Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Redefining autism
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Four-year-old Adam Wolfond is comforted by shadows. Jumping on his backyard trampoline, with his arms at his side and his face turned to the sun, he wiggles his hands furiously so that, in the lower periphery of his vision, he sees sunlight flicker through his tiny fingers.

His parents noticed this shadow play as early as his first birthday party. "I think there's something wrong," his father, Henry Wolfond, said at the time, to which his mother, Estee Klar-Wolfond, answered crossly, "There is nothing wrong with my child."

Today, as she leads an effort to rebrand autism as a positive condition -- an ability rather than a disability, even a gift -- she still believes there is nothing wrong with Adam, despite knowing he is autistic, and that his shadow play is properly called self-stimulatory behaviour, like his habit of spinning around and around, and strangely never losing his balance. The trampoline has a similar calming effect.

"I could never think about Adam losing his Adamness," Ms. Klar-Wolfond told a packed uptown art gallery on Thursday night, where a show of paintings by autistic artists went on display. It is part of The Joy of Autism, Ms. Klar-Wolfond's month-long lecture series that begins next week.

It is also part of the wider and controversial "neurodiversity" movement, according to which autism is simply a different way of thinking, not a disability, and certainly not an illness.

Advocates claim that treating autism is akin to treating left-handedness or homosexuality --an impossible goal that can only end in disaster. They claim the words used to describe autism are unfairly loaded, and focus on disability over ability.

"Semantics are very important to us," Ms. Klar-Wolfond said. "Our children have so many hurdles to face, at least we can advocate for accurate representation and a rigorous science."

Skeptics see the movement as fetishizing disability, or the blinkered refusal of parents to accept that their child is less than perfect and in need of treatment.

Hanging over this debate is the hypothetical cure, which some consider the goal of the current scientific effort to map autism's genetic aspects, and others see as the planned genocide of peculiar people.

If there was a cure, "I would be injecting," said Wendy Roberts, director of the Autism Research Unit at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children, and a leader of the genome-mapping project.

She meets parents who have been beaten black and blue by their autistic children, and spent more than they can afford on treatment that is not covered by provincial health plans.

"Those people would laugh at the concept that autism is something to cherish," she said.

She has also met people with autistic siblings who refuse to have children of their own until they can be sure they will not be autistic. Such a prenatal genetic test, however, is at least 10 years away.

And yet, she says it is ridiculous to call autism a disease.

"I think of autism as being a difference in wiring," she said. It is like a collection of otherwise normal "quirks" that are taken to such an extreme that they impair a person's ability to function. But it is still "on a continuum of normal."

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news

TheDifferenceEngine Wrote:
These curists are nazis.

And, historically there is only one way to deal with nazis.


Actually, many of them are simply misguided, well-meaning parents who are unaware of the implications of what they are doing.  Estee was a regional fundraising coordinator for NAAR two years ago, before she learned that the money was being used to develop a prenatal test.  She honestly believed that she was working for a charity that would help her son.

So don't be too quick to reach for the crowbar.  There are quite a few pro-cure folks who can be converted to our way of seeing things, if we take the time to engage them in a personal and respectful dialogue.

Yes, that's a valid point about Downs syndrome. I understand that most women who are found to be expecting a baby with Downs syndrome are advised to have an abortion.

Never mind that at the stage that it is found (around 16 weeks+), they often have to go through a form of labour to have the child. Surely, apart from any ethical considerations (of which there are plenty), if they have to go through labour, why not have the child?

There's far worse things to cope with than Down's syndrome.

As for autism, there is no way of knowing prenatally how severe it is going to be so if a prenatal test goes ahead and made widely available, babies at any point of the spectrum would be in danger of being aborted.

This is hardly the kind of thing I would like to see - it is bad enough that a form of genocide is being carried out on Downs syndrome foetuses.
It's discrimination in our society and ignorant attitudes that are the main problems.
Getting back to the original post - it is most interesting that now parents who do not wish their autistic children did not exist are being treated the same as autistic adults. You can only be accepted if you agree with them in the world of the curebies.
Iron Man, I used to go on the bus into town of a morning and there were some Downs syndrome ladies - they had a bit of a speech impediment but were nicely dressed and had jobs.

Not all Downs syndrome people are severely retarded: in fact, most are mildly to moderately retarded and some of "normal" intelligence. The test doesn't tell a prospective parent how severe the condition will be and there are false positives and false negatives from the tests that are available.

It's not very likely that I would have any more children but I wouldn't want anything other the usual ultrasounds.
But can we expect to be treated with consideration if we show discrimination against people with Down's syndrome and the like?

I will leave the CAN heads out of this as they have no excuse for making unintelligent comments and they are able to fight back.
I must agree that this "political correctness" claptrap has gone too far. Last year, a school principal had to apologise to some parents because she used the word "Christmas" "too often" in a school newsletter.

Then again, some pre-schools have done away with Christmas celebrations because a minority of children come from families that don't celebrate Christmas.

We're so afraid of causing offence to one group we end up causing offence to all the other groups. It reminds me of a joke that was doing the rounds a while back where this lady was organising a work Christmas party. In the end, she had a nervous breakdown because all her efforts to appease various minority groups upset other minority groups.

There was also an episode on South Park that had a similar theme and in the end, Hankey the Christmas Poo was the one who told them all to wake up to themselves. Imagine that, a poo had more common sense than supposedly intelligent people?
Of course, this presupposes that there is a cure for autism and there isn't one and what's more, there isn't likely to be one.

Iron_Man Wrote:
If we asked Down's patients directly if they wanted to be cured, and an overwhelming majority said no, then so endeth the matter.


This is what some people with Down's (and by the way, they don't like being called "patients" any more than we do) have said about it:

http://www.mouthmag.com/issues/78/30_souza.html

As for what you've seen in institutions, anyone who visited the cesspools where autistic children used to be routinely thrown away wouldn't have had a very high opinion of autistic intelligence, either.  That's probably where CAN and other such groups got their stereotypes.

Here's a link about that (I know you're a tough guy, Iron Man, but I should warn other readers, it's pretty disturbing stuff).

http://atlanta.creativeloafing.com/gyrob...d%3A114404

One of my favourite books is a quite dark work by Dean Koontz named "Seize the night" (If you wish to read this - read the prequel first, not as involved but sets the scene very nicely). Most of the book is quite irrelevant to this discussion (some stereotypical sci-fi horror actually) but one theme that sticks out is the idea of raising someone's intelligence just enough for them to want more and to be miserable but not enough to overcome themselves. In the book, there are some horrendous scenes of violent suicide caused by self-hatred in both animals and humans (the animals having their intelligence artificially raised until they despise their animal nature and long to be at the level of humanity but lack the ability to get there and the humans becoming more primitive).

The true horror of what the curebies represent is not just preventing people like us (at any part of the spectrum) from being born but in robbing those who do make it of self-esteem, and setting the majority up for failure. It is a horrible thing to witness someone with so much potential being brought down.

Quote:
Accepting Autism
I copied this from a scanned copy of the paper today. The paragraphs are a little off in reformatting here.

COUNTERPOINT -- Today in The National Post
Accepting autism
Estee and HENRY WOLFOND

The article in last Saturday's Post headlined Redefining Autism grossly mischaracterized the mission of The Autism Acceptance Project and misrepresented
the role that we take in raising our autistic son. The premise that acceptance
of our son's autistic condition equates to acquiescence or denial is totally
misleading. Autism is a challenge. Our son works many hours with us,with speech language therapists, with occupational herapists and with his school teachers to learn and thrive in the world. We do everything we can to ensure him the brightest future possible- a future that will include autism.

Autism is a disability that needs to be accepted and accommodated in society
in the same way that ramps are provided for the wheelchair-bound and braille
is put on signs for the blind. We view it as a human rights issue. The focus of
The Autism Acceptance Project is promoting the objectives of gaining deeper
scientific understanding of autism and exploring methodologies to enhance
autistic potential through reciprocal education of both the autistic and nonautistic
populations. It is imperative that autistic individuals participate in
this dialogue. We advocate that more funding be applied to research the inherent
strengths and weaknesses of autistic people. Services and government financial support should be provided to accommodate autistic people. All policies must respect the dignity and intelligence of the autistic individual and their special needs.

While the title of The Autism Acceptance Project's exhibit and conference,
"The Joy of Autism: may be provocative,it is organizations that attack autism as a
disease to be beaten, the ones that focus on the "misery of autism" (Autism
Speaks, Defeat Autism Now, etc.), that undermine the opportunities for autistic
children to lead happy, productive lives. The message that war must be waged on
autism leads to prejudice against autistics. Despite their peculiar behaviour,
autistic people have intelligence, sensitivity and many other empirically documented
strengths. So long as we persist with the view that normalizing our children
is the ultimate goal, autistic people will continuously face stigma and discrimination. Misery proponents lead parents to believe that autism is attacking our children and needs to be eradicated. Parents are channeled in to a therapy that aimsto normalize behaviour - to make their children "inistinguishable from their
neurotypical peers." There is no accommodation for a parent who accepts that
his child may at times behave autistically, but who still wants to focus on developing inherent intellectual strengths.

If there is anything that could ravage our son Adam of which we are most fearful, it is this attitude that he is somehow diseased, insufficient or incomplete. As we evolve, let us all find a common language that supports parents and families so that our autistic children can be the best autistic children they can be. We work to achieve every possibility for our son. Adam works very hard to reciprocate, to become part of this world that judges him so harshly. To witness such an affectionate, charming child be viewed by society as less than human - in fact, "not human at all" - that is the tragedy.

National Post
estee@taaproject.com
I Estee and Henry Wolfond are
founders of The Autism Acceptance
Project.


http://joyofautism.blogspot.com/2006/10/...utism.html

see also: http://joyofautism.blogspot.com/2006/10/...risis.html

PS: Based on my own limited and others' extensive observations, Downs people tend to be brilliant at that social stuff that we auties tend to suck at.

Which, you know, that's cool.  I mean, somebody had to be good at it, right?!
[edited]

Oh yeah, and ... I read somewhere that there is some significant overlap of DS and ASD, which means that some of "them" are also some of "us" ... not that that should even matter.

[edited]
"morons" or other unreasonable people are not in charge, not in the deepest sense.  they may think they are and act like they are, though, and do make things miserable in the meantime.  

but this is not the whole picture.  we can't even see the whole picture.

i admit to not usually remembering the principle that i'm trying to say here, though.
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's