![]() |
|
Enneagram - Printable Version +- Aspies For Freedom (http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com) +-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=48) +--- Forum: Diagnosis (/forumdisplay.php?fid=31) +--- Thread: Enneagram (/showthread.php?tid=7677) |
Enneagram - Five - 04-05-2007 08:29 PM Hi, I see a lot of similarities between AS and enneagram type 5. Before I write anything further: Is there already an existing thread about this subject? RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 04-05-2007 08:57 PM I've never seen anything here about the Enneagram, but I agree that type 5 is most similar to the stereotypical Aspie. 5 with a 6 wing, maybe... Here's an example of one writer's analysis of a Five: Enneagram Type 5 - The Investigator Thinkers who tend to withdraw and observe Enneagram type 5 - The Investigator: People of this personality type essentially fear that they don't have enough inner strength to face life, so they tend to withdraw, to retreat into the safety and security of the mind where they can mentally prepare for their emergence into the world. Fives feel comfortable and at home in the realm of thought. They are generally intelligent, well read and thoughtful and they frequently become experts in the areas that capture their interest. While they are sometimes scientifically oriented, especially with the Six wing, just as many Fives are drawn to the humanities and it is not at all uncommon for Fives to have artistic inclinations. Fives are often a bit eccentric; they feel little need to alter their beliefs to accommodate majority opinion, and they refuse to compromise their freedom to think just as they please. The problem for Fives is that while they are comfortable in the realm of thought, they are frequently a good deal less comfortable when it comes to dealing with their emotions, the demands of a relationship, or the need to find a place for themselves in the world. Fives tend to be shy, non-intrusive, independent and reluctant to ask for the help that others might well be happy to extend to them. Fives are sensitive; they don't feel adequately defended against the world. To compensate for their sensitivity, Fives sometimes adopt an attitude of careless indifference or intellectual arrogance, which has the unfortunate consequence of creating distance between themselves and others. Trying to bridge the distance can be difficult for Fives, as they are seldom comfortable with their social skills, but when they do manage it, they are often devoted friends and life long companions. Fives are usually somewhat restrained when it comes to emotional expression, but they often have stronger feelings than they let on. Few people know what is going on beneath the surface, as Fives have an often exaggerated need for privacy and a deep seated fear of intrusion. Because of their sensitivity and their fears of inadequacy, Fives fear being overwhelmed, either by the demands of others or by the strength of their own emotions. They sometimes deal with this by developing a minimalistic lifestyle in which they make few demands on others in exchange for few demands being made on them. Other Fives make their peace with the messiness of life and engage it more fully, but they almost always retain their fears that life is somehow going to demand more of them than they can deliver. RE: Enneagram - Ivar T - 04-05-2007 08:57 PM "I don't care searching" RE: Enneagram - Ivar T - 04-05-2007 09:05 PM I guess I am trying to keep the honour of being a bigger idiot than Ian. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 04-05-2007 09:19 PM Here are a couple of free online tests that might help establish which of the Nine personality types you are: http://www.eclecticenergies.com/enneagram/test.php RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-06-2007 03:35 AM Oh dear, you've posted about my current special interest! I started a thread but it got lost in the forum remake several weeks ago. There's a really cool enneagram forum linked below that I post to under a different username http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/forum/ I'm guessing that 5w6 and 1w9 (and possibly 6w5) are fairly common types for aspies. moi--5w6 RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-06-2007 08:15 AM Max, thanks for the type 5 summary. And Energeia, I know the forum you mention. I'm a 5w6 with few special interests, the enneagram and Paris. For others: 5w6 is short for 5 wing 6, meaning type 5 with some type 6 traits. There is a lot of information about the enneagram available on the internet. In time, I've become an enneagram expert and have more than 30 books about it, and also about the background (Gurdjieff, Ouspensky). I use my knowledge daily, in contacts with people. I have difficulty with small talk, prefer email and need lots of time alone. Being with people can be draining. So for years I'm thinking that being an enneagram type 5 explains my behaviour. Now that I'm getting to know more about Aspies, maybe I'm an Aspie thinking he's a Five. My score on the Geek Syndrome test is 33. Or you are all Fives, assuming to be Aspies... Until now I'm assuming all Aspies are Fives, but, Energeia, apparently you have another suggestion. So how to decide, am I an Aspie, or are you Fives? Maybe Aspies are at the extreme end of the Enneagram type Five range? RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-06-2007 05:25 PM Hi Five Think Venn diagram --one large circle for 5s, one smaller one for aspies (fewer aspies that people of any E type)... The intersection is the overlap between the circles, and I'm guessing the area of intersection might be larger for 5s/aspie than for other E types and aspie. As I said, I'm guessing that aspies could easily be Type 1w9 (w2 much less likely)--e.g., attention to detail, rigid routines, obsessive-compulsive tendencies, moral, concern for justice, self-critical, etc. When I posted an E test here on the now vanished thread, some people came out as Type 6, which I don't find surprising. Think all the effort put into figuring out how to adapt to the neurotypical world...attempting to see what the rules are...lots of fear, accompanied by reactivity and sensitivity. I thought I was 6w5 for a while, and then drifted back to 5w6--seeing avarice as a larger issue than fear. For me *personally* (not wanting to generalize here), I'd say that the following is true. 1. Some of my aspie traits are probably not related to Type 5 or other E type--i.e. the more physiological issues (e.g. hard recognizing faces, lack of good motor skills as a kid, certain sensitivities to touch, asexuality)--I guess one would have to poll 5s to see how common these are, but I don't think they're hallmarks of 5s. 2. Some of my aspie traits contradict typical 5 traits. For example, I'm more "out there" with what I think, what I say. And I don't hoard information. (Note: I test higher in 8 and 1 than I do in 5...and I think this is because of being less inhibited than are more typical 5s. Very "what you see is what you get") With these caveats, I do think there's a fair bit of overlap between 5ness and aspieness. Presumably this is due to neurological wiring. That is, if the Enneagram types are at all real, then there's likely to be a biological basis for why someone is a 5 instead of, say, a 2. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 04-06-2007 06:08 PM Almost all psychological/neurological "categories" relate primarily to a specific Ennegram type. The enneagram was around long before all the DSM labels were created. I agree that while most aspies will hover around the Ennegram Five, there will be a lot of Six mixed into the Five for many people. (And some Four for others) Certainly here on this board there are some very creative, artistic Fourish Fives. And many, many sixy fives -- both phobic and counter-phobic sixes. I wonder... if we looked at lists of famous 5's, would we see a lot of AS folks? Examples of 5s with a 6 wing: Isaac Asimov, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud, Bill Gates, Jane Goodall, Stephen Hawking, Alfred Hitchcock, Theodore Kaczynski, Karl Marx, Ezra Pound Examples of 5w4s Hannah Arendt, Tim Burton, Kurt Cobain, Albert Einstein, Franz Kafka, Stanley Kubrick, John Lennon, David Lynch, Friedrich Nietzsche, Vincent Van Gogh RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 04-06-2007 07:40 PM List of "Famous Fives" -- I think there are quite a few Aspies here... Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Bill Gates, Georgia O'Keefe, Stanley Kubrick, John Lennon, Lily Tomlin, Gary Larson, Laurie Anderson, Merce Cunningham, Meredith Monk, James Joyce, Bjšrk, Susan Sontag, Emily Dickenson, Agatha Christie, Ursula K. LeGuin, Jane Goodall, Glenn Gould, John Cage, Bobby Fischer, Tim Burton, David Lynch, Stephen King, Clive Barker, Trent Reznor, Friedrich Nietzsche, Vincent Van Gogh, Kurt Cobain, Jodie Foster, "Fox Mulder" (X Files). RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-06-2007 08:27 PM Although what you write, energeia, in my opinion still has to be considered as a hypothesis, it seems highly likely to me that all of it is true. Thanks for the clarification. One sentence I would say differently: energeia Wrote: With these caveats, I do think there's a fair bit of overlap between 5ness and aspieness.  Presumably this is due to neurological wiring. That is, if the Enneagram types are at all real, then there's likely to be a biological basis for why someone is a 5 instead of, say, a 2.
Maybe the overlap between 5ness and aspieness is caused by a common tendency (for both 5s and aspies) to use the brain in a serial way (thinking, computer-like, do one thing at a time, orderly) as opposed to using it in a parallel way (feeling, multi-tasking, chaotic). If this theory is true then we would expect that it's unlikely for an enneatype 2 (all feelings, repressed thinking) to be aspie. How does that sound?
RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-06-2007 08:39 PM And Max, yes, I also think there will be aspies amongst the famous fives. The question is, are they famous because of their aspiesness or despite it. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 04-06-2007 08:54 PM "are they famous because of their aspiesness or despite it?" I think that's always an impossible thing to prove, but my stance is that WHATEVER a person achieves, it is essentially a product of being the person he/she is -- and being Aspie is a core identity/character/personality factor for anyone on the AS spectrum. So it's ultimately like asking "Would Emily Dickenson be Emily Dickenson if she weren't Emily Dickenson?" -- and I say no. Without Asperger's, she probably would have been just another NT housewife with nine kids. Her entire genius -- her observation, understanding and expression -- came from her Aspie gifts. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-06-2007 09:40 PM My supposition of commonalities between the neurological wiring of 5s and aspies was, indeed, a hypothesis. There's no definitive test for either. (If there were, there would be far fewer arguments over who are the true 5s and over where one is, or if one is, on the autistic spectrum. Regarding the serial vs parallelized use of the brain, or use of thinking function vs feeling function as discriminators....um....I think it's more complex than this for both 5s and aspies. Can't get into it now..I'm on my work lunch break ![]() Five....just out of curiousity, what E type would you be most likely to be if you weren't a 5? And, how do you work your doi to 8? RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-07-2007 07:42 PM energeia Wrote: Five....just out of curiousity, what E type would you be most likely to be if you weren't a 5?  And, how do you work your doi to 8?
I walk. It's so simple but has a big effect. I mean, I've discovered that during walking (not running) I go to 8 and feel very good. So I walk on almost every day that I don't work. For several reasons, I prefer to do that in big cities, so I take a lot of short holidays. And I'm very curious how do you manage to go to 8, Energeia? I hope everybody call still follow this, enneatype 8 is "the leader". energeia Wrote: Regarding the serial vs parallelized use of the brain, or use of thinking function vs feeling function as discriminators....um....I think it's more complex than this for both 5s and aspies. Can't get into it now..I'm on my work lunch break
![]()
Actually I thougt the serial vs parallel part was brilliant. No, I'm joking now. But seriously, I really see a lot of serial things in me. For example, I like trains (that's serial, one station following the other, very predictable too). I manage to do my work by putting a lot of small tasks in my agenda, in time (serial again). Aspies, anyone recognizes serial aspects in yourself? Or is multi-tasking (parallel behaviour) not a problem for you? As I see it, a thought is a serial form of a feeling, and feelings are parallel versions of thoughts.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-07-2007 10:24 PM Five Wrote: And I'm very curious how do you manage to go to 8, Energeia? I hope everybody call still follow this, enneatype 8 is "the leader".
I'm certain I'm a 5 but also have 1, 9 and 8 traits. The 6 happens to me unvoluntarily when people I know are present. Â
Quote: Actually I thougt the serial vs parallel part was brilliant. No, I'm joking now. But seriously, I really see a lot of serial things in me. For example, I like trains (that's serial, one station following the other, very predictable too). I manage to do my work by putting a lot of small tasks in my agenda, in time (serial again). Aspies, anyone recognizes serial aspects in yourself? Or is multi-tasking (parallel behaviour) not a problem for you?
Quote: As I see it, a thought is a serial form of a feeling, and feelings are parallel versions of thoughts.
Hmmmm..this sounds really deep, Five, but I don't understand what you mean RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-08-2007 10:24 AM energeia Wrote: [Decide what I want to do and do it.  Ask for permission or forgiveness later
![]()
energeia Wrote: Interestingly, I'm a reluctant leader...I end up in the position more often than I would like either because I'm the person who knows the most about what needs to be done.
That's the same for me, probably because we're the same enneagram type, and nothing to do with Aspies. energeia Wrote: where figuring out the overall best sequences makes sense
That's my main contribution in my job. I'm good at planning, which is: putting tasks in a row (serial, or another word would be: linear). My guess is, many aspies are good with sequences (computer programming for example), which is serial. Talking about linear, is there a preference amongst aspies for straight lines, sharp edges instead of curves? Imagine you are selecting a new car. energeia Wrote: Unfortunately, that particular job description has ended, and I'm now supposed to be multitasking and I'm always exhausted.  It was amazing to me how I would work 70 hour weeks no problem when I was in focus mode and how, now, I can barely work 30.  But, I don't think you can generalize this to all aspies or fives.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-08-2007 10:56 AM energeia Wrote: Quote: As I see it, a thought is a serial form of a feeling, and feelings are parallel versions of thoughts.
Hmmmm..this sounds really deep, Five, but I don't understand what you mean
I mean thinking as in the enneatype 5, 6 and 7. And feeling as in type 2, 3 and 4. Not sensations. I don't mean fear or anger or love, it's hard to define, I mean the feeling triad. If reality is a whole, and through our limited brains we perceive reality as dualities, then opposites are not real. For example, we say hot and cold exist, but really there is only temperature. If something we can´t observe expresses itself in a parallel way, we call it a feeling. If it expresses itself in a serial way, we call it a thought. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-08-2007 05:36 PM Quote: To bring this back to the subject of this forum, my hypothesis is that Aspies are at the serial end of the range, and have difficulty with parallel things. For example, meanings are parallel. A serial brain doesn´t see all meaning which exists, as can become depressed easier than average. Again, this is my hypothesis, not a proven fact.
I doubt that a parallel brain sees all meanings that exist either. Don't know why a "serial" brain would get depressed more easily than a "parallel" brain. Unless, maybe, your thinking is that depression constitutes an inability to adequately process feelings. But anyways, you're raising interesting questions...maybe repost it as a new thread, so more folks will read and respond to it, as I'm guessing that many have tuned out on this thread? (soc variant speaking here, HA!) RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-08-2007 09:03 PM Yes, probably good to post some questions as a new thread or poll to get more people involved. Thanks for your feedback and openness. About the assumed sensitivity for depressions of aspies and fives: if someone easily sees an activity or task or his/her life as useless or meaningless, the person will be hard to motivate for that activity (narrow interests of aspies!) or can get depressed as a consequence of seeing a lot of meaninglessness. My guess is that enneatype 4 (opposite of 5) sees more meaning than really exists (consequence: magic, predicting future etc.). Enneagram authors I prefer: Baron&Wagele use a lot of pictures, very funny. Very detailed: all books of Riso&Hudson. Michael Goldberg is very good. And Hurley&Donson's books are my number 1 but you have to skip a lot of pages with religious nonsense (But there are many more. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-08-2007 09:47 PM Thanks, Five. Haven't read Goldberg yet--I've been looking in the New Age section of the local used bookstores but it hasn't turned up. I also like Hurley/Donson and Baron/Wagle. And even Riso/Hudson! I find Almass/Maitri harder to read. All that "essence" stuff makes me kind of sleepy. I suppose one could say that a 4 infuses situations with meaning (i.e. the amplification of feelings), but I think that a 5 can also do this, via amplification of thoughts--like what happens in an active aspie special interest. It's very weird--I look at some of my past obsessions and wonder...what was I thinking? And who was the person who was so fascinated by this stuff? (e.g. chemical bonding). Being a 5, you're going to be attuned to meaning and lack thereof, in your desire to avoid emptiness. Not sure this is so important for other types--that is, it's not that they don't want meaning, but they're not so obsessed with Meaning, if you get what I mean. I suspect that having a difficult time getting motivated based on external concerns afflicts all of the head types. (5, 6, 7 just in case somebody besides 5 and myself are actually still reading this thread). It for sure affects me. Having been raised by a 1 mother, I got being responsible and keeping agreements drilled into me, so I can generally get stuff done if I have to. But it's so much easier when my will and desire are aligned. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-09-2007 10:46 AM I just read the thread "Musings of a NTishAspie or AspieishNT or Something". I'm impressed by the attitude of many people on this forum, so helpful and understanding, and let's not forget the humour. ![]() I guess my skills to keep this thread open to everybody aren't very good, and maybe the subject has become to specialistic for others to join in. Energeia, you sound not only very intelligent but also very healthy. To me the high number of your posts is an indication for the social variant. There is a relation between a lower desire for intimacy and the social variant. On the other hand, there might be a relation between a lower desire for intimacy and aspies. But your posts show a lot of openness, which might be seen as a fairly high desire for intimacy. So I don't understand. I've read you don't have TV. Guess what, I don't have a TV either. My collegues don't understand it at all. This can be related to fives. I know someone else without a TV, and she's a 5 (I know conclusions about this require a statistical approach).Like I've read in another person's post: I live happily alone. I'm still confused, whether I'm aspie or not. I see more similarities between aspies and me than before, but also differences. I guess everbody is unique. What aspie test do you recommend? RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-09-2007 04:56 PM Five Wrote: I just read the thread "Musings of a NTishAspie or AspieishNT or Something". I'm impressed by the attitude of many people on this forum, so helpful and understanding, and let's not forget the humour.
![]() I guess my skills to keep this thread open to everybody aren't very good, and maybe the subject has become to specialistic for others to join in.
Quote: Energeia, you sound not only very intelligent but also very healthy. To me the high number of your posts is an indication for the social variant. There is a relation between a lower desire for intimacy and the social variant. On the other hand, there might be a relation between a lower desire for intimacy and aspies. But your posts show a lot of openness, which might be seen as a fairly high desire for intimacy. So I don't understand.
I don't totally understand, either. I think soc/sx is a real possibility for me but the folks on the EIDB aren't convinced. Probably what's most true is that I like to go deep with people in conversations (small talk...UGH) and like to have longstanding friendships. The sex thing...too messy...and this could be an aspie response, e.g., not liking the sensation, say, of moisture on skin, or various odors. I'm definitely not Sx first.....I would find exclusive one-on-one focus to be too limiting. Sp stuff...I manage it, but don't find it interesting. Quote: I've read you don't have TV. Guess what, I don't have a TV either. My collegues don't understand it at all.
This can be related to fives. I know someone else without a TV, and she's a 5 (I know conclusions about this require a statistical approach).
For me...TV has too much stimulation. It's like speed or something...especially the commercials. I haven't been in the homes of enough clear-cut 5s to do my own statistical analysis. I also don't have a car or a cell phone or an ipod or DVD player -- it's a wonder how I manage to function Quote: Like I've read in another person's post: I live happily alone.
I'm still confused, whether I'm aspie or not. I see more similarities between aspies and me than before, but also differences. I guess everbody is unique. What aspie test do you recommend?
Just out of curiosity, how old are you? RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-09-2007 07:44 PM I don't have TV because I'm not interested enough, but also to be able to spend time to other things (like typing this post). I have a cell phone because my job requires it, but in private time I use it only in case of an emergency. An ipod, I've seen it in shops but hardly know what it is. A DVD player is part of my computer, but I've never used it. I'm 42. Like you, I also like to go deep with people in conversations, but am most of the time rather silent. Being of the sp variant, and a 5, when I produce a few words that's already a lot. So now I run out of words... and I'm going to do the rdos test. If I can be useful to you, don't hesitate to contact me by Email. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-09-2007 08:37 PM Your Aspie score: 100 of 200 Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 104 of 200 You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits I answered all questions, but on some questions you can give any answer you like.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-09-2007 11:50 PM I got 91/200 aspie, 83/200 neurotypical--skipped several questions, flummoxed by the "depends on what you mean by....." problem. Or by the "gee, I don't know how most people respond..." problem. Love the comment....sp 5...when I produce a few words, that's already a lot. Bet you talk when it's on a topic you're interested in, though. Thanks for telling me how old you are--42, eh? Definitely old enough to have figured out ways to cope and compensate. I wonder how many older aspies come out both aspie and neurotypical on that test. (Course we oldies are kind of rare on this forum.) RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-10-2007 08:20 AM Yes, I can be called "older" or "oldie" now. Haven't thought that way before. There will be a difference between a person's physical age and mental age. Some adults seem to have a mental age lower than their physical age. And some people seem to have a mental age larger than their physical age. Maturity has to do more with mental age than physical age. Possibly the rdos quiz/test can be improved further, but maybe the concepts of "aspies" and "enneatypes" are too simple to describe this complex reality. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-10-2007 05:16 PM Over 40 is ancient on THIS forum! Re: enneagram and aspie concepts--it's always hard to fit an individual into a category such as "type"--difficult to sort out what's essential from incidental, both in the individual and in the type. Re: mental age--there's also emotional age. I feel kind of ageless....a big territory between, say, 25 and....I'm not sure. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-10-2007 07:55 PM Energeia, would you give me some advice? I have very very few "real" contacts with people so I'm asking this question to you, see that as a compliment. Feel free not to respond. My problem is at my work. My boss, a 9w1, and me agree that I have a narrow focus. He sees that as negative. He is putting a lot of pressure on me to come up with small projects outside my work area and to complete them. I think his unconscious 1 wing is trying to improve or correct or adapt me. My boss and I agree that my performance in this job is excellent and I want to keep this job. If I don't do these small projects (I will have to generate/create them myself) then I have a serious conflict with my boss. But for doing such projects I'm absolutely unmotivated. What would you do? Have you been in a comparible situation?Thanks! RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-11-2007 04:27 AM Hi Will get back to this later tonight...just got home and gotta go out again. If you happen to read this....any idea what your boss's conscious or stated incentive is? (I know 9s can be indirect...but just curious what reasons he's given you.) RE: Enneagram - Natalie - 04-11-2007 05:38 AM I seemed to have confused the test website: You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 1w9. It is not clear from these test results which Enneagram type and wing you are. To determine your true type, you might want to start by considering the types with the highest scores on the lists below. Also, there are many fine books and other websites that contain detailed descriptions of the types. Consulting these might give you the information you need to determine your true type. As knowing your Enneagram type involves self-knowledge, you might want to observe and analyze your behavior and motivations. You might also benefit from taking the test again later. Type 5 - 8.3 Type 1 - 7.7 Type 9 - 7 Type 4 - 5 Type 2 - 1.3 Wing 1w9 - 11.2 Wing 5w4 - 10.8 Wing 9w1 - 10.8 Wing 5w6 - 9.2 Wing 4w5 - 9.2 Wing 1w2 - 8.3 Wing 9w8 - 8.2 Wing 4w3 - 5.8 Wing 2w1 - 5.2 Wing 2w3 - 2.1 I thought most of the questions were really weird ("self-revelations" - WTF?), and I ended up saying "No" on most of them. RE: Enneagram - Natalie - 04-11-2007 05:48 AM Enneagram test with instinctual variant:
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-11-2007 06:21 AM Natalie Try reading this link and see if you identify more with 1 or 5. http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/misid/1and5.asp You could also try a different test, e.g., http://similarminds.com/advtest.html RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-11-2007 06:50 AM Five, back to your boss questions. I'm thinking that you need more information about why exactly your boss wants you to take on new small projects that you're not interested in. I'll presume that he thinks he's looking out for your best interests (rather than his own interests...e.g. dumping more work on you). For example, there could be external issues about the company that you may not be aware of (e.g. you could be maybe getting bought out and these extra experiences would poise you better to stay or leave) or maybe he wants to promote you and can't justify it unless you obtain these new experiences. Or maybe he's getting pressured from other people in your workplace to make you do different things. Or, as you surmise, he thinks it would be in your interests to move outside your comfort zone because....well...just because...you oughtta. So my first response is to suggest you try and get more info out of him as to what exactly are his motivations for pushing you in this "small extra job" direction. (Course, being a 9, if this involves confrontation or interpersonal difficulty, he may not want to be direct with you.) My second thought is to see if it's specific projects he wants done, or if instead it's a set of skills he wants you to obtain or develop more fully. For example, maybe you don't like to write and he wants you to produce a technical manual for something (I don't know what you do, so I'm just grasping for examples.) so you'd become more at ease with writing. Or maybe he wants you to show more initiative, or execute higher level planning--I don't know. If it's skills he wants, then maybe some of these could be developed within the context of what you're already working on. My third thought is to level with him....for example, maybe say that if you take on projects you're not interested in or motivated to do, this will sap your energy and effectiveness regarding the work you currently do well. He might not appreciate this as a possible consequence. Many bosses can deal in terms like efficiency, effectiveness, accomplishment, etc. (Course, being a 9, he's going to care about interpersonal harmony, compromise, agreement, etc.). While it might be good, in theory, to develop areas of weaknesses, I think that if you're an aspie, it probably works better to develop areas of strength. You can make this point without saying you're an aspie...but rather that you're more effective and HAPPY when you play to your strengths, which are...<fill in specific strengths with examples of how these benefit your employer>. My fourth thought is .... stall...(if you haven't come up with a plan that you both accept as viable). Wouldn't recommend this if your boss were an 8 or a 1 or a 3 but a 9.......stall and maybe he'll just give up or forget ![]() My fifth thought is to see if it's possible to agree on a plan you can both live with. Perhaps there are solutions you all haven't thought of yet. But this won't be productive, I don't think, until you get a better grip on where he's coming from in wanting you to take on these small projects. Dunno if this helps any. --------- Me, I have a 7w8 boss whom I basically like and respect but who, on occasion, drives me bats with his ever-varying "let's do this, let's do that, let's write a 60 page grant in a week, etc". He also pushes me, with varying resistances on my part, to get outside my comfort zone. I often feel as if I'm disappointing him because I don't sign on with exuberant enthusiasm to his latest pie-in-the-sky brilliant solution to inventing the future. I swear, this guy brings out the "provocative cynic" in me, so we have some good arguments sometimes. RE: Enneagram - Natalie - 04-11-2007 06:57 AM type...score...type behavior motivation 5.......50.......I must be knowledgable and independent to be happy. 9.......47.......I must be peaceful and easy to get along with to be happy. 1.......43.......I must be perfect and good to be happy. 6.......36.......I must be secure and safe to be happy. 8.......29.......I must be strong and in control to be happy. 4.......27.......I must avoid painful feelings to be happy. 7.......27.......I must be high and entertained to be happy. 3.......25.......I must be impressive and attractive to be happy. 2.......24.......I must be helpful and caring to be happy. Perfectionism........||||||||||||||||......62% Helpfulness...........||||||||||..............34% Image Focus.........||||||||||..............36% Hypersensitivity.....||||||||||..............39% Detachment..........||||||||||||||||||...72% Anxiety................||||||||||||||.........52% Adventurousness...||||||||||..............39% Aggressiveness......||||||||||||...........41% Calmness..............||||||||||||||||......68% Meh... Still pretty vague. I think I like the other personality tests better. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-11-2007 08:14 AM Natalie Wrote: Meh... Still pretty vague. I think I like the other personality tests better.
I hope you don't mind I've read a few of your posts to see what your type is. There's a big chance you're a 7. You have humour and produce many posts, and you like fun. You bend the rules (speeding limits for driving) (all type 7). Be aware that type 7 is linked to 5, under safe conditions, and to 1, under stress. You make few typing errors, and correct other's typing errors and seem to be in control of yourself (type 1). You are interested in science (type 5). I honestly hope you don't mind me writing such personal things about you. The following may not sound very scientifically to you. How do you laugh? 7s laugh a lot, with sound, in a non-agressive way.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-11-2007 08:52 AM Natalie--do you know what your mbti type is? RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-11-2007 08:53 AM energeia Wrote: back to your boss questions. Â
Thanks very much for your quick and long response. You understand correctly what the problem is, "going out of the comfort zone" are exactly the words my boss uses. Nice to hear I'm not the only one having sometimes arguments with the boss. I'm not giving too much details about my job because the whole world can read this and I don't want to be recognized. The company rules prescribe that also for people with good performances during performance reviews a developmental need has to be identified. The progress in an employee's development is part of a monthly meeting, so he will not forget this. Because of his 1 wing, he fully supports this company policy. If I would say I don't want to develop further, well not at work, that's not in compliance with the company policy. My resistance is already bothering him, he's saying that I'm not very grateful for him trying to help me. But he's destroying me, more or less. He's basically a good guy (9) though. Thanks again. Running out of time now...
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-11-2007 09:03 AM Five--UGH! (re: company policy). I don't guess that there's any chance that you and your boss can fake out the system...i.e. come up with something that sounds plausible. You have to be evaluated every MONTH? Yee Gads! Okay...so it sounds as if an interpersonal challenge here centers on how to convince your boss that his well-intentioned efforts are counterproductive. He's a 9--he's going to want to find points of agreement between you. I guess what I'm curious about is whether or not you and he can come up with ways for you to "develop" within the context of your current job and interests. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-11-2007 07:03 PM energeia Wrote: You have to be evaluated every MONTH?Â
Actually, the performance evaluation is annually and the follow up on action items from the evaluation is part of a monthly meeting. energeia Wrote: He's a 9--he's going to want to find points of agreement between you.Â
Right, I'll have to keep that in mind and talk to him when he's in "9 mode". RE: Enneagram - Natalie - 04-11-2007 07:29 PM I don't mind being analyzed, though you must have read through a lot of posts to know that I speed while driving (that was way back there, I believe). I will say, however, that I actually do strive to obay rules. Speeding is the only illegal thing I do (and only because the speed limits here are designed for drunken hicks), and I'm actually really strict about following traffic rules in particular. I don't know about being a type seven... There's a lot of things that don't really fit me. Here are some of the things mentioned on the site about this type: People of this personality type are essentially concerned that their lives be an exciting adventure. I try to avoid excessive excitement. I am emetophobic and even positive excitement can turn into anxiety and then trigger a panic attack (emetophobia is a terrible fear to have in this sense because anxiousness triggers nausea and nausea triggers more anxiousness - a vicious cycle). Sevens are future oriented, restless people who are generally convinced that something better is just around the corner. Heh... Ironically, I rarely think about the future (or the past for that matter). They are quick thinkers who have a great deal of energy and who make lots of plans. Ugh, I hate making plans. I wouldn't say I have tons of energy either, especially in social situations. Sevens are practical people who have multiple skills. They know how to network and to promote themselves and their interests. They often have an entrepreneurial spirit and are able to convey their enthusiasm to those with whom they come in contact. When they are able to focus their talents, they are often highly successful. That kind of sounds like me except for the networking/entrepeneurial spirit/conveying enthusiasm parts. I don't really do enthusiasm (or at least I don't show it). Focusing does not always come easily for Sevens, however. Their tendency to believe that something better awaits them, makes them reluctant to narrow down their options or to pursue their aims with true devotion. That's like the opposite of me. I've been certain that I wanted to major in Animal Biology/Zoology (specializing in herpetology or ichthyology) ever since I was in sixth grade. For this reason, Sevens are more prone than most to addictions of all sorts, whether it be to shopping, gambling, drugs or whatever. I have an anti-addictive personality. Sevens usually have a high opinion of themselves and their talents; they tend to focus on their strengths and virtues and to downplay their flaws and vices. They are often a bit self-centered which manifests in an unfounded feeling of entitlement. As Sevens don't want to confront their own darker emotions, they also have difficulty acknowledging the pain that others experience, so that they sometimes have a hard time seeing the reality of other people. The extent of the Seven's flight from negative emotions is really a measure of the Seven's mental health; the more that the Seven flees from them, the more their strength grows and the more likely they are to erupt into consciousness in the form of an anxiety disorder or a severe depressive episode. That kind of sounds like me I guess, though somewhat exaggerated. I don't have too many dark emotions, and the ones I do have I don't really have any problems "confronting", and they aren't the cause of my anxiety either (a specific phobia is). Also, I rarely get depressed. Overall, I feel that like most people on here, type five fits the best. Pretty much all of it applies to me except for the "people of this personality type essentially fear that they don't have enough inner strength to face life, so they tend to withdraw, to retreat into the safety and security of the mind where they can mentally prepare for their emergence into the world" part. Five with a nine "wing" I guess. RE: Enneagram - Natalie - 04-11-2007 07:30 PM energeia Wrote: Natalie--do you know what your mbti type is?
RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-11-2007 08:30 PM Natalie Wrote: I don't mind being analyzed, though you must have read through a lot of posts
I spent not more than 5 minutes, honestly. The posts I read were just a small random selection. I apologize if my post bothered you. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-11-2007 09:14 PM Determining enneatype by laughter phenotype--haven't heard that one before! Gee, if you're a member of the EIDB I'd love it if you'd start a thread there on how you go about doing this--bet it might get some good discussion going, if you're up for people disagreeing with you. You'd probably throw me out of the 5 camp, Five (although I dunno how you think 5s laugh). At work, I've been told to tone it down...that is, I'd spontaneously laugh so loud it would startle people. I find myself most amusing sometimes. Re: my 7w8 boss--he is the master of reframing and "flexible commitments", thank heavens he has a strong line to 5, else he'd be totally all over the map. Often hard to talk with because he keeps interrupting with what he thinks. Big, gestalty thinker, impatient with details. Very "positive attitude" coping strategy. Breaks any rule he doesn't like. Rules and procedures don't apply to him. Speedy driver, to use one of your metrics for 7. Actually, I have a hard time typing most people, but the boss is really clear-cut. I'd be really surprised if I was wrong on his type. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-11-2007 09:19 PM Natalie Wrote: energeia Wrote: Natalie--do you know what your mbti type is?
Natalie--suggest you read through various descriptions of types 1 and 5 to see if either of them seems like a good fit....if you care to know more, that is. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-12-2007 07:24 AM energeia Wrote: Determining enneatype by laughter phenotype
Maybe an aspie trait in me, seeing patterns. energeia Wrote: ...that is, I'd spontaneously laugh so loud it would startle people. I find myself most amusing sometimes.
Wow, fascinating! I don't know whether in English the proverb is the same, but it's something like: people laugh about others, but real wise people can laugh about themselves. It has do with being able to take a distance from themselves. This is a confirmation of what I said in one of my earlier posts: very healthy. RE: Enneagram - Athlynne - 04-12-2007 09:56 AM Ooh, very interesting, thank you for starting this topic! For the enneagram test with instinctual variant : You are most likely a type 5 (the Investigator) with 6 wing Self-preservation variant For the first enneagram test: You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 5w4. Neat... <hugs> Athie RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-12-2007 07:31 PM Natalie Wrote: Five with a nine "wing" I guess.
Wings can be +1 or -1 from the main type only. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-12-2007 08:09 PM Athlynne Wrote: Self-preservation variant
RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-12-2007 09:05 PM Athlynne Wrote: You are most likely a type 5 (the Investigator) with 6 wing
You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 5w4.
Apparently type 5 has a high probability but the wing is uncertain (4 wing, no wing or 6 wing). RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-13-2007 02:13 AM Five, what do you consider to be your most Five-ish qualities? And which aspects of yourself least fit the type? (If you want to answer, of course.) RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-13-2007 08:14 AM energeia Wrote: your most Five-ish qualities?Â
SEEING. Thinking is a poor substitute for seeing. energeia Wrote: which aspects of yourself least fit the type?
I lack knowledge. My lack of knowledge sometimes can make daily life difficult. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-13-2007 04:48 PM Hey Five--thanks for the elaboration. What kind of 6 wing do I have? Given your distinction as stated, I'm not sure (I really oughtta reread Hurley/Donson!). I can relate to both. My 6 wing adds an element of congeniality (but also soc first) to my personality--makes me more outgoing, fueled by that need for some safety obtained through connection. Also probably decreases my self-confidence--I'm often questioning what I think or how I feel (assuming I can figure the latter out)--the "but but but" internal counter-arguments. Which I sometimes externalize and hence drive people bonkers. I'd say my analytical side is more pure 5 (people sometimes assign this to the 6 wing in contrast to 4 wing but I don't buy it). The 6 wing probably helps me to take more risks--the counterphobic face-the-fear thing. RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-14-2007 07:51 AM Everybody, what about this: 1. Most aspies are enneagram type fives; not all aspies are fives. 2. There are many similarities between aspies and fives. 3. There are some similarities between aspies and enneatype one. 4. It is more difficult to determine the enneatype of aspies than of NTs. 5. Because of the similarities between aspie traits and 5 traits and 1 traits, many aspies will be wrongly typed to be fives or ones. 6. Because of the similarities between aspies and fives, fives struggle less with aspie traits than aspies with other enneatypes. I have become convinced I'm a five with (a light form of) aspies. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-14-2007 06:16 PM Quote: 6. Because of the similarities between aspies and fives, fives struggle less with aspie traits than aspies with other enneatypes.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 04-14-2007 08:18 PM Everybody: please note that Energeia and me agree that many aspies will be WRONGLY TYPED to be fives or ones. Please keep that in mind when you do an enneagram test to determine your type. I didn't know that when I started this thread. =============================== energeia Wrote: It might be easier for 5s to make the aspie traits work for them.
Thanks, "work for them" is indeed better than my "struggle less with". It's not exactly the same. energeia Wrote: There's a liberating "who really cares what other people think" attitude.
Intellectually I know that that is great, but I still fail often, I do care. I see it not only as a positive trait but also as a growth and a sign of health. I see it as that you have grown further than me (but hey, you've had more time to grow since you're older.) energeia Wrote: And I'm not wholly convinced that I'm a 5--lots of 1 and 8 and 6 traits in me--I've wondered with aspieness would do to an 8.  The people who both know the enneagram and have met me in real life (6 of them) have all but one thought I was a 5 (the other one thought I could be a 7).
Energeia, what I, as a 5, have is a longing to understand. The word desire is too weak, I like the word longing better. A longing to understand existence or life or whatever you want to call it. Let's say I'm a seeker. Your signature "I'd like to know what this whole show is all about before it's out" suggests to me, I might misunderstand, that it is meant in a serious way and is meant before death, and that you have that longing to understand too. If you have this then in my opinion that confirms you are a 5 (well, nobody is a five, everbody is unique). I'm curious, have you found out ("what this show is all about")? But maybe your signature was meant insignificantly or as a sort of joke. If my question about this "show" is too personal and private, just ignore this post and don't respond. No problem at all RE: Enneagram - energeia - 04-15-2007 12:08 AM LOL! (re: last two sentences above) True, one can grow a lot in 14 years (56 vs 42)--I probably grew more, though, in the 14 years between 24-38. Regarding my signature....I read that line when I was about 20...it has always struck a chord with me....definitely, I interpret it as a desire to learn, to understand, to figure things out, to figure myself out. Something like seeing how aspieness has influenced my life is one of those missing pieces--that is, the piece was missing until I found out about asperger's in my late 40s. There are probably still other big pieces missing. So...my answer is yes and no--I've figured out some stuff but there's always always more. And I still need to figure out what I want to do when I grow up
RE: Enneagram - ASDAdult - 06-21-2007 01:44 PM I'm 1w9. RE: Enneagram - ASDAdult - 06-21-2007 01:47 PM Oh, and my variant is: Self-preservation variant People of the self-preservation variant are generally trying to be comfortable and independent. Their well-being is very important to them, so they pay much attention to their health, house and financial position. They are less interested in interpersonal contact, and are typically less spontaneous and don't show as much emotion as people of the other two subtypes of their enneagram type. RE: Enneagram - Ellen - 06-21-2007 03:45 PM "Enneagram type 5 - The Investigator: People of this personality type essentially fear that they don't have enough inner strength to face life, so they tend to withdraw, to retreat into the safety and security of the mind where they can mentally prepare for their emergence into the world. " At the risk of sounding like Shirley Maclaine I'll pass along what a very saintly, very in the loop spiritually, woman is quoted as saying some years ago: The autistic were soldiers in their last life so are battle-weary and not too happy to be back in the body. Now I assume she was probably talking about the profoundly autistic, but I don't know. It may explain the gender confusion I sometimes see and hear about with female Aspies. I mention this because Gurdjieff, whom you mention, based his enneagram comments on eastern metaphysics- what was known at the time- so maybe you and others in this forum would be open to a remark like the above. He thoroughly researched and read about Eastern mysticism, astrology, Buddhism, etc. He was probably on the spiritual path himself. Also, I believe some Aspies and HFAs (as well as some ADHD kids) are part of an important group soul migration that began in earnest about 1980 (other souls have been "coming in" for decades but in smaller numbers). They are here to change the status quo quite frankly, because they have both the desire (a certain purity and inability to keep promulgating bullsh** as is the world's wont) and characteristics (they learn differently, are primarily right-brained, etc.) to make it happen. Google "indigo, rainbow, crystal" children. My own Aspie is an indigo and I have a nephew who is an indigo. Their primary characteristics are a type of purity, inability to lie, inability to bow and scrape before authority, a certain inherent sense of entitlement (because they know their great spiritual status on a subconscious level imo). I have read and heard that many teachers and doctors who have noticed that these children are very different from the norm that way say they feel they ARE spiritually superior to the norm- miles ahead of the average NT soul I guess. In any case concepts like the enneagram (I am a "helper" btw) only point to WHY we are here this lifetime in terms of what our soul needs to accomplish in order to move forward in a big way, which is everyone's goal no matter what their religion (or lack thereof). I probably wouldn't believe ANY of the above (I was raised by a scientist) if I hadn't learned about Avatar Meher Baba when 30 years old. That led to my embarking upon my own metaphysical journey then and intense reading and studying of these matters (every night almost for another 20 years til the present). But I only really pay attention to what great souls (Gandhi, etc.)/THE avatar (Jesus, Buddha, Ram, etc., there is only one) /perfect masters (Sai Baba in India, etc.) have said about these concepts and really no one else. If the rank and file like the authors of "The Secret", say, confirm in some direct or indirect way what I have already read from souls I feel to be impeccable then I just stash it away in my brain as likely also true. But I try very hard not to repeat any of it as I am still not CERTAIN of its accuracy. Having said that, the great souls above never mentioned indigo children, but much has been said and written about certain other, similar group soul migrations by them and others, hence my openness about it. Gurdijeff was authentic and given the seal of approval by Meher Baba (in an offhand comment once) so I believe in the enneagram but I still don't obsess over it. Astrology I pay attention to about 40%, but that 40% I am sure about! ![]() the number one thing that defines you is your spiritual status which is contigent on the number and type of your sanskaras (mental impressions). The latter are the result of your past lives, but can be overcome, disposed of in the end... I am digressing and possibly proselytzing big time. Sorry. RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-25-2007 08:58 AM Ellen, your post contains many interesting subjects.Ellen Wrote: Now I assume she was probably talking about the profoundly autistic, but I don't know. It may explain the gender confusion I sometimes see and hear about with female Aspies.
Possibly. Also: many Aspies have type 5 characteristics, and type 5 is seen by society more a male type of mind. Ellen Wrote: He thoroughly researched and read about Eastern mysticism, astrology, Buddhism, etc. He was probably on the spiritual path himself.
I think Gurdjieff was gifted. He had great people skills and a big sense of humour. I think he was an enneagram type 8 who became enlightened. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 06-25-2007 04:23 PM Hey Five! I signed up to attend the international enneagram conference in california at the beginning of august. Am hoping to learn tons. It looks like an interesting schedule. RE: Enneagram - Shrek - 06-25-2007 04:51 PM Enneagram - any way to take that online? I'd love to know what my score is, given I am a INTJ on Myers-Briggs. According to Wikipedia, that, and the Asperger, make me a certified nerd. RE: Enneagram - woodpeace - 06-25-2007 05:37 PM For the first enneagram test I am most likely a five with a four wing. RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-25-2007 07:20 PM energeia Wrote: Hey Five!
I signed up to attend the international enneagram conference in california at the beginning of august. Am hoping to learn tons. It looks like an interesting schedule.
Hi energeia. I didn't know there was a conference coming. Somehow my focus is still much more on books than the internet. RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-25-2007 07:46 PM GuessWho Wrote: Enneagram - any way to take that online?
This site has free tests: http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/ RE: Enneagram - Ayreon - 06-25-2007 08:14 PM well i don't know much about this (im gonna research more) yes i think the AS id related whit enneagram types 4 (a little) 5 and 6 RE: Enneagram - energeia - 06-26-2007 04:00 AM Five--here's a link to the enneagram conference http://www.internationalenneagram.org/ieaconferences.php Guess who--here's another link to an enneagram test You download it and open from Excel--I like it because you can then review your answers and see how they fit the types http://www.enneagramdimensions.net/whats_my_type.htm RE: Enneagram - Ellen - 06-26-2007 02:16 PM Why do you think Gandhi was a great soul? He was anti-technology, that doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Gandhi was a mahatma which means great soul. He wasn't perfect, but he was great, undoubtedly. About Sai Baba in India: there are 2 Sai Baba's but I assume you mean the more recent person. I see him as an illusionist, not a master. Are you really convinced Sai Baba is authentic? The more recent Sai Baba is as you say an illusionist, able to manipulate reality to a certain extent but clearly a fraud in many respects. He is misusing his powers from what I understand.... I have read "The Secret" by Osho. Probably you refer to another book with the same name. Who are the authors? I meant the recent The Secret book but I will check out the Osho book. BTW, a psychic I went to recently for fun in Sedona, Arizona was trained in "Osho" in Pune, India- any connection? About believing in the enneagram: I see the enneagram as a model, not as a reality. But a model which is very useful for me, which works well. To understand myself and others, to avoid unnecessary conflicts. [/quote] the enneagram probably only points to what you plan to work on in this lifetime. I tested as a helper (which I can't seem to resist very often!!!). RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-26-2007 08:02 PM energeia Wrote: the enneagram conference
Looks very interesting. Seeing the names of the speakers maybe they will also talk about other applications of the enneagram (other than psychology/personality).
RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-26-2007 08:14 PM Ellen Wrote: BTW, a psychic I went to recently for fun in Sedona, Arizona was trained in "Osho" in Pune, India- any connection?
Yes, I meant the guy formerly known as Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, now known as Osho. I considered starting a thread about him but there is no connection with Aspieness and I expect too few people would be interested.
RE: Enneagram - LoftyD - 06-26-2007 09:45 PM I am most likely a type 6. Taking wings into account, I seem to be a 6w5. Thats what I get but I say it should be: 5w6. RE: Enneagram - Shnoing - 06-27-2007 04:43 PM … most likely a type 1. Taking wings into account, a 1w9. Type 1 - 9.7 Type 5 - 9 Type 9 - 6.7 Type 8 - 6 Type 2 - 3 Now I've gotta read what that might mean … RE: Enneagram - Ellen - 06-27-2007 07:49 PM "Yes, I meant the guy formerly known as Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, now known as Osho. I considered starting a thread about him but there is no connection with Aspieness and I expect too few people would be interested." [/quote] Five: Do you think these psychics channel Rajneesh or are they trained by him? I see religious masters is one of your main interests. Mine too. RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-27-2007 08:40 PM LoftyD Wrote: I am most likely a type 6.
Taking wings into account, I seem to be a 6w5. Thats what I get but I say it should be: 5w6.
5s and 6s are both thinkers but in a different way. The thinking of 6 works well for the outside world but less for their insides. 6s in a way don't trust what they think. 6s ask the opinions of others. 6s are more conformists. 5s are more independent, more non-conformist. 5s can take a standpoint and defend that even if the whole world has another opinion. 6s are more focused on co-operation. 5s are more loners. Hope that helps to determine whether your type is 5 or 6. RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-27-2007 08:53 PM Shnoing Wrote: … most likely a type 1.
A 1 sees something (objects, people, circumstances, documents) as not perfect and focuses on improvement. To exaggerate: if you give a text to a 1 he immediately sees where the errors are. For a 1 imperfect can be the same as wrong. If the improvement focuses on people a 1 can be a great teacher. 1s are full of "shoulds", focus on ideals, put high demands on themselves. A 1 would be a good judge. A 5 cares much less about improvement, focuses more on innovation. A 1 is more a doer than a 5. A 5 is a thinker. RE: Enneagram - Five - 06-27-2007 09:21 PM Ellen Wrote: Five: Do you think these psychics channel Rajneesh or are they trained by him?
I see religious masters is one of your main interests. Mine too.
With reference to our contact by private message, I will start a separate thread about Osho to avoid mixing with the subject of the enneagram in this thread. Maybe others are interested in him too. I will start the thread tomorrow (if I can access this site) and respond to your questions.
RE: Enneagram - Shnoing - 06-27-2007 10:41 PM Five Wrote: Shnoing Wrote: … most likely a type 1.
A 1 sees something (objects, people, circumstances, documents) as not perfect and focuses on improvement. To exaggerate: if you give a text to a 1 he immediately sees where the errors are. For a 1 imperfect can be the same as wrong. ...
RE: Enneagram - adversarial - 07-08-2007 04:52 PM It would seem that I hit the 5w6 category as well, even though there are other potential categories I could fit into. Enneagram test results You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 5w6. No personality test is completely accurate. Although several measures were taken to make this test as accurate as possible, there's always a chance that you are not typed correctly by it. Therefore, when deciding which Enneagram type and wing you are, you might also want to consider the types with the highest test scores on the lists below. (Note that your lowest scores may be omitted.) Type 5 - 11.7 Type 1 - 9.7 Type 6 - 7 Type 4 - 5 Wing 5w6 - 15.2 Wing 5w4 - 14.2 Wing 6w5 - 12.8 Wing 4w5 - 10.8 Wing 1w2 - 9.7 Wing 1w9 - 9.7 Wing 6w7 - 7 Wing 4w3 - 5 RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-08-2007 05:12 PM 5w6--We're the BEST type! (Ha Ha Ha) I also score high in type 1, and there are days I think I could easily be a 1, when my various forms of rigidity kick in. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-08-2007 05:58 PM adversarial Wrote: It would seem that I hit the 5w6 category as well, even though there are other potential categories I could fit into.
Under safe circumstances you should see a shift from "an environment which is affecting you" to "you influencing the environment/people" (5 to 8). If you know this, you can use it and turn it around: start influencing the environment and as a result feel more safe (5 to 8). That's the opposite of withdrawal. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 03:01 AM energeia Wrote: Oh dear, you've posted about my current special interest!
I started a thread but it got lost in the forum remake several weeks ago. There's a really cool enneagram forum linked below that I post to under a different username http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/forum/ I'm guessing that 5w6 and 1w9 (and possibly 6w5) are fairly common types for aspies. moi--5w6
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 03:03 AM I found it.. Yeah I am and "DOer" and "Improver" type... RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 03:07 AM Actually I am all of them but 9. It looks like horoscope stuff. lots of generalizations.. I have traits of all but 9. Five Wrote: GuessWho Wrote: Enneagram - any way to take that online?
This site has free tests: http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 03:08 AM Actually I am all of them but 9. It looks like horoscope stuff. lots of generalizations.. I have traits of all but 9. Five Wrote: GuessWho Wrote: Enneagram - any way to take that online?
This site has free tests: http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 03:10 AM My overall response to this is.. I know what I am , what are you? LOL Honestly I know my personality type... Yes, I do not like lazy, I do not like dreamers who do not do! I do not like doers who do not dream! Its a balance. I believe if you waste your life away you feign God , the universe and the world, so God MUST place you on earth for example of what NOT to be<G> RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 08:31 AM Max the Bear Wrote: Here are a couple of free online tests that might help establish which of the Nine personality types you are: http://www.eclecticenergies.com/enneagram/test.php
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 08:33 AM energeia Wrote: 5w6--We're the BEST type!
(Ha Ha Ha) I also score high in type 1, and there are days I think I could easily be a 1, when my various forms of rigidity kick in.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 08:35 AM I like being a doer type one.. We get things DONE! THinking is not good if you can't make the answers work. RE: Enneagram - Joeker - 07-15-2007 08:54 AM Type 5 - 10 Type 9 - 8.3 Type 8 - 7.3 Type 1 - 7.3 Type 4 - 7.3 Type 6 - 5.7 Type 3 - 5.3 Wing 5w4 - 13.7 Wing 5w6 - 12.8 Wing 4w5 - 12.3 Wing 9w1 - 12 Wing 9w8 - 12 Wing 8w9 - 11.4 Wing 1w9 - 11.4 Wing 6w5 - 10.7 Wing 4w3 - 9.9 Wing 8w7 - 9.4 Wing 3w4 - 8.9 Wing 1w2 - 8.8 Wing 6w7 - 7.8 Wing 3w2 - 6.8 I'm a 5w4. It's interesting that mostly we're scoring into the 5th, no? RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-15-2007 09:09 AM ...although 1's can be -- judgmental inflexible dogmatic obsessive-compulsive critical of others overly serious controlling anxious and jealous ...but nobody's perfect RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 10:25 AM Yetti Wrote: I like being a doer type one.. We get things DONE! THinking is not good if you can't make the answers work.
Everybody has all types in themselves. It will be most healthy to become balanced, to use thinking, feeling and doing, all three of him. I have to remind myself of that, I cannot "think" my house clean RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 10:34 AM Joeker Wrote: It's interesting that mostly we're scoring into the 5th, no?
Yes. Probably the whole rest of this day I will be thinking about that again. To modify the model I have in my head. To put aspieness into it.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-15-2007 05:32 PM Granting that I don't think I'm good at picking out 8s (I don't seem to know many), I definitely got 1 vibes from Yetti while reading her posts and then, when I saw her current picture, my view was reinforced. 1w2 would be my guess. But I could be wrong. I'll bet you her husband is a 9 or a 5. (If you're reading this, Yetti, and are curious, I'd be interested in hearing about your husband's type). From the Riso-Hudson web site, http://www.enneagraminstitute.com Misidentifying Ones and Eights Both Ones and Eights are in the Instinctive Triad, both have strong wills, both are action-oriented, and both have strong notions about how to do things. However, Ones try to convince others to do the right thing (as they see it) from the standpoint of a moral imperative–because it is the right thing to do. They try to logically convince the other of the soundness of their views, but become irritated and less logical when others resists their reasoning. Eights, on the other hand, rely on their own self-confidence, and attempt to sway others by their gutsy convictions and sheer personal charisma. ("I don't know if it's the right way, but it's my way.") Ones try to convert those who resist them: Eights try to power through them. The greatest misunderstanding between these two types involves their concern with justice, although the nature of their sense of justice can be quite different. Ones hold justice as an extremely important value–many judges, attorneys, advocates, and criminal prosecutors actually are Ones. Ones think a great deal about issues of providing suitable standards for human beings and about the specifics of how to administer a fair and equitable system. Ones at all Levels of Development refer to justice and think that they seek justice (no matter how skewed their interpretation of it may become). In any case, justice is a matter of principles–part of their idealism. They strive after justice and want to rectify injustices wherever they find them because, among other reasons, to do otherwise would be to fail to live up to their high moral standards and make them feel guilty. In Eights, justice is more of a visceral response, a reaction to witnessing injustices occurring. Eights, generally speaking, do not walk around thinking about these matters, but if they saw a helpless person being harmed or bullied by others, without thinking about it, Eights would rush in to "level the playing field." For Eights, justice has little to do with abstract principles. Eights see themselves as protectors of others, and when they are healthy, they actually are. Eights are more likely to seek justice for "their people"–their family, friends, co-workers, ethnic group, and so forth. It is usually expressed in a concern that those in their care (or under their power and authority) be treated fairly. The cowboy marshal protecting the town against criminals and the union chief negotiating a just wage for the rank and file are examples of this more restricted concern for justice. With Eights, the sense of justice usually involves addressing an imbalance of power. This is quite different from the One who seeks to make sure that people are appropriately rewarded for good actions and punished for bad ones. Of course, in their unhealthy manifestations, both types can be extremely unjust. Ones will still believe that they are being fair–the punishments they are meting out are for the good of the person being punished, or at the very least, for the good of society. Ones feel they need to rationalize their punitive activities. Eights do not. For unhealthy Eights, administering justice is simply meting out vengeance. ("You hurt me or my people, and I'll destroy you." "He ripped me off. Now he has to pay.") Needless to say, others may question the "justice" in either of these types' unhealthy behavior. The confusion between Eights and Ones probably also stems from the fact that some Ones may misidentify themselves as Eights since they would like to have the authority and influence of Eights. They may also recognize that they have aggressive impulses and misidentify themselves as an "aggressive type," although they are really compliant to their ideals; the Eight is the true aggressive type par excellence. On the other hand, Eights almost never misidentify themselves as Ones, viewing Ones as lily-livered and bloodless–moral only because they are too weak to be strong. Although Eights themselves are unlikely to think they are Ones, other people sometimes misidentify Eights as Ones because they see them as reformers. But clearly, many natural leaders, including Eights, lead reforms when they are needed. Contrasting Ones such as Pope John Paul II, Ralph Nader, and Hilary Clinton with Eights such as Lee Iococca, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Barbara Walters gives a vivid sense of their differences. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 05:37 PM Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: I like being a doer type one.. We get things DONE! THinking is not good if you can't make the answers work.
Everybody has all types in themselves. It will be most healthy to become balanced, to use thinking, feeling and doing, all three of him. I have to remind myself of that, I cannot "think" my house clean
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 05:40 PM Yetti Wrote: Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: I like being a doer type one.. We get things DONE! THinking is not good if you can't make the answers work.
Everybody has all types in themselves. It will be most healthy to become balanced, to use thinking, feeling and doing, all three of him. I have to remind myself of that, I cannot "think" my house clean
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 05:42 PM Yetti Wrote: Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: I like being a doer type one.. We get things DONE! THinking is not good if you can't make the answers work.
Everybody has all types in themselves. It will be most healthy to become balanced, to use thinking, feeling and doing, all three of him. I have to remind myself of that, I cannot "think" my house clean
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 05:48 PM Max the Bear Wrote: ...although 1's can be --
judgmental inflexible dogmatic obsessive-compulsive critical of others overly serious controlling anxious and jealous ...but nobody's perfect
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 05:58 PM energeia Wrote: Granting that I don't think I'm good at picking out 8s (I don't seem to know many), I definitely got 1 vibes from Yetti while reading her posts and then, when I saw her current picture, my view was reinforced. 1w2 would be my guess. But I could be wrong. I'll bet you her husband is a 9 or a 5. (If you're reading this, Yetti, and are curious, I'd be interested in hearing about your husband's type).
From the Riso-Hudson web site, http://www.enneagraminstitute.com Misidentifying Ones and Eights Both Ones and Eights are in the Instinctive Triad, both have strong wills, both are action-oriented, and both have strong notions about how to do things. However, Ones try to convince others to do the right thing (as they see it) from the standpoint of a moral imperative–because it is the right thing to do. They try to logically convince the other of the soundness of their views, but become irritated and less logical when others resists their reasoning. Eights, on the other hand, rely on their own self-confidence, and attempt to sway others by their gutsy convictions and sheer personal charisma. ("I don't know if it's the right way, but it's my way.") Ones try to convert those who resist them: Eights try to power through them. The greatest misunderstanding between these two types involves their concern with justice, although the nature of their sense of justice can be quite different. Ones hold justice as an extremely important value–many judges, attorneys, advocates, and criminal prosecutors actually are Ones. Ones think a great deal about issues of providing suitable standards for human beings and about the specifics of how to administer a fair and equitable system. Ones at all Levels of Development refer to justice and think that they seek justice (no matter how skewed their interpretation of it may become). In any case, justice is a matter of principles–part of their idealism. They strive after justice and want to rectify injustices wherever they find them because, among other reasons, to do otherwise would be to fail to live up to their high moral standards and make them feel guilty. In Eights, justice is more of a visceral response, a reaction to witnessing injustices occurring. Eights, generally speaking, do not walk around thinking about these matters, but if they saw a helpless person being harmed or bullied by others, without thinking about it, Eights would rush in to "level the playing field." For Eights, justice has little to do with abstract principles. Eights see themselves as protectors of others, and when they are healthy, they actually are. Eights are more likely to seek justice for "their people"–their family, friends, co-workers, ethnic group, and so forth. It is usually expressed in a concern that those in their care (or under their power and authority) be treated fairly. The cowboy marshal protecting the town against criminals and the union chief negotiating a just wage for the rank and file are examples of this more restricted concern for justice. With Eights, the sense of justice usually involves addressing an imbalance of power. This is quite different from the One who seeks to make sure that people are appropriately rewarded for good actions and punished for bad ones. Of course, in their unhealthy manifestations, both types can be extremely unjust. Ones will still believe that they are being fair–the punishments they are meting out are for the good of the person being punished, or at the very least, for the good of society. Ones feel they need to rationalize their punitive activities. Eights do not. For unhealthy Eights, administering justice is simply meting out vengeance. ("You hurt me or my people, and I'll destroy you." "He ripped me off. Now he has to pay.") Needless to say, others may question the "justice" in either of these types' unhealthy behavior. The confusion between Eights and Ones probably also stems from the fact that some Ones may misidentify themselves as Eights since they would like to have the authority and influence of Eights. They may also recognize that they have aggressive impulses and misidentify themselves as an "aggressive type," although they are really compliant to their ideals; the Eight is the true aggressive type par excellence. On the other hand, Eights almost never misidentify themselves as Ones, viewing Ones as lily-livered and bloodless–moral only because they are too weak to be strong. Although Eights themselves are unlikely to think they are Ones, other people sometimes misidentify Eights as Ones because they see them as reformers. But clearly, many natural leaders, including Eights, lead reforms when they are needed. Contrasting Ones such as Pope John Paul II, Ralph Nader, and Hilary Clinton with Eights such as Lee Iococca, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Barbara Walters gives a vivid sense of their differences.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 06:08 PM I don't know whether this link is already in this thread: http://www.9types.com/descr/baron2.html Yetti, in this link scroll down and read relational 8 to check your type. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:14 PM Here is my husband's results You are most likely a type 2. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 2w1. No personality test is completely accurate. Although several measures were taken to make this test as accurate as possible, there's always a chance that you are not typed correctly by it. Therefore, when deciding which Enneagram type and wing you are, you might also want to consider the types with the highest test scores on the lists below. (Note that your lowest scores may be omitted.) Type 2 - 12 Type 1 - 11 Type 9 - 10 Type 3 - 9.3 Wing 2w1 - 17.5 Wing 1w2 - 17 Wing 2w3 - 16.6 Wing 1w9 - 16 Wing 9w1 - 15.5 Wing 3w2 - 15.3 Wing 9w8 - 11.2 Wing 3w4 - 10.8 My husband thinks I am a 2 as well.. He feels I went too fast through the test... RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:15 PM But after reading the 8 he said that is more me than 2...... He is right here... RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:16 PM Yetti Wrote: Yetti Wrote: Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: I like being a doer type one.. We get things DONE! THinking is not good if you can't make the answers work.
Everybody has all types in themselves. It will be most healthy to become balanced, to use thinking, feeling and doing, all three of him. I have to remind myself of that, I cannot "think" my house clean
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 06:21 PM Yetti, do you have something like this (like an 8): you do something fully, or not at all? You said you were madly in love. That's an example: with full energy, excessive. You can be "on" or "off", nothing in between? RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:23 PM My husband says he does not believe in this stuff... He said he is very "Unimpressed with the test or any value it may have." RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:25 PM Five Wrote: Yetti, do you have something like this (like an 8): you do something fully, or not at all? You said you were madly in love. That's an example: with full energy, excessive. You can be "on" or "off", nothing in between?
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:28 PM Five Wrote: I don't know whether this link is already in this thread:
http://www.9types.com/descr/baron2.html Yetti, in this link scroll down and read relational 8 to check your type.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:30 PM Yetti Wrote: Five Wrote: I don't know whether this link is already in this thread:
http://www.9types.com/descr/baron2.html Yetti, in this link scroll down and read relational 8 to check your type.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-15-2007 06:31 PM If you all want to take a different (somewhat better, I think) test, you can download one from the link below--it's an excel file so you can go back and look at your answers. http://www.enneagramdimensions.net/whats_my_type.htm On the other hand, it might be more fun to go see the Harry Potter movie! (I don't think you're a 2, Yetti. But if you're an 8, then you have a connection to 2--as you feel safe and fulfilled, you'd be inclined to be generous towards the needs of others.) RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:32 PM energeia Wrote: If you all want to take a different (somewhat better, I think) test, you can download one from the link below--it's an excel file so you can go back and look at your answers.
http://www.enneagramdimensions.net/whats_my_type.htm On the other hand, it might be more fun to go see the Harry Potter movie! (I don't think you're a 2, Yetti. But if you're an 8, then you have a connection to 2--as you feel safe and fulfilled, you'd be inclined to be generous towards the needs of others.)
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 06:35 PM Yetti Wrote: My husband says he does not believe in this stuff... He said he is very "Unimpressed with the test or any value it may have."
If you know yourself well, you can avoid unnecessary misery. If you know other people well you can avoid conflicts and make communication much easier. Every type has a pinch, a button you don't want to push. If I know a person's type, I know what not to do. And I know what to do. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:36 PM Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: My husband says he does not believe in this stuff... He said he is very "Unimpressed with the test or any value it may have."
If you know yourself well, you can avoid unnecessary misery. If you know other people well you can avoid conflicts and make communication much easier. Every type has a pinch, a button you don't want to push. If I know a person's type, I know what not to do. And I know what to do.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 06:41 PM The 8: I'm O.K. if I'm in charge. You are O.K. if you let me be in charge. So my strategy (at work) with 8s would be: let them lead, I follow. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:41 PM about helping people... my husbands family and mine always felt we should treat people with the human dignity God gave them at birth, if they want help... My mother always did this.. people remember her for her compassion when people are ill, physically and mentally. I think I inherited this from her.. my father , like my husband, are less likely to get involved... I am usually my husbands consscious... He tends not to act on appropriate actions .. he likes being at home with no intrusions... I like solitude but will open my home to those in need or organizations who need help.. so we are both a mixed bag ..but it works... RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:42 PM Five Wrote: The 8:
I'm O.K. if I'm in charge. You are O.K. if you let me be in charge. So my strategy (at work) with 8s would be: let them lead, I follow.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 06:45 PM energeia Wrote: (I don't think you're a 2, Yetti. But if you're an 8, then you have a connection to 2--as you feel safe and fulfilled, you'd be inclined to be generous towards the needs of others.)
Exactly. And under stress 8s behave more like 5s, become more silent and introvert, start thinking instead of doing.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:46 PM Yetti Wrote: Five Wrote: The 8:
I'm O.K. if I'm in charge. You are O.K. if you let me be in charge. So my strategy (at work) with 8s would be: let them lead, I follow.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:49 PM Five Wrote: energeia Wrote: (I don't think you're a 2, Yetti. But if you're an 8, then you have a connection to 2--as you feel safe and fulfilled, you'd be inclined to be generous towards the needs of others.)
Exactly. And under stress 8s behave more like 5s, become more silent and introvert, start thinking instead of doing.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:51 PM When I am in the 5 mode... I am observing and calculating who everyone is and what the situation is... I am good at waiting and watching... and then I do get involved. IT takes some people off guard who think they have me pegged. I learned to do this early on as a child. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 06:51 PM Yetti Wrote: .. but then again.. I am good with people who are dictators.. I can play their game.. I don't battle for who is king of the mountain unless my odds are good.. I weigh the individual situation.. I am a good team player..but I do take my place if I can to be the leader, more than my husband.
There are 3 variables: RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 06:58 PM Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: .. but then again.. I am good with people who are dictators.. I can play their game.. I don't battle for who is king of the mountain unless my odds are good.. I weigh the individual situation.. I am a good team player..but I do take my place if I can to be the leader, more than my husband.
There are 3 variables:
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 07:01 PM Our daughter is a combination of both of us... She just wants to be a dictator of a third world island.. where the central location is a mall and the armed services wear designer uniforms <G> She is an ambitious young woman, and people gravitate to her like they do my husband... She has very good people skills. She gets input from my husband and me, and has private conversations with us respectively for certain advice she feels we have to offer. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 07:15 PM For me as a 5, it is good to think less and do more, especially physically. So I walk a lot, and indeed that makes me feel good. By doing more, following my body instincts and needs more, the result is I think less and feel more. Am more balanced. For 8s, it will be good to do less and feel more for others, be compassionate and helpful, sensitive, loving. More like 2s (although 2s are not in balance, 2s don't think enough, 2s repress thinking). You already do that, so you are rather balanced already, healthy. A balance of doing, thinking and feeling. A less healthy 8 will over-do and under-feel. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 07:31 PM energeia Wrote: (Note: I test higher in 8 and 1 than I do in 5...and I think this is because of being less inhibited than are more typical 5s. Very "what you see is what you get")
Energeia, maybe your high score in 8 might be related to a relatively stressfree childhood?
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 07:31 PM Five Wrote: For me as a 5, it is good to think less and do more, especially physically. So I walk a lot, and indeed that makes me feel good. By doing more, following my body instincts and needs more, the result is I think less and feel more. Am more balanced.
For 8s, it will be good to do less and feel more for others, be compassionate and helpful, sensitive, loving. More like 2s (although 2s are not in balance, 2s don't think enough, 2s repress thinking). You already do that, so you are rather balanced already, healthy. A balance of doing, thinking and feeling. A less healthy 8 will over-do and under-feel.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 07:37 PM I wonder... does anybody have thoughts/ideas about how I could make my enneagram knowledge and skills into my work, earn money with it? I have thought many times about, with the result that it remains a hobby only. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-15-2007 07:41 PM Yetti, I kind of doubt that your husband's a 2--I bet he's a 9. If he thinks that some of every type applies to him, he's more likely to be a 9. Just my guess. Five--I'm guessing soc/sp/sx for Yetti. She found her Mr Right and is happy with him, which Sx last folks are certainly capable of doing. I'm guessing her major energy thrust is mainly towards the world, hence the strong type 1 score, rather than needing the juice provided by intense one-on-one interactions. (Yetti--people discuss others' E type often--it's a way of understanding both people and the system better.....and it's fun. Hope you're not insulted--I don't get the sense that you mind this.) RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-15-2007 07:48 PM Five Wrote: I wonder... does anybody have thoughts/ideas about how I could make my enneagram knowledge and skills into my work, earn money with it? I have thought many times about, with the result that it remains a hobby only.
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-15-2007 07:50 PM I don't think this sort of thing is actually accurate to how the world works. As in, I don't think there's 9 types of people in the world, etc. I do think that the sort of things like "Don't do X to a person who fears Y" are real enough but they don't need a 9-type model to figure them out necessarily. There's a zillion models of personality out there and you can get those same ideas from every one. So I view this sort of thing as just a fun pastime more than anything, and I think believing in it as some kind of template to reality might be useful to some people, but in the end it's just another mental widget people use and I prefer reality to widgets in the end, like actually looking at people and seeing what they're like. That said, I do find it fun to do these things. I listed all the stuff in the baron2.html thing and came up with percentages for each type. By that, I'm a 5w4 most strongly (77.3% 5, 36% 4), but have a lot of qualities of an 8w9 (50% 8, 40% 9) as well. Which is usually how these things go for me. I also out of curiosity totaled things up by Self-Preservation, Relational, and Social, and found that my answers tended to be 47.6% self-preservation, 23.1% relational, and 40.3% social. Similarly on that other test someone just posted, 5w4 (54 and 46 respectively) with 8w9 also pretty high but lower than that (47 and 39 respectively). RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-15-2007 07:53 PM Thanks for sharing your scores, Anbuend. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 08:01 PM energeia Wrote: Yetti, I kind of doubt that your husband's a 2--I bet he's a 9. If he thinks that some of every type applies to him, he's more likely to be a 9. Just my guess.
All the data we have, although limited, suggests 9 only. Female 8s usually don't like male 2s, but like male 5s, 6s and 9s, that's another clue. So likely 9, not 2. energeia Wrote: Five--I'm guessing soc/sp/sx for Yetti. She found her Mr Right and is happy with him, which Sx last folks are certainly capable of doing. I'm guessing her major energy thrust is mainly towards the world, hence the strong type 1 score, rather than needing the juice provided by intense one-on-one interactions.
I thought sx first because Yetti mentioned sex related subjects in her posts. In one of the links there are 3 descriptions of 8s (sp, sx and soc), Yetti can check. Why do you think otherwise? RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 08:02 PM energeia Wrote: Yetti, I kind of doubt that your husband's a 2--I bet he's a 9. If he thinks that some of every type applies to him, he's more likely to be a 9. Just my guess.
Five--I'm guessing soc/sp/sx for Yetti. She found her Mr Right and is happy with him, which Sx last folks are certainly capable of doing. I'm guessing her major energy thrust is mainly towards the world, hence the strong type 1 score, rather than needing the juice provided by intense one-on-one interactions. (Yetti--people discuss others' E type often--it's a way of understanding both people and the system better.....and it's fun. Hope you're not insulted--I don't get the sense that you mind this.)
OMG... my husband and I are not insulted in the least.. Goodness. There is nothing on the net that really insults us . Often when I write or speak someone may think I have intense emotion behind it.. I don't . I tend to be very energy oriented with passion.. I do think it comes from my theatre... which do use in my lectures... I love multimedia and performances and exchange.. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 08:08 PM What I also found is my husband and I love being together and we love time alone to be ourselves.. he is more likely to want me around always... We also like our independance.. and we are not possessive. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-15-2007 08:13 PM Yetti Wrote: What I also found is my husband and I love being together and we love time alone to be ourselves.. he is more likely to want me around always... We also like our independance.. and we are not possessive.
So maybe the relational 9, see RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 08:20 PM Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: What I also found is my husband and I love being together and we love time alone to be ourselves.. he is more likely to want me around always... We also like our independance.. and we are not possessive.
So maybe the relational 9, see
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-15-2007 08:24 PM Five Wrote: Yetti Wrote: What I also found is my husband and I love being together and we love time alone to be ourselves.. he is more likely to want me around always... We also like our independance.. and we are not possessive.
So maybe the relational 9, see
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-15-2007 11:10 PM Yetti, my parents had a long and happy marriage (55 years until my father's death). She was a 1w2, he a 9w1. I cannot imagine being married to either one of them, but they made it work, using many of the strategies you have written about. She was the more dynamic of the two of them. It's really weird that people in your circle denigrate or want to break up your marriage. I haven't seen that kind of thing with the people I hang out around (admittedly a rather nerdly and/or gay crowd). I think it's great when partners stay together. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 01:33 AM energeia Wrote: Yetti, my parents had a long and happy marriage (55 years until my father's death). She was a 1w2, he a 9w1. I cannot imagine being married to either one of them, but they made it work, using many of the strategies you have written about. She was the more dynamic of the two of them. It's really weird that people in your circle denigrate or want to break up your marriage. I haven't seen that kind of thing with the people I hang out around (admittedly a rather nerdly and/or gay crowd). I think it's great when partners stay together.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 01:34 AM energeia Wrote: Yetti, my parents had a long and happy marriage (55 years until my father's death). She was a 1w2, he a 9w1. I cannot imagine being married to either one of them, but they made it work, using many of the strategies you have written about. She was the more dynamic of the two of them. It's really weird that people in your circle denigrate or want to break up your marriage. I haven't seen that kind of thing with the people I hang out around (admittedly a rather nerdly and/or gay crowd). I think it's great when partners stay together.
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-16-2007 01:35 AM My short-hand on 1's and 8's is that a 1 says "Everyone must follow the rules, especially me" while and 8 says "Everybody has to follow MY rules -- except me!" RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 01:51 AM Max the Bear Wrote: My short-hand on 1's and 8's is that a 1 says "Everyone must follow the rules, especially me" while and 8 says "Everybody has to follow MY rules -- except me!"
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-16-2007 02:08 AM Yetti, I had you figured for an 8 in your first few posts at AFF. Some people would say "takes one to know one." There's such a thing as an "Eight style" and it's usually hard to miss. (Though sometimes a particularly problematic 1 or a counter-phobic 6 can look a lot like an 8 on the surface.) You probably don't agree with everything in the 8 descriptions, but 8's seldom do. One thing that sometimes makes it hard for 8's to see themselves as 8's is that they are not really great at self-awareness. Plus, their favorite defense is Denial. (They especially deny being short on self-awareness. )
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:12 AM Max the Bear Wrote: Yetti, I had you figured for an 8 in your first few posts at AFF. Some people would say "takes one to know one."
There's such a thing as an "Eight style" and it's usually hard to miss. (Though sometimes a particularly problematic 1 or a counter-phobic 6 can look a lot like an 8 on the surface.) You probably don't agree with everything in the 8 descriptions, but 8's seldom do. One thing that sometimes makes it hard for 8's to see themselves as 8's is that they are not really great at self-awareness. Plus, their favorite defense is Denial. (They especially deny being short on self-awareness. )
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:14 AM Yetti Wrote: Max the Bear Wrote: Yetti, I had you figured for an 8 in your first few posts at AFF. Some people would say "takes one to know one."
There's such a thing as an "Eight style" and it's usually hard to miss. (Though sometimes a particularly problematic 1 or a counter-phobic 6 can look a lot like an 8 on the surface.) You probably don't agree with everything in the 8 descriptions, but 8's seldom do. One thing that sometimes makes it hard for 8's to see themselves as 8's is that they are not really great at self-awareness. Plus, their favorite defense is Denial. (They especially deny being short on self-awareness. )
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:41 AM The more I read on the board, the more I think I will just live my life out and not get involved with the aspergers movement. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:42 AM I am just going to run with the bulls in Spain. It's safer. <G> RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-16-2007 02:50 AM Yetti Wrote: INteresting you are stuck on denial label about me..
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:52 AM Yetti, I had you figured for an 8 in your first few posts at AFF. Some people would say "takes one to know one." There's such a thing as an "Eight style" and it's usually hard to miss. (Though sometimes a particularly problematic 1 or a counter-phobic 6 can look a lot like an 8 on the surface.) You probably don't agree with everything in the 8 descriptions, but 8's seldom do. One thing that sometimes makes it hard for 8's to see themselves as 8's is that they are not really great at self-awareness. Plus, their favorite defense is Denial. (They especially deny being short on self-awareness. ) RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:53 AM Max the Bear Wrote: Yetti Wrote: INteresting you are stuck on denial label about me..
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:53 AM Max......................................................
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:55 AM Max........................wanna meet after school on my turf?
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:55 AM I love being 56! RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:58 AM Yetti Wrote: I love being 56!
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-16-2007 03:03 AM Five Wrote: I wonder... does anybody have thoughts/ideas about how I could make my enneagram knowledge and skills into my work, earn money with it? I have thought many times about, with the result that it remains a hobby only.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 03:07 AM Am I being Ignored? Max the Bear Wrote: Five Wrote: I wonder... does anybody have thoughts/ideas about how I could make my enneagram knowledge and skills into my work, earn money with it? I have thought many times about, with the result that it remains a hobby only.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 03:07 AM Yetti Wrote: Am I being Ignored? Max the Bear Wrote: Five Wrote: I wonder... does anybody have thoughts/ideas about how I could make my enneagram knowledge and skills into my work, earn money with it? I have thought many times about, with the result that it remains a hobby only.
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-16-2007 03:13 AM Yetti, there are a lot of great Enneagram sites in the Internet, and people here that know more about it than I do. The Ennegram is primarily a practice that leads to self-discovery. Approach it in that spirit. http://www.enneagram-instrument.org/links.htm RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 03:49 AM Max the Bear Wrote: Yetti, there are a lot of great Enneagram sites in the Internet, and people here that know more about it than I do.
The Ennegram is primarily a practice that leads to self-discovery. Approach it in that spirit. http://www.enneagram-instrument.org/links.htm
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-16-2007 07:53 AM Max the Bear Wrote: Five, where have you studied the Enneagram? or are you self-taught? I've met professionals who certainly don't know more than you do. Are you connected to any of the professional organizations?
I'm self-taught, never followed a training for this and not connected to an organization. Max the Bear Wrote: Most of the people I know who use the Enneagram as part of their careers are therapists, counselors or coaches. The Personal Strengths Coaching program at San Francisco State University has an Enneagram course as part of its coach certificate curriculum.
Something like working in a personal strenghts coaching program is a possibility I'm thinking of. Especially for business people because I have experience to work in a big company, I know their problems. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 02:29 PM My husbands former company once used a service like this for NT etc etc. It just cost a lot of money and really did not tell anyone something they already did not know... I don't see where it helped them.. like horoscope stuff. You get these things all the time.. some new gimmick for filing and labeling people's personalities... It does nothing for a company. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-16-2007 04:33 PM It can shed light on certain types of conflicts or disconnects between pairs of individuals. For example, it helped me to realize that my boss is a flaming 7. Great at visionary, not so great at detail-oriented follow-through. And a master at reframing conversations or situations. Stuff that used to bother me I now think is amusing. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 05:14 PM energeia Wrote: It can shed light on certain types of conflicts or disconnects between pairs of individuals. For example, it helped me to realize that my boss is a flaming 7. Great at visionary, not so great at detail-oriented follow-through. And a master at reframing conversations or situations. Stuff that used to bother me I now think is amusing.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-16-2007 07:10 PM energeia Wrote: Stuff that used to bother me I now think is amusing.
Exactly. Sometimes people ask me: why are you smiling? I say: Oh, just nothing RE: Enneagram - Marieke - 07-16-2007 07:43 PM Yetti Wrote: energeia Wrote: It can shed light on certain types of conflicts or disconnects between pairs of individuals. For example, it helped me to realize that my boss is a flaming 7. Great at visionary, not so great at detail-oriented follow-through. And a master at reframing conversations or situations. Stuff that used to bother me I now think is amusing.
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-16-2007 08:17 PM Yetti Wrote: My husbands former company once used a service like this for NT etc etc. It just cost a lot of money and really did not tell anyone something they already did not know... I don't see where it helped them.. like horoscope stuff. You get these things all the time.. some new gimmick for filing and labeling people's personalities... It does nothing for a company.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:20 PM Marieke Wrote: Yetti Wrote: energeia Wrote: It can shed light on certain types of conflicts or disconnects between pairs of individuals. For example, it helped me to realize that my boss is a flaming 7. Great at visionary, not so great at detail-oriented follow-through. And a master at reframing conversations or situations. Stuff that used to bother me I now think is amusing.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:22 PM Yetti Wrote: Marieke Wrote: Yetti Wrote: energeia Wrote: It can shed light on certain types of conflicts or disconnects between pairs of individuals. For example, it helped me to realize that my boss is a flaming 7. Great at visionary, not so great at detail-oriented follow-through. And a master at reframing conversations or situations. Stuff that used to bother me I now think is amusing.
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-16-2007 08:24 PM I don't think it's your happiness people are responding to this way, but your characterization of other people as "rotten". RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-16-2007 08:31 PM Yetti, is this what you mean: if a person is miserable, and another person feels sorry for that, then in a way you double the crying and weeping. On the other hand, if you solve the problem of the miserable person, you end up with 2 happy persons. If someone is hungry, give him bread, not pity. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:36 PM Five Wrote: Yetti, is this what you mean: if a person is miserable, and another person feels sorry for that, then in a way you double the crying and weeping. On the other hand, if you solve the problem of the miserable person, you end up with 2 happy persons. If someone is hungry, give him bread, not pity.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:37 PM Yetti Wrote: Five Wrote: Yetti, is this what you mean: if a person is miserable, and another person feels sorry for that, then in a way you double the crying and weeping. On the other hand, if you solve the problem of the miserable person, you end up with 2 happy persons. If someone is hungry, give him bread, not pity.
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-16-2007 08:38 PM What Five said makes sense. But it also only makes sense if the solutions offered actually match the problems in question. It is a problem to refuse to do something when there is a way to do it. It is also a problem to offer solutions that do not fit the problem and then complain (when people are not jumping up and down with gratitude for your solution) that nobody wants to solve their problems. Imagine the "teach a man to fish..." analogy. One person sees the hungry person and only gives pity. That is a problem. Another person sees the hungry person and gives them fish. That is better than the first person, and possibly a temporary solution, but still could be a problem if the hungry person is capable of getting their own fish. A third person tries to teach the hungry person to fish. This third person does so by telling the hungry person to hang a fishing net in the tree next to their house. The hungry person says, "But there are no fish in the air." The third person gets disgruntled with the hungry person and says "Don't be so negative, do you want fish or don't you?" The fourth person actually shows the hungry person how to catch fish in the lake by the house. The tricky part is that the third person is dead certain that he's actually identical to the fourth person. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:41 PM anbuend Wrote: What Five said makes sense.
But it also only makes sense if the solutions offered actually match the problems in question. It is a problem to refuse to do something when there is a way to do it. It is also a problem to offer solutions that do not fit the problem and then complain (when people are not jumping up and down with gratitude for your solution) that nobody wants to solve their problems. Imagine the "teach a man to fish..." analogy. One person sees the hungry person and only gives pity. That is a problem. Another person sees the hungry person and gives them fish. That is better than the first person, and possibly a temporary solution, but still could be a problem if the hungry person is capable of getting their own fish. A third person tries to teach the hungry person to fish. This third person does so by telling the hungry person to hang a fishing net in the tree next to their house. The hungry person says, "But there are no fish in the air." The third person gets disgruntled with the hungry person and says "Don't be so negative, do you want fish or don't you?" The fourth person actually shows the hungry person how to catch fish in the lake by the house. The tricky part is that the third person is dead certain that he's actually identical to the fourth person.
RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:44 PM As I stated many times.. I am not a therapist nor do I wish to be.. but it frustrates me to see this going on over and over... I think I am best just tending to my own needs in the R world and at national conferences than things like this... Too many who use these forums for other things... than education... or self improvement. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:44 PM Take care all!.. I think I have learned positively all I can here... RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-16-2007 08:47 PM Don't forget to read Gurdjieff. RE: Enneagram - Yetti - 07-16-2007 08:51 PM Five Wrote: Don't forget to read Gurdjieff.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-16-2007 08:54 PM I learned a lot from you Yetti, you're a good person. Thank you. RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-16-2007 08:55 PM Wow, well I guess if you assume everyone has (and should have) identical goals in using a forum to your own goals in using it (and identical ways of going about those, that are always recognizable to you), then you are going to end up incredibly disappointed and possibly angry. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-16-2007 09:23 PM If nobody else is going to say this, I will: Yetti, please stay, we can learn so much more from you. I hope to meet you again tomorrow. See you. RE: Enneagram - Marieke - 07-16-2007 10:06 PM Five Wrote: If nobody else is going to say this, I will:
Yetti, please stay, we can learn so much more from you. I hope to meet you again tomorrow. See you.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-16-2007 10:23 PM A forum such as this serves multiple purposes. Me, I'm most interested in some of the discussions, and I think it's great that we have people of all different ages, genders, orientations, abilities entering into the conversations. I'm curious about Asperger's--in general theory, how it works itself out in different individuals, and what it has meant for my life. Yetti, in my experience, people don't generally want advice unless they specifically ask for it, and even then, they often don't want it. (Does this stop me from giving advice? Well hell no!) And I think it's natural that each person here gravitates to some people and might be abhorred by others. There's picking and choosing among the tidbits that are offered...take what is meaningful or useful. Since you've lived 55 years without Asperger's as a conceptual framework, it's clear that this isn't something you have to have in order to live a good life. Maybe after your discovery and information-gathering frenzy has hit saturation, you'll pretty much pick up as you were before, but with more insights. I don't know. I second Five's sentiment--I hope that you'll stay. And I second Marieke's opinion that you might be reading into some posts criticism that is not intended by the poster but felt as such by you. What Marieke said about the literal thing--I agree. I've had people here project unintended meaning onto what I've written and it can be really frustrating. (Not been my personal experience with you....but rather is my observation from reading some of the back-and-forths between you and some other posters.) Regarding personality theories like enneagram, Myers-Briggs and even, gasp, astrology, they're one of my aspie-style special interests. They give me roadmaps by which to interpret why people might behave the ways they behave, prioritize the ways they prioritize, etc. I've found it really helpful in making sense of some of the interpersonal mazes I find myself in. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-17-2007 02:27 AM Don't worry about Yetti leaving, Five. No one in the history of the Internet has ever said, "Well, that's it. I'm leaving," and actually left. RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-17-2007 03:43 AM No one in the history of the Internet has ever said, "Well, that's it. I'm leaving," and actually left. Point. That's why I tend not to announce my departure from somewhere unless it's to let people know where to find me or something. (Among other things, it creates all kinds of sudden posts on other people's parts on the order of "Don't leave," which when I really do want to leave at least for that point, is heavily annoying.) RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-17-2007 03:51 AM anbuend Wrote: No one in the history of the Internet has ever said, "Well, that's it. I'm leaving," and actually left.
it creates all kinds of sudden posts on other people's parts on the order of "Don't leave," which when I really do want to leave at least for that point, is heavily annoying.)
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-17-2007 04:09 AM I don't think all people who announce they're leaving are just trying to get people to ask them to stay. I'm sure some are. But others are just not thinking about that at all when they say they're leaving. They either think it's polite to say something, or they are doing some equivalent of slamming the door on their way out, or they have some other reason to say they're leaving altogether (I'm sure there are tons). RE: Enneagram - Sophist - 07-17-2007 10:51 PM I don't think I've ever "left" anywhere... been banned (erm, WP, *cough, cough*), but not really left. More often I slowly dwindle out and then once in awhile pop back in for a looksie, a little wave, and then I leave again. RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-18-2007 12:11 AM Only place I've ever been banned on (that I remember, at any rate) is here, and that was only a temporary one. Surprised, given that I used to have a really nasty temper, that it never happened more places. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-18-2007 01:15 PM Here's the Enneagram class at San Francisco State University that I'll be taking: http://www.cel.sfsu.edu/coaching/classes.cfm?selection=classes&ID=936104&Period=20074 RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-18-2007 05:23 PM Are you going to the enneagram conference in redwood city? aug 2-5. I'm really looking forward to it, to learning tons. http://www.internationalenneagram.org/ieaconferences.php RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-19-2007 12:22 AM Too much $$$ for me. Have you seen Don Richard Riso before? He claims to be a 4, but he sure seems fiveish (and Aspie-ish) to me. His work seems much better (and he seems much more self-aware) in the years since he and Hudson got together. RE: Enneagram - woodpeace - 07-19-2007 12:37 PM In the classic enneagram test my result was: "You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 5w4." The types with the highest test scores were: " Type 5 - 11 Type 4 - 7.7 Type 9 - 7.3 Type 6 - 3" RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-19-2007 05:21 PM Max--No, I haven't seen Riso--hopefully I will at the conference. Several enneagram authors are supposed to be there. I had to overcome my fivish fiscal retentiveness and cough up the money to register. But...what am I saving it for, anyway? RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-19-2007 09:00 PM Energia, I wish you could meet Helen Palmer -- you would love her; a wonderful person and still my favorite Enneagram teacher. Her work has led her more toward the study of intuition, but what a great natural-born teacher she is. Do you live in the Bay Area, or are you traveling to the conference? RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-19-2007 10:10 PM I'd love to meet Helen Palmer--I don't think that she'll be at the conference. I've read her books, and even though I cannot relate to her description of five hardly at all, I like much of what she says. We joke on the EIDB about her "five" being sp/sp/sp. I'm soc/sx/sp I'm travelling there from Seattle. RE: Enneagram - Ando - 07-19-2007 10:58 PM I just tested as a 3w4. It makes sense because I have huge ambitions and I'm always afraid that I'm going to end up being a loser. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-20-2007 12:13 AM Interesting, Energeia. I used to feel Riso was way off base with his description of Fives -- all Mr. Spock two-dimentionality. I figured it was because he was so out-of-touch with his own Five-ness (and delusional about being a Four). Again, he was a very repressed person at that point. V E R Y. He became much better on Five and in other ways in the last 20 years. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-20-2007 01:07 AM Ando Wrote: I just tested as a 3w4.
It makes sense because I have huge ambitions and I'm always afraid that I'm going to end up being a loser.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-20-2007 01:09 AM Max--I swear, I read many 5 descriptions and think--No way am I a 5! But then....I look at the big picture. (I have a pretty strong line to 8 and am social first--hence more outgoing than the "standard" 5). Sounds like you've known Riso a long time--do you personally know him or is it that you've been following him in action? RE: Enneagram - Ando - 07-20-2007 02:15 AM energeia Wrote: I'm speculating that 3 would be a fairly rare type for autistics--the 3's strength (one of them) lies in being able to easily adapt an image to fit the prevailing expectation of whatever contexts the 3 inhabits.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-20-2007 04:56 AM You did. RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-20-2007 08:13 AM "Five" (original poster of this thread) suggested I might be a 6. Energeia, many months ago, you said I might be a 6. What do you guys think about this? Is 6 fairly common on the spectrum? RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-20-2007 08:20 AM Yetti Wrote: Marieke Wrote: Yetti Wrote: energeia Wrote: It can shed light on certain types of conflicts or disconnects between pairs of individuals. For example, it helped me to realize that my boss is a flaming 7. Great at visionary, not so great at detail-oriented follow-through. And a master at reframing conversations or situations. Stuff that used to bother me I now think is amusing.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-20-2007 08:23 AM Yetti Wrote: anbuend Wrote: What Five said makes sense.
But it also only makes sense if the solutions offered actually match the problems in question. It is a problem to refuse to do something when there is a way to do it. It is also a problem to offer solutions that do not fit the problem and then complain (when people are not jumping up and down with gratitude for your solution) that nobody wants to solve their problems. Imagine the "teach a man to fish..." analogy. One person sees the hungry person and only gives pity. That is a problem. Another person sees the hungry person and gives them fish. That is better than the first person, and possibly a temporary solution, but still could be a problem if the hungry person is capable of getting their own fish. A third person tries to teach the hungry person to fish. This third person does so by telling the hungry person to hang a fishing net in the tree next to their house. The hungry person says, "But there are no fish in the air." The third person gets disgruntled with the hungry person and says "Don't be so negative, do you want fish or don't you?" The fourth person actually shows the hungry person how to catch fish in the lake by the house. The tricky part is that the third person is dead certain that he's actually identical to the fourth person.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-20-2007 08:28 AM Yetti Wrote: The more I read on the board, the more I think I will just live my life out and not get involved with the aspergers movement.
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-20-2007 09:39 AM Actually, Energeia, I attended a couple of his workshops very early, I think, in his career -- around the time of his first book. I was turned off by some of his personal qualities -- plus, I think I was somewhat resistant out of loyalty to Helen Palmer. (She was the Big Name at that point and Riso was the new kid on the block -- and as I said, I just adore Helen.) He struck me as deeply closeted and a shameless self-promoter. I didn't pay much attention for quite a few years. When Riso became Riso & Hudson -- maybe at the time of the big blue book ("Wisdom of the Enneagram"?) -- I felt his work has matured and that the additional point of view much improved his perspective. RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-20-2007 10:25 AM Yetti Wrote: Now you are reading into things... Seeming to say is your assumption... no .. I Know there are aspies out there who are not getting diagnosed or treated and are quite happy.. to me a support group is about all the good the bad and the ugly... I am not a negative person but I do get tired of a lot of whining when there is good advice and not just from me... I Like to focus on the positive... all i see is people passing up not only my advice which you are focused on ME as usual... but others good advice... I read a lot of great advice on here only to see the same person go on and on about the same problem...
Support groups also celebrate success and look to the positive to help.. not just misery loves company... And BTW several told me that most who go to these internet or support groups are the ones with the severest problems that many are adusting fine and do not seek these places... I am beginning to think they are right.. It did not come from me but others who are Aspies and NTs.. So stop with Yetti is bragging etc etc.. I think I am getting a lot of good information from all sides and take it all in.... NOthing wrong with being happy! Try it sometimes.. it feels good.My husband agrees as do many I have talked with .... I tried starting a positive support group and I basically get are the ODDs and people who never take advice.. its incessant complaints... NO JOY! One kid on this line talked about his getting scholarship... I did not se many congratuate him as should have... This is all way too negative for me.. and I think I will be leaving all these forums and support groups... I can go to the conferences myself and learn first hand... Some just want to blame others and stay miserable all their lives esp the adults... and look for company who share the same misery , not to help but to pat each other on the back that no there is no hope... It gets old!
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-20-2007 06:30 PM Batman55 Wrote: "Five" (original poster of this thread) suggested I might be a 6. Energeia, many months ago, you said I might be a 6.
What do you guys think about this? Is 6 fairly common on the spectrum?
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-20-2007 08:21 PM energeia Wrote: You did.
Energeia, I agree. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-20-2007 08:45 PM energeia Wrote: Batman55 Wrote: "Five" (original poster of this thread) suggested I might be a 6. Energeia, many months ago, you said I might be a 6.
What do you guys think about this? Is 6 fairly common on the spectrum?
The only information we have is written texts and answers from people, so there is a risk of typing persons wrongly. But having said that, I think Batman55 is a 6. One thing you do, Batman55, is ask a lot of questions (like type 6, the questioner), but I see many more clues. By the way, there are 2 kinds of 6 (like a 1, feeling supports doing, or like a 2, doing supports feeling). RE: Enneagram - grizeldatee - 07-20-2007 08:56 PM Took 2 tests linked in this thread. One said most likely a 5, 9w8 taking wings into account. The other gave me this: Type 1 = 4 Type 2 = 1 Type 3 = 3 Type 4 = 4 Type 5 = 8 Type 6 = 4 Type 7 = 3 Type 8 = 2 Type 9 = 7 I took the first test a couple of days ago. I took pretty much all the tests a couple of days ago. I figured I'd see if it would replicate at a different time of day on a different type of day. Pretty consistent. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-20-2007 09:04 PM Grizelda--5 and 9 can be lookalike types--both being in the "withdrawn" triad. A way to distinguish them is that 9s are comfort-oriented and will like to sooth over conflict (sometimes by avoidance, at a cost to self) in order to restore equanimity. 5s are more mentally high-strung--if conflict is the price to be paid for getting at truth and insight, they're more likely to take it on than 9s. 5s, through questioning, will disturb peace. Max--thanks for answering about Riso...will let you know what I think after the conference...and Five, thanks for the good wishes. Batman--I think there's a good chance you're a 6. But I'm not altogether sure. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-20-2007 09:16 PM Batman55 Wrote: Is 6 fairly common on the spectrum?
I can be wrong, but from what I've seen many people here are 6s, I have seen both men and women here. I don't think it is good to mention their names until they start posting in this thread.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-21-2007 08:01 AM energeia Wrote: Batman55 Wrote: "Five" (original poster of this thread) suggested I might be a 6. Energeia, many months ago, you said I might be a 6.
What do you guys think about this? Is 6 fairly common on the spectrum?
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-21-2007 08:03 AM Five Wrote: energeia Wrote: Batman55 Wrote: "Five" (original poster of this thread) suggested I might be a 6. Energeia, many months ago, you said I might be a 6.
What do you guys think about this? Is 6 fairly common on the spectrum?
The only information we have is written texts and answers from people, so there is a risk of typing persons wrongly. But having said that, I think Batman55 is a 6. One thing you do, Batman55, is ask a lot of questions (like type 6, the questioner), but I see many more clues. By the way, there are 2 kinds of 6 (like a 1, feeling supports doing, or like a 2, doing supports feeling).
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-21-2007 08:07 AM On closer examination, it seems Type 4 transformation is also very close to my experience. I can't be sure... RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-21-2007 08:27 AM 6s do one thing continuously: they doubt. That's also a strength, it's a scientific attitude. 4s postpone when something is boring, when they are not in the mood. 6s postpone when they have to take a profile, when they have to act as an authority. RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-21-2007 10:02 AM Five Wrote: 6s do one thing continuously: they doubt. That's also a strength, it's a scientific attitude.
4s postpone when something is boring, when they are not in the mood. 6s postpone when they have to take a profile, when they have to act as an authority.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-21-2007 10:07 AM Five Wrote: 6s do one thing continuously: they doubt. That's also a strength, it's a scientific attitude.
4s postpone when something is boring, when they are not in the mood. 6s postpone when they have to take a profile, when they have to act as an authority.
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-21-2007 03:36 PM A person's Ennegram type is largely formed by his early life experience. When that experience is one of exclusion and being treated as "different" in an unacceptable way, I think that tends to form a 6 world view. I've known a much larger percentage of Sixes among excluded/different groups (gay, black) than among the general population. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-21-2007 07:16 PM Batman55 Wrote: [I do all of these things.
I don't know what's up.
One possibility can be type 6 of the 1 kind. When a 1 is rather stressed, he gets 4 properties, becomes more emotional unbalanced. In other words, it's possible to be a 6 and recognise yourself in 4 too. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-22-2007 09:03 AM I recently saw an enneagram book and did not buy it because Lady Diana was, in my opinion, wrongly typed in it. The book said she's a 4, but I don't think so. To my surprise I see Riso also mistyped her, as a 6: http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/enfame.htm I won't say yet what type I think she really is. What do all of you think? RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-22-2007 09:08 AM I'm not a big PD fan so I don't know enough about her... but I can see a case for Diana being a 4, yet I can also see her as a 3 with both 2 and 4 wings apparent. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-22-2007 09:15 AM Five & Energeia I score quite high on both 8 and 4 -- usually almost a tie. I've been told that's impossible because a 4 and an 8 are "nothing" alike. What made me think of this is was Five's rejection of the erroneous Diana categorization. Similarly, I have seen my idol Bette Davis show up on both 4 and 8 list -- there must be some connection, commonality or overlap, at least for me and Miss Davis. Helen Palmer said I was absolutely, unequivocally a -- well, I'd like to hear from you two first...
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-22-2007 03:53 PM What always makes me skeptical of these systems, actually, is the fact that just about any type can be linked to any other, such that if you behave more like another type than your typing category seems to suggest, it can be explained away. For instance, let's say we're talking about a Type 6. If you act like a 5 or a 7, those are your wings. If you act like a 3 or a 9, those are the directions you go when healthy or unhealthy. You can also apparently be, as Five described, like a 1 (feeling supports doing) or a 2 (doing supports feeling). And if you are a 6 who is like a 1, you might also show traits of a 4 (or a 7 I'd presume). So if you are a 6 who is like a 2, you might also show traits of an 8. So, then you could be like a 1 (one type of 6), like a 2 (another type of 6), a 3 (one direction a 6 might go in), a 4 (a direction a 6-like-a-1 might go in), a 5 (a wing of the 6), a 6 (the type you supposedly are), a 7 (another wing), an 8 (a direction a 6-like-a-2 might go in), and a 9 (a direction a 6 might go in). So the system conveniently accounts for any traits you have that are in any other type that your own, therefore being impossible to prove wrong. Which is why I don't take it as seriously as some do. A little handwaving can explain any discrepancies. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-22-2007 05:07 PM Anbuend--you go, girl, that was GOOD! (Seriously....very succinctly put). And when you throw in the instinctual variants (social, self-pres, sexual), the typing problem gets even more complicated, because some variants "go against" type--like Sx and 5. I'm not altogether convinced of my type or the types of some of the complex personalites that I know. The way I'd explain the problem is that it can be hard to delineate the primary or most dominant fixation in a person who has a wide range of defensive responses. Or, conversely, in a person who has developed flexibility and adaptability with respect to the difficulties life throws them. The idea here isn't to limit oneself to a type but to understand driving forces behind one's responses to life. Re: Princess Di--I don't know all that much about her. But I could see type 2 as a possibility. I get the impression that she was not an especially wanted child--she had some older sisters. She was looking for love, and the idea of being mated to royalty might have been appealing to a 2 (ego-flattery). But, she didn't receive love--I'm guessing that she tried various A, B, C strategies to no avail....and then went to 8 in major ways. She stood up to the queen by virtue of doing her AIDS outreach and other activities. She saw a need and decided to fill it. Re: Max the bear--not enough data for me to guess at your type. If you test high in 4 and 8, that suggests you could be a reactive, leaving therefore 6 as an alternate possibility--cp6w7 perhaps? (grin). RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-22-2007 06:56 PM Max the Bear Wrote: Helen Palmer said I was absolutely, unequivocally a
3
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-22-2007 07:03 PM anbuend Wrote: So the system conveniently accounts for any traits you have that are in any other type that your own,
Excellent, you understand, you are very rational. anbuend Wrote: therefore being impossible to prove wrong.
That's why I like it, because I'm always right this way (just joking). RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-22-2007 07:05 PM energeia Wrote: Re: Princess Di--I don't know all that much about her. But I could see type 2 as a possibility. I get the impression that she was not an especially wanted child--she had some older sisters. She was looking for love, and the idea of being mated to royalty might have been appealing to a 2 (ego-flattery). But, she didn't receive love--I'm guessing that she tried various A, B, C strategies to no avail....and then went to 8 in major ways. She stood up to the queen by virtue of doing her AIDS outreach and other activities. She saw a need and decided to fill it.
That's what I thought, a 2.
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-22-2007 07:07 PM (And I suppose if I analyze the thing in this way it "proves" I'm a type 5 :-P ) RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-22-2007 07:23 PM anbuend Wrote: (And I suppose if I analyze the thing in this way it "proves" I'm a type 5 :-P )
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-22-2007 07:39 PM Palmer once said (of herself) "When I'm researching, I research like a 5. When I'm taking care of my kids, I attend to them like a 2. When I'm negotiating a contract, I negotiate like an 8. But I walk down the street like a 6. Most of us can and do display traits from almost all nine types when those traits are called for. But there is usually the type that just how we are "walking down the street" -- how we are when we're not being situationally tugged to function as one of the other types. People also get very caught up in observing behaviors and forget that the motivation behind the behavior is very defining. RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-22-2007 08:58 PM I'm not actually that interested in "identifying with my fiveness" -- that would presume that such a thing as "fiveness" actually existed. I find widgets such as this one entertaining but not a useful way of looking at the world. RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-22-2007 09:04 PM By which I mean, it's far more interesting to me to look at the world in order to understand it, rather than to look at a bunch of little pretty artistically-designed ideas that float in the air above the world, and get so wrapped up in those that I actually think they represent the world. The Enneagram and similar things strike me as the latter sort of thing. They are symbolic systems for understanding the world through, and that's my least effective method for understanding the world. Symbols seem useful for communication, but for understanding what's in front of you they seem to leave a lot to be desired. I'd rather just look at what's in front of me. I see patterns but they sure don't conform to any 9-type model no matter how complex it's made. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-22-2007 09:56 PM Yes, anbuend, you've made your aversion to the Ennegram clear and I assume you can move on now. RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-22-2007 10:34 PM I didn't say I had an aversion to it, I just don't believe in it the way some people do. It doesn't mean I don't ever want to discuss it, or that I need to "move on" just because some people take it a lot more seriously than I do. As I said before, it's interesting, and kind of fun (thus hardly an "aversion"), I just feel the need to insert a reality-check now and then as to what exactly it is we're talking about here. RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-22-2007 10:44 PM As in, basically, I didn't know this was a thread solely for people who believed over a certain amount in the Enneagram. I thought it was a thread for discussion of the Enneagram, which includes varying degrees of skepticism about it. People on here talk about how useful they find it to type people or themselves by the Enneagram, and from the look of it this thread includes everyone from people with a vague casual interest to people who attend entire conferences on the thing. I actually have read a number of books on the topic due to friends who were interested in it, which puts me beyond the vague casual Internet test-taking sort of person in terms of how much research I've done in the topic, but I also have not spent any money or time going to conferences about it and probably wouldn't even if I had the money to throw around. So to that degree my interest in it has probably gone beyond some others who have posted to this thread. (I have also studied the MBTI in roughly as much depth, which is to say, not as far as a person could, but further than most people do. I have identical reservations about reality of the the MBTI although I find the Enneagram more fun than the MBTI.) At any rate, the thread seems to contain people of varying degrees of interest in it, and also of varying degrees of belief in it. I would think that if people on this thread are entitled to repeatedly type each other as if the types are real and discuss that in depth, then I am equally entitled to (when the topic seems to come up) mention what I see as the shortcomings of personality-typing systems such as this one, and elaborate on why I believe this. I have no clue why both ideas could not exist on this thread or why the one would detract from the other. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-23-2007 04:49 AM Anbuend--no problem with your expressions of enneagram skepticism on my end. I'm all for discussion. (Can't speak for Max, but Max doesn't speak for me, either.) Quote: They are symbolic systems for understanding the world through, and that's my least effective method for understanding the world. Symbols seem useful for communication, but for understanding what's in front of you they seem to leave a lot to be desired.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-23-2007 07:36 AM In my view, the enneagram is a very useful model of the mind. The mind is a very complex biological mechanism. But people are more than their minds (I like the word being but you can call it soul). People have a subjective factor, people are more than complex moving objects. The enneagram describes only the mechanical, unconscious part of us. The more healthy a person, the more conscious/aware, the more flexible in their behavioural patterns, the harder to determine their type (because healthy people are more rooted in their subjective factor, they use their mind, their bio-computer, instead of being used by it). My interest in the subjective factor made me interested in religions, to compliment my interest in the enneagram. RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-23-2007 08:39 AM anbuend Wrote: By which I mean, it's far more interesting to me to look at the world in order to understand it, rather than to look at a bunch of little pretty artistically-designed ideas that float in the air above the world, and get so wrapped up in those that I actually think they represent the world. The Enneagram and similar things strike me as the latter sort of thing. They are symbolic systems for understanding the world through, and that's my least effective method for understanding the world. Symbols seem useful for communication, but for understanding what's in front of you they seem to leave a lot to be desired. I'd rather just look at what's in front of me. I see patterns but they sure don't conform to any 9-type model no matter how complex it's made.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-23-2007 08:47 AM Five Wrote: In my view, the enneagram is a very useful model of the mind. The mind is a very complex biological mechanism. But people are more than their minds (I like the word being but you can call it soul). People have a subjective factor, people are more than complex moving objects. The enneagram describes only the mechanical, unconscious part of us. The more healthy a person, the more conscious/aware, the more flexible in their behavioural patterns, the harder to determine their type (because healthy people are more rooted in their subjective factor, they use their mind, their bio-computer, instead of being used by it). My interest in the subjective factor made me interested in religions, to compliment my interest in the enneagram.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-23-2007 10:47 AM Here's what I got on the Classic Enneagram Test, from Eclectic Energies: You are most likely a type 5 or 6. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 5w4 or 5w6 or 6w5. It is not clear from these test results which Enneagram type and wing you are. To determine your true type, you might want to start by considering the types with the highest scores on the lists below. Also, there are many fine books and other websites that contain detailed descriptions of the types. Consulting these might give you the information you need to determine your true type. As knowing your Enneagram type involves self-knowledge, you might want to observe and analyze your behavior and motivations. You might also benefit from taking the test again later. (Note that your lowest scores may be omitted.) Type 5 - 10.7 Type 6 - 10.7 Type 4 - 10.3 Type 9 - 8 Type 7 - 6.7 Wing 5w6 - 16 Wing 6w5 - 16 Wing 5w4 - 15.8 Wing 4w5 - 15.7 Wing 6w7 - 14 Wing 4w3 - 12.7 Wing 7w6 - 12.1 Wing 9w1 - 9.3 Wing 9w8 - 8.2 Wing 7w8 - 6.9 RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-23-2007 10:55 AM Enneagram Test with Instinctual Variant results You are most likely a type 4 (the Individualist) with 5 wing Social variant Type 4 SO Type 5 SP Type 6 SP Type 1 SP Type 9 SP Type 8 SP Type 7 SO Type 3 SX Type 2 SP The list shows how likely it is that you are each enneagram type. Most people will be the type at the top of the list, however, your actual personality type might be somewhat lower in it (usually it's in the top 3). Your instinctual variant is most likely the one indicated next to your actual type. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-23-2007 04:12 PM Batman--try on 6w5 for size. RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-24-2007 09:44 AM energeia Wrote: Batman--try on 6w5 for size.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-24-2007 10:25 AM Batman55 Wrote: energeia Wrote: Batman--try on 6w5 for size.
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-24-2007 01:45 PM Batman55 Wrote: My mistake: I just realized that there are only 18 possible combinations on the Enneagram, and 6w4 is not one of them.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-24-2007 04:29 PM Some theorists advocate the concept of "trifix", meaning that you have a dominant fixation for each of the three head-gut-heart groupings. In my case, for example, 5 is my main type (head), but my trifix would be 5-1-2 (1 from the gut triad, and 2 from the heart triad). Using this idea, Batman could have a 6-9-4 trifix possibly. Of course, one might object that this idea as yet another example of expanding the system to the point where it can explain everything and therefore nothing. Nonetheless, I have found it helpful. For example, I see within myself that "give in order to get" motivation characteristic of type 2--it's a drive to be connected. Even though it runs counter to my 5 drive towards self-sufficiency, it is still operative. And I've had to own that love-seeking part of myself. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-24-2007 07:15 PM Batman55: I think 6w5 is more likely than other options, mainly because your doubt and uncertainty are so strong, you ask so many questions. As I said earlier, that trait can be positive, good. 6w5 doesn't mean you don't have feelings. I, as a 5w6 (which is different from 6w5 but also in the thinking triad) am bothered by feelings (fear, anxiety, anger) often. When you said "...question things..." that's like a 6 (or 5). When you took my general statement about healthy/flexible personally, that's how a 4 would react. For example when somebody says to find the enneagram nonsense, I don't take that personally (otherwise I could be a 4). By the way, I don't think you're unhealthy. I myself am much more inflexible than I would like. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-24-2007 07:21 PM energeia Wrote: For example, I see within myself that "give in order to get" motivation characteristic of type 2--it's a drive to be connected. Even though it runs counter to my 5 drive towards self-sufficiency, it is still operative. And I've had to own that love-seeking part of myself.
I was surprised to find out that when I'm at ease and feeling like an 8, I start responding like a 2, fully unconsciously. For example spontaneously telling strangers who seem to be lost which direction to take.
RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 07-25-2007 08:35 AM Five Wrote: energeia Wrote: For example, I see within myself that "give in order to get" motivation characteristic of type 2--it's a drive to be connected. Even though it runs counter to my 5 drive towards self-sufficiency, it is still operative. And I've had to own that love-seeking part of myself.
I was surprised to find out that when I'm at ease and feeling like an 8, I start responding like a 2, fully unconsciously. For example spontaneously telling strangers who seem to be lost which direction to take.
RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-25-2007 09:19 AM The trifix is new to me, too. (Okay, I'm busted; I haven't been reading much on the Enneagram for a few years... Batman, I agree that 6 is most likely your real point. 4 results are often inflated when one is going through a period of depression. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 07-25-2007 09:40 AM Dang, Energeia! You are so cutting-edge! I could find almost nothing about the trifix on Google. Tell us what you know! Here's the best little bit I found on the Internet, and how I would apply it to myself: Dave: > First of all, the teaching is based on the TRIFIX or tri-fixation. In each of the triads we have a fixated point, one being primary, the other 2 being co-fixations. Each point in the triad is formed by a perceived trauma in early childhood with mom(8/9/1), dad(2/3/4/), and siblings/world(5/6/7). The primary fixation is what we know as out type. > So, for example, those that feel they are a 4 w/ 9 wing are most likely a 4 primary fix, 9 as a co-fixation, and 5/6/7 as the lesser co-fixation. > That brings up a number of other "sub-types", but in the ARica/Ichazo system all those wing, stress/disintegration & security/intgration, and insticntual subtypes are false. I disagree with that though. Is this essentially saying Choose one from each triad, in descending order of applicability? That would make me a 4/8/6... So since I'm primarily a Four, That would mean I had some sort of childhood trauma with/from my father. Oy! Is that the truth. Later, my mother's death when I was 11, hence the equally strong 8. It also makes sense that my 6 is in the sibling arena -- issues of trust/loyalty/ dominated my relationships with my brothers. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-25-2007 04:02 PM LOL Max, I'm still learning about various peoples' enneagram theories. That's why I'm attending the upcoming conference. A lot of my info comes from what people post on the Riso-Hudson enneagram discussion board (EIDB). Some people think you can adopt the wing theory or the trifix theory to add richness to the nine types and thereby explain more facets of personality. Others think you can use both. If you go with trifix, start with your main type and then clockwise to your dominant types in the other two triads. Hence 5-1-2 in my case, 4-6-8 in yours. I haven't seen the theory about trifix as related to parents and siblings discussed. I like the idea of being wounded and hence fixated in each of the three triads--it makes sense to me. And lord knows that I've had to work on type 1 issues in response to criticisms about being too demanding, too critical, too obsessive, too nit-picky. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-29-2007 10:58 AM I think the preferred version of a model (enneagram is a model, not reality) is the most simplest version of the model that can explain observations and do predictions. In this way, I use the wing theory a lot, but never the trifix theory. In my opinion, trifix is not really needed. The 2 in me comes from this: everybody has all types, but we have an innate preference for 1 type. Other types show up dependent on the circumstances, such as stress, no stress or other circumstances. The definition of stress is different for everybody. The less used types in a person need very specific circumstances to show up. I need to be in a safe situation for about 2 days or longer, feeling like an 8, before I see altruistic type 2 behaviour. All types together in a person behave somewhat like a team, in a way we are more than one person. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-30-2007 08:26 PM From the table in http://www.breakoutofthebox.com/flauttrichards.htm there are 2 kinds of 5s: INT and IST. Maybe there are 2 kinds of Aspies, the creative ones (INT, more like a 5w4) and the not so creative ones (IST, more like a 5w6). (I'm an ISTJ with excessive scores for S and T and I'm absolutely not creative). RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 07-30-2007 08:41 PM On the MBTI the only thing I consistently and strongly seem to score is I and to a lesser extent P. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-30-2007 08:49 PM Five Wrote: From the table in http://www.breakoutofthebox.com/flauttrichards.htm there are 2 kinds of 5s: INT and IST. Maybe there are 2 kinds of Aspies, the creative ones (INT, more like a 5w4) and the not so creative ones (IST, more like a 5w6).
(I'm an ISTJ with excessive scores for S and T and I'm absolutely not creative).
RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-31-2007 08:40 AM I counted in the MBTI thread: 2 INFP, 2 INTP/INTJ, 11 INTJ, 4 ISTJ, 1 INTP, 1 INFJ, 1 INTJ/ISTJ, 1 ENFP. So that is: 14 INT, 4 IST, 4 other. According to the link I gave about the relation between MBTI and Enneagram the possibilities are: enneagram type 1 can be IST, type 5 is either INT or IST, type 6 can be IST. I don't know what to conclude from this. Where is Aspiesness in the whole MBTI / Enneagram field? Not all Aspies are 5s; most Aspies are 5s. Not all Aspies are INTs; most Aspies are INTs. All INTs are 5s. Not all 5s are INTs. Some Aspies are ISTs. 5 is the only enneatype which can be either INT or IST. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 07-31-2007 04:13 PM In the general population, INTs could easily be 1s (INTJ), 3s, 5s, 6s, or 9s...2 and 4 being least likely, probably. If it weren't for some of the odd collection of common physical aspie traits I have (e.g. motor uncoordination, strabismus, sensory sensitivity) I'd just think I was one of those odd duck 5s. RE: Enneagram - Five - 07-31-2007 07:20 PM energeia Wrote: In the general population, INTs could easily be 1s (INTJ), 3s, 5s, 6s, or 9s...2 and 4 being least likely, probably.
Not according to the correlation table in the link I gave. energeia Wrote: If it weren't for some of the odd collection of common physical aspie traits I have (e.g. motor uncoordination, strabismus, sensory sensitivity) I'd just think I was one of those odd duck 5s.
I admit I had to look up strabismus; now I know what it is. I didn't see that on the photo on this forum and not on the photo on the EIDB (sorry RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-01-2007 03:06 AM Hi Five Hey, it turns out that this hotel I'm staying at for the conference has a public computer--yeah! Re: myers-briggs types--it depends on what site you read what they say about the correlation with E types. My opinion is that there are no hard and fast rules--just some generalizations. E.g. 1s are generally Js, 5s are generally introverted thinkers, etc. Re: EIDB--my advice would be to email katytaylor--this computer won't let me open an new browser page (I hate windows) so I can't look it up. I think it's katy@enneagraminstitute.com but if you look around at the site I bet you can find it. Anyway, you could tell her what your original user name is and ask her if she would please change it to the one you want to use now. Or, you can ask for help with the second registration you did. Hope you solve it, it would be fun to see you over there. RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 08-01-2007 08:17 AM Five Wrote: According to the link I gave about the relation between MBTI and Enneagram the possibilities are: enneagram type 1 can be IST, type 5 is either INT or IST, type 6 can be IST.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-01-2007 05:04 PM Batman....type 6 is inhabited by every Myers-Briggs type. Not to worry. RE: Enneagram - ῦ - 08-16-2007 07:29 PM necrobump i took the test from the first page,and got a type 5w6 RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-16-2007 08:57 PM 5/6 and 6/5 have got to be the biggest category among Aspies -- with more than a few 1's. In looking at people here at AFF, I can think of 5/4's and 5's who are very connected to their 8. When I was in theater, I would have the cast take the test and it would be 75% 4's -- often with that "I'm gonna be a STAR!" 3wing. RE: Enneagram - generic_humanoid - 08-16-2007 09:18 PM Five Wrote: All INTs are 5s. Not all 5s are INTs.
No, not all INTs are 5s. Most probably are, but it's not uncommon to find INTJ 6s on Enneagram boards, and in academia. Few people identify as INTP 6s. Legend has it that INTP 9s and INTJ 1s are also fairly common. Quote: 5 is the only enneatype which can be either INT or IST.
No...6s, 9s,and 1s can be INTs or ISTs too. My father is an ISTP 6w5. But for these types, unlike 5, INT's and IST's are probably a minority, as the I and the T are not mandatory in those types. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-17-2007 05:00 PM My Dad was an ISTJ 9. I'm wary of attempts to come up with definitive correlations between different personality typing systems. I think there can be feeling (e.g INFP) 5s and extraverted 4s etc. RE: Enneagram - Five - 08-23-2007 07:30 PM O.K., my information was based on only 1 website about enneagram & MBTI, apparently not all websites agree with eachother. I don't know a lot about MBTI. Although apparently there is no clear correlation between enneagram and MBTI, both typing systems may be able to give an explanation for some personality traits. For example, I suppose my very high score for S in ISTJ can explain my reading texts literally, an Aspie trait. I see exactly what is written including all typos, not what could be there. I realise that this explanation is in contradiction with Aspies who have a low score on S (high score on N) and also take texts literally. Nevertheless, a high score on S still makes sense to me as an explanation for reading literally. In fact, I also think a very high score on S explains a capacity for concentration, a focus on the herenow. To exaggerate, sometimes it's difficult to imagine that there is a past, a future, other places than "here". I don't know whether Aspies have difficulty to imagine to be in another place on another time (as I said, exaggerating a bit). To me, MBTI explains these characteristics, while the enneagram does not. So both systems may be useful side by side. RE: Enneagram - Ando - 08-23-2007 08:57 PM I should add that I also score pretty high as a 1 sometimes. So, a 1 and a 3...makes sense to me. RE: Enneagram - Luai_lashire - 08-24-2007 04:05 PM I got a 4. The page describing 4 mentioned 4w5, though, and that sounded like me. But, it also said 4s miss-identify as 5s, so I don't know. ![]() I had to take the less detailed one because the more detailed one wanted me to choose between two oposite adjectives- BOTH OF WHICH DESCRIBED ME, depending on mood and whatnot. So, am I more inttroverted or extroverted? Both, depending on whether I'm in a good mood. Do I feel comfortable talking about personal things? Again, yes if I'm in a good mood, no if I'm not. I am a creature of opposite extremes. This causes VERY frequent problems with online tests. RE: Enneagram - jedi - 08-24-2007 07:22 PM Max the Bear Wrote: Here are a couple of free online tests that might help establish which of the Nine personality types you are: http://www.eclecticenergies.com/enneagram/test.php
RE: Enneagram - Five - 08-24-2007 07:46 PM Luai_lashire Wrote: I got a 4. The page describing 4 mentioned 4w5, though, and that sounded like me. But, it also said 4s miss-identify as 5s, so I don't know.
![]()
Here are some descriptions of types (there are many more available): RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 08-25-2007 08:10 AM Five Wrote: I don't understand the statement you got about 4s miss-identify as 5s. 4s are in the feeling triad, 5s are thinkers.
RE: Enneagram - Luai_lashire - 08-25-2007 09:29 PM Five Wrote: Luai_lashire Wrote: I got a 4. The page describing 4 mentioned 4w5, though, and that sounded like me. But, it also said 4s miss-identify as 5s, so I don't know.
![]()
Here are some descriptions of types (there are many more available):
RE: Enneagram - Mich - 09-02-2007 05:19 PM Quote: You are most likely a type 3 or 6.
Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 6w5. It is not clear from these test results which Enneagram type and wing you are. To determine your true type, you might want to start by considering the types with the highest scores on the lists below. Also, there are many fine books and other websites that contain detailed descriptions of the types. Consulting these might give you the information you need to determine your true type. As knowing your Enneagram type involves self-knowledge, you might want to observe and analyze your behavior and motivations. You might also benefit from taking the test again later. (Note that your lowest scores may be omitted.) Type 3 - 8 Type 6 - 8 Type 8 - 7.3 Type 5 - 6.7 Type 9 - 4.7 Type 7 - 4.7 Wing 6w5 - 11.3 Wing 5w6 - 10.7 Wing 6w7 - 10.3 Wing 8w7 - 9.7 Wing 8w9 - 9.7 Wing 3w2 - 8.8 Wing 3w4 - 8.8 Wing 7w6 - 8.7 Wing 9w8 - 8.3 Wing 7w8 - 8.3 Wing 5w4 - 7.5 Wing 9w1 - 6.3
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 09-02-2007 07:56 PM I think at this point I'd find some emo feelings to be rather refreshing. RE: Enneagram - Five - 09-02-2007 08:14 PM jedi Wrote: Interesting stuff , I have actually never heard about it before.
One way to look at the enneagram is this way: RE: Enneagram - energeia - 09-02-2007 09:33 PM Good point, Five! Well said. RE: Enneagram - Nominalist - 10-23-2007 06:48 PM I have taken several enneagram tests (both online and in books), and I always come up as a five (with four usually in second place). Cheers, Mark RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 10-23-2007 08:21 PM Five Wrote: I don't understand the statement you got about 4s miss-identify as 5s. 4s are in the feeling triad, 5s are thinkers. That's a big difference.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 10-24-2007 05:42 AM They're both (4 and 5) internally focussed. And, despite the stereotype, 5s feel. 4s are more likely to amp up their feelings (so the stereotype goes) and 5s suppress them or detach from them. Are any of you folks, especially all you 5s, social firsts? (guilty, here) RE: Enneagram - Lucie1 - 10-24-2007 08:37 AM Chakras Acupressure Exercises Energy Yijing Enneagram Enneagram Enneagram Introduction Variants Enneagram Test About the Test Self-development Personality Type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Energy Healing Type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Elsewhere Books Links Buy all articles in one file Enneagram Type 5 - The Investigator Thinkers who tend to withdraw and observe People of this personality type essentially fear that they don't have enough inner strength to face life, so they tend to withdraw, to retreat into the safety and security of the mind where they can mentally prepare for their emergence into the world. Fives feel comfortable and at home in the realm of thought. They are generally intelligent, well read and thoughtful and they frequently become experts in the areas that capture their interest. While they are sometimes scientifically oriented, especially with the Six wing, just as many Fives are drawn to the humanities and it is not at all uncommon for Fives to have artistic inclinations. Fives are often a bit eccentric; they feel little need to alter their beliefs to accommodate majority opinion, and they refuse to compromise their freedom to think just as they please. The problem for Fives is that while they are comfortable in the realm of thought, they are frequently a good deal less comfortable when it comes to dealing with their emotions, the demands of a relationship, or the need to find a place for themselves in the world. Fives tend to be shy, nonintrusive, independent and reluctant to ask for the help that others might well be happy to extend to them. Fives are sensitive; they don't feel adequately defended against the world. To compensate for their sensitivity, Fives sometimes adopt an attitude of careless indifference or intellectual arrogance, which has the unfortunate consequence of creating distance between themselves and others. Trying to bridge the distance can be difficult for Fives, as they are seldom comfortable with their social skills, but when they do manage it, they are often devoted friends and life long companions. Fives are usually somewhat restrained when it comes to emotional expression, but they often have stronger feelings than they let on. Few people know what is going on beneath the surface, as Fives have an often exaggerrated need for privacy and a deep seated fear of intrusion. Because of their sensitivity and their fears of inadequacy, Fives fear being overwhelmed, either by the demands of others or by the strength of their own emotions. They sometimes deal with this by developing a minimalistic lifestyle in which they make few demands on others in exchange for few demands being made on them. Other Fives make their peace with the messiness of life and engage it more fully, but they almost always retain their fears that life is somehow going to demand more of them than they can deliver. Fives, especially with the Four wing, sometimes mistype themselves as Fours. Such Fives recognize that they have strong emotions and don't identify with the often extremely cerebral portrait of type Five. But, Fives, unlike Fours, always retain some degree of discomfort when it comes to the expression of their emotional states. However much facility they may gain with it, the language of emotion is not their native tongue. 5 with a 4 wing RE: Enneagram - tenaciouscj - 10-24-2007 11:17 AM I seem to be one of those 5's with a 4 wing myself. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 10-26-2007 02:39 AM Eight: the Activator — a competitive, practical, passionate maneuverer. Eights experience life as a series of obstacles to be overcome. They disdain weakness and rely on their strength, although they rarely feel as strong as they appear to others. Often known as vital and engaging, they prefer to deal directly with most situations. Taking a stand is easy for them while backing down, even when they are wrong, is difficult. They intend to get the most from life and to let little if anything or anyone stand in their way Eights concentrate on their own abilities to make things happen; thus they come across as forthright, blunt, firm, and full of life and strength. Some are loud and raucous, others are reserved and proper, but all are direct in communication. They have clearly defined ideas on what is just and use their considerable strength to make the world conform to their ideas, first for themselves and then for others. Eights are organized yeah, right people who are determined to be in control whenever possible. A tender side lies within them which their own family can tap into, along with anyone they consider to be oppressed. or Four: the Individualist — a self-absorbed, sensitive, creative overanalyzer. Fours experience life as a series of interpersonal encounters, even as they feel overwhelmed by life’s practical necessities. For them, life is a highly personal experience that demands an authentic response. They feel intensely about anything or anyone important to them and feel compelled to express their feelings. Analyzing situations and their own experience occupies much of their time as they search for creative and artistic means of expressing themselves. Fours are emotionally sensitive people — first toward themselves, and then toward others. Emotions, both positive and negative, are the lens through which they view the world. This focus on emotions is both a strength and a weakness. The strength lies in their creative sensitivities which lead them to initiate new and original programs and/or innovative ideas that will enhance existing programs. The weakness lies in their tendency to take everything personally and to identify everything that could go wrong with a project before they are able to give their wholehearted support. When their emotions are balanced with objectivity, Fours excel in communication and relational skills. Fours feel caught in their own ordinariness (hmmm... I have tried to achieve ordinariness, but have not been very successful...) and so strive to avoid it; they want to feel unique. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 10-26-2007 03:38 AM Average them and you get six (evillll grin)--counterphobic, of course RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 10-26-2007 06:27 AM energeia Wrote: Average them and you get six (evillll grin)--counterphobic, of course
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 10-26-2007 06:42 AM I don't know you well enough to type with any degree of confidence--I was kind of joking with you. You're not 9 for sure, not 2, 3, 5. I'll bet you've got a line to one somehow, maybe via wing. I could see a 7wing. If you're Sx first, that could explain the 4ishness. What about cp6w7? Possible 8w7? I'll have taken the Part I training (I hope) by the time you guys head up here--maybe my typing skills will be better by then. Not sure anyone can deal with an unhealthy 3. I shared a lab with one who was on his way down--not good. He came to a bad end, but fortunately after he'd left our place. RE: Enneagram - Five - 11-28-2007 09:12 PM I hadn't read this forum, or any discussion board, for a long time (months), but have read some threads now. I'm totally convinced about the usefulness of the enneagram, for many purposes, and continue buying books. The enneagram might be helpful for conflict management too, also on fora. Especially the book on this site (http://www.bogda.com/) has really good hints to prevent and handle conflicts. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 11-29-2007 05:26 PM Hey Five--welcome back. I attended Bogda's workshop at the IEA--she's good. RE: Enneagram - Five - 11-29-2007 08:49 PM Hi Energeia, glad you're still here! Yeah, I already figured out Bogda is a she. She writes "….personalities are usually a contributing force in the dynamics of a conflict and its resolution. An understanding of the Enneagram enables conflicting parties to do the following: (1) Take responsibility for their part of the conflict (2) Engage in self-management during the conflict (3) Know best how to approach others (4) Use their angry reactions for their own personal development work." Unrelated to Bogda, in my opinion, if conflicts, also on fora, have to do with misunderstanding eachother, and the enneagram is all about understanding other points of view, then the enneagram must be helpful for managing conflict. For example, a 6 can have a focus on authorities and ask for references constantly. While other types may not understand that need. Or a 5 may read and write very literally, meaning not more than just what is written. While other types may conclude much more than what is written factually. Or a 4 who takes things personal which are not meant personal at all. Or a 1 who thinks black and white. If the other is right, the 1 must be wrong. In reality both may be wrong or both may be right. Or a 1 who wants to express his anger by going into a conflict, and not wanting to discuss what he sees as his principles. Others may not understand that, unless they know something about the enneagram types. Or an 8 who interprets a statement as a (false) accusation and explodes, while a 5 had meant the statement as a fact or an opinion. This must be useful on fora too, not only in real life. RE: Enneagram - quickduck - 11-29-2007 10:03 PM Yes it is good to have you back Five.
RE: Enneagram - Five - 11-30-2007 09:32 AM Hi Quickduck , nice avatar you have. Mine becomes invisible sometimes.As I see it, what an enneatype 9 (a peacemaker) or some other types can do intuitively (to prevent conflicts, or to mediate) must be possible for others to do in a conscious manner too, based on knowledge and learned insights. If on AFF we would know eachother's enneatypes, and have an understanding of the specific ways the types are motivated and think, that would be a tool to keep discussions from getting too intense and too serious. I wonder what would happen if we cannot only see the contents of what the other person writes in his or her post, but also interpret the form, the container, correctly, what the other's real purpose is, what is meant. After all, and not everybody will agree with this, but "that doesn't change the fact" (joking now, said something exactly in the way a 5 would say it): we are all connected; it is like the left hand of a body fighting with its own right hand. Neither can win.... RE: Enneagram - Batman55 - 12-01-2007 10:17 AM Five Wrote: Hi Quickduck
, nice avatar you have. Mine becomes invisible sometimes.As I see it, what an enneatype 9 (a peacemaker) or some other types can do intuitively (to prevent conflicts, or to mediate) must be possible for others to do in a conscious manner too, based on knowledge and learned insights. If on AFF we would know eachother's enneatypes, and have an understanding of the specific ways the types are motivated and think, that would be a tool to keep discussions from getting too intense and too serious. I wonder what would happen if we cannot only see the contents of what the other person writes in his or her post, but also interpret the form, the container, correctly, what the other's real purpose is, what is meant. After all, and not everybody will agree with this, but "that doesn't change the fact" (joking now, said something exactly in the way a 5 would say it): we are all connected; it is like the left hand of a body fighting with its own right hand. Neither can win....
RE: Enneagram - anbuend - 12-01-2007 05:19 PM Of course, some conflicts are not over misunderstandings. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 02-22-2008 05:30 AM I just got back from the Riso-Hudson Part I enneagram training--it was awesome! Russ Hudson was great in the way that he put things together--Riso wasn't there because he's recovering from arsenic poisoning he got from eating the wrong fish in China. Anyways, I'm definitely a 5, heavy 6-wing. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-11-2008 01:26 AM Necrobump for the Enneagram: Free Ennegram test at this site: Go to: http://www.enneagram.net/tests/paidlogin.aspx Use the code: Tritype808 According to this test, I'm a Four. Okay, fine. I'll be a four. But PLEASE a five wing, not a three. And I'm guessing a so/se subtype stacking... RE: Enneagram - Natalie - 08-11-2008 01:47 AM I'm a five, and I couldn't clearly discern whether I had a four or a six wing, if any at all. Enneagram Type 5: Observer, Investigator, Thinker, Sage or Voyeur Overview You want to be intelligent, informed, knowledgeable and perceptive. More importantly, you want to be self-sufficient and not have the entanglements of obligation. You see yourself as intellectual, dispassionate and investigative. You would like others to see you as rational, logical and scholarly. Your idealized image is that you are thoughtful and wise. Private and solitary by nature, you like to be invisible until you are ready to reveal yourself. You tend to stay on the sidelines preferring to meet the world with your mind. You prefer to play the role of detached observer or investigator. In general, you see the world as intrusive, overwhelming and chaotic—often demanding too much and giving too little in return. As a result, to manage the fear of not knowing, you conserve your energy and focus your attention on acquiring the information necessary to make sense out of the chaos. Studious and scholarly, you develop expertise in any area that is of interest to you, often in more than one field. You believe that knowledge is power and feel it is imperative that you be intellectually astute as a means of survival. Often scientific, you have unparalleled powers of mental perception due in part to your ability to remain detached and unaffected by your emotions. You have an inquisitive and observant nature with an insatiable appetite for information. You like to think things through before offering your perceptive insights regarding systems, people or how the world works. Avoiding the glaring light of scrutiny, you seek the safety of camouflage. When you feel that you lack intellect, you become withdrawn, isolated and reclusive. You see yourself as intense, unexpected, original and different from others. You are private and introspective, although others may think of you as anti-social, secretive, remote and eccentric. You are not afraid to point out the 'emperor who has no clothes' and your wonderful sense of humor is based on postulating the absurd. Rather than the wave crashing on the shore, you have the strength of the undertow and know exactly when to give or withhold your involvement and information to have the greatest impact. Need Fearing intrusion, you need to keep yourself hidden and camouflaged. However intellectual you may be, you often feel vulnerable and exposed like an animal without fur. You need time alone to recharge and for others to not place high demands on your time or energy. It is essential for your well being that your mind is clear, your life uncluttered, and that you have the autonomy to control your time. Avoid You avoid standing out and/or being misinterpreted. You also avoid pretentious or ostentatious displays. You may find small talk or a brainstorming session at work to be an insufferable waste of time. You fear annihilation, contamination, and being fully embodied – as you feel more comfortable being with your thoughts than in your body. Because you prefer to live a life that isn't weighed down by attachments – either material or relational – you also avoid surplus of any kind. The one exception might be a library of resources. Virtue Your greatest strengths are your clear objectivity and your penetrating insight that is unfettered by emotions. You have an innate ability to gather information and create systems to assess and categorize data in a clear and concise manner. Mentally astute, you are able to observe, study and track even the smallest details, often developing expertise in many areas. Underneath your shyness and reserve, you are a kindhearted and giving person. You are also very loyal to and supportive of those you trust. Vice Your vice is avarice. This can manifest as a greedy hording of yourself, your time, your energy and/or your things. Be careful of your tendency to observe the world through a peephole. It can keep you isolated and out of touch with human concerns. Be aware of your tendency to withdraw into your ivory tower of ideas. Others may start to see you as arrogant and unfeeling. Being dispassionate and 'cool as a cucumber' is good in an emergency but hard on relationships. Attention Your attention goes to observing the world, hiding or withholding to protect yourself and gathering information for the purpose of knowing and understanding. Hesitant and reluctant to engage, you search for factual data, seeking reason, logic and objectivity. Spiritual Path Your spiritual path is to reclaim a sense of non-attachment and experience omniscience—true knowing from a higher source. Spiritual growth will come when you offer freely of yourself to others without fear of incurring obligation and realize that mere information can never be a substitute for true direct knowing. Mantra Your map of the world is a mental construct, not the actual territory. For deeper knowing, remember to include your feelings as they yield important information in any equation. As a rule, you believe that there is always more that can be learned, known and understood. It is helpful to recognize when you know enough to make a decision. Wing If you are the Enneagram Type 5 with the 4 Wing, you desire to appear imaginative. You see yourself as aloof, understated, penetrating, intuitive, inquisitive and quiet. If you are the Enneagram Type 5 with the 6 Wing, you desire to appear intellectual. You see yourself as changeable, receptive, careful, whimsical and trustworthy. Famous 5s St. Thomas Aquinas, Issac Asimov, Samuel Beckett, The Buddha, Tim Burton, David Byrne, Richard Chamberlain, Agatha Christie, Montgomery Clift, Michael Crichton, Daniel Day-Lewis, René Descartes, Joan Didion, Joe DiMaggio, Amelia Earhart, Albert Einstein, T.S. Eliot, England, Ralph Fiennes, Bobby Fischer, Peter Gabriel, Greta Garbo, Bill Gates, J. Paul Getty, Jane Goodall, H.R. Haldeman, Hildegarde of Bingen, Alfred Hitchcock, Anthony Hopkins, Howard Hughes, Ted Kaczynski, Franz Kafka, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, Dean Koontz, Stanley Kubrick, Gary Larson, Annie Leibowitz, George Lucas, David Lynch, Norman MacLean, Robert MacNeil, Leonard Maltin, Timothy McVeigh, Natalie Merchant, Sam Neill, Georgia O'Keefe, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Al Pacino, Michelle Pfeiffer, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., Oliver Sacks, Jean-Paul Sartre, Scrooge, Sister Wendy, George Stephanopoulos, Madeleine Stowe, Jules Verne, Max Von Sydow, Ken Wilber. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-11-2008 04:04 AM Max--soc/sx stacking for you makes sense. That's my stacking also. Natalie--you're in good company here being a 5. Note: the link to the test that Max posted will only work for a couple more days. There's a different free online test you can take linked below (take the classical) http://www.eclecticenergies.com/enneagram/test.php RE: Enneagram - micgrace - 08-11-2008 04:24 AM Enneagram Type Two. Giver, Caretaker, Helper, Nurturer, Advisor or Manipulator Interesting Test. I'm the odd one out by the looks. RE: Enneagram - ethereal - 08-11-2008 04:43 AM I'm fascinated by the enneagram. I've taken the test several times weeks and months apart and always come out as a 4 with a 5 wing. RE: Enneagram - joesteel64 - 08-11-2008 04:59 AM I just took one, and came out as a 5, with a tie between 6 and 4 as my wing. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-11-2008 05:27 AM energeia Wrote: Max--soc/sx stacking for you makes sense.  That's my stacking also.
Natalie--you're in good company here being a 5. Note: the link to the test that Max posted will only work for a couple more days.  There's a different free online test you can take linked below (take the classical) http://www.eclecticenergies.com/enneagram/test.php
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-11-2008 05:50 AM Same type as Don Riso, eh? (Don't barf, don't beat me, I'm just giving you a hard time) I don't see much 3 or 9 in you, based on what I've observed so far. RE: Enneagram - micgrace - 08-11-2008 06:01 AM Well this different test from energeia puts me at a type 9 or 2 (same) with wing 5w6. Peace & Harmony / Helper and Thinkers who withdraw and conflict between trust/distrust RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-11-2008 06:19 AM Some pretty decent descriptions of the types are found here: http://www.ocean-moonshine.net/e142857369/ And you can always ask questions at the enneagram discussion board that I post to. http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/forum/ RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-11-2008 06:56 AM energeia Wrote: Same type as Don Riso, eh?  (Don't barf, don't beat me, I'm just giving you a hard time) I don't see much 3 or 9 in you, based on what I've observed so far.
RE: Enneagram - Alias Pseudonym - 08-11-2008 07:32 AM I got 9 wing 1, but my score for 5 was also over eleven. The description of 9 does sound a lot like me and I'm certainly more 1 than 8. 8 seems like a weird wing for 9. RE: Enneagram - Alias Pseudonym - 08-11-2008 07:46 AM Tried the other test, exactly the same results; very high 9 score, slightly lower 5, much lower 1 and very low other scores. Self-preservation variant, no surprise there. I think 9w1 is correct. RE: Enneagram - Natalie - 08-11-2008 07:56 AM On that link from Energeia I got the following scores: Type 9 - 9.7 Type 5 - 9 Type 1 - 8.3 Type 3 - 5.3 Type 8 - 5.3 RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-11-2008 08:32 PM Alias Pseudonym Wrote: Tried the other test, exactly the same results; very high 9 score, slightly lower 5, much lower 1 and very low other scores.  Self-preservation variant, no surprise there.  I think 9w1 is correct.
RE: Enneagram - Rendeverance - 08-12-2008 03:13 AM Hmmm... You are most likely a type 6. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 6w5. Type 6 - 11.3 Type 5 - 8.7 Type 4 - 7 Type 1 - 6.7 Type 3 - 5.7 Type 7 - 5 Wing 6w5 - 15.7 Wing 5w6 - 14.4 Wing 6w7 - 13.8 Wing 5w4 - 12.2 Wing 4w5 - 11.4 Wing 7w6 - 10.7 Wing 4w3 - 9.9 Wing 3w4 - 9.2 Wing 1w9 - 8.6 Wing 1w2 - 7.4 Wing 3w2 - 6.4 Wing 7w8 - 6 Does this mean I am everything? lol... I have not seen this before and did not read up before the sest... gonna read up what this means now... Well I suppose I am very much like the 5w6 that was stated as 'typical aspie'... but slanted toward the 6 instead... RE: Enneagram - Marcia - 08-12-2008 03:17 AM I did the tests on the both the links on this thread and came out as a nine every time! On the more detailed test I was 9w1, and my next highest score was for a 5. Thought I'd saved the results, but can't find them now. RE: Enneagram - Rendeverance - 08-12-2008 03:21 AM Hmmm skeptical bout this - the second shorter test gives: You are most likely a type 4 (the Individualist) with 3 wing Self-preservation variant Type 4 SP Type 3 SX Type 6 SP Type 1 SP Type 5 SX Type 8 SX Type 7 SO Type 9 SP Type 2 SP RE: Enneagram - Rendeverance - 08-12-2008 03:22 AM So I really am... everything LMAO RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-12-2008 03:24 AM Rendeverance Wrote: Hmmm...
You are most likely a type 6. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 6w5. Type 6 - 11.3 Type 5 - 8.7 Type 4 - 7 Type 1 - 6.7 Type 3 - 5.7 Type 7 - 5 Wing 6w5 - 15.7 Wing 5w6 - 14.4 Wing 6w7 - 13.8 Wing 5w4 - 12.2 Wing 4w5 - 11.4 Wing 7w6 - 10.7 Wing 4w3 - 9.9 Wing 3w4 - 9.2 Wing 1w9 - 8.6 Wing 1w2 - 7.4 Wing 3w2 - 6.4 Wing 7w8 - 6 Does this mean I am everything? lol...
RE: Enneagram - Marcia - 08-12-2008 03:54 AM Well, I did the test again and still came out as a 9w1. Here are the results: Type 9 - 11 Type 5 - 7.7 Type 1 - 7.3 Type 7 - 7 Type 8 - 2.3 Wing 9w1 - 14.7 Wing 1w9 - 12.8 Wing 9w8 - 12.2 Wing 1w2 - 8.8 Wing 5w4 - 8.7 Wing 5w6 - 8.4 Wing 7w8 - 8.2 Wing 8w9 - 7.8 Wing 7w6 - 7.7 Wing 8w7 - 5.8 RE: Enneagram - Marcia - 08-12-2008 03:55 AM Well, I did the test again and still came out as a 9w1. Here are the results: Type 9 - 11 Type 5 - 7.7 Type 1 - 7.3 Type 7 - 7 Type 8 - 2.3 Wing 9w1 - 14.7 Wing 1w9 - 12.8 Wing 9w8 - 12.2 Wing 1w2 - 8.8 Wing 5w4 - 8.7 Wing 5w6 - 8.4 Wing 7w8 - 8.2 Wing 8w9 - 7.8 Wing 7w6 - 7.7 Wing 8w7 - 5.8 RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-12-2008 04:16 AM Marcia Wrote: Well, I did the test again and still came out as a 9w1.
Here are the results: Type 9 - 11 Type 5 - 7.7
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-12-2008 04:20 AM I wavered between 5w6 and 6w5 for a while. Max--do you see me as more 5 or 6? (or something else?) RE: Enneagram - Rendeverance - 08-12-2008 04:24 AM Max the Bear Wrote: Actually, that's a pretty clear and decisive 6w5 (if decisive is ever the right word to use with a Six...).
Almost everybody will pick up a point or two or more in every category -- all of us have a touch of everything. (Except that I've got no 9)
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-12-2008 04:49 AM The classical test on the eclectic energies site is pretty good but the variant test sucks, in my opinion. That's why I recommend classical. I'm pretty darn low in 9 also. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-12-2008 04:50 AM energeia Wrote: I wavered between 5w6 and 6w5 for a while.
Max--do you see me as more 5 or 6?  (or something else?)
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-12-2008 04:52 AM Hmmmmm......not sure what to do with that answer, Max. RE: Enneagram - Max the Bear - 08-12-2008 04:53 AM Rendeverance Wrote: Hmmm skeptical bout this - the second shorter test gives:
You are most likely a type 4 (the Individualist) with 3 wing Self-preservation variant Type 4 SP
RE: Enneagram - ocampo - 08-12-2008 06:17 AM Type 1 - 13.3 Type 5 - 12.7 Type 7 - 10.3 Type 9 - 9.3 Type 8 - 8.7 Type 4 - 8.7 Type 3 - 8.3 Type 2 - 8 Type 6 - 7.7 Wing 1w9 - 18 Wing 1w2 - 17.3 Wing 5w4 - 17.1 Wing 5w6 - 16.6 Wing 9w1 - 16 Wing 4w5 - 15.1 Wing 2w1 - 14.7 Wing 7w8 - 14.7 Wing 7w6 - 14.2 Wing 6w5 - 14.1 Wing 8w7 - 13.9 Wing 9w8 - 13.7 Wing 8w9 - 13.4 Wing 4w3 - 12.9 Wing 6w7 - 12.9 Wing 3w4 - 12.7 Wing 3w2 - 12.3 Wing 2w3 - 12.2 I don't understand the wings although I can see definite Ones in my personality! RE: Enneagram - energeia - 08-12-2008 06:20 AM I can see the 1 in you also, Ocampo. RE: Enneagram - skyblue1 - 12-07-2009 04:55 AM a good personality test ? RE: Enneagram - Marcia - 12-07-2009 05:11 AM skyblue1 Wrote: a good personality test ?
RE: Enneagram - Solus - 12-07-2009 07:31 AM Is there a type for thread necromancers?  ![]()
RE: Enneagram - Solus - 12-07-2009 07:44 AM www.eclecticenergies.com Wrote: Type 5 - 12.3
Type 4 - 12.3 Type 6 - 12 Type 9 - 9 Type 7 - 1.7 Wing 5w4 - 18.5 Wing 4w5 - 18.5 Wing 5w6 - 18.3 Wing 6w5 - 18.2 Wing 6w7 - 12.9 Wing 4w3 - 12.7 Wing 9w1 - 9.5 Wing 9w8 - 9 Wing 7w6 - 7.7 Wing 7w8 - 1.7
RE: Enneagram - AlsoRan - 12-07-2009 08:48 AM An interesting test, indeed. Quote: Type 4 - 12.7
Type 1 - 11 Type 5 - 11 Type 6 - 10 Type 9 - 8.3 Type 3 - 6.3 Wing 4w5 - 18.2 Wing 5w4 - 17.4 Wing 5w6 - 16 Wing 4w3 - 15.9 Wing 6w5 - 15.5 Wing 1w9 - 15.2 Wing 9w1 - 13.8 Wing 3w4 - 12.7 Wing 1w2 - 12 Wing 6w7 - 11 Wing 9w8 - 8.7 Wing 3w2 - 7.3
RE: Enneagram - skyblue1 - 12-08-2009 03:11 AM You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 5w6. Type 5 - 11.7 Type 6 - 11 Type 1 - 9.3 Type 3 - 7.3 Type 4 - 7.3 Type 8 - 6.3 Type 9 - 5.7 Wing 5w6 - 17.2 Wing 6w5 - 16.9 Wing 5w4 - 15.4 Wing 4w5 - 13.2 Wing 1w9 - 12.2 Wing 6w7 - 11.5 Wing 3w4 - 11 Wing 4w3 - 11 Wing 1w2 - 10.5 Wing 9w1 - 10.4 Wing 8w9 - 9.2 Wing 9w8 - 8.9 Wing 3w2 - 8.5 Wing 8w7 - 6.8 RE: Enneagram - skyblue1 - 12-08-2009 03:21 AM this is right in line with the Myers-Briggs test for me Enneagram Type 5 - The Investigator Thinkers who tend to withdraw and observe People of this personality type essentially fear that they don't have enough inner strength to face life, so they tend to withdraw, to retreat into the safety and security of the mind where they can mentally prepare for their emergence into the world. Fives feel comfortable and at home in the realm of thought. They are generally intelligent, well read and thoughtful and they frequently become experts in the areas that capture their interest. While they are sometimes scientifically oriented, especially with the Six wing, just as many Fives are drawn to the humanities and it is not at all uncommon for Fives to have artistic inclinations. Fives are often a bit eccentric; they feel little need to alter their beliefs to accommodate majority opinion, and they refuse to compromise their freedom to think just as they please. The problem for Fives is that while they are comfortable in the realm of thought, they are frequently a good deal less comfortable when it comes to dealing with their emotions, the demands of a relationship, or the need to find a place for themselves in the world. Fives tend to be shy, nonintrusive, independent and reluctant to ask for the help that others might well be happy to extend to them. Fives are sensitive; they don't feel adequately defended against the world. To compensate for their sensitivity, Fives sometimes adopt an attitude of careless indifference or intellectual arrogance, which has the unfortunate consequence of creating distance between themselves and others. Trying to bridge the distance can be difficult for Fives, as they are seldom comfortable with their social skills, but when they do manage it, they are often devoted friends and life long companions. Fives are usually somewhat restrained when it comes to emotional expression, but they often have stronger feelings than they let on. Few people know what is going on beneath the surface, as Fives have an often exaggerrated need for privacy and a deep seated fear of intrusion. Because of their sensitivity and their fears of inadequacy, Fives fear being overwhelmed, either by the demands of others or by the strength of their own emotions. They sometimes deal with this by developing a minimalistic lifestyle in which they make few demands on others in exchange for few demands being made on them. Other Fives make their peace with the messiness of life and engage it more fully, but they almost always retain their fears that life is somehow going to demand more of them than they can deliver. Fives, especially with the Four wing, sometimes mistype themselves as Fours. Such Fives recognize that they have strong emotions and don't identify with the often extremely cerebral portrait of type Five. But, Fives, unlike Fours, always retain some degree of discomfort when it comes to the expression of their emotional states. However much facility they may gain with it, the language of emotion is not their native tongue. RE: Enneagram - Marcia - 12-08-2009 03:25 AM You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 9w1. It is not clear from these test results which Enneagram type and wing you are. Type 5 - 12 Type 9 - 11.3 Type 1 - 8.7 Type 2 - 7.3 Type 7 - 6.3 Type 4 - 4 Type 6 - 3.3 Wing 9w1 - 15.7 Wing 1w9 - 14.4 Wing 5w4 - 14 Wing 5w6 - 13.7 Wing 1w2 - 12.4 Wing 9w8 - 11.8 Wing 2w1 - 11.7 Wing 4w5 - 10 Wing 6w5 - 9.3 Wing 7w6 - 8 Wing 2w3 - 7.3 Wing 7w8 - 6.8 Wing 6w7 - 6.5 Wing 4w3 - 4 RE: Enneagram - Marcia - 12-08-2009 03:27 AM Enneagram Type 9 - The Peacemaker Keeping peace and harmony People of this personality type essentially feel a need for peace and harmony. They tend to avoid conflict at all costs, whether it be internal or interpersonal. As the potential for conflict in life is virtually ubiquitous, the Nine's desire to avoid it generally results in some degree of withdrawal from life, and many Nines are, in fact, introverted. Other Nines lead more active, social lives, but nevertheless remain to some to degree "checked out," or not fully involved, as if to insulate themselves from threats to their peace of mind. Most Nines are fairly easy going; they adopt a strategy of "going with the flow." They are generally reliable, sturdy, self-effacing, tolerant and likable individuals. Nines tend to adopt an optimistic approach to life; they are, for the most part, trusting people who see the best in others; they frequently have a deep seated faith that things will somehow work out. They desire to feel connected, both to other people and to the world at large. They frequently feel most at home in nature and generally make warm and attentive parents. The Nine's inability to tolerate conflict sometimes translates into an overall conservative approach to change. Change can provoke unpleasant feelings and disrupt the Nine's desire for comfort. Less healthy Nines seem incapable of motivating themselves to move into action and bring about effective change. When change does come however, as it generally will, Nines find that they are usually well able to adapt. They tend to be more resilient than they give themselves credit for. In fact, Nines tend not to give themselves enough credit in general, and their self-effacing attitude often seems to invite others to take them for granted or to overlook their often significant contributions. This can cause a subterranean anger to build inside the Nine's psyche, which can erupt into consciousness in occasional fits of temper which quickly blow over, but which more often manifests itself in passive agressive footdragging. Being overlooked is often a source of a deep sadness in Nines, a sadness that they scarcely ever give voice to. Nines frequently mistype themselves as they have a rather diffuse sense of their own identities. This is exacerbated by the fact that Nines often merge with their loved ones and through a process of identification take on the characteristics of those closest to them. Female Nines frequently mistype as Twos, especially if they are the mothers are small children. Nines, however, are self-effacing whereas Twos are quite aware of their own self worth. Nines also mistake themselves for Fours, but Nines tend to avoid negative emotions whereas Fours often exacerbate them. Intellectual Nines, especially males, frequently mistype as Fives, but Fives are intellectually contentious whereas Nines are conciliatory and conflict avoidant. RE: Enneagram - Clicky - 12-09-2009 04:06 PM I usually end up 4w5 on those tests although occasionally I end up as a 6w5. RE: Enneagram - energeia - 12-12-2009 11:21 PM Oh goodie, somebody bumped the Enneagram thread! (I love it when my special interest spontaneously appears out in the real world.) Yes, it's possible to have both wings. RE: Enneagram - skyblue1 - 12-13-2009 12:08 AM energeia Wrote: Oh goodie, somebody bumped the Enneagram thread!
(I love it when my special interest spontaneously appears out in the real world.) Yes, it's possible to have both wings.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 12-13-2009 12:23 AM A wing is a type that's adjacent to the main type--it's like one is an admixture of both. Think about a circle with nine points....it's like your working framework would be somewhere on that circle between 5 and 6. That is, you'd be blending the 5 qualities with the 6 qualities. Experientially, this might mean that your anxiety is more overt than what's true for mainline 5. It could also mean that you're more conscious of or alert to interpersonal dynamics than what's true for mainline 5. Both types question assumptions, although the motivations are different. 5 wants to know what is really true. 6 wants to know what is really trustworthy. RE: Enneagram - skyblue1 - 12-13-2009 01:09 AM energeia Wrote: A wing is a type that's adjacent to the main type--it's like one is an admixture of both.  Think about a circle with nine points....it's like your working framework would be somewhere on that circle between 5 and 6.  That is, you'd be blending the 5 qualities with the 6 qualities.  Experientially, this might mean that your anxiety is more overt than what's true for mainline 5.  It could also mean that you're more conscious of or alert to interpersonal dynamics than what's true for mainline 5.  Both types question assumptions, although the motivations are different.  5 wants to know what is really true.  6 wants to know what is really trustworthy.
Thank you that helps. RE: Enneagram - skyblue1 - 12-13-2009 01:15 AM My wing: Enneagram Type 6 - The Loyalist Conflicted between trust and distrust People of this personality type essentially feel insecure, as though there is nothing quite steady enough to hold onto. At the core of the type Six personality is a kind of fear or anxiety. This anxiety has a very deep source and can manifest in a variety of different styles, making Sixes somewhat difficult to describe and to type. What all Sixes have in common however, is the fear rooted at the center of their personality, which manifests in worrying, and restless imaginings of everything that might go wrong. This tendency makes Sixes gifted at trouble shooting, but also robs the Six of much needed peace of mind and tends to deprive the personality of spontaneity. The essential anxiety at the core of the type Six fixation tends to permeate the personality with a sort of "defensive suspiciousness." Sixes don't trust easily; they are often ambivalent about others, until the person has absolutely proven herself, at which point they are likely to respond with steadfast loyalty. The loyalty of the Six is something of a two edged sword however, as Sixes are sometimes prone to stand by a friend, partner, job or cause even long after it is time to move on. Sixes are generally looking for something or someone to believe in. This, combined with their general suspiciousness, gives rise to a complicated relationship to authority. The side of the Six which is looking for something to believe in, is often very susceptible to the temptation to turn authority over to an external source, whether it be in the form of an individual or a creed. But the Six's tendency towards distrust and suspicion works against any sort of faith in authority. Thus, two opposite pulls exist side by side in the personality of enneatype Six, and assume different proportions in different individuals, sometimes alternating within the same individual. The truly confounding element when it comes to typing Sixes is that there are two fundamentally different strategies that Sixes adopt for dealing with fear. Some Sixes are basically phobic. Phobic Sixes are generally compliant, affiliative and cooperative. Other Sixes adopt the opposite strategy of dealing with fear, and become counterphobic, essentially taking a defiant stand against whatever they find threatening. This is the Six who takes on authority or who adopts a dare devil attitude towards physical danger. Counterphobic Sixes can be agressive and, rather than looking for authorities, can adopt a rebellious or anti-authoritarian demeanor. Counterphobic Sixes are often unaware of the fear that motivates their actions. In fact, Sixes in general, tend to be blind to the extent of their own anxiety. Because it is the constant back drop to all of their emotions, Sixes are frequently unaware of its existence, as they have nothing with which to contrast it. Because Sixes so frequently fail to appreciate the extent of their own fear, they often mistype themselves. It is common for instance, for female Sixes to mistype as Twos, especially if they are identified with a helper role, but Sixes have a much more ambivalent attitude towards relationships than do Twos, who generally know exactly what they want. Sixes, failing to recognize their anxiety, can mistype as Nines, but Nines have the ability to relax and to trust in others, neither of which come easily to Sixes. Sixes can mistype as Fours, especially if they have artistic inclinations, but they lack the Four's self-absorption. They can mistype as Fives, especially if they are intellectual, as many Sixes are, but unlike Fives, Sixes tend to be practical. Finally, conterphobic Sixes can easily mistype as Eights, but they lack the Eight's self-certainty. RE: Enneagram - skyblue1 - 12-13-2009 01:19 AM I cant believe how much I resemble these description of my personality type. I would definitely say I am counterphobic. Its like when I was told I was an Aspie, the more I learned about it the more things made sense.
RE: Enneagram - energeia - 12-13-2009 02:31 AM I love the explanatory power of the enneagram. It's very deep. Especially the Riso/Hudson version. http://www.enneagraminstitute.com And yeah, discovering the aspie framework was sure illuminating for me. 5 traits and aspie traits overlap quite a bit. If it weren't for some of the aspie things like having a hard time recognizing faces, reading body language, being uncoordinated, being very literal, etc, I'd have maybe just said I was a 5. RE: Enneagram - ZodRau - 12-13-2009 08:42 PM You are most likely a type 5. Taking wings into account, you seem to be a 5w4. Type 5 - 12 Type 4 - 4.7 Type 6 - 2.7 Wing 5w4 - 14.4 Wing 5w6 - 13.4 Wing 4w5 - 10.7 Wing 6w5 - 8.7 Wing 4w3 - 4.9 Wing 6w7 - 3.4 |