Aspies For Freedom

I am an anarchist in my heart.  I don't mind if people tell me what to do, but that does not mean I am gonna do it.   I support myself and live under the radar so I do the LEAST to tick anyone off so I can have the biggest amount of freedom.
Mavis

I think AS makes people prone to anarchism because a strong sense of logic and practically will push people against lousy rules. However, that same sense of practicallity and logic should also bring us to accept that some rules are practical and necesairy.

Your point being?

I only know one anarchisitc party the APPD The anarchisitc pogo party of Germany
Main Aim. Balkanisaton of Germany , beer for everyone.

An antichrist is anyone who denies that Christ is the promised Messiah.  Thus, there are probably a lot of antichrists here.  "The Antichrist" is a particular antichrist who will become a major world ruler and institute a reign of terror, with worship either of himself or of the state as the only legal religion.  But even in his case, he is not some sort of supernatural entity, merely a charismatic human being.

So, how many countries do you rule?  If you're not well on your way to world domination, you're still just a garden-variety penny-ante antichrist.

Anarchy is, like communism, an idea that would only work if everyone was sane, rational and basically good (in the sense of having a moral code, doesn't really what that code is).

Nevertheless, I am, personally, an Anarchist. I pay no attention to rules that make no sense, and I hold firm to my belief that if George Bush & co really cared about Iraq that would have sent an assassin instead of bombing them. I know it wouldn't have solved the underlying problems anymore than war has, but it wouldn't have caused so many new ones either.

The problem with laws is that there is always an exeption to the rule, and the Law, by nature and necessity, never makes allowances for that.

Once again, it seems that very few people have the intelligence to understand the difference between generic "anarchy" and the specific political movement of "Anarchism".

Since I'm not a delusional out-of-touch goofball, I lean towards no flavor of Anarchism.  I actually have some experience with reality and refuse to live in a fantasy world, so it is not possible for me to actually espouse any sort of Anarchism, no matter how pretty a pipe dream any of them might be.

That being said, I'm familiar with pre-Marxist communal Christian anarchism (I grew up in Indiana, where New Harmony exists, after all), Nihilism, Minarchism, Rothbardian Anarcho-capitalism, Marxist Anarcho-socialism, and a few other currents.

Some people prefer to live striving for an ideal. You might call it naive, but that attitude has created many great things. Those who believe it is impossible to do something should not get in the way of those that are doing it.

I said "striving for an ideal", not "impose out-of-touch...harmful dogmas upon us all." I also never said only good outcomes are possible.

You have a flair for negative dramatics, DogBrain.

It is possible to live without trying to force others to do what you want. I find the tangle you've created between the word "ideals" and the word "dogma" very odd. They are capable of existing independently.

One can also at once be an idealist and a realist, capable of dealing with details.

People agree to be "receptacles" for semen for free, people like mothers. Are they dirty too? Is it the price of a courtesan that you find distasteful, or simply sex itself? This strange simile of yours opens up a whole new arena of discussion.

I did notice.

It was an area I saw in the "arena of discussion" I said his simile had opened. My primary point was about prostitution itself. I have found that introducing any perceived feminist slant can rattle some readers out of all logic, so that they miss my original point. I decided to proceed one subject at a time for that reason.