and it's murder, or they're not, and it's acceptable. If it's wrong to terminate an Autist fetus, it's wrong to terminate an Entie fetus; likewise, if it's wrong to terminate a fetus of one race, it's wrong to terminate a fetus of another. Motivation should not come into ethics - into morality, perhaps, but not into ethics.
http://needsmoremarshmallows.blogspot.co.uk/
|
|
| 11-19-2011 02:32 PM |
|
 |
142857
Posts: 6,158
Group: Registered
Joined: May 2010
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
...Killing a fetus because it's black is different, that is just race, now if black somehow came with potential issues or struggles it would be a different reason...
Errr, have you been paying attention to history over the past few centuries?
Even today, being black carries much greater risk of:
* Poverty
* Unemployment
* Jail
* Being a Gangsta Rapper
And even if I can prove that being black is a struggle... that doesn't justify terminating black foetuses on that basis.
|
|
| 11-19-2011 02:49 PM |
|
 |
Mordeth_kai
Posts: 6
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2012
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Declaring ourselves a minority group
I like this. However it is done, we should definitely lobby for our rights, but we will need non-autistic people to champion this cause initially due to the one dominant obstacle to us, that is our social skills and differences. We should seek out lawyers and politicians interested in making a name for themselves and get their aid, preferably ones with charisma.
One question, what can the members of this community do to help gather support for this?
Classic ideas such as rally's and whatnot may be a good place to start, but anything the community can proactively do to help push this through should be mentioned.
This post was last modified: 04-27-2012 07:39 PM by Mordeth_kai.
|
|
| 04-27-2012 07:36 PM |
|
 |
|
|