Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Got Flamed By Another Aspie
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Bahhh

I never got along with other aspies. I had all the criteria for it. My symtoms weren't as apparent as most were. (Think I vowed never to date another text-book aspie)

but this guy sounds like self-righteous troll, who use his "***-bugers" as front for his asshattery.

(completely comedic) He just wishes that he was cool like us.

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Ethel is one of the unsung heroes of AFF.

That is merely an opinion.  Don't get me wrong, I like Ethel and a lot of what she has to say but I don't view anyone on here as a "hero."

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Before staring a fight spread across several threads, I would humbly suggest you first click on Ethel's name, click on 'find all posts by this user' and read everything she has to say on a variety of subjects.

I have done similar in the past; it gives a new member a chance to catch up on long-standing 'personalities' on the forum and gives you an insight into their true character.

Yes, but a new member may read all of a long standing member's posts and agree with most of them but still clash over one or two things.  Why should a new member have to humbly bow before an established member?  Aren't we all equal here?

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:

ethereal Wrote:

Tigger_the_Wing Wrote:
Before staring a fight spread across several threads, I would humbly suggest you first click on Ethel's name, click on 'find all posts by this user' and read everything she has to say on a variety of subjects.

I have done similar in the past; it gives a new member a chance to catch up on long-standing 'personalities' on the forum and gives you an insight into their true character.

Yes, but a new member may read all of a long standing member's posts and agree with most of them but still clash over one or two things.  Why should a new member have to humbly bow before an established member?  Aren't we all equal here?


I was not the one who dragged an irrelevent quote into another thread.

I'm not asking for her to be humble, I was humbly offering my opinion - what does it matter to you?

You suddenly seem to have it in for several of the members here; who has been whispering what in your ear for your attitude to become so snarky all of a sudden?

By the way, if it weren't for Ethel, my haircut wouldn't have raised several years' worth of site fees for AFF.

I can see and think for myself thank you very much.  I've no interest in getting into an argument with you either.

Let's just out him as a troll...
Oh God!  This is all my fault!  Look, I really am sorry!!! I'm having a BPD flare-up, I'm oversensitive and read too much into things, BUT, that is no excuse.

I'm sorry.  It does seem like we're all misreading each other here.

There is No Self  Wrote:

As an aside, who was that loser who'd posted 8,888 times in the past two years? Sheez , get a life.  


hey, I've made 4,000 posts in just over a year, do you mind?

Parvati Wrote:
Who gave older members permission to cyber-club newbies?  It is the height of rudeness to demand newbies to bow and scrape before the established member.  And as for the question "aren't we all equal here?"  Apparently not and obviously not.  

The question screaming to be asked is:  Just because a person has made two or three thousand posts in this forum, what gives them the right to behave like a bully?  And why is the bully ENCOURAGED to bully ONLY new members?  Is there some unspoken rule in the forum that if you need to bully someone, you must only bully the newest members?  Is there so much pent up hostility in this forum that newbies are seen as target practice?  On the other hand, it is probably a good idea for newbs to frame their comments in a way which neither attacks older members nor invites attack.  And that would appear to be a skill one could use to one's advantage in the real world. 

Heh. Better quit before I find  cyber-noose around my neck.


This isn't an "oldies vs. newbies" situation. Here's what I see (and I'm not taking sides here, just trying to sum things up so we can start moving towards mutual understanding).

First off, Johanna, as an enthusiastic new autistic rights campaigner, made some very strong blanket statements about GF/CF diets & the psychological state of aspies that would choose to take a cure if offered.

Next, as someone to whom these blanket statements did not apply, Ethel called both these statements gross overgeneralisations (paraphrasing).

Johanna saw someone disagreeing with these statements, decided that this meant they were against autistic rights, and escalated the argument.

Ethel responded to angry posts with her own angry posts.

...and here we here.


This is why Tigger gave the advice she did to Johanna - reading Ethels previous posts will give a greater insight into Ethels real point of view, which is entirely in favour of autistic rights. It isn't about "bashing the newbie" at all - it's about suggesting a method that will lead to greater understanding.

Here's my advice:

Johanna: It's great that you're as passionate as you are about these issues, but there is much more to these things than a "for" or "against" position. If someone disagrees with you, it's best to ask them questions about what their opinion actually is before you blast them for it - and you might find that your opinions are closer than you think.

Ethel: I agree that the blanket statements made were completely wrong, but a new member isn't going to understand all the nuances of these debates within a few days of being here. We're going to get lots of new members wanting to "fight against the oppressors" straight away, and it doesn't always mean that they're going to be looking for a fight forever. Give things a couple of weeks, and see what happens.


Hope that helps...

Johanna Wrote:
Thank you for the advice, EvilZakkie. About me just responding with angry posts, I actually made a post saying that Ethel persuaded me about GF/CF diets being beneficial. Ethel, not to be rude, but please read what EvilZakkie wrote you before you do more flaming.


No problem. I did see that post, but things have continued since then.

Regarding the last sentence, my advice was for two people, not just one. This thing happened due to escalation on both sides, and if you use neutral advice as a tool against the other person, it's just escalating things again.

This flame war is over when you both choose it, not when the other person "loses".

skyblue1  Wrote:
actually whether you are a newbie or not it appears if you are not in the cligue which pervades this forum your ideas can be trampled on by folks who ask for tolerance and acceptance from others especially Nt`s, but are not willing to accept or tolerate the ideas of others. In other words you are free to be , say or believe what you wish as long as it is " the way I feel or think " .
   I am now suicidal because of attacks and misunderstandings of things I have recently posted.  I am used to being rejected by NT`s. But to be rejected by my own kind is a little more than I can stand. especially when I was just trying to be helpful.
   Please tread carefully here.




Skyblue1,

Misunderstandings are there to sort out. AFF is not without miscommunicationproblems. The difference with life IRL is that we are prepared to sort it out. We know it can be a communication problem.

You cannot expect AFF to be heaven. AFF can be a home.

Misunderstandings often come from two sides. Maybe people on that thread did not understand how you coping in daily life is what you chose.
I think you did not understand how you hurt them with things that were completely pc in your eyes.

Solving the misunderstanding needs to come from you too.

Had your opening post been a personal story about you, instead of 'the cure' it would have been understood, as your choice.
Reactions might be oposing, but that you chose it would have been accepted. It's your way of coping in society. Who are we to take that from you. It might not be ours, that's something else.

The second misunderstanding is on your side. You don't know how you hurt them. Solving to understand that is yours.

Suicide is not an option.

AFF is for Autists. But it's not heaven. It is a good place to be. But you can expect rows and tiffs too. That is part of communication. Sometimes it is rough. Sometimes very rightly so. But it is also a loving and caring community.

Parvati Wrote:
EvilZakkie....Your 'advice' to Ethel provided insight into the hidden mechanics of this forum and the general tone of your posts has been a welcome breath of fresh air.  When you said "a new member isn't going to understand all the nuances of these debates within a few days of being here"  --- I realized that whatever was in this forum before I registered ....isn't really my prob or the prob of any noob.  And we sort of get caught in the cross-fire without realizing we're in a battle zone.  Of course I can't speak for all noobs but in my own case I am simply in so much pain I was hoping to find some understanding or consolation.  Instead I saw people being accused of being trolls and others being bullied for framing their questions or comments in a way that was seen to be clumsy or offensive or stupid.  I just wanted to thank you for your sweet spirit.  If more of the older members would follow your lead (in sincerity and peace- making skills), us noobs might be able to feel some relief in this forum, instead of feeling scapegoated for things which existed in here before we registered.  Some of us noobs are totally clueless and certainly don't mean to offend anyone.  We just desperately need some empathy...and you have given me hope to keep trying.  However, if this forum makes others besides Skyblue1 suicidal, I will reconsider.


Thanks, this means a lot.

I also wanted to add that AFF has just come out of some very dark months, and people here are still very cautious, tense and nervous - this is why there are so many accusations of trolling and similar things flying around. I believe that as people begin to feel safer here once again, things will become much calmer.

In the meantime, when people here become angry over small things, it's a good idea to just ask what's going on - often these sorts of scuffles don't take much to deflate...

Quick_Duck Wrote:
^ There is bullying; but although Korrigan is fiery I’ve not  noticed much bullying from her; there are worse offenders. Is your recent fight with Korrigan the reason you’ve singled her out for a ban?


Max the Bear Wrote:
I think the fact that Korrigan's post was necrobumped from five weeks ago is interesting. Also, of course, that Korrigan has been very helpful to Johanna and they are friends. It's hard to see it as a pressing issue.


This was what I was referring to, regarding security.

You cannot have a healthy forum, if people are scared to post, in case they offend, or cross wires with an admin, who they fear (if this fear is justified or not; I'm not picking a side yet, merely providing...feedback..) may ban them later.

I'll refer you over to Wrongplants moderators; I'm sure you can find the thread here.

Quick_Duck Wrote:
In the past Lucie posted some of my Pms with personal information; EZ deleted the personal stuff; but she wasn’t banned.
I don’t think Korrigan’s PM post was worse than that; it certainly didn’t contain any personal info.
I only hope that once this mess has been sorted out (if it is sorted out) that the rules are enacted with just as much ruthless efficiency as they are being now. For the rules to mean anything they need to be enforced in an even handed manner; not only when its personally convenient to those in charge.


At the time, I didn't have access to a list of rules, so I was making them up as I went - just removing personal info seemed like the best course of action at the time.

Easiest solution is just to not post PMs from now on - and yes, the fact that Korrigan was banned over this sucks, but there's not much we can do about that.

Do I have to whip my WTF doll?

I think I do


Ok so Zakkie got demoted, Korrigan is banned, and jeebus did someone called for a "Fourm Apocolypse?"
.....

OH OH FOURM ORGY I CAN DO!

*I am Bardwolf and I approve of this message*
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Reference URL's