09-09-2006, 01:19 AM
As someone who did NOT have the godsend of a diagnosis at a young age, I have to disagree with Louise about its necessity.
A diagnosis would allow access to resources. It would provide a platform on which to stand when trying to get school accomodations, when dealing with teachers who like to single out the "odd kid" for unfair treatment. This is absurdly difficult without one, especially in schools that turn a blind eye to bullying.
A diagnosis at an early age, rather than during the teenage years, provides a female child with a chance to adapt to it before she hits the notorious adolescent self-esteem crash. If it's not presented to her as a huge disability, odds are she's not going to regard it as one at her current age. Half the problem a lot of kids have is that their parents find out their child is on the autistic spectrum and immediately commence with the wailing and teeth-gnashing and tearing of hair like it's a diagnosis of terminal cancer or something. If it's handled better, presented as a difference for which coping strategies are needed rather than as a hopeless, permanent handicap, it doesn't have to be a horrible, intrusive, crushing thing.
Kids aren't stupid. Yeah, this means you shouldn't lie to them, but it also means they tend to know at a fairly early age that they don't fit in. For me, a diagnosis -- or even acknowledgment that my difficulties weren't just the result of petulant childish stubbornness -- would have been a massive relief. I could have spent time as a child learning the coping strategies I need to get by in the world as an adult, rather than having to play a horrifically stressful game of catch-up in college, rather than having spent my teenaged years in a miasma of "what the hell is wrong with me" depression.
I'm not discounting the fact that many parents handle the diagnosis process in an extremely inappropriate manner. However, I don't think this means that no one should get one at an early age. It's certainly easier than trying to get one later.
My parents were authoritarian to the extreme, and their intentions were certainly not always benign (as they have more recently admitted), so I share concerns about honesty with one's children and about the idea of parents' intent always being for the best of the child being utter crap. In an ideal world, that would be true. In the real world, it's not, and people's assuming that's the default case is dangerous for those children who are in abusive (especially emotionally abusive) situations. But just because there are a lot of truly awful parents out there doesn't mean that there aren't any who are concerned about their child's being able to gain the skills he or she needs to actually be able to live an independent life later.
Just my personal perspective. *shrugs*
A diagnosis would allow access to resources. It would provide a platform on which to stand when trying to get school accomodations, when dealing with teachers who like to single out the "odd kid" for unfair treatment. This is absurdly difficult without one, especially in schools that turn a blind eye to bullying.
A diagnosis at an early age, rather than during the teenage years, provides a female child with a chance to adapt to it before she hits the notorious adolescent self-esteem crash. If it's not presented to her as a huge disability, odds are she's not going to regard it as one at her current age. Half the problem a lot of kids have is that their parents find out their child is on the autistic spectrum and immediately commence with the wailing and teeth-gnashing and tearing of hair like it's a diagnosis of terminal cancer or something. If it's handled better, presented as a difference for which coping strategies are needed rather than as a hopeless, permanent handicap, it doesn't have to be a horrible, intrusive, crushing thing.
Kids aren't stupid. Yeah, this means you shouldn't lie to them, but it also means they tend to know at a fairly early age that they don't fit in. For me, a diagnosis -- or even acknowledgment that my difficulties weren't just the result of petulant childish stubbornness -- would have been a massive relief. I could have spent time as a child learning the coping strategies I need to get by in the world as an adult, rather than having to play a horrifically stressful game of catch-up in college, rather than having spent my teenaged years in a miasma of "what the hell is wrong with me" depression.
I'm not discounting the fact that many parents handle the diagnosis process in an extremely inappropriate manner. However, I don't think this means that no one should get one at an early age. It's certainly easier than trying to get one later.
My parents were authoritarian to the extreme, and their intentions were certainly not always benign (as they have more recently admitted), so I share concerns about honesty with one's children and about the idea of parents' intent always being for the best of the child being utter crap. In an ideal world, that would be true. In the real world, it's not, and people's assuming that's the default case is dangerous for those children who are in abusive (especially emotionally abusive) situations. But just because there are a lot of truly awful parents out there doesn't mean that there aren't any who are concerned about their child's being able to gain the skills he or she needs to actually be able to live an independent life later.
Just my personal perspective. *shrugs*