06-19-2006, 09:36 AM
Thought people might be interested in today's UK Daily Mail front-page article:-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/ar...=NEWS&ct=5
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/ar...=NEWS&ct=5
How true!
??? Can anyone explain this a bit more?
It annoys me that a child could be described as "defective", as if he/she is a piece of machinery!
Here we go again, disabled people being described as a burden on society! :evil: Why is it that some people only think of a human life as being worthwhile if it is capable of economic production?
I find that one pretty ironic - that they are a disabled person and they still support embryo screening. If the testing had been available when he was conceived, and his parents had chosen a different embryo instead of his, it wouldn't have been the same person, would it? It would have been another child with a different soul. Therefore, the author of the above comment wouldn't be here today. (Although I do find the concept of souls to be very confusing).
That is the worst one of all, and it was posted on a page (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/ar...rtComments specifically referring to autistics. I found that comment to be the most offensive out of all the ones I read, especially the bit in bold. (I added the "boldness" myself).
I got to that article and tried to post the following comment, but I don't think it was accepted. I avoided the issue of eugenics; 1,000 characters could not do it justice, even if I had already finished Martin Gilberg's book about the holocaust.
Maybe they have to be approved by a moderator first? I would have posted a comment myself, but I didn't want to put my name and hometown on it.