04-04-2007, 03:13 PM
I keep having outraged parents of autistic children tell me that I am self-righteous because I don't want a cure and I should put myself in someone else's shoes. I am told that I only have Asperger's so how could I know what it is like to have Kanner's or whatever.
1. I do lack theory of mind, so really, I can't imagine myself in someone else's shoes. Just shows their ignorance of how someone with autism thinks.
2. I "only have Asperger's" -- well, I can communicate verbally somewhat better than someone with Kanner's can communicate non-verbally even. The issue is communication, not a way of thinking.
3. I do not agree with a cure mostly because I think if people with Kanner's or other autism could get the help they need and a better way to communicate with NT's so they could make themselves happy (not neccesarily the way the NT's want it, but what they would like) ok. I am just very pro-life. I do not support genetic research into autism because I think it will lead to people aborting babies with autism (but some might still keep the ones with Asperger's). If I really did not care about people with other autism types, I would not be pro-life for a prenatal autism test.
4. Actually, why should I care if people think I am self-righteous for being pro-life. At least I have some moral standards. I am not like "well, have an abortion if you don't like a baby with a cleft palate or Kanner's but having a baby with Asperger's might be fun." Because I know saying that would mean that I do not value people with cleft palate or with Kanner's.
5. I am not naive enough to think that a genetic test will not be used prenatally and that people with autistic fetuses will not be encouraged by society to have abortions. Medications to treat autism will not be developed unless companies are going to make tons of money on them. So to me, charities that fund genetic research on autism are just pro-abortion and I will not support them.
1. I do lack theory of mind, so really, I can't imagine myself in someone else's shoes. Just shows their ignorance of how someone with autism thinks.
2. I "only have Asperger's" -- well, I can communicate verbally somewhat better than someone with Kanner's can communicate non-verbally even. The issue is communication, not a way of thinking.
3. I do not agree with a cure mostly because I think if people with Kanner's or other autism could get the help they need and a better way to communicate with NT's so they could make themselves happy (not neccesarily the way the NT's want it, but what they would like) ok. I am just very pro-life. I do not support genetic research into autism because I think it will lead to people aborting babies with autism (but some might still keep the ones with Asperger's). If I really did not care about people with other autism types, I would not be pro-life for a prenatal autism test.
4. Actually, why should I care if people think I am self-righteous for being pro-life. At least I have some moral standards. I am not like "well, have an abortion if you don't like a baby with a cleft palate or Kanner's but having a baby with Asperger's might be fun." Because I know saying that would mean that I do not value people with cleft palate or with Kanner's.
5. I am not naive enough to think that a genetic test will not be used prenatally and that people with autistic fetuses will not be encouraged by society to have abortions. Medications to treat autism will not be developed unless companies are going to make tons of money on them. So to me, charities that fund genetic research on autism are just pro-abortion and I will not support them.



No, first they tried to "cure" whatever it was via ECT, then when that didn't work, they suggested institutionalizing me. (My parents said "no".) 