If I was freezing to death and an eskimo offered me a coat made of seal pup fur I would gladly wear it, but like most humans, warm, furry, cute animals being killed for their fur would otherwise turn my stomach.
I voted for the top choice, but I wouldn't buy real fur though unless my life (literally) depended on it.
Leather is okay, but, like Brightman, I would NOT wear fur unless my life really depended on it (i.e. the eskimo situation Bright mentioned). I think it's sad that they kill minks (like ferrets, only bigger and softer [Yes, I've actually seen a live one before.]) for fashion. How shallow! :cry:
:!: Mich :?:
I would not wear fur because the animals killed for it are killed for that alone which I think is wrong.
If youre going to kill an animal then A - the main reason should be to sustain yourself and B - nothign should be wasted (i.e. leather and other biproducts)
As if that ever happens. It's your ecstasy, not mine.
First one here who manages to kill a cow with his bare hands and to eat it uncooked gets to eat my cat :lol:


I have seen documentaries on the way livestock are killed, and most slaughterhouses are not like the ones you see on PETA's website and actually adhere to their policies designed to reduce the stress/pain experienced by the animal.
I recently saw chickens being slaughtered on Hugh's Chicken Run and Jamie's Fowl Dinners, both part of Channel 4's "Big Food Fight" season. (That's Messrs Fearnley-Whittingstall and Oliver.)
All egg-laying chickens are sent to be slaughtered and processed once their egg-laying abilities diminish (I believe that starts to happen at around one year of age).
And male chicks are gassed shortly after hatching (this was also demonstrated on Jamie's Fowl Dinners.)