Aspies For Freedom

I would describe myself as a neuro-socialist. It is the patriotism and brotherhood of the neurologically unique. The nationalism is in one's extreme pride of their difference which transcends all races, ethnicities, religions and so forth, to improve their people's situation in NT society or to establish a separate society of their own (which is what I'm for) in the form of a nation, to corrode all thoughts and behaviour and language that is reserved for neurotypicals only, and to establish dominance over NT's, who in turn are meant to serve our needs and whims. The socialism is the type where Aspies, Auts and other neurologically unique are all equal, transcending race, religion, ethnicity, etc., that the welfare of the community and individual rights are equally important and come first, yet the democratic and socialistic benefits are reserved for the neurologically unique only.

Well, the Nazis actually exploited the word and used it in the most extreme of examples. My type of nationalism is something quite different.

And you still don't live in any of those countries.  Evidently, you'll talk the talk but don't have the guts to walk the walk.

Therefore, they will institute eugenics to ensure it.

I doubt they would get back. And if they stayed in hell, how would they know the difference.

Anything to an extreme is wrong , even PC ism.  Its a balance.

But, perhaps that is what he is talking about, the Orwellian society. This societal system monitors those it finds repelling the social order with labels. Then having labeled those who oppose its policies, that system attempts to ruin their reputations, and impute ill will, a concept that Orwell called doublethink. I wouldn't doubt that involved in the BNP as countelpro to make it look bad.

Anyhow, just look at the the number of cameras you Brits have on every street corner {think telescreens} and tell me that you don't already live in an Orwellian society.

On another note, I laugh at all those Tories and G.W. Bush types that laud the system of "Adam Smith" when that was the imperial system of old in which the colonies produced the raw materials, and Britain produced the final products.

How can anyone compete against a slave labor system such as in China where the government controls the means of production and the United States buys the product on at a fixed exchange rate.

It's the exact opposite of Adam Smith's system more rightly titled The International Wealth of the Few in a Few Nations

I've reiterated the following having noticed ample spelling and structural errors in the first post.

But, perhaps that is what he is talking about, the Orwellian society. The Orwellian society monitors those it finds repelling the social order and labels those who oppose its policies. Then having labeled those who oppose its policies, that system attempts to ruin their reputations, and impute ill will. Sometimes new labels are created, and new phrases coined in an attempt to control the language of the argument. I believe that Orwell called these phenomenon doublethink, and doublespeak, respectively. I wouldn't doubt that someone at the level of the government is involved in the BNP as countelpro, if only to monitor the party or incite incidents and recruit members that make it look bad.

Anyhow, just look at the the number of cameras you Brits have on every street corner {think telescreens} and tell me that you don't already live in an Orwellian society.

On another note, I laugh at all those Tories and G.W. Bush types that laud the system of "Adam Smith" when that was the imperial system of old in which the colonies produced the raw materials, and Britain produced the final products.

These same persons like Alan Greenspan or George W. then brag about their free market ideals and knowledge of Adam Smith's work. Only, in modern economics we have a system quite unlike "The Wealth of Nations".

How can other nations such as the U.K. or "new democracies" such as Russia compete against a slave labor system such as in China where the government controls the means of production and the United States buys the product at a fixed exchange rate. In turn, China buys America's debt instruments.

It's the exact opposite of Adam Smith's system, and more rightly titled "The International Wealth of the Few in a Few Nations."

This is a most interesting thread.

Anand has shown us four states that don't play the international banking game, but none strike me as the kind of place I'd like to live in.

Jean-Pierre seems to find North Korea a model of order, but again I don't see a system that productively handles either the employment of its people or the international banking system.

Stuart M has shown us a picture of "the Nazis" ie Tyndall. Pictures may speak a thousand words and strike a thousand blows if your enemy uses them wisely. Iconography stifles further thought and is a primary weapon in the game of politics. Just my thoughts on the matter.

There was even some talk about the Greens.

Bump!

As a species we claim to be the superior one, yet we have to stop at something we call a 'national border' where the lowly ant crosses freely. I guess nationalism has served to defeat greater injustices which happened in the systems it replaced, but the idealist in me doesn't want this to be the final stage in our development.

I would hope that mankind might govern his/her affairs more responsibly than a band of marauding ants, for what happens when there are too many ants, or ants of a daintier type accidentally find themselves down the shaft of another colony?

In that case I would venture, "so much for the unity of ants!"

Of course, the social order of the ant is directed by chemical/ pheromonal emissions while that of mankind should be directed by humanity/ charity, or at least, some system of laws.

Apparently, at times our systems have become confused only to reach the picayune level of lost ants and ant aggressors.

Yet, collectively we are ants.

So, nature=bad.

Artificial constructs=good?

In their own anarchic way the ants are better prepared for reality than the humans.

Lots of ant have stepped on me. I never took any harm from it (well, some of them bite). Your point?

And no, I'm not a nationalist.

In the South we have what is called the bull ant. It is large and orange with stripes like a tiger.

You can step on it with your natural weight and yet there is no way to kill it. Luckily it is a friendly ant.

More like a little roving tank than anything.

Actually, it's the cow ant.