12-23-2006, 10:55 AM
This is the thought I am analysing at the moment waiting for my friend to lend me season 2 of House.
Why does an actor who has bi-polar disorder do a blxxdy good job of playing a role of someone who shows the characteristics and traits of asperger's?
Why is bi-polar so close to asperger's?
people on the autistic spectrum can have either low or high seratonin as I have read, hence b-polar (autistic bi-polar), drugs to treat this have failed, the one that worked had too many side affects (I got this info from a diet sheet from NAT), recognise that diets is the way to treat it.
I have read that in diagnosing adults with asperger's they look to a history of bi-polar disorder, bear in mind asperger's was not recognised officially until 1994 even though the severest cases were noted in 1944 by Asperger, the paper made its way to the UK in 1981. Now teacher's are aware of asperger's, ad/hd, the like now.
They are recognising girls are different, internalising not expternailising.
Is bi-polar over diagnosed? My family has a history of manic depression (unofficial with the exception of my cousin who childhod ad/hd was reclassified as bi-polar recently, now they are looking at asperger's this is in south africa).
This has puzzled me as my case is being treated as bi-polar, now its either asperger's or bi-polar, my colleagues are doing the same thing.
Thought this was something that ought to be discussed, it seems tragic, I am aware of a lot of bi-polar suffers who meds do not seem to work for all, its traumatic and has lead to social exclusion, drug abuse, family stress, major depression. Surely primary bi-polar would be manageable with drug treatment? Therefore a relatively stable/normal life would be possible?
Why does an actor who has bi-polar disorder do a blxxdy good job of playing a role of someone who shows the characteristics and traits of asperger's?
Why is bi-polar so close to asperger's?
people on the autistic spectrum can have either low or high seratonin as I have read, hence b-polar (autistic bi-polar), drugs to treat this have failed, the one that worked had too many side affects (I got this info from a diet sheet from NAT), recognise that diets is the way to treat it.
I have read that in diagnosing adults with asperger's they look to a history of bi-polar disorder, bear in mind asperger's was not recognised officially until 1994 even though the severest cases were noted in 1944 by Asperger, the paper made its way to the UK in 1981. Now teacher's are aware of asperger's, ad/hd, the like now.
They are recognising girls are different, internalising not expternailising.
Is bi-polar over diagnosed? My family has a history of manic depression (unofficial with the exception of my cousin who childhod ad/hd was reclassified as bi-polar recently, now they are looking at asperger's this is in south africa).
This has puzzled me as my case is being treated as bi-polar, now its either asperger's or bi-polar, my colleagues are doing the same thing.
Thought this was something that ought to be discussed, it seems tragic, I am aware of a lot of bi-polar suffers who meds do not seem to work for all, its traumatic and has lead to social exclusion, drug abuse, family stress, major depression. Surely primary bi-polar would be manageable with drug treatment? Therefore a relatively stable/normal life would be possible?