Communism in general is a really bad system because for it to really work it would require everyone to treat others as being on the same level as anyone else, and that's simply not in human nature. At least, that is my opinion.
Luai_Lashire came with an eye-opener, but she also created a hostile atmosphere which DogBrain responded to in the standard way of making more hostile atmosphere.
Please think before you post further regarding communism now, please.
I prefer talking about socialism, as communism is a radical branch of socialism. Maybe aspects of communism could be useful.
Which is one reason that it failed. It misunderstood Human nature. Which is one of the reasons that I Admire the American founding Fathers like Thomas Jefferson ( who was possibly an Aspie), John Adams and James Madison because they understood that religion was essential to a well ordered and moral society.
Wrong. The opposite is true. Naturally developed atheism is a sign of a liberal nation with a high standard of living. Communists enforced atheism, which is unnatural.
I wouldn't say that religion is essential for a decent, functional society. Maybe it's different when it pertains to individuals, but yeah.
That's an opinion. It does nothing to contribute to this debate.
yes its my opinion, and you leftist pigs won't oppress it ;p
But it's not a fact. A debate a collection of facts used to analyze an opinion. Restating the opinion doesn't advance the debate.
I don't seem to understand your second comment.
Ian just hangs around, does apparently not want to debate.
I don't like the apartheid rule here in this world where people are divided by nationality. In voilent conflicts the life of an american is apparently alot more worth than the life of an african. They are the first to get medical help while others have to wait.
But there should definitely be government organisations that represent areas, economy or groups of people.
I don't know if africans like fast-food though, but you definitely have valid point!
What humans would like robots to take over?
I don't care about the survival of society as long as humanity is still alive.
There has to be more than military power that chooses leaders. A dictatorship is pretty much doomed in bad times if it doesn't have military power, so a successful dictator usually need military power.
Personally I don't think popularity is enough to choose a leader either, but I don't see how things could be different.
It really has to be someone who kind of "feel the emotions" of the community the person is leading. There should be consequences for the leader if something bad happens in the community, aswell as rewards for good times. I don't think education could help someone "feel the emotions" of a community.
Regardful or regardless?
As in useful and useless.
