So, the only sportsman who deserves being called a sportsman is the world champion?
Why do both of you asume louise is NT? Just because she is intolerant and bigotted? NTs are not the only people capable of bigotry, just so you know. You should take a good, long look at yourselves and ask yourselves why you would make such an assumption.
that is so true lashire. i was on wrongplanet, and i saw hypocrites all over the place. one aspie admitted that he bullies anyone who appears to be "emo." then some misogynist chick creates threads expressing her hatred towards all women as individuals (exept herself). and many others don't have any respect for aspies that are willing to keep their diagnosis out of the closet. they think that all it does is draw bullies, and so they bully along with. people like that are the reason i rarely go to wrongplanet. i definitely prefer aspies for freedom, even though i don't get thread replies as quickly.
Mine were all from the 50s.

Now a BIG problem I see with your premise is the understanding you seem to have of a lot of abstract concepts. They are not universal. Indeed words such as "value", "success", "respect", "intelligence" and the like mean different things to different people.
What efforts have you seriously made in defining these terms that are central in espousing your ideologies? It is not the sign of a good critical thinking mind that is not willing (or unable?) to define the parameters of such concepts. It is either saying I am allowing myself at any point to defend myself with "Yes but I didn't mean my argument to be taken or viewed in that light because what you believed I meant is not what I did mean" OR it is the assumption that everyone understands intrinsically that when you say an abstract word that their concept exactly matches your own.
Of course there is great risk in doing this. Whilst it does show you have a mind that allows itself to think about what the hell you are gibbering on about, it does expose your argument. You are unable then to redefine your argument without looking like you are scrambling IF your argument is unable to stand on it's own.
So how about it? Why don't you trawl through this couple of dozen of posts on this thread redefine what on Earth you were really trying to present and restructure and redefine what your argument was/is? Try it out on a "valueless" ex-cleaner. See how you go. It will hardly be a measure of critical thinking or academic fortitude or even intellectual superiority to soundly thrash me verbally on this forum, but.......I really think you are not that clever or that good at having people question you. I think it sounds like fun.















You (ex-cleaner) and I (ex-taxi driver and ex-postwoman) will be OK - Louise18 will be on the 'B' Ark. 
Hmmm not quite sure where I fit into this, But although I am a nurse, at one point due to serious money problems, I also worked in an abattoir (x two jobs), albeit packing bones & pigs ears , hosing down etc.

Does that count?
Can I come on the same Ark as you two? please???
Of course! 
Only people like television executives, lawyers and hairdressers got onto the 'B' Ark!
Remember, for example: for solving the 7 (well, now this are 6) "millenium problems" in mathematics, one million dollar prize is promised. If not this "million guarantee", I bet 99% of people who spend their lives on trying to solve millenium problems, wouldn't try it. So people with academical achievements also do WHAT THEY ARE PAID FOR.