What I find interesting about the guy who made this is that he seems to be against just about every group, whether they are for cure or not. He is paranoid.
"Someday, you'll be rounded up, locked up and cured for your own good. We can't have crazy people like you running loose."
Please tell me you are not taking that comment serious. It is obviously just warped humor. He's just trying to get a rise out of you, very sucessfully I might add. The more attention you give him, the more he wins. The wisest thing would be to let it go and never speak of him again.
I most certainly do not approve of bullying. I also do not approve of the things in that blog. However, you need to learn the difference between a real physical threat and a verbal joke.
I went over and read some of that blog. I personally found it ridiculous and offensive. Consequently, I choose not to go there any more. I have better things to do with my time.
What I found disturbing is how frequently you have posted to that blog. That man is messing with you and you keep giving him material. He is despicable, but he isn't going to round up people and cure them.
I did not see the blog/pics, but I will take everyone's word for it.
I have a rule about the Internet:
When in Sweden, do what the Saudis do.
Tim
everyone,put down the flamethrowers and cool it.
go take a walk,haev a cup of tea,whatever,just think before you post.
remember,Fight or Flight instinct!
I am sure we respect you have a strong view. I am sure you believe righteously in this issue. I am sure it impacts on your psyche that this man does what he does. I expect that respect to be returned from you. That is all I ask.
Rossco, all I'm hearing right now from you and others who I keep explaining this to is words to the effect of "Get over it". It's not important in the grand scheme of things etc etc. Now you ask for respect. That's fine. But as I see it you haven't been giving it - contrary to your claim otherwise. Well, until this post from which I'm quoting.
We do not have to share it. We do not have to join you. We are not deaf to your assertions we just do not share your views. We have differing opinions and are entitled to it. If you wish to take your anti-Hating Autism supporters and rally against ForeSam, do it but do not give us a hard time for not supporting you.
The only people I am giving a "hard time" are those who don't believe this petition is really worth it and won't sign it even though they are clearly offended by it, or they take the incorrect attitude that Best isn't important. Now individually maybe he's not - but that's not the point. That's why I said I'll be patient. Sometimes it's hard for us Aspies to think outside our own world as we see it. I know that - and that's why I keep explaining in general.
Anyway - the whole idea of this petition is to protect. OK, maybe I've said that before and I'm repeating myself. It's open to everyone to sign, not just us Aspies and any other ASD person who may be lurking around here. Heck, a number of my friends have signed it already and they aren't affected by an ASD person within their family at all. And only one has contact with them (aside from me of course).
So - if one doesn't believe Best to be a threat to them, at least take into account that he is a threat to others. Hence another reason for my explanations.
Hope that clears things up.
Joeker, I'm hearing you. Don't forget (and yes I've said this to you before) that I've known Best longer than you have. For the petition to succeed the way we want it we need as big a number of signatures as possible. You might not agree with my tactics and that's fair enough. The idea is to get people angry and want to act against him. And all that's needed to achieve that is the truth, which makes it easy to promote. It's just a shame (as I explained to Rossco) that not everyone can see that. Reverse checking statements (AKA explaining again) - in my experience - are the way to overcome that issue.
Beyond that - I'm not trying to force anyone. Apologies if anyone is feeling forced. That's not the intention. I'm just trying to promote understanding of what Best truly represents, and his power. Disempowering him would be more than appropriate - and the deletion of the blog would achieve that admirably.
Joeker, I happen to know that any mention of Best on the Hub's head blog (Left Brain/Right Brain - Kevin Leitch's blog) is discouraged. But there's no reason why you can't email him about it. Trouble is I don't have it handy right now.
There's also Neurodiversity.com (Kathy Seidel's site) and Autism Vox - off the top of my head.
Wilky, I have avoided this word up until now, but now I'm going to use it in relation to you and you alone.
STUPID.
You are kind of pushing things a bit far. 
Timelord,you have my support on the matter of the petition fully,but personal attacks just make the attacker look bad,and they just create a bad atmosphere.
I guess I may contact Kev, then. I'm not sure how he'll take it...
I hope he's in agreeance with it, but I'm not going to get my hopes up.
Keep us posted. 
Kurai-gaka is a great example of Best's behaviour.
I'm sorry, but what do you mean by that?
-would rather they found a cure for nasty people like him,than for innocent people who go about their day doing nothing wrong,being nasty to no one.
So would I! Removal of voice would be the only one I could think of that wouldn't be breaking the law (otherwise one could go several ways!). His problem is that he is looking for someone to blame. There is no one. Autism is genetic in basis. (Number 2's) happens.
Just posting to let everyone know, there's a discussion page up, a blog, to be exact, where people are welcome to come and post their thoughts.
This is also for people who don't agree with the petition, and level heads are welcomed.
Where is this located?
follow the link to the petition,it should logically be around that page someplace
It was Wilky - in reference to her calling Amy naive, and Amy's thoroughly appropriate response.
That's honest. Unlike Joeker's reference to me "assuming" people know things, when in fact there was no need to assume. I won't carry the argument from Joeker's blog over to here and explain what that means.
Drop it, people! And just to help this is my final post on this thread.
and right there is the is the godson theory in all its glory...
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10