Aspies For Freedom

You'd be amazed at how stupid some people can get.

Reading that blog, I'm thinking the exact same thing.

Not Like while he's still posting.

All I need to say.

Mich - this is the "famous" Phil that gets mentioned on Best's blog every now and then, and I thought I would tell you (and the rest of the forum) about my article on the twit;

(and I'll break it up per forum rules!)

http:// phils world.wiki- site.com/index .php/Fore _Sam

It includes two update articles.

Also, take a look at this one as well (and I think this link will be OK so I won't break it up - Gareth can break it if he disagrees with me)

http://philsworld.wiki-site.com/index.ph...-_The_Myth

Best is a meglomaniac. Pure and simple.

Don't email him, Flardox. It won't do any good. All he'll do is either ignore it totally, or respond with his usual "go and get cured" BS. Or both.

Unfortunately, Alison, I think he's one of us. In denial of course.

This paragraph nails in one why this blog is so dangerous, because (as indicated by your experience with your local politicians, Alien Girl) too many people think like this. Best puts into words what many people think. You should see how he reacted when it was suggested (but never confirmed thankfully) that Cho Seung-Hui was Autistic. It was just as bad as the article Aspie 44.8 quoted, if not worse. Heck - as a result of that Best attacked my Wiki asking me if I owned a gun! And I wasn't the only one who copped that one!

He added another target recently - William Stillman. Along with his "obligatory" rants at Kathy Seidel and Kristina Chew. Interestingly though his last three subject posts on Kev Leitch, Amanda Baggs and myself are all gone. I know why mine's gone, and I'll bet I know why the other two went as well.

But I think it's not right to just ignore this person. If one feels more comfortable ignoring him then OK, that's no skin off my nose. But I for one feel far more comfortable fighting him - given that he has attacked me personally. And I do it in my own way - off his blog.

Actually I think this went just a tad too far, guys. OK - he deserves to be insulted, and I've come up with some beauties in the past - but wishing death on someone else is not on no matter what.

Just as a matter of interest, which thread is this on? (Don't link it!)

Did you record your post, Tenacious? Always a good idea to do that because Best has a habit of deleting posts he doesn't like so they never show up on the thread.

And I want to point out that NOTHING I have said or done (or tried to do) to Fore Sam is as bad as wishing death on him. Wishing death on anyone is a heinous statement that is the lowest of low. Compared to that I'd consider being called a child abuser/neglector a compliment. Mind you - in the eyes of some one is normally followed by the other (ie "you are a child neglector - you deserve to die"). That's a great example of a fair comment then sinking to the gutter - using Best as an example.

As observed above, you got it backwards!

Replace "BETTER" with "WORSE" and then you've got it right.

I think your intense personal hatred of me is making you see things - maybe you should get away from me as I have already told you to do.

AI - what you have suggested has already been done by a number of people. All it does is give him more fodder. He does it to me for that reason because I have a lot of commentary on him on my Wiki. That's OK - one back scratches the other because whenever he responds to me I've always got an answer.

Anyway - if Google (AKA Blogger) were to act, they would not just delete the blog they would delete his account as well. Bang goes his archives.

Ignoring him doesn't work. I assume you haven't been personally attacked by him. Speaking as someone who has, he has a knack of dragging people into arguments and embarrassing the heck out of them. I've been caught a few times - although the last one will come back and haunt him and he knows it as well.

I've said enough.

Tenacious, in case you missed it - as a result of Fore Sam's slander I got a visit from the police. So someone took that seriously at least.

AI I did see your comment, and it was a good one!

He didn't report me. Someone else did. And no I did not deserve it because (unlike Best) I did not do what was accused. Best has done what I accused him of - and I will stand by that.

Once, in January. And it wasn't his conduct that caused the report - it was his neglect. For SEVEN YEARS he did NOTHING to help his son (1997 to 2004) and for that entire period Sam was in physical pain (gut problems). And likely did damage in the process.

http://philsworld.wiki-site.com/index.ph...neral%29_9

Read it - and learn the truth about Best. In HIS words. Mine merely emphasises the point.

Time this thread was locked I think. As I recall, Amy wanted discussion about Best to stop. On this board we have other things to talk about. As far as I'm concerned - the matter is in hand. I have my Wiki, and I have my lawsuit (for the Kurai-Gaka incident) to work on. I don't need to talk about that here. And if everyone else wants the subject dropped who am I to argue? I tried to drop it some time ago - on this board. And I think it's about time Rossco dropped his petty feud with me while we're about it.

No, Tenacious, it was his LACK of action that was the problem. And the wrong action on top of that once he actually started to do something.

And no, I don't think it was "leaky gut syndrome" although to be honest I don't know what that is. I'm just going on the name you gave and it doesn't sound right. Sam was severely constipated just to help you out.

Because chelation fixed that particular problem, Tenacious, I lean towards heavy metals in his intestines - which gives rise to the question "What was Best feeding his son anyway??" Definitely medical attention was needed, but did Best pursue that line? Nope - he was too busy blaming it all on Autism and pursuing that idea exclusively.

Tenacious, ignore Rossco. He is biased against me out of sheer hatred and nothing else. I don't think he's capable of thinking clearly on any matter relating to me and my view of John Best.

If you look at the link I provided above, I explain it in more detail. The constipation was very bad. You may understand the situation better if you give that a look.

You could be right about the chelation being a coincidence - but when I quoted Best in the afore mentioned link, that wasn't the only thing that happened - related to the gut problems. Sam also had a limp and that also disappeared at the same time - likely he was cramped up slightly by the pain. I know the feeling. I had gut problems when I was 19 and I was the same. Mind you my problem wasn't constipation - it was something else. And it was resolved by an operation.