|
Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
|
| Author |
Message |
Ethel
Unregistered
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
[qutoe]IQ tests measure the ability to take IQ tests. [/quote]
Total word.
My IQ score is a bit above average, but utterly meaningless - I have one narrow skill set that's off the scale, one or two others that are severely lacking, and those miles-apart figures were used to calculate the final score!
|
|
| 08-27-2008 05:19 AM |
|
 |
2EM
Posts: 43
Group: Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
[qutoe]IQ tests measure the ability to take IQ tests.
Total word.
My IQ score is a bit above average, but utterly meaningless - I have one narrow skill set that's off the scale, one or two others that are severely lacking, and those miles-apart figures were used to calculate the final score!
[/quote]
Yeah - I know what you mean. It's like -- how is averaging these things going to provide MORE information, rather than just muddle it all up in an even more misleading way than originally?
|
|
| 08-27-2008 05:36 AM |
|
 |
Tigger_the_Wing
Activist
  
Posts: 3,692
Group: Activists
Joined: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
IQ tests measure the ability to take IQ tests.
Total word.
My IQ score is a bit above average, but utterly meaningless - I have one narrow skill set that's off the scale, one or two others that are severely lacking, and those miles-apart figures were used to calculate the final score!
Yeah - I know what you mean. It's like -- how is averaging these things going to provide MORE information, rather than just muddle it all up in an even more misleading way than originally?
I had a wonderful maths teacher who taught all her pupils to think beyond the things that it is possible to do with numbers to the wider implications.
One of my favourites was her explanation of why averages have no bearing on what's normal.
"Some people take averages and assume them to be normal. The average family has 2.3 children, but no normal family would have 2.3 children. What would 0.3 of a child look like?
"It's like the idea that centuries ago everyone died of old age at forty because that was the average life span. She explained that given the high infant mortality rate the average life span could be accounted for even if you were virtually certain to reach seventy if you survived your fifth birthday and no-one died at forty...
"Eventually there will come a time when the current live population of the planet equals the number of people who have died. It will then be true to say that 50% of all the people who have ever lived are alive today. It won't be true to conclude that we only have a 50% chance of dying!"
Since averaging out wildly differing IQ scores gives the impression that someone should be averagely good at everything, instead of impressively good at some things and hopelessly bad at others it becomes a meaningless tool.
Tigger the Pokégran says:
Life IS a bed of roses - I just keep lying on the thorns!
|
|
| 08-27-2008 05:58 AM |
|
 |
tenaciouscj
Posts: 7,470
Group: Registered
Joined: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
It's easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission.
|
|
| 08-27-2008 01:04 PM |
|
 |
Johanna
Posts: 442
Group: Registered
Joined: Jul 2008
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
IQ tests measure the ability to take IQ tests.
Total word.
My IQ score is a bit above average, but utterly meaningless - I have one narrow skill set that's off the scale, one or two others that are severely lacking, and those miles-apart figures were used to calculate the final score!
Yeah - I know what you mean. It's like -- how is averaging these things going to provide MORE information, rather than just muddle it all up in an even more misleading way than originally?
I had a wonderful maths teacher who taught all her pupils to think beyond the things that it is possible to do with numbers to the wider implications.
One of my favourites was her explanation of why averages have no bearing on what's normal.
"Some people take averages and assume them to be normal. The average family has 2.3 children, but no normal family would have 2.3 children. What would 0.3 of a child look like?
"It's like the idea that centuries ago everyone died of old age at forty because that was the average life span. She explained that given the high infant mortality rate the average life span could be accounted for even if you were virtually certain to reach seventy if you survived your fifth birthday and no-one died at forty...
"Eventually there will come a time when the current live population of the planet equals the number of people who have died. It will then be true to say that 50% of all the people who have ever lived are alive today. It won't be true to conclude that we only have a 50% chance of dying!"
Since averaging out wildly differing IQ scores gives the impression that someone should be averagely good at everything, instead of impressively good at some things and hopelessly bad at others it becomes a meaningless tool.
Your math teacher sounds like an interesting person, Tigger. And you also make a good point about the scoring on some IQ tests. Once I took one that told me my score for everything. I turned out to be good at everything and I got an above-average IQ that I can't remember. So I guess your remark would only apply to IQ tests that don't show the kinds of results as the one I just mentioned.
Gracie needs help with a serious issue. And quickly! Click here for details. I've got a minor problem that needs solving before I start high school. Please click here for details and maybe even give me some feedback.
My post count is the one listed below my name here + 77
|
|
| 08-27-2008 05:37 PM |
|
 |
Alaras
Posts: 54
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
[qutoe]IQ tests measure the ability to take IQ tests.
Total word.
My IQ score is a bit above average, but utterly meaningless - I have one narrow skill set that's off the scale, one or two others that are severely lacking, and those miles-apart figures were used to calculate the final score!
[/quote]
My score was the average of several verbal skills that were too high for the WAIS to measure, and a set of non-verbal skills that ranged from average to low. Still wound up significantly above average, but it isn't an accurate measure of my abilities. There is a test called Raven's Progressive Matrices that's supposedly far more accurate when working with autistics.
|
|
| 08-27-2008 08:07 PM |
|
 |
earthmonkey
Activist
  
Posts: 1,856
Group: Activists
Joined: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
And if you have difficulty sustaining attention for prolonged periods of time (like me), then even on sections where you score pretty high, well that means the testing of that section lasted pretty long, and I know that towards the end of the matrix reasoning subtest that the last few I guessed on without looking at them, because I just couldn't keep concentrating on that test. No complaints though. Really what the tests measure are how good you are at those particular skills at that particular time.
A lot of times people assume that if you don't do well on those particular tasks, that this will generalize to lack of ability in language or reasoning in general, which is often not true at all. And I've known people in gifted programs who demonstrated regularly a terrible grasp of logic, even with an IQ that tested well above my score.
Talking about "a cure for autism" is like taking a sledgehammer to a glass Domino set.

Want to Pull the Plug on the JRC? Follow the link.
"The logic is so utterly flawed that I think a new fallacy was invented." --Kassiane Sibley
"The difference between high-functioning and low-functioning is that high-functioning means your deficits are ignored, and low-functioning means your assets are ignored." --Laura Tisoncik
|
|
| 08-27-2008 11:50 PM |
|
 |
Alaras
Posts: 54
Group: Registered
Joined: Apr 2007
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
Well, they say geniuses often lack common sense...
|
|
| 08-28-2008 12:18 AM |
|
 |
Ana54
Posts: 5,676
Group: Registered
Joined: Aug 2009
Status:
Offline
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
What is the percentage of people with AS or PDD-NOS who have children?
What is the percentage of people with AS or PDD-NOS who marry?
Genocide is defined as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, social, political, economic, intellectual, familial, genetic, or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
|
|
| 09-12-2009 12:29 AM |
|
 |
Mars Mariner
Posts: 622
Group: Registered
Joined: Aug 2009
Status:
Away
|
RE: Could autistics keep the future from becoming something out of Brave New World?
I recently decided to re-read Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited, both by Aldous Huxley. In Brave New World, society is too social and the world is over-populated. In Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley says that we need to use birth control and increase the average IQ as some of the few out of many steps to keeping the future from becoming a Brave New World.
The average IQ for autistics is higher than the average IQ for NTs, so if we kept autistics around, the average IQ would be bound to increase. Since LFAs almost never marry and have children and the chances of a HFA marrying and having children is only 1 in 11 (only about 9%), just having autistics around might decrease population because they'd take up space in families and then few of them would have children. Also, everyone knows that autistics are not as social as NTs, so if we kept them around, it might mean the prevention of society becoming too social like in Brave New World.
With these points in mind, society shouldn't be looking at autistics as defective, but as the solution to the problem of our society quickly becoming a Brave New World. Your thoughts on this?
I am concerned as to where eugenics-related thinking leads. I have seen too much of it on this forum. It increases hatred and resentment.
"A human being is a part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty." (Albert Einstein)
|
|
| 09-26-2009 12:25 AM |
|
 |
|
|