|
Should the non-wealthy have children?
|
| Author |
Message |
Kapkao
Unregistered
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the victims of nuclear attacks. Check your physics books.
Since when were atom bombs not nuclear? I'm pretty sure the 200,000 people immediately dead or injured didn't make the distinction.
This was what I found when I looked at the subject:
"Only two nuclear weapons have been used in the course of warfare, both by the United States near the end of World War II. On 6 August 1945, a uranium gun-type device code-named "Little Boy" was detonated over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, on 9 August, a plutonium implosion-type device code-named "Fat Man" was exploded over Nagasaki, Japan. These two bombings resulted in the deaths of approximately 200,000 Japanese people—mostly civilians—from acute injuries sustained from the explosions.[3] The role of the bombings in Japan's surrender, and their ethical status, remain the subject of scholarly and popular debate.
Since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nuclear weapons have been detonated on over two thousand occasions for testing purposes and demonstrations."
Sounds like they were nuclear to me, no matter how much you quibble over namenclature.
Alison
(heh)
As my pic said, "not sure if trolling or serious business"
This Luke is even more fun than "mytelli!". Myttle ruffles as few feathers as he possibly can and runs as soon as challenged. Luke sticks to his guns while challenging everyone!
That's what we veteran (me: since 96) websurfers call "a freebie". 
You just sorta... watch certain individuals make assertions they can't back up then go 'down in flames' after a rebuttal or two. Their jaded grasp of empiricism... would have the main characters of "Dangerous Minds" and "187" laughing out of their seats. No, I don't think arguments like these necessarily involve people on the spectrum... just individuals who seem to think their opinion is automatically more merited and from a higher sort of authority than everyone else's.
|
|
| 02-17-2012 03:53 AM |
|
 |
Kapkao
Unregistered
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Sometimes I think the wealthy should be sterilyzed. Like Paris Hilton.
Me too 
Only Paris is (as yet) a harmless imbecile. Plenty of heirs and heiresses that fit the description.
|
|
| 02-17-2012 04:00 AM |
|
|
skyblue1
Activist
Posts: 21,012
Group: Activists
Joined: Jan 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Luke is just stating their opinion, might be different than mine. But they are welcome to it
I'm not anti-social; I'm just not user friendly
|
|
| 02-17-2012 04:08 AM |
|
|
142857
Posts: 6,352
Group: Registered
Joined: May 2010
Status:
Online
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
By most objective measures Stalin was the most evil man in history. Luke thinks Stalin was a pretty good guy... he is entitled to his opinion. I know a couple of people who lived under Stalinist rule who might very strongly disagree with him though.
|
|
| 02-17-2012 04:13 AM |
|
|
Kapkao
Unregistered
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
|
|
| 02-17-2012 04:44 AM |
|
|
skyblue1
Activist
Posts: 21,012
Group: Activists
Joined: Jan 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
He just needs to study the history more. he will come round
I'm not anti-social; I'm just not user friendly
|
|
| 02-17-2012 04:46 AM |
|
|
Kapkao
Unregistered
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Someone knows Luke better than I do....
|
|
| 02-17-2012 04:56 AM |
|
|
skyblue1
Activist
Posts: 21,012
Group: Activists
Joined: Jan 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Someone knows Luke better than I do....
dodging gunfire...heads for the kitchen
I'm not anti-social; I'm just not user friendly
|
|
| 02-17-2012 04:57 AM |
|
|
Lang
Posts: 6,787
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
[erects giant electro magnetic repulsion field]
Chris Christie is so fat, his lap-band is a symphony orchestra.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
PROUD DISRUPTIVE DINGBAT
http://Siochanna.deviantart.com
http://neversubmit.xanga.com/
|
|
| 02-17-2012 05:03 AM |
|
|
skyblue1
Activist
Posts: 21,012
Group: Activists
Joined: Jan 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Someone knows Luke better than I do....
dodging gunfire...heads for the kitchen
comes back with turkey, slaw and popcorn to watch the show
I'm not anti-social; I'm just not user friendly
|
|
| 02-17-2012 05:11 AM |
|
|
Kapkao
Unregistered
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Someone knows Luke better than I do....
dodging gunfire...heads for the kitchen
comes back with turkey, slaw and popcorn to watch the show
There are days I actually wish I had one of the M16A3s with 'launcher still attached.
Some of the experimental M16s in development wouldn't be much of a trade-off either, provided they work. Granted... I would have to literally go Black Market before I find one.
|
|
| 02-17-2012 05:18 AM |
|
|
skyblue1
Activist
Posts: 21,012
Group: Activists
Joined: Jan 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Someone knows Luke better than I do....
dodging gunfire...heads for the kitchen
comes back with turkey, slaw and popcorn to watch the show
There are days I actually wish I had one of the M16A3s with 'launcher still attached.
Some of the experimental M16s in development wouldn't be much of a trade-off either, provided they work. Granted... I would have to literally go Black Market before I find one.
Meh, I make do with my Romanian built AK-47
Well, it scares the squirrels anyway
I'm not anti-social; I'm just not user friendly
This post was last modified: 02-17-2012 05:25 AM by skyblue1 .
|
|
| 02-17-2012 05:21 AM |
|
|
Kapkao
Unregistered
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
Damn... now I'm getting hungry for
|
|
| 02-17-2012 05:21 AM |
|
|
skyblue1
Activist
Posts: 21,012
Group: Activists
Joined: Jan 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
I'm not anti-social; I'm just not user friendly
|
|
| 02-17-2012 05:26 AM |
|
|
Kapkao
Unregistered
|
RE: Should the non-wealthy have children?
I'm still waiting for my government-issued raygun/phase rifle 
If there is a cure for diabetes addison's both before I turn 35 in roughly 6 years, I might just get that chance. Of course... that would take quite the leap in medical science.
Alas, whatever hi-tech rifles and attachments are under R & D presently... I'm not willing to become a possible federal criminal just to have them.
("Caseless kinetic energy" weapons come to mind)
|
|
| 02-17-2012 07:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
Homepage
Avatars
AutTV
Forums
Games
Chatroom
Search
Calendar
Help
