Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: School Choices for My 6Yr Old. Help!
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
i like 1 and 3 looks nice but it seems to ostresize them excesively.
I agree with guardian, I like one the best though because that sounds freaken sweet, I have an easier time talking to older and younger students. The sensory therapy sounds very attractive to me, only the most severely autistic get sensory therapy at my school. The whole idea of school #1 makes me jealous I want to go to that school. Also sounds very efficiant.

#2 just sucks...seriously. getting pulled out of class for "special needs" things is humiliating. Well I go to a #2 school and I dont have any special needs things, Im just a general Ed student, but everything is so dumb and a waste of time!!! HUMUNGOUS chance of getting bullied.

#3 sounds like the second best. But it might be hard to make the transistion from other gifted's to neurotyp type of socialisation. And there is a greater chance of social isolation and being made fun of. In all logic i should be in a program like that but Im very sensitive to have any reason for others to make fun of me.

I would be very excited to go to the #1 school, it has everything that sounds cool, but it would be interesting to see how the teacher could manage all those students and teach different ages, but it's definatly the best choice
it really depend what kind of class room and how old the student are i think. becuase 32 6-9 year olds  is deffrent than say 20-30 14-18 year olds, in the ways they act what and they'd tend to do with class periods. i my expesanace mean/in tolarant NT's would believe that sped means easier work and thus he might not be value grades  as highly.

(please keep in mind most of us are fairly jaded by a school like your #2. and those who arent  are very lucky)

guardian001 Wrote:
it really depend what kind of class room and how old the student are i think. becuase 32 6-9 year olds  is deffrent than say 20-30 14-18 year olds, in the ways they act what and they'd tend to do with class periods. i my expesanace mean/in tolarant NT's would believe that sped means easier work and thus he might not be value grades  as highly.

(please keep in mind most of us are fairly jaded by a school like your #2. and those who arent  are very lucky)


those who are like can hurt just as much as those who are not.

I dont care how big the class is as long as I at least have one friend I can be with
careful that anywhere he learns is a good environment... that is, no distractions, he can concentrate in it...
Hi MomMagnus. Do you mind if I ask where you're from? I'm curious about what kind of public education system you're working with.
When we had to make a choice for our child with ADHD+Aspie traits, we didn't choose the Montessori school. We thought there was too little structure.
You depend very much on the personality of the teacher. Can you have your child "try out" the different teachers to see with whom he would interact or whom he would dislike?

MomMagnus Wrote:
Hi,

I am addressing Aspies who may be able to provide insight into which environment sounds best for my son, almost 6, who will be in 1st grade in the fall. He is leaving his Montessori school that ends at kindergarten.

So, in other words: if you could go back to grade school, where would you want your Mother to send you? Here are our choices:

(1) Montessori (free, charter) that goes up to 8th grade.

(2) Public school. 32 1st graders with one teacher.

(3) Twice Exceptional Gifted with Disability self contained classroom with children who tested as Gifted but also have something like Aspergers, ADHD, etc.

Please let me know what you think of these choices and if you could do school over again, where would you want your Mother to send you!!!??  Thanks!!!


For those interested-
This topic was started in another part of the forum:
http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com/showthread.php?tid=7248

I do understand posting in many parts of the forum to get as much feedback as you can in this situation.  Personally, though, I find it confusing to navigate and keep up with the conversations.

Hmm. This is a tough one. I know from my own experience, that I need both structure and the ability to learn at my own pace.

I have a sequencing disorder stacked with my Aspies so I heed things to be set out in a clear fashion, instructions and processes especially.
My memory is also strongly biased towards the visual spatial.

Probably doesn't answer your question, I know, but taking that into account I like the sound of #3 even though I don't appear as 'Gifted' to most people (I never really got exceptional grades.) The lower student to teacher ratio appeals to me.

Even in my current studies, I feel there are individuals who hog the tutor/lecturer/teacher's time even though their work is exceptional while I'm left to struggle with remembering the process used to complete the work.
It came to me, in the shower just now, that if primary and high school had been more oriented to the way I learn - as opposed to the "what works for everyone" approach - I might have achieved a whole lot more.

Looking back at it now, it seems like things were very achievement oriented in an area I wasn't particularly good at. On top of that, if you didn't achieve in those areas at a high enough level you either didn't get to try out things you might be better at because you were pulled out of class for extra help in your weak area (while the other kids did extra activities); or those activities just weren't available to you period.

Admittedly, a lot has changed in education since the 70's and 80's, but that's something I'd be looking for now; the oportunity to learn things that I know I'm better at even though I'm not particularly good at "core areas of learning".

Case in point, I've seen high school students carrying a laptop to school with them. (And I understand students can arrange to use their laptop in class in place of traditional materials - that is: pen/pencil and paper) Part of it is that when I was in High school I attended a new and small school that didn't have extensive resources, but the only computers were in the office and the library and they simply weren't used by students or to directly teach students.

Further, as others have said in other threads, I learn things faster/better if they can be related to one of my interests.
I'm also rather fussy and get bogged down in details, so while there are times when I need that structured 'kick in the pants' to get me moving on with a particular task, I also tend to like learning things that are a little on the side of the spectrum.

Ok, seems to me like I'm rambling and focusing on myself a bit so I'll end this post there.
If I understand it properly, I'd still prefer the Montessori style.  It's more geared towards hands-on, practical learning.  If there's zero structure and you can "learn" whatever you want, whenever you want then I don't know how well that'd work.  If it's structured like "We'll do math for the next 45 minutes." and the kids are given opportunities to learn math in their own way with assistance from the teachers then that would've worked for me.

Currently I am dealing with difficulties relating to co-workers in my workplace.  So, naturally, I am looking at this from the persepctive of how the school choice would affect the child in a life-long way.  To that end, I would have preferred more opportunities to engage with my peers.  I think I would've made more friends in the Montessori option than the other 2 options (lived option #2).

I guess it sort of depends on what your desired outcome is.  Academically the last option makes the most sense if your child can handle the potentially overwhelming environment.  Socially, I'd go for #1 and make sure the academics are happening.

I agree with a former poster who said to let your child have a say in the decision.  At least I agree in principle.  I am all about letting autistic kids make choices for themselves as much as is possible for them to handle.  (Sometimes the kids I help shut down when offered one too many choices in a day.  Heck, so do I!  That's when I say I don't care what's for dinner and my partner gets to decide.)  That being said, I caution that often a child's gut reaction decision can lead you astray.  If your child can't spend a good few days in each environment (rarely a feasible option) then I wouldn't count on a guided tour leading the way to a lightbulb above your head (at least not one with a strong, long-lasting shine).  I'd suggest you tour the places without your child to ensure their aren't any overwhelming sensory factors at any of these locations and to get a feel of the places for yourself, though.  I just imagine that your child might like a place for a reason you don't pick up on, like a child in the class they visit is wearing a shirt with something on it that your child is drawn to.  I know it sounds silly, but I doubt anyone would say it's entirely unlikely, especially for a child on the spectrum.

Is this helping at all?  It's hard for me, as a Special Needs Educator and a person on the spectrum, to not want to give as much help as I can when questions like these are posed.  I'll stop for now.

Again, I wish you luck in your journey and peace with your eventual decision.

Take care.

MomMagnus Wrote:
What kind of school did you ultimately go with? Please share and how old is your son? Thanks!


Our child is now 19 and has been in 8 (!) schools since we considered the Montessori school. That's a new school every 18 months. 4 of them public schools, 4 private schools (2 catholic, 2 protestant) Sad.

MomMagnus Wrote:
Yes, what you are saying is Extremely helpful. I am so happy to have posted here! Everyone is so cool and helpful.

Regarding the Montessori. You know, everyone has the impression that Montessori is "not structured." Not so. In our experience, there are a LOT of rules and a LOT of emphasis on respect for others and respect for the classroom materials. It is very "community" minded --- this is your classroom and you are a part of making it work and keeping it beautiful. They actually empower children with a lot of responsibility --- they let children do things that most people wouldn't expect small children to be able to do. They are given a lot of respect and independence. But that independence also has to be earned --- by the child following the rules of the classroom. This includes respect for other children on the playground and personal space issues too b/c they have to walk around each others' rugs on the floor where someone's "work" could be laid out.

I think people have the impression that kids can just do whatever they want. That's not true.  The way I see it, it is actually very structured -- they are "prepared" classrooms with everything child-sized and VERY organized.

What is NOT structured is time. It's not like 9-9:30 is math. 10-10:45 is reading. Yes, there are requirements for math, language every day, etc but the philosophy/method is that if a child is interested in something, he should be able to explore it as long as he wants. But he has to do those other requirements and also has to have a lesson first on any new "works" he wants to try. They can't just rummage through the room. They have to "ask for a lesson." The teacher then will "give the lesson" and show the child how it's done. Then the child has to do it back for the teacher to show that they understand. Then the child may do that lesson any time he wants as long as he has had a lesson on it.

The other main philosophy is that you don't interrupt the child. They are allowed to explore and do something they like or are fascinated with as long as they like......a little scary for an Aspie or someone on the spectrum??!! Smile But the point is, the teacher does not interrupt a child. This is supposed to develop concentration and you're not supposed to interrupt them while they are figuring things out.
So, let's say a child chooses to do "Plant Care" which is a small tray with a real live houseplant on the tray. The child takes the tray to his small desk. On the tray is a small spray water bottle and cotton balls and Q=Tips in a cup. The child puts on the accompanying apron, and is free to do Plant Care (as long as he has had a lesson on it). This involves spraying the plant with water, and wiping it clean with the cotton balls and Q-tips. The kid can do this for a freakin' half hour if he wants to. The point is, he is learning many things from this activity and is not being interrupted. (I witnessed my child doing this and it was awesome because he was so meticulous and careful (he is not so much at home!). Then when he is done, the child has to put back everything the way he found it. Folds the apron; puts everything back with great care.

That just gives you an example. Yes, it would be like: Math, what do you want to work on for math? There is required stuff, and then there is the "free to explore the classroom" time. THIS is where people I think get the wrong impression.

The other thing that is great in Montessori is that they use REAL materials. For example when children are learning about money, they use REAL money. They aren't given a worksheet with drawings of pennies or dimes. The work with real pennies and dimes, etc. It is rooted in the real world -- there is no pretend kitchen. They really cook. There is a kitchen right there in the school that the kids cook in. I saw one 4yr old child peeling potatoes - it was a lesson in March for St Patrick's Day. They do tons of cool stuff like that that are rooted in real life. And that's what that part of Montessori is called: "Practical Life"


YAAAAAAAAAY!!!  As an SEA I am constantly saying kids, especially those with special needs, need real money when learning about it!!  I know they've come out with some great, realistic looking, plastic coins but they don't weigh the same and that's a big part of learning about coins and what their values are!!  I guess that's so people don't use them in vending machines but that doesn't change my feelings.  Use real money!!

MomMagnus Wrote:
I guess the danger with Montessori is that an obsessive type child could perseverate and do repetitive stuff but I don't think a good Montessori school would let that go on for long. To me the classrooms are just so cool and stimulating because a kid can do anything like wash windows, hammer small nails into clay, trace letters in sand, tons of geography manipulatives, rocks, minerals they can touch. YOu kind of have to see it in action.  It's true that too many choices could be bad for ADHD types, but at the same time it has that freedom of choice that keeps the love of learning on fire.

I don't know. He did go to the Open House with me and Hubby almost a month ago and loved the Montessori school. I think he would feel at home and he knows the routine. That's so funny what you said about the shirt! Smile

But at the same time, I like the small class size and protectiveness of the Self Contained classroom. I feel like he would be safe there from teachers who don't understand him.

I really appreciate your thoughts regards the social aspect. The most important thing is the Emotional Quotient - I just want him to be happy. I don't care about the academics as long as he is happy. I don't want anyone messing with my kid's head! Smile Peers or teachers. So I am really being careful about this because I want him to have a very positive school experience because he is so enthusiastic about learning, if he has a bad experience it's just going to put out that spark.

I'm really rambling. Thanks so much for your post. It helps tremendously. Everyone's input has been very helpful.



I don't mean to negate anyone else's views, these are mine.

Personally, I think that structure can almost always be added, even in the environment you describe.  Use of a visual timer or a watch that beeps (or one of many other things that exist for this purpose) can help a child keep from working on the same thing for insane amounts of time.  
Does Montessori allow visual schedules?  If they do then I must say that'd I'd absolutely love the opportunity to work at such a school with an autistic child!!

I'm currently reading The Unwritten Rules of Social Relationships and in it both of the authors mention, repeatedly, about how important it is for an autistic individual to develop flexible thinking.  Indeed, they say it's important that you start as young as possible.  I wish sooo, sooo much that'd I'd had the chance to learn this at a young age!!  I struggle with it to this day.

As much as it might be difficult to make a decision, I'd be thrilled to have these options made available to me if I had a child on the spectrum!!

Take care!

Actually, why not online school? You can choose which people to listen to , from the computer...and even if there were 90 people in the classroom, you could still choose to listen, to the peers you wish to listen to. No noise!
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's