Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Wealthy School Systems More Likely to Spot Autism
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Children with signs of autism are more likely to be diagnosed with the disorder in wealthier school districts, results of a new study show.

"For some reason school districts with more resources have the ability to capture a greater percentage of autistic kids that are residing in their districts," study author Dr. Raymond F. Palmer, of the University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, told Reuters Health.

In light of this finding, "it is important to consider providing resources to poorer districts and economically disadvantaged communities to help them identify children with ASDs (autistic spectrum disorders) and other developmental delays that require attention," write Palmer and his colleagues in the American Journal of Public Health.

Through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, children with ASDs are eligible for special education services such as one-on-one instruction and behavioral interventions, from birth to 21 years old. Yet, up to 80 percent of children with an autistic spectrum disorder are not diagnosed until school age, studies show.

In the current study, Palmer and his team investigated the effect of community and school district resources on the identification of children with autism.

They looked at 1,040 school districts in Texas, representing approximately 4 million kindergartners through twelfth graders, from the 1994-1995 though the 2000-2001 school year.

In 1994-1995, 2.5 out of every 10,000 children, on average, were identified as having autistic disorder. This rate increased by about one child per 10,000 per year, the report indicates.

Revenue in the school districts ranged from $100,000 to $966.7 million, with the average being $17.4 million.

School districts with the highest revenues showed a three-fold increase in their rates of identification of children with autistic disorder, similar to the increasing rates of autism identified throughout the nation, Palmer and his team report.

"This disorder is exponentially increasing over time," said Palmer, who describes the phenomenon as an "epidemic."

Yet, districts with the lowest revenues showed little change in their rate of identification during the study period, Palmer and his team report.

By the end of the study period, for example, 21 out of every 10,000 children in the highest revenue districts were diagnosed with autism, compared with 3.5 per 10,000 children in the lowest revenue districts.

"Is there really less kids with autism in (poorer districts)?" Palmer asked. "I would think not."

Citing the importance of the "parental push factor," Palmer said that parents in wealthier districts may be better educated and more assertive and may push for the resources their child needs. On the other hand, even if children in poorer districts are identified and diagnosed with autism, the lack of resources may force schools to "scramble" to provide even sub-par services, he said.

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jht...ID=7194812
This makes some sense, and nearly all parents I know who have aspie kids have ended up sending them to private schools and some cases, making huge financial sacrifices. I don't think all private schools are better than state schools but they can certainly have the advantage of giving children more individualised attention.
ASC or ASC-behaving kids in wealthier schools will be labeled autistic (or learning disabled or ADHD or something like that) while kids in poorer schools with the exact same behavior will be labeled "problem children."
American school system is unequal for resources.  Canadian school system is becoming that way now.  

Poorer parents might also spend less time with their children and have less stimulated and poorer quality pre-school care.  If they do not have assess to public health care, they would not likely have their children assessed early for autism.  When the child arrives at school at age 5, the school will notice.

Lily_of_the_Field Wrote:
ASC or ASC-behaving kids in wealthier schools will be labeled autistic (or learning disabled or ADHD or something like that) while kids in poorer schools with the exact same behavior will be labeled "problem children."

All too true, and it's very likely they've been labelled as such in their homes too, so this would have added to their behaviour problems. Plus, their parents would have fewer resources to help them cope.

Mind you, that isn't always completely bad. If the parents could not afford intrusive programming or quack therapies, the kids might be better off than some others with wealthier parents. Then again, there might be less tolerance of their behaviour; if the parents are struggling with debt, addiction and poor housing.

Reference URL's