Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Any nationalists here?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I'm a Flemish nationalist and support the independence of the Flemish region and the destruction of the non-state called Belgium. My people has been exploited by the Walloons for far too long now and deserves to be independent.
I am a White Nationalist. I believe that whites have a culture and distinctiveness worth preserving. Since whites (of european ancestry) are quickly becoming minorities in all the places indigenous to them, I think that whites need to wake up and realize the situation. By 2050 we will be a minority in the USA.

What do you think?

Sat_Chit_Anand Wrote:

SonOfVlad Wrote:
I am a White Nationalist. I believe that whites have a culture and distinctiveness worth preserving. Since whites (of european ancestry) are quickly becoming minorities in all the places indigenous to them, I think that whites need to wake up and realize the situation. By 2050 we will be a minority in the USA.

What do you think?


I think that the wake up will be inevitable when capitalism fails. In America your main problem is that there are plenty of places and spaces to run to.

In the UK, where I live, we are already grossly overpopulated, and in a financial meltdown (it is happening) we would pressured enough just to feed and look after half of our white population, so I do fear for the future of our country.

Have you heard of the Pioneer Little Europe (PLE) idea? I used to see it being discussed on the Stormfront.org forum. I used to post there, until I was flamed for being too moderate. What is your white ancestry?

There is a higher incidence of autism within the Cro-Magnoid sub-racial groups of Europe. That might be of interest to you.

As an 'evil racist', it would suggest to me that autism genes have obviously played a beneficial role in assisting Cro-Magnon man in surviving the Ice Age.

There is also a high degree of political intolerance and trolling on this forum, but as you can see it is mostly ad hominem/fallacious, poorly constructed and directed towards me.


In the words of Scott Adams, I respectfully decline the invitation to join you're hallucination.

This thread is about nationalism right? What does nationalism have to do with Aspergian ideas?  Just about the same as over done pride based on ones ethnicity.  There are many difernt viewpoints in the world.  Some are seemingly well-thought out, others sure seem estreme, many others may feel are down right dumb.  We are all entitled to our opinions.  As they are like *** ***** we all have one.

Let us open our minds ... and close our books .... and put dwon our weapons (stop typing) and not feed the thread so that it grows into something we don't recognize.

pikajedi4 Wrote:
I'll get the cannon!



Warning; read the entirety of the following before constructing an opinion. the contents are not very well put, and are easily misconstrued

I was going to wait till I had a couple of people read this over, to see if it came across how I meant it, but sod it. it'll be irrelevent soon, so I may as well bite the bullet.

Sat_Chit_Anand Wrote:
The Nazi's ideas were sound except that they blamed 'the Jews' and other minorities and put science above morality.


mm...I think that's being quoted out of context.

think of it like this;

had they not been such racist fuckers, and genocidal manics, then it would have been view as remarkable how quickly the country was turned around.
I haven't put that across very well, so I expect to be misunderstood and quoted out of context.

I'll make this clear, here and now;
what happened then was aberrant. nothing could ever excuse it.
Hitler was...a fucking homicidal manic. but he was highly intelligent, and, (and this is what makes me doubt the people who say he had AS) he was charismatic.

He was a great man in the way that Stalin,Cromwell and the Roman emperors were; complete bastards.

I will again re-iterate; I am in no way defending or endorsing the ideologies or methodologies used; that would make me a right royal hypocrit.

people of such ilk rise to the fore in times of either great social upheaval (see: the Russian Revolution) or great economic depression, coupled with poor living standards.

and usually? the one who rises is but the tip of the boil.
eliminate the racists, and more will arise. the word I think I am looking for is "Martyr".

Given the choice, would you go back to WWI and correct the aim of the shell that just missed Hitler?
better the devil you know...if not him, then perhaps someone who was even worse, might have risen to the fore.

tip of the boil; you are seeing it here, first hand. otherwise rational people, become irrational around charisma.

incidentally, Oliver Cromwell was just as bad, if not worse. but you dont hear about that, do you?

Malic Cromwell; the Curse of Cromwell.

History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Winston Churchill


I have to disagree.  A strongman was sure to come to the fore in Germany, but Hitler was an aberration even among totalitarian strongmen.  Cromwell wasn't nearly as bad, nor was Stalin (I wrote an essay on this one.)  Kill Hitler and someone like Mussolini, the Italian Fascist leader, might have come to power; he was dangerous but not genocidal.  Italy actually harbored Jews during WWII despite being allied to Germany.

To the one with the underscores:

When you take out the eugenics, the Aryan nonsense (it's not even a real race; they pulled it out of a myth) and the aggressive foreign policy Nazism no longer has a leg to stand on.  If you'd said fascists instead of Nazis you might have had a chance at defending yourself, but 'kill the Jews' and 'Germans are better than everyone else" was pretty much the sum of Nazism.

pikajedi4 Wrote:
thing is, Hitler was not the only extreme anti-Semite in his party.
and Stalin killed a comparable amount.

Cromwell would have been just as bad, had he the technology.
you are aware of the many crimes he committed, I am sure..?

what about the mass killings in the name of the Pope? you have heard of Montségur and the Cathers? the Inquisition?
from the dawn of history, human beings have realised various forms of energy. civilisations have progressed with them. however, the technology of death tends to keep pace with it. its a bad habit of mankind to want to use its new toys immediately.


The 'technology of death' was only important because Hitler wanted to kill all the Jews as quickly as possible.  Cromwell had the time; if he'd really wanted to he could have totally purged Ireland, and he at least had the decency to insist he wasn't killing civilians.  Hitler bragged about it.  It's like Germany rolled a pair of dice and got a three.  Yeah, it could have been worse, but not much and not likely.  While it's true antisemitism was rampant at the time, most people (even Germans, before he got into power) thought Hitler was a raving lunatic (of course, better to support the lunatic than the commies, right?)

Also, the gas chambers weren't all that high tech; just a big closed off room you dropped cyanide tablets into.  Nobody had thought of using that stuff to kill before.

As for Stalin, yeah, he was a paranoid nut who had people killed for things like being the last to stop clapping for him.  But keep in mind, Hitler ruled for much, much less time than Stalin and racked up a higher kill count.  If Hitler had ruled as long as Stalin there'd be no Jews left in Europe.

The only allowance I'll make to the 'it could have been worse' argument is that they might have gotten a military genius.  Hitler micromanaged his generals way to much, and, though it got him past the Maginot Line, it lost him the Battle of Britain (hey, lets stop bombing air fields and go for London.  That'll make the Brits want to give up all right.)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Reference URL's