In what way is it valid outside of the Hippocratic oath?

Publish the papers in some little-known 'ethics'-related outlet, where I don't have to give a *** and plebs can focus on their "bread and circuses!"

Another reason why these two imbeciles have it wrong: John B Calhoun and the mice of NIMH.

Who wants to take bets that overpopulation and high population density also stresses human-animal sociopsychology and drives them to things like suicide, violence, poor food/water access, inability to make shelter, 'degenerate' behaviors on behalf of adults sacrificing the well-being of children for the sake of the well-being of the adults and maybe weak attempts at coping like self-medication (addiction)???

Population is spiraling rapidly out of control yet everyone should have the inalienable right to be born and have children entirely of their own making; medicine is barely keeping up with the 'costs' that puts on modern, industrialized society. It will inevitably fail in a number of "developed" countries as well, at some point.

NOTE: Here I was thinking philosophy studies got tiresome by the time most people finished their 4-year major. I guess it's for a reason: most philosophers are either wrong or say a lot of stupid *** on their way to their to having their names marked down in history for whatever limited 'saliency' they might have had in life.
Aristotle still kinda sux in my mind.

*yawn*