I wouldn't categorize my political ideology as socialist... but I do agree with some socialist ideals...
I do think a strong central government is helpful, as long as they aren't dictating morals...I do believe that gov't programs can shape the country for the better... the problem is the connotation that comes with the word "socialist", especially in the US... people here think communism is the same, then the association is made with the Soviet Union, and China, you can see where it goes from there...inane stereotyping...
I also advocate a strong sense of libertarianism in how our gov't deals with issues of gender, race, preference, religion, etc... the gov't should not make laws that dictate morality... all people deserve to be treated equal... people have the right to decide what is best for themselves... internationally, we need to be humane, but not builders of nations...
I come down somewhat conservative(historical sense) on the idea of fiscal contraint, we should not spend more than we take in... a flat graduated taxation system...
So I would call myself pragmatic... maybe a social liberal... or a fiscal conservative... if someone has one of those parties, I will join.. I suppose I am an independent...
I believe that socialist enthusiasts should be given interest-free loans by to set up collectives, co-ops and communes, and that workers should be able to get assistance from local authorities to form co-operatives, or to create worker shareholder schemes, if they choose to.
Apart from that everything should be run on a free market system, apart from perhaps public utlities which could be publicly owned according to the situation.
I am a member of the BNP (British National Party, http://www.bnp.org.uk)
This explains the model which the BNP favours:
http://www.bnp.org.uk/articles/worker_ownership.html
I think that it is a little bit more realistic than socialism.
Apart from that everything should be run on a free market system, apart from perhaps public utlities which could be publicly owned according to the situation.
What do the socialists think of this idea?
Thanks,
Sat.
I think that these methods can work within a capitalist system to promote a more equal society.
Co-operative home-schooling
Credit Unions
Local Exchange Trading Schemes (currency free)
Local Buying Co-operatives
Co-operatives
Co-housing schemes
Saint is talking about what Thatcher did when she 'privatised' our national assets. They were sold to friends of the Conservative Party, but clauses were put in so that the tax payer would still have to bail them out when they failed.
British Rail could not really have been run as a workers' co-operative. However, I could perhaps envisage a mixture of public ownership, with workers' holding a stake in the company.
KIM IL SUNG FOREVER ! ! !
None of them do.
That would scupper me good and proper ;] I would be, in a word, buggered.
While "I don't have a political mind" sounds nice and humble, being able to reason right from wrong (apart from, say, "murder is wrong", "theft is wrong" and other widely-accepted norms) isn't really humble.
Making moral cases, I have found, is extremely hard, especially since even establishing the existence of objective morality is so hard.
ummmmmm - sometimes telling right from wrong is reasonably straight forward- (I think). Making moral cases can be extremely difficult - A lot of it comes down to careful weighing up of ethics - based on moral norms and personal values.
Good point Simen - maybe I was oversimplying.
Well, until I get my dynastic, totalitarian, hegemonic style of Business going.
Whoops.