Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Man kills autistic son, then himself
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
A former Commerce Department official killed his 12-year-old son and himself early Friday following an apparent domestic dispute, police said.

Police found the bodies of William Lash III, 45, a law professor at George Mason University and a former assistant secretary of commerce, and his son William IV inside a first-floor bedroom of their home following a barricade that lasted more than six hours, said Mary Ann Jennings, a Fairfax County police spokeswoman.

Lash's wife called police shortly before 10 p.m. Thursday and told them her husband and son were barricaded inside the home, Jennings said. Shortly after officers arrived, they heard two gunshots inside the home. SWAT officers surrounded the house after the gunshots were fired, and residents were told to turn their lights off and stay in their basements.

After trying to reach Lash for several hours, police entered the home at about 3:45 a.m. and found the bodies. Both had been shot in the upper body with a shotgun that was found nearby, police said.

Police said in a statement that a preliminary investigation indicates it was a murder-suicide.

Neighbors said the boy was autistic. A George Mason University colleague and neighbors told The Washington Post that Lash was devoted to his son and often took him to Nationals games.

According to the George Mason Web site, Lash taught at the university's law school from 1994-2001, served in the Commerce Department until 2005 and then returned to the law school.

Lash also taught law at Saint Louis University and Western New England College.
From wvec.com
do you think autism speaks has anything to do with this, with that digusting video of theirs that says that killing an autistic child is lifting them of burden?

i think some people view autistics as incomplete humans and can be murdered without cosquence.
I think what they have done with their propaganda seeps into the subconcious and does have an effect in the long term.

Amy Wrote:
I think what they have done with their propaganda seeps into the subconcious and does have an effect in the long term.


I would have to agree.  At least with respect to someone suffering from depression.  When I was in the middle of post partum depression, before I sought treatment, I remember certain news stories drilling into my brain like a worm.  Scared the heck out of me; one of the prime reasons I realized something had to be done.  Anyway, I can see a parent that is depressed seeing a news story and starting to think it would solve all his problems ...

Amy Wrote:
I think what they have done with their propaganda seeps into the subconcious and does have an effect in the long term.


That's the danger of normal mirror neuron function

But of course nobody's more defective than we are  :roll:

Comment on the article, they heard two shots, knew there were two people inside, but took five hours to decide to go in?  Did it not occur to them that five+ hours would make a difference in, say, MEDICAL TREATMENT?  

Gun shot wounds to many places, you can bleed to death in minutes if aid is not recieved; and yet, it is still survivable.  That should have been a factor in their considerations.  Who knows how it would have turned out if they had recieved immediate first aid.  Maybe they would have died anyway, but how could they know that so long before going in?  

They were supposed to save lives, otherwise they wouldn't have been called in in the first place.

ConLang Wrote:
Comment on the article, they heard two shots, knew there were two people inside, but took five hours to decide to go in?  Did it not occur to them that five+ hours would make a difference in, say, MEDICAL TREATMENT?  

Gun shot wounds to many places, you can bleed to death in minutes if aid is not recieved; and yet, it is still survivable.  That should have been a factor in their considerations.  Who knows how it would have turned out if they had recieved immediate first aid.  Maybe they would have died anyway, but how could they know that so long before going in?  

They were supposed to save lives, otherwise they wouldn't have been called in in the first place.


Yeah I wondered about that, too.  Although I have seen enough depictions of hostage situations on TV to know that confusion is very prevalent.  But it does seem like a long time.

Quote:
Ex-Bush Aide Fatally Shoots Son, Himself
Gunfire at McLean Home Followed Fight With Wife

By Tom Jackman and Stephanie McCrummen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, July 15, 2006; B01

A former Bush administration official, after arguing violently with his wife Thursday night, shot and killed his 12-year-old son inside their McLean home, then turned a shotgun on himself and committed suicide, Fairfax County police said.

William H. Lash III, 45, was an assistant secretary of commerce from 2001 until last year, then returned to teach at George Mason University Law School in Arlington, where he had begun as a professor in 1994. His wife, Sharon K. Zackula, fled the house before the shootings, and police said yesterday they were not sure what ignited the murder-suicide in a first-floor bedroom.

Friends and neighbors described Lash as devoted to his only child, William H. Lash IV, who was autistic. Will Lash had just completed sixth grade at Haycock Elementary School in the Falls Church area, Fairfax school officials said. The father and son could often be seen side by side on the swing set in their back yard, one neighbor said, and the pair often attended Washington Nationals baseball games.

Police said they had not been summoned this year to the blue expanded Cape Cod-style home on Pathfinder Lane in the West McLean neighborhood. There was no record of any domestic complaints. Neighbors said the family kept a low profile.

But shortly before 10 p.m. Thursday, police said, Lash and Zackula had a dispute and Zackula ran from the house and called police. Zackula was not hurt, but the dispute was physical enough that police later obtained a warrant charging Lash with domestic assault, Officer Richard Henry said.

Lash never knew about the warrant. When three or four officers arrived at 9:55 p.m., Henry said, they knocked on several doors but got no answer. Within 10 minutes, while trying to decide their next move, the officers heard two gunshots from inside the house, Henry said.

Not knowing who was shooting -- and who was being shot at -- the officers called for help. Teams of tactical officers and hostage negotiators were summoned, Henry said. Black-clad officers with rifles darted across front lawns, a command post bus was brought in, and police dispatchers phoned neighbors with urgent instructions: Turn off all lights and get in the basement, neighbors said.

After phone calls failed, a police negotiator began circling the house with a bullhorn, two neighbors said. The negotiator gently pleaded with Lash, "Bill, we need to know you're okay," the neighbors said. "Please give us a sign. Answer the phone. Turn on a light."

The negotiator tried to reach Lash for more than two hours. "He was incredibly compassionate," said one neighbor, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

After 1 a.m., police released a remote-controlled robot, equipped with a video camera, so police could gauge what was happening inside. The neighbor said the robot rolled slowly down Pathfinder Lane, up the Lash driveway and into the house.

Finally, at 3:50 a.m., officers went inside and found Lash and his son, both dead from gunshots to the upper body.

Daniel D. Polsby, dean of GMU's law school, said, "This thing just doesn't belong to the normal range of human experience, and we're all just heartbroken for his family, his community and for ourselves."

Lash's résumé was long and quintessential of the Washington elite -- an Ivy League pedigree, high-powered law firms, a presidential appointment, think tanks, boards of directors, guest spots on television news programs, and prestigious university positions.

He had an undergraduate degree from Yale University, a law degree from Harvard University. He clerked for a New Jersey Supreme Court justice. He served as counsel to the chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission during the Reagan years, worked for the law firm of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson and served on the boards of directors of private and publicly traded corporations. In 1994, he found a place in academia on the GMU law faculty.

He specialized in the arcana of business law there and earned a reputation as a generous and jovial cigar-smoking colleague, an approachable professor and a sharp-minded and willing debater of ideology.

"He was a wonderful colleague, lively and full of ideas, full of energy," Polsby said. "I would describe him as an engaged and articulate person, not at all the sort of person whose last act would be what it appears to have been."

Polsby said "there was nothing" to suggest that Lash was troubled.

Lash took a leave from the law school in 2001, when President Bush appointed him assistant secretary of commerce for market access and compliance. Among his duties at the Commerce Department, Lash headed a task force on the reconstruction of Iraq, in which he dealt with businesses seeking contracts.

In a statement, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez said: "Bill was a passionate, committed and hard working individual who was much loved and respected by his colleagues. . . . He was a vivacious, expansive, and tenacious Assistant Secretary."

Lash resigned the post last year and returned to GMU. He also was a senior adviser to the Brunswick Group LLC, a firm specializing in corporate public relations.

A few weeks ago, he had dinner at his house with a Mason colleague, Todd J. Zywicki, whose office was next door. Zywicki said he detected no signs of trouble that night, not even in retrospect.

"I'm just stunned," Zywicki said yesterday. "He loved his son so much. He really loved his son . . . and he did everything for him."

It was the impression Lash left on most everyone.

"I have no explanation," said Michael Krauss, another GMU colleague. "There are people who seem troubled, but I never would have thought that about Bill Lash. Never."

Lash was born and raised in New Jersey, where his parents still live. They declined to comment yesterday.

Zackula, a lawyer with the National Association of Securities Dealers, could not be located yesterday.
© 2006 The Washington Post Company


http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle.php?...02_pf.html

A new "conspiracy theory":

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m24643
This is too strange.  And what kind of person flees their house in fear but leaves their child behind?  The mother ought to be at least investigated.
Also, I donno if this has been mentioned yet, but ...

They keep mentioning that the son was autistic.  But they don't mention why this has anything to do with the murder.  Becos the conflict was between the wife and the husband, not necessarily having anything to do with the kid.

Would they say he killed himself after killing "his son who had brown hair"? No. "his son who was dyslexic"? No.  "His son who was diabetic"? Maybe.  "His son who was confined to a wheelchair"?  Definitely.  "His son who was MR"? Also definitely.  So the mention of the son's autism probably has to do with the perceived level of the son's helplessness to defend himself.  What do you think?  

I hope someone knows more about journalism than me: please correct.
Even more strangeness (about these kind of stories in general) that needed pointing out:

http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=164 :

Quote:
That “creepy” guy down the hall might just be harmless and autistic or something else that makes him seem unusual. That “sweet” elderly man who seems totally harmless may just be a murderer. Then there are the people who seem creepy and are creepy, and the people who seem harmless and are harmless. There just isn’t much of a pattern there.

Not enough facts.  The trigger of the events seems to be a domestic dispute and one might assume that it was between the parents.  The mother could have been at work or out when all this started.  She did call the police.  The child was 12 yrs old and some might assume that he could have known what was going on and tried to escape from the home.  Maybe he was not aware that his life was in danger and did not know what to do.  He might not have understood that his father would kill him.  

How horrible!  I always think of parents as being loving and never want to harm their children.

M Wrote:
How horrible!  I always think of parents as being loving and never want to harm their children.


Unfortunately parents are incredibly varied - ranging from the kind who simply don't care about their kids to the ones who actively harrass them. The worst i've found is the ones who think they're helping their children and in doing so commit terrible acts upon them - this kind get sympathy.

Fortunately however it seems that parents generally do have love for their children, even if it is sometimes misguided.

The only thing I want to say about this story is that marital disputes and separations and divorces can be very, very hard on the partners involved. It's a very emotive and vulnnerable and uncertain time for those involved, and all kinds of stuff can happen. If you know anyone who is going through such a situation, try your best to be supportive and at least listen if they wish to talk. Being an aspie, maybe the best one can do is simply be there and try to avoid saying anything that could make the situation worse. People can do and say some pretty crazy and extreme things while they're inthe middle of a domestic situation, but you've just got to try to be a calming influence and don't gossip about stuff that you find out about.
Reference URL's