08-10-2006, 01:47 AM
apparenlty in the us, there was a situation where a child who survied brain cancer struck out to end a little league game, and people are now villifying the opposing coach for walking the guy before him (the team's best player) to get to the cancer surivior, who isn't as good as him.
the general view of the public is that he has overcome cancer and that he should be treated as a less than capable child and be given all smthyapy and should not fail ever, simular to the jason mcelawn story, as he was treated like he should be given symathy always like their lives are always a tradegy and that if he fails, someone is a bad guy becuase they werne't human to see if they overcome so much and not give them any more pain.
i agree with the coach here. it's nice he surived cancer, but he's a human being, the general public just medicalizes people who have cancer as that is the only thing about them, sort of how autistics are medicalized in many aspects as just a condtion instead of a human being.
thoughts?
the general view of the public is that he has overcome cancer and that he should be treated as a less than capable child and be given all smthyapy and should not fail ever, simular to the jason mcelawn story, as he was treated like he should be given symathy always like their lives are always a tradegy and that if he fails, someone is a bad guy becuase they werne't human to see if they overcome so much and not give them any more pain.
i agree with the coach here. it's nice he surived cancer, but he's a human being, the general public just medicalizes people who have cancer as that is the only thing about them, sort of how autistics are medicalized in many aspects as just a condtion instead of a human being.
thoughts?