Welcome to AFF, we have autism forums and a chatroom. Please note, if you do not wish to receive cookies from this webserver please do not connect to it. If you connect to this webserver with the intent to file a complaint regarding cookie usage then you are hereby notified that your implied consent to connect is withdrawn. This notice is of no concern to most of you. Please do not post research surveys without permission either. more details here
Current time: 06-20-2013, 06:25 AM
Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)
I do not like the term "self diagnosis". It sounds like unqualified people playing doctor with themselves.
Diagnosis implies a disorder or illness. I have neither. I do not require diagnosis. Autism may be a distinct neurotype, in fact I am almost certain that it is. But in the absence of an objective test we could perhaps see it as 2 categories: a medical condition requiring diagnosis and support. And as a personality type that has some non-debilitating deficits and benefits from self awareness and knowledge. The former befits from professional diagnosis. The latter benefits from what is commonly referred to as self-diagnosis, but may be disadvantaged by a professional diagnosis.
I am thinking out loud here. Not publishing a scientific paper. Discussion welcome.
If I were black then I would not feel the need to tell people that I was self-diagnosed as black. If I were shy then I would not feel the need to tell people that I was self-diagnosed as shy. If i have a cold... Ditto. I think "self aware" HFA or aspie makes more sense, since I am not a doctor and I am not qualified to diagnose anyone, including myself.
Diagnose isn't just a medical term. Diagnose means to find out the nature or cause of anything.
Self-awareness is the ability to tell yourself apart from your surroundings and be introspective. That is a basic facet of human consciousness. It has little to do with self-identification or self-diagnosis.
I do not like the term "self diagnosis". It sounds like unqualified people playing doctor with themselves.
I'm not qualified to know (not self DX) but isn't that what you're doing if you self DX? How do you know? I know I always felt different and was an outsider etc but the problem is, I was obviously special needs as a kid but I'm not sure if I'd have ever labeled myself correctly.
Quote:
Diagnosis implies a disorder or illness. I have neither. I do not require diagnosis. Autism may be a distinct neurotype, in fact I am almost certain that it is. But in the absence of an objective test we could perhaps see it as 2 categories: a medical condition requiring diagnosis and support. And as a personality type that has some non-debilitating deficits and benefits from self awareness and knowledge. The former befits from professional diagnosis. The latter benefits from what is commonly referred to as self-diagnosis, but may be disadvantaged by a professional diagnosis.
I see your point about the 2 groups. Should there be a clear distinction between the two? Would the second group become some kind of fan club or group of "wannabes"? Please don't misunderstand me on this. I'm not anti self DX, I just don't understand it... and the fanclub/wannabe idea seems really odd and makes no sense to me. Why the hell would someone fake being autistic anyway? It doesn't exactly make for an easy or successful(relatively speaking) life. But it keeps being suggested so I have to guess that people might.
Please don't flame me. EEeek.
Edit: maybe I should just say: Self DX, how does that work anyway?
This post was last modified: 01-26-2012 10:18 PM by 41 6c 79.
Some people on the higher end of the anti-social spectrum have autism as well. I highly suspect I am too.
Suspecting you're a psychopath is not a healthy thing to do off the cuff.
A psychopath is a person with no sense of compassion with glib charm (i.e. no actual content), is quick to accusations, says anything to get their way even if it's hypocritical and puts on a mask of sanity.
Psychopathy and Autism being linked is something from Kanner's day. That it continues today is suspect.
This post was last modified: 01-26-2012 10:20 PM by Gedrene.
Just about all Autists especially Aspies share some of the benign traits of psychopathy
Which ones?
Psychopaths are extremely adept at reading others but are incredibly incompassionate. Autistic people are said to be the opposite way. 142 was nothing how his child felt extreme unwillingness to respond to his other child's domineering behaviour.
As I said up above. Comparing autism to psychopathy is from the time when Kanner said 'autistic psychopathy'.
There is nothing benign about psychopathy.
Just about all Autists especially Aspies share some of the benign traits of psychopathy
Which ones?
Psychopaths are extremely adept at reading others but are incredibly incompassionate. Autistic people are said to be the opposite way. 142 was nothing how his child felt extreme unwillingness to respond to his other child's domineering behaviour.
As I said up above. Comparing autism to psychopathy is from the time when Kanner said 'autistic psychopathy'.
There is nothing benign about psychopathy.
Asperger was responsible for that terminology, not Kanner