Many people have asked why we do not tolerate illegal actions. It is sad that I have to make a post to explain this but here is the reason:
Those we are fighting would love nothing more than to portray as criminals. Committing illegal acts therefore plays right into their hands. On top of this there is the normal issue that it just isn't worth turning to crime.
Anyone who wishes to commit illegal acts does so without the support of AFF.
Again, to anyone who that was not clear to:
Anyone who wishes to commit illegal acts does so without the support of AFF.
And if the curebies actually succeed in making a cure, and commence their planned genocide campaign?
People are allowed to defend themselves in line with their local laws.
aww, I was getting hyped up to molotov CAN headquarters as well...
maybe next month.
...to commit illegal acts...
But would this hypothetically also include freeing children being mistreated in institutes like JRC? or undercover filming at institutes like JRC? Since, with those acts you do not actually harm a person, but even potentially save someone, although these things are not officially accepted by current laws...
On the other hand, the United Nations wants a law now which would be a possible ban on all (excessively) violent punitive acts on children, so you might get support from higher levels than your own governement for actions like these.
This all being hypothetical, since breaking into and freeing children from JRC or filming there, is quite impossible, right?
My dad works at a place called STRYKER BIOtech, and they do things like research medicinal substances. What if I had to save a guy from there?
........I'd probably organize a ring of Master Aspie Ninja-Thieves!
Go MANTs!
Thank goodness you didn't decide on Professional Aspie Ninja-Thieves! 
lol!
I think it would b easier to stick with hypnotised NT's!! 
Oh yes! And I noticed that when they raised the school leaving age to fifteen, then sixteen, in the UK the armed forces argued that the earlier age should apply to potential recruits - and they were right! Applications have dropped. Older kids cannot be as easily brain-washed into thinking that the armed forces are a good career.
Mind you, the quotes on this page show that Military Intelligence really is an oxymoron.
My dad works at a place called STRYKER BIOtech, and they do things like research medicinal substances. What if I had to save a guy from there?
........I'd probably organize a ring of Master Aspie Ninja-Thieves!
Go MANTs!
Thank goodness you didn't decide on Professional Aspie Ninja-Thieves!
...or the Fighting Aspie Retrieval Team...
Or Aspie Stealth Squad.
Or Aspie Retrieval Stealth Équipe
There are times when we have to break the law. Historically, the best example is Harriet Tubman founding and operating the underground railoroad.
When cigarette machines were legal, they wre legal for the illegal purpose of selling cigarettes to children. They were delberately placed where children could buy cigarettes unseen. They were also placed for the convenience of public smokers long after the entire mainstream scientific community had concluded definitively that chronic exposure to second hand smoke causes diseases that kill tens of thousands of non smokers per country per year. Since murder is illegal and selling cigarettes to children is illegal and bribing law writers to allow it is liiegal, was it really illegal to sabotage cigarette machines by filling the coin slots with epoxy so as to disable these machines or pouring acid into any seams or openings in the tops of these machines?
When I was prosecuted for fighting back with tear gas against a smoker who was blowing smoke in my face, the guards at the prison where they were planning to send me promised to have me gang raped when I arraived. Perhaps it was against some trivial law to take advantage of an opportunity to blackmail a state witness in order to destroy the prosecutor's case against me but what about laws against having me gang raped if I had not bkackmailed the witness?
When the law refuses to protect everyone you can't reasonably ask the unprotected to obey laws they can't live with, can you?
There are times when we have to break the law. Historically, the best example is Harriet Tubman founding and operating the underground railoroad.
    When cigarette machines were legal, they wre legal for the illegal purpose of selling cigarettes to children. They were delberately placed where children could buy cigarettes unseen. They were also placed for the convenience of public smokers long after the entire mainstream scientific community had concluded definitively that chronic exposure to second hand smoke causes diseases that kill tens of thousands of non smokers per country per year. Since murder is illegal and selling cigarettes to children is illegal and bribing law writers to allow it is liiegal, was it really illegal to sabotage cigarette machines by filling the coin slots with epoxy so as to disable these machines or pouring acid into any seams or openings in the tops of these machines?
    When I was prosecuted for fighting back with tear gas against a smoker who was blowing smoke in my face, the guards at the prison where they were planning to send me promised to have me gang raped when I arraived. Perhaps it was against some trivial law to take advantage of an opportunity to blackmail a state witness in order to destroy the prosecutor's case against me but what about laws against having me gang raped if I had not bkackmailed the witness?
    When the law refuses to protect everyone you can't reasonably ask the unprotected to obey laws they can't live with, can you?
Hmmm...if you're breaking the law to protect someone else. It is really hard to figure out when the end justifies the means. If you break into the JRC and free those poor kids, you're doing a good thing for them, but they might end up back in the JRC plus you might end up in jail. I think a good thing to do is to get a job there and have a hidden camera with you so that you can prove that the JRC is being cruel to children. Or better yet, you can speak out against it and spread the word on how bad it is.
Hmm...while breaking them out yourself, is likely to just end up in them being put back in JRC and you in jail, just working there and getting evidence won't help - the evidence is already there, has been considered by courts, and such. Probably the best course of action will be something big and kind of edgy sort of publicity, but not going overboard (again, lots of judgment calls here, and I definitely think that any sort of stunt should be discussed within the community - I know myself that I've had lots of ideas that at the time seemed really good, but when looking back on it days or months or years later, if I had done those things it just would've made me look foolish and not helped at all).
I just noticed this:
When I was prosecuted for fighting back with tear gas against a smoker who was blowing smoke in my face, the guards at the prison where they were planning to send me promised to have me gang raped when I arraived. Perhaps it was against some trivial law to take advantage of an opportunity to blackmail a state witness in order to destroy the prosecutor's case against me but what about laws against having me gang raped if I had not bkackmailed the witness?
See, this is what I mean by going overboard. Tear gas in someone's eye for smoking? I don't care how rude or whatever such an individual was, that is going overboard. We don't want to do overboard drastic things about JRC - we want to do actions that will be likely to lead to the ending of their unlawful, unethical, and immoral treatment of people at the JRC and comparable institutions.
However much some individuals may deserve particular actions, such as being beaten or whatever, we don't want publicity to feed into the idea of us being unreasonable. We want to bring attention to the serious issues.
I think the main thing about why it would be unwise to just go in there and break people out, is because it would be unwise and ultimately your goals wouldn't be fulfilled. I mean, you'd have to have some place for them to go for one thing, even if it were totally legal and everything.
Second, since it's not legal, then you'd get in trouble, they'd get sent back like they would be there anyway, and people who hear about it will think of you as some radical nutjob. That doesn't seem like an effective way to bring about better treatment for people in schools and so-called "schools".
We can say that we do not approve of breaking the law, but I do not think it is as simple as that. There is probably a law against using hidden cameras to catch them abusing children but is it not against some law or morality to let their illegal and immoral action continue if you can stop it? Then there would still be a question of whether the law might refuse to prosecute you for taking video tape to TV news.
Several years ago a woman who knew that her husband who had put her in the hospital several times would soon kill her. The law refused to help her so one night she killed her husband while he slept. She was acquitted for self defennse. Some of thet was because she had a good lawyer. What about the innocent convict who escaped from prison and skipped the country because the guards had a contract out on him?
The question is all too complicated for a simple rule to cover it.
Civil disobedience of some laws that support evil is no simple matter. The movie about John Dillinger is a perfrct example of the complications involved. Most people thought hm a hero because the banks he had robbed had profited from people losing their homes and starving. They said "Normally I don't approve of breaking the law, but we are in a depression." It sounded good, but everyone in his gang degenerated into killing innocent bystanders. And yet there are times when we must disobey the law when the law does something evil or against a higher standard of right and wrong. Illegally filming children being tortured in institutions is an example but bombing and shooting is not. Squirting epoxy into the coin slots of cigarette machines that are placed so that children can buy them might be illegal, but the tobacco companies that sell cigarettes are as vicious a form of predators as sexual predators, against whom the child's parent could be prosecuted for using a baseball bat to stop the predator from taking a razor to the child's sex organs. (You are convicted of using excessive force.) There have been a few rare times in history when we had a moral duty to disobey the law because there was no other way to protect the innocent.