I am definately not a nationalist .... I am emigrating .... jumping ship .... leaving blighty for pastures new .... ! I am a lot of things but not a nationalist lol.
I am a White Nationalist. I believe that whites have a culture and distinctiveness worth preserving. Since whites (of european ancestry) are quickly becoming minorities in all the places indigenous to them, I think that whites need to wake up and realize the situation. By 2050 we will be a minority in the USA.
What do you think?
I just...dont know where to begin, other than facepalming into OBLIVION!!
seriously, this is not a forum that tolerates racism or bigotry.
if you have come here looking for like minded individuals, bugger off back to whence you came, if thats all you are going to talk about.
I have several hundred, you want a link?
He's alive. That proves that Darwin's theory of Evolution...
IS DEFUNCT!
National Communism eh? Yeah, I think that North Korea is probably better than they make out.
I like countries which resist. Libya, Iran, Cuba and North Korea are the four countries in the world which do not have a Rothschild controlled bank.
There are examples of nationalists who have been pretty wonderful.
Eva Peron, Ionnis Mextaxas (a Greek fascist who wanted to model Greece on national socialist Germany, but never killed a single political dissident, did not persecute Jews and resisted Mussolini!) and perhaps Mahatma Gandhi.
*smiles*
Why am I smiling? My name foreshadows which resisting county my descent is from!
"new"?
its been around for quite awhile.
sensitive moderation?
see: EvilZakkies reinstatement, Couldbecousins history of fair and intellegent moderation, and I would assume the older, prior mods were fair and just too.
Vlad's comments were blatently racist, and the forumites, in..no uncertain terms...told him that it is not appreciated, nor tolerated here.
quite frankly, most of us have been on the receiving end of that kind of hatred, and we cant stand it.
also;
oh, quit trying to flame Marcia.
I'm guessing you two have had a disagreement; keep it to the thread in which it occured, and be civil in the rest of them. snide comments are pathetic.
(that is, Sat, stop trying to flame Marcia, not Marcia, stop flaming...)
Veiled threats and snide remarks via private message, I will not tolerate it from the likes of him.
I've had them before, no doubt I will have them again.
easiest way to resolve that?
post 'em here -.-
I'll get the cannon!
Warning; read the entirety of the following before constructing an opinion. the contents are not very well put, and are easily misconstrued
I was going to wait till I had a couple of people read this over, to see if it came across how I meant it, but sod it. it'll be irrelevent soon, so I may as well bite the bullet.
The Nazi's ideas were sound except that they blamed 'the Jews' and other minorities and put science above morality.
mm...I think that's being quoted out of context.
think of it like this;
had they not been such racist fuckers, and genocidal manics, then it would have been view as remarkable how quickly the country was turned around.
I haven't put that across very well, so I expect to be misunderstood and quoted out of context.
I'll make this clear, here and now;
what happened then was aberrant. nothing could ever excuse it.
Hitler was...a fucking homicidal manic. but he was highly intelligent, and, (and this is what makes me doubt the people who say he had AS) he was charismatic.
He was a great man in the way that Stalin,Cromwell and the Roman emperors were; complete bastards.
I will again re-iterate; I am in no way defending or endorsing the ideologies or methodologies used; that would make me a right royal hypocrit.
people of such ilk rise to the fore in times of either great social upheaval (see: the Russian Revolution) or great economic depression, coupled with poor living standards.
and usually? the one who rises is but the tip of the boil.
eliminate the racists, and more will arise. the word I think I am looking for is "Martyr".
Given the choice, would you go back to WWI and correct the aim of the shell that just missed Hitler?
better the devil you know...if not him, then perhaps someone who was even worse, might have risen to the fore.
tip of the boil; you are seeing it here, first hand. otherwise rational people, become irrational around charisma.
incidentally, Oliver Cromwell was just as bad, if not worse. but you dont hear about that, do you?
Malic Cromwell; the Curse of Cromwell.
History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Winston Churchill
thing is, Hitler was not the only extreme anti-Semite in his party.
and Stalin killed a comparable amount.
Cromwell would have been just as bad, had he the technology.
you are aware of the many crimes he committed, I am sure..?
what about the mass killings in the name of the Pope? you have heard of Montségur and the Cathers? the Inquisition?
from the dawn of history, human beings have realised various forms of energy. civilisations have progressed with them. however, the technology of death tends to keep pace with it. its a bad habit of mankind to want to use its new toys immediately.
I have to disagree. A strongman was sure to come to the fore in Germany, but Hitler was an aberration even among totalitarian strongmen. Cromwell wasn't nearly as bad, nor was Stalin (I wrote an essay on this one.) Kill Hitler and someone like Mussolini, the Italian Fascist leader, might have come to power; he was dangerous but not genocidal. Italy actually harbored Jews during WWII despite being allied to Germany.
Given the choice, would you go back to WWI and correct the aim of the shell that just missed Hitler?
better the devil you know...if not him, then perhaps someone who was even worse, might have risen to the fore.
yeah, it feels like December '06 again...
alright guys, settle down, back to topic. lets have some debate here people!
