Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: autistics vrs aspergers
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

how she twists and twirls Wrote:
Labels, labels, labels. This is what I don't like about having diagnosises to begin with. Everyone says, "Oh, you're X! I know what Xs are like. Xs are all the same." or else it's, "You can't be X, because you don't fit my preconcieved notions about Xs. I don't believe you." or "You're an X and I'm a Y. By default, we're too different to ever get along, so just forget about it." Rolleyes


The bold print is the one I personally hate the most.

My therapist was that way essentially: "You're too capable and intelligent sounding, and your mannerisms are highly restrained, for you to have Asperger's."

The other one my therapist said, after I suggested I may have Asperger's: "You may exhibit some outward signs of that, but you're far too capable and functional to let it control you."

I suppose my NT therapist really is that good at putting himself in someone else's shoes.

Noetic Wrote:

Ziyaret Wrote:
One of the major differences between the 2 syndromes is the fact that aspies are verbal whereas many autists are not. The few autists who are verbal will only speak if they are spoken to; they dont initiate conversations.

I am not sure where you get the idea from but far more autistics than you seem to assume are actually verbal.

Quote:
Many autists have no desire to interact with people at all or to live independently; in fact quite a few of them are incapable of taking care of themselves at all.


Again, that seems rather uninformed there - there are many autistics who want social interaction, just as many Aspies show no desire or even a hatred of social interaction and other people. And there are many autistics who are extremely independent and motivated to take care of themselves (Temple Grandin is such an example), moreso than some Aspies who may have the abilities needed to do so but not the motivation or willingness to do so (often complicated by problems like anxiety, depression etc.).


This would seem to be obvious, but there's also a lot of Aspies who desire social interaction, some almost as much as NTs...

Ziyaret Wrote:
Might I add that I have always thought that it is a tendency of Aspies in particular to generalize and even buy into stereotypes. Im not trying to be closed minded but I AM trying to be categorical and systematic because that is what I have discovered to be the most accurate way to look at the world and the most effective way for me. I recall saying that many autists are not(verbal) but that does NOT mean I assume all of them are not verbal. Many NTs scold me for generalizing and categorizing Even when the data fits or closely approximates them. I understand they're just bein Politically Correct[thanks to all that postmoderist crap they've been taught] but Im not concerned in the least with political correctness. Im concerned with TRUTH-even if the truth may offend some people;-)


I tend to place things into a black-and-white train of thought, something is either one way or the other--and there's not often much in between.  This is a highly effective approach if you're trying to be systematic or categorical with information, as opposed to integrating data seamlessly.. that is more an NT approach (gray area, abstract thinking, etc.)

My abstract thinking ability is rather deficient, so I prefer the more detailed "lots of separate details" way of thinking--it helps me make up for what I lack in abstract thinking ability.

JennaP Wrote:
My son has kanners autism and is verbal.  Several of his friends are.  I have spent countless hours researching this topic.   I am actually pretty good at spotting people on the spectrum.

What I stated before were just the actual thoughts that went through my mind when I first read this thread.  My thoughts are my own and they could be wrong.  I thought it was interesting when you posted that people call you a "fake autistic" because you just do not come across as autistic to me.


Whatever.  I understand it is only your opinion that "seven" does not sound autistic and may not "really" be autistic, or something, but personally that doesn't sit well with me.

I am a "possible" Aspie as I am only self-diagnosed, and when I came on this forum, I didn't appreciate people "dismissing" me as someone who only has Attention Deficit with social anxiety (which, to those people, can make an individual think they have Asperger's when they really don't) and therefore I'm "not really Aspie."

I don't really think anyone likes to get "turned away at the door" here, and I speak from the experience of one who was dismissed in that manner... and what's more, I continue to be seen as someone who probably doesn't have Asperger's but really "wants" it, to justify my problems in life.

Deep down, in all honesty, there's two things going on:  I want a reason/excuse for my problems and ongoing "avoidance" of life, but I also know that there is something fundamentally different about me... and Asperger's matches up with many of these differences.

My underlying point is I don't like being "dismissed," and I don't think others do, either.  What gives you the right to say someone "doesn't belong"?  I don't appreciate that sentiment.

rossco Wrote:
I agree. I have stated my experiences earlier. If someone (and people in the past and I'm sure future will) dismissed that I have autism, I would be very angry. Who understands your perspective and experiences? I would say you. This concept is a simple one and not only can be applied to SEven, but Batman55, and rossco, JennaP.....let's face it...everyone.
If someone identifies themselves as AS or HFA I assume they have reasons for it. We as a collective group do not get "benefits" for being so. We as individuals do not get "favourable" treatment. So what would be the point in attaching yourself to a diagnosis that does not apply. Think about it.


Glad to see someone agrees with me on this point.  Cool

I spoke my mind for the benefit of all future ADDers with Social Anxiety (I am one), so they don't have to feel as "left out" initially on AFF, as I did.  I've stated my experiences before as well and they match up fairly well with Asperger's, the Social Anxiety thing kicked in around age 16 but in an "idiosyncratic" manner that I feel Asperger's can account for.

Noetic Wrote:
But what really blew me away was the section on differentiating AS from HFA - I am now left with no doubt whatsoever that I am HFA, not AS. The most interesting bit was the idea that Aspies take in only one thing at a time, i.e. they are able to focus really well but find it hard to see the big picture. Whereas with HFA you are more bombarded with "everything" at once ("gestalt processing"), and eventual focus on a part is more a reaction to this bombardment of the senses than  stable, intense observation or attention.


It seems the bold print is "more like" how things happen with me, but perhaps not to the agree to which it occurs in actual HFA.  Because I also get the "focusing on one small part", but in general all of this seems very inconsistent.

I wonder if I'm leaning toward that because I have comorbid ADD, and this "bombardment" is more like a "distraction" sort of...?

JennaP Wrote:

rossco Wrote:
I agree. I have stated my experiences earlier. If someone (and people in the past and I'm sure future will) dismissed that I have autism, I would be very angry. Who understands your perspective and experiences? I would say you. This concept is a simple one and not only can be applied to SEven, but Batman55, and rossco, JennaP.....let's face it...everyone.
If someone identifies themselves as AS or HFA I assume they have reasons for it. We as a collective group do not get "benefits" for being so. We as individuals do not get "favourable" treatment. So what would be the point in attaching yourself to a diagnosis that does not apply. Think about it.


Rossco, your point is very well taken.  I agree with what you stated.  Out of respect I will not adress this issue in the future (on this thread or others).  I would like to end with an explaination.  I was not trying to be antaganistic.  I saw that there had been some frustration with dealing with people and I thought it was worth at least considering that perhaps this was the reason.  I do agree though that it is not my place to make such a judgement.


Where is my name in this "agreement"?  I believe I had things to state as well, in direct reaction to you, and yet I'm "skipped over."

Thanks for acknowledging my contributions!

BardWolf Wrote:
For the Limiting comments. I find that agurment null, since I told everyone that I'm already satfied with someone who means the world to me. Just because I don't do "aspies only" in dating doesn't make awful person and very limited. Yes I'm picky, thats only because I want to choose a male that can protect and care for me and is far more mature. I don't do the "Shy little guy" in the corner. I want some that isn't afrid to kiss me. To lisent, and not to feel offended when I speak my mine. So far only ONE guy fits that discription.

Now. Can you please get off my *** thank you


I have no problems with you being picky.

What I do have a problem with is you saying things like, "I want a guy who is far more mature" than an Aspie, etc.

If you're going to keep insinuating that Aspie guys are childish in this manner, you may eventually have to put me on your "ignore" list because as an Aspie male myself, I'm not one to tolerate such horribly generalizing, negative labels being thrown around.  However "true" they might be, it's not very nice and just because you're mostly "indifferent" to criticism, doesn't mean others don't get defensive about these things.

To me there is no worst label that an Aspie could receive than "immature"... there are others that are worst, but only cosmetically so.

It seems you're going to have to learn some diplomacy on here, after all, if you don't want to attract some rather justifiable criticism.

Sheesh!

seven Wrote:
you know, there is such a thing as being "half aspergers" you may want to look into that.


I think I'm a bit more than "half Asperger's," though.

Noetic Wrote:
Another (although closer to "Schizoid" according to the Camberwell study) would be AS (as in the more sterotypical view of AS based on Asperger's own observations: monologuing, monotonous, black-and-white-thinking, verbally gifted, stilted, verbally manipulative and capable of sophisticated verbal humour, puns etc.)


I believe you have just described me to a T.  Verbally manipulative and black-and-white thinking and monologuing (when it's "triggered") are things I'm well known for.

Please don't try to place me in another group outside the spectrum like "Tourette's/rapid cycling bipolar/ADD" combined type... that's just very contrary to what I've learned about myself.  I have known many ADDers AND ADHDers in my life and the only similarity I have to them is inattention and distractibility when faced with boring schoolwork.  That's my honest to God truth.

Now this is true, admittedly: I DO have ADD.  But you'll have to let me be my own diagnostic specialist here:  whatever my ADD is, it's comorbid to my Asperger's self-diagnosis.  I's like to make that a fact but I cannot do so, so how 'bout you "just believe me" for once?

Callista Wrote:
It's possible to have severe AS. If you have good verbal abilities, and spoke on time as a child, categorize yourself as "low-functioning AS" (if you have trouble with the daily-life stuff) or "severe Asperger's" (if it's more social stuff). I don't particularly like "severe" because that makes it sound really bad, but I don't know of another term. I call my own AS "moderate to severe", depending on the day and the mood and how much energy I have...


I believe I'm "moderate" AS, although the specific social difficulties I have (for instance, I definitely feel I am living behind glass, and don't "connect") affect certain aspects of functioning profoundly.  You can call me lazy for not working to improve it, but the thing is, I don't even have the impulse or the "instinct" to improve these social things.  It's just not there.

seven Wrote:
no, unlike the word normal, intelegence is clearly defined; its the ability to learn.


In that case, thank you for confirming what I thought all along:  I'm a complete idiot.  I haven't learned anything useful at all, in 25 years of life.

Now tell me how to convince the other members of AFF who insist on calling me "intelligent."  That's one label that certainly doesn't fit.

Noetic Wrote:
By the way you mentioned how you had Borderline traits - well rapid-cycling Bipolar has a huge overlap with Borderline personality disorder so maybe that explains this aspect of you?


I apologize.  Maybe I'm going through a negative "cycle" right now, I seem to be experiencing "identity dysphoria" at the moment, and I'm lashing out at anyone who challenges the identity I have "built up" through being on AFF.

Basically I have an urge to identify with a group of people who have issues similar to mine, perhaps when I even perceive that someone is suggesting I might not belong here (as I have just done with you, and in a rather snide manner--my fault) this whole "dysphoria" flares up and I have to get it out somehow.

For future reference should I assume that when you suggest I might have something besides AS, it's not to suggest I don't have AS?  Perhaps you are suggesting the conditions you are naming might be comorbid to my purported AS, more likely?

Noetic Wrote:

Batman55 Wrote:
For future reference should I assume that when you suggest I might have something besides AS, it's not to suggest I don't have AS?  Perhaps you are suggesting the conditions you are naming might be comorbid to my purported AS, more likely?

Indeed, or just traits of them alongside AS. I guess it's the black and white thinking again, i.e. someone says "You sound like you have mood issues" and your brain tells you "They said you have mood issues, not AS". Smile


That sounds accurate.  I am a black-and-white thinker, in all honesty.

Noetic Wrote:
Sorry about that I wasn't feeling very well-connected with language when I posted that...

What I meant was that with HFA you tend to get tiny bits of information from all over the place (the whole sensory impact), so it takes a while to focus on something. When you DO finally focus though it is terribly hard to shift that focus onto something else, unless something really catches your attention.

With ADHD, starting to focus is usually less of a problem but you hop from one thing to the next (or rather your attention does).

Wit AS, you tend to focus on one thing for a long time, then shift to the next - shifting information is more conscious/in your conscious control, and the focus on a single subject is more of a "preference" than with HFA - with HFA it is often "can't" do it differently, with AS it is (or at least feels like) mroe a case of "this is just the way I do things".


The bold print is me in a nutshell.

I hope you stop believing my Self-DX is unfounded and/or dubious, simply because I haven't written of enough "too obvious" features like frequent stimming (I think I have stims but I'm just not aware of them; although I do have, and have had, many tics) or logical/practical thinking tendencies.

I can't get information about what I was like when I was young, from other sources besides myself: my mother is reluctant to tell me and I have a very poor relationship (non-talking) with my father.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Reference URL's