This is about a Yahoo news article I've read titled Rich Kids of Instagram  and, I've got to tell you, this is literally rubbing being rich in our faces.

Of course I think this only popular because people are curious of how the 1% of this world lives but it also causes people to become "wannabes" and envious.

I do like how this article points out the problem of these rich snobby kids being real risky of posting about their schedules so anybody can attempt to kidnap them for their "mommies and daddies" money.  

Just take a look at this receipt:

  

The first ten items I have no clue about, but $20 for a Coca Cola? Wtf? What's the freaking difference between a $3 and a $20 Coca Cola? Does this mean that the rich elite's kids are stupid? I guess money can get you everything instead of an education or common sense huh?

Here's a quote from the article that I like as well:

I like how Rebecca Greenfield says that. "Preteens posing with helicopters they did nothing to earn and posting the pictures online for others to ogle"

To be frank, that sort of pisses me off too. And any a-hole can read this thread and say "your just mad because your jealous that you don't have a helicopter".

No, I'm just mad cause I absolutely despise brats, ignorance, and snobbishness!

I could care less that some one is richer than me, it's the snobby attitude they adopt thinking their better than everyone else just because their loaded that upsets me...  

Like I said before, too bad money doesn't buy you brains, decency, morals, or common sense.

So what do you think ? Would you agree with me on the above sentence?

They are bragging and showing off and that's annoying. Also, that is dangerous as you said, they need to be more careful.

What these people are showing isn't their wealth, it's their stupidity. Give me $100 and I can keep my family fed for over a week.

That bill isn't in dollars. It's from St Tropez.

107,524 Euros would be $132,856.6544 US. That's still a lot of money.

$132,856.6544 ? Don't you mean $1,328,566,544 ? But still that's a lot of money for just one meal and I'd still like to know what's the difference between a $20 and a $2 Coca Cola though ?

@Yuji:

Did you know that if you give someone who's one of the %1 rich elite a $100 and told them they'd had to live off of it for a week, they'd probably dead within a few hours... Think about that guys :/

Actually, those last two digits are a portion of a cent. The conversion rate isn't an even amount from one to the other.

I know it's from St. Tropez, and I know where St. Tropez is, and I know the USD-Euro conversion rate. That wasn't the point I was trying to make. It would take me over nine years to earn the equivalent of what those filthy, filthy rich kids spent on a single meal. There's a sobering thought!

Oh.... my bad.... :/

Let's think about this:

Federal minimum wage (US): $7.25/hour
Median income (US): $12.67/hour
Average top 1% income (US): $14,903.85/hour

That is idiotic.  If that were my kid, he or she would be eating balogna sandwiches for a month, at least. Then they would be off to work in the soup kitchen.  

I don't understand why someone would let their kid have access to that kind of cash.  Stupid.

The lesson here for today is:  

Money can buy you an education, but it can't buy you morals nor a brain....

But it takes 40 days to starve to death...

Well okay, maybe that was bit of a harsh and a distasteful thing to say... Not to mention surreal...

But the point was the person wouldn't know how to survive on his/her own since he/she had to have everything handed down to him/her... Is this the kind of irresponsible people who secretly runs the world ? :/

What would happen in the worst case scenario ? If the world went to hell and the rich are suppose to live on their own would they know how to ?