Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Monkey bottoms and CAN - whats the link?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Hmm, interesting. Actually, some of those scantily clad women in various magazines look as if they have monkey bottoms.
This research seems to imply that people with AS would not like porn.  I don't think that's true across the board.
....I actually don't trust much of what researchers say is the motivation behind animal behaviour.
Especially if the study was done as some thing to explain a mental functioning in a group of people they really don't know anything about.
Huh? I look at guy's butts all the time and freak out in my head when someone in science class sits on his stool in a way that I can partially see the true shape of his butt. Does that make me not autistic?

I am le pervert, but I hate porn. Why? It's slutty, not sexual. Usually, the typical porno picture is of some woman sitting in some revealing pose, and pretty much demanding sex or luring men. I think that nudes of unsuspecting bodies are more appealing. Maybe it's because I find mild submissive innocence in guys appealing.

Blah blah blah, enough of what makes me horny. You probably never wanted to know anyway.

What these researchers need to read is the sexual preference thread in the General forum.
NyanChan, do you mean that we should be looking at bums each day? I can certainly think of worse things, especially if the bums are nice and shapely and if some of them are furry. I don't believe it will cure autism though.

TheASman Wrote:
I guess it really only goes to show how much of NT behavior is rooted in monkeys.  

Autistics are less monkey like  than the NTs.


I've sometimes been tempted to make this observation.  For example, the social heirarchies that are so important in monkey and ape communities.  You have to know whether the other monkey is your 'superior' or 'inferior' before communicating with them - or else get punished.

TheASman Wrote:
I guess it really only goes to show how much of NT behavior is rooted in monkeys.  

Autistics are less monkey like  than the NTs.


Hey! Don't knock monkeys. They're very sophisticated creatures.

I read somewhere that in New Zealand, monkeys and apes have the legal right not to be experimented on.

Shame there aren't more monkeys in New Zealand.

Shame that it's the humans who make the rules.

Gareth Wrote:
Maybe i'm just confused here but - what is wrong with not being socially influenced to look at lady's bottoms?

ah, i know: it's more normal
...


Personally, I prefer male bottoms.

I find British spelling rather peculiar.  Why bother putting the letter 'u' in the word 'behavior'?
'Color' looks better without a 'u'.
In Canada, the American spelling and British spelling are used interchangeably.  When I was younger I was always told to use the British spelling but I've always preferred using the American spelling.
^ that was my 200th post. Cool
^ and ^^ Congratulations. Cool

RichardL Wrote:
^ that was my 200th post. Cool


Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool

Many words ending in "--our" came from French through Latin, and realistically, French words rarely use logical spelling. It annoys me too that almost all computers use American spellchecks. But most of the time you can add the alternative spellings to the spell check.

As for the monkey bottoms, I have heard of far worse experiments on animals that most experimenters wouldn't call "cruel". I wonder if they deliberately desensitise people into thinking that such things are okay.

Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's