LABEL IT: Psychiatrists have developed a new diagnosis for people struggling to cope after the death of a loved one; adjustment disorder related to bereavement.
Relevant offersPeople suffering from long-term grief after the death of a loved one will soon have their condition officially labelled a mental disorder.

Many psychiatrists have argued grief should not be labelled as a mental condition because it is a natural phenomenon which everyone experiences.

However, the next edition of the industry's so-called bible, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, will include a new diagnosis for people still struggling to cope a year or more after a loved one dies.

The condition will be officially known as adjustment disorder related to bereavement.

University of New South Wales psychology professor Richard Bryant, who is on the manual's review committee, said 10 to 15 per cent of people have a persistent grief reaction which can last up to 40 years.

Those most likely to mourn for more than a year include people who lose a child or suffer a loss through suicide and unexpected death such as a road accident or homicide.

"People have said it's not right to medicinise grief which has personal and culturally specific responses and psychiatry is butting in where it doesn't belong," Prof Bryant told AAP.

"The alternative view is that all of the above is true but we know after a traumatic event a proportion of people will have negative psychological reactions that will affect them.

"Having a diagnosis means we can identify people through formal screening programs and facilitate people to getting directed to appropriate treatments like cognitive behaviour therapy."

Prof Bryant, who is also the director of the traumatic stress clinic at Sydney's Westmead Hospital, said people with long-term grief tended to be "stuck in the past" and unable to move on with their lives.

"For most people after six months the pain starts to ease and for those who it doesn't they will have a long-term problem," he said.

"They are going to be more likely to abuse substances, have mental health problems, heart conditions and engage in poor health behaviour like smoking and drinking."

Often people who are struggling to cope with grief are prescribed anti-depressants and offered counselling.

But Prof Bryant said these were unlikely to be solutions for people with long-term grief.

"The reaction is about yearning and missing and longing and is distinct from anxiety and depression and is not responsive to treatment for depression," he said.

"So, medication is not going to help it.

"It is psychotherapy programs which are different from the normal grief work programs and counsellors that are best."

Prof Bryant is due to discuss the new diagnosis for long-term grief at a forum hosted by the University of Melbourne's Australian Centre for Post-traumatic Mental Health on August 12.

The next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is due to be published by the American Psychiatric Association in 2013.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/537080...al-illness

Redefining process of mourning - Proposal would label grief a mental disorder


Human grief could soon be diagnosed as a mental disorder under a proposal critics fear could lead to mood-altering pills being pushed for “mourning.”


Psychiatrists charged with revising the official “bible” of mental illness are recommending changes that would make it easier for doctors to diagnose major depression in the newly bereaved.

Instead of having to wait months, the diagnosis could be made two weeks after the loss of a loved one.

The current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – an influential tome used the world over – excludes people who have recently suffered a loss from being diagnosed with a major depressive disorder unless his or her symptoms persist beyond two months. It’s known as the “grief exclusion,” the theory being that “normal” grief shouldn’t be labelled a mental disorder.

But in what critics have called a potentially disastrous suggestion tucked among the proposed changes to the manual, “grief exclusion” would be eliminated from the DSM.

Proponents argue that major depression is major depression, that it makes little difference whether it comes on after the loss of a loved one, the loss of a job, the loss of a marriage or any other major life stressor. Eliminating “grief exclusion” would help people get treatment sooner than they otherwise would.

But critics fear that those experiencing completely expectable symptoms of grief would be labelled mentally “sick.” Dr. Allen Frances says the proposal would pathologize a normal human emotion and could bring on even wider prescribing of moodaltering pills.

“This is a disaster,” says Frances, a renowned U.S. psychiatrist who chaired the task force that wrote the current edition of the DSM, which is now undergoing its fifth revision. “Say you lose someone you love and two weeks later you feel sad, can’t sleep well, and have reduced interest, appetite, and energy. These five symptoms are completely typical of normal grieving, but DSM-5 would instead label you with a mental disorder.”

http://www.cchrint.org/2011/04/18/psychi...-disorder/

Grief to be known as a mental disorder


you tube video

This seems to me like a good idea.

THis is atrocious. Grief is a natural part of the human cycle. Why are they trying to rediagnose 15% of the population with a psychological disorder? This sounds like a money-making scheme.

Could not read it!
Had to stop when I read the words "adjustment disorder".  Interesting.


(Just read the post above mine) 15% hmmm...  I keep hearing in the US that 1 in 4 people will have a psychological disorder (mental illness) in the U.S.  It (the statistic) is supposed to help make people not stigmatize people who take drugs for depression etc., "chemical imbalance" low seratonin (never proven), as people assume they or someone they know will eventually be diagnosed/../
(hmm as I said have not read anything but the first sentance and the last post in this thread but that this new disorder will require meds is probably not a stretch.  The commercials for drugs here in the U.S. are never ending)

Really? Apparently everything's becoming a disorder. Leave us alone, experts.

This post was last modified: 01-26-2012 08:43 PM by shrinkingviolet.

Grief CAN be as debilitating as major depression. Depression is natural, grief is natural, but just because they are natural does not mean that people suffering from either do not need help.

Grief is natural because it's near-unavoidable and integral to human experience. Clinical depression is not. It's a movement away from normal health.

Recalssifying grief as a mental disorder with some hysterical belief that 15% suffer from it sounds like a pot of gold for big pharma. Simple as.

Whatever the case this cycle of new disorders is self-feeding.

This post was last modified: 01-26-2012 09:04 PM by Gedrene.

as soon as it officially becomes a label, it will become a huge money- maker. The DX will snowball with many incorrect DX.

The people that actually have the problem will be forgotten in the crowd of DXs

Well this sounds alot like ADHD, and Childhood Bipolar Syndrome... and Autism.

This is true. So how do you ensure that the appropriate people can access help?

There is a black hole in my life from the age of 27 until the age of about 33. I'd like those 6 years back and I would hate for anyone who cares about me to go through the same thing.

Agree 100%

Grief is natural because it's near-unavoidable and integral to human experience. Clinical depression is not. It's a movement away from normal health.

Recalssifying grief as a mental disorder with some hysterical belief that 15% suffer from it sounds like a pot of gold for big pharma. Simple as.

Whatever the case this cycle of new disorders is self-feeding.

So anyone who might doubt a person who self-diagnoses? Do you mean that?