Sorry, I just can't less this post go by.
I am convinced that the SYSTEM has to be changed RADICALLY.
We should examine if pupils really need to go to school at all - hey, don't get me wrong! Up to a few decades ago it was only a small (up-scale) sector of society who received formal education.
Wrong!
Education, at least at a primary school level, was made compulsory in some American states in the mid 19th century, in Scotland in 1872 and in England and Wales shortly afterwards.
The big majority of kids would play and work (i'm not suggesting child-labour, mind you!).
Yes. They'd work on an apprenticeship learning how to make clothes so that your average person could have five shirts to wear. The industrial revolution outdated all that,
For centuries, humans lived a much better life than we are doing, even though their levels of education was much less.[quote]
Waitaminute, so if the average person never travels more than 30 miles from their house, has to walk a mile to get to the store, lives in a small house, lives off of bread, potatoes, and whatever else they can get, and has to live with having 25% of their kids die in early childhood, that's a "better life?" Modern medicine didn't exist, doctors would amputate limbs regularly, there were no computers or the internet, your average peasant couldn't read, AND YOU CALL ALL THIS A BETTER LIFE?
[quote]My point is that the educational system is overloaded. And there is NO GAIN in it.
There's no gain in learning about fractions and decimals, about how only certain types of clouds produce rain, how to read, how to spell, etc? There definitely is gain...
Anyone whose IQ is less than 130 would never make it to a rocket-technology lab ... if you can get what i mean
You mean only the gifted become scientists, engineers, mathematicians, and other educated positions? Wrong!
... so why the hell are teachers making everyone study a gazillion of (useless) things ?
Why the hell do athletes try to learn how to benchpress 300 pounds? They'll never need to do that in a game...
It's lifting weights with your mind.
Why are we forcing kids to sit for complicated (not complex!) examinations?
To make sure they retained the material, duh!
Why are we making it so hard for them?
We're making it hard for them? I suppose it is *possible* that the Italian and Japanese exchange students I've met who called the American education system comparatively easy were lying, but I doubt it...
And why don't we tell them the truth: "There is no special destiny for you, my son! You will have to strive and struggle just as your ancestors used to do."
Just to avoid being accused of ignoring your arguments, I state that I have no idea what you're talking about.
Thomas Edison had received no special schooling and Socrates did not attend any academy (the concept of "academy" was eventually invented by one of his students!). Yet their genius revolutionized the world.
Lots of other people did receive special schooling. Albert Einstein, the greatest genius of the 20th century, did. John von Neumann, the second greatest genius of the 20th century did.
In contrast, we were made to study loads of things like crazy ... and what did we achieve? We're here on this forum grumbling like crazy! ! ! ! ! !
You can read. You know how to use a computer. You know how to write well enough to grumble. You have the vocabulary necessary to grumble.
You cannot judge the entire system, which varies heavily, by one school, be it the best or the worst.
To all, I recommend Paul Graham's most famous and popular essay: Why Nerds Are Unpopular, which, contrary to the name, deals with the school system not only on the subject of why nerds are unpopular.