Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: The island will not be built in Dubai or UAE
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
We have been studying laws in the area and have found that homosexuality (their term) is illegal and punishable by prison.
This is of course, entirely unacceptable for aspies and auties to go and live in that climate where many of us are LGBT.

Therefore we will be looking for other regions.

Amy Wrote:
Therefore we will be looking for other regions.

How about Greece? It has thousands of natural islands, its weather is nice and it is in the European Union.

Does Greece have islands for sale? I don't think that they would allow man-made islands there.

Quote:
This is of course, entirely unacceptable for aspies and auties to go and live in that climate where many of us are LGBT.


Also, if being homosexual(which is largely recognized as a valid difference) is punishable by jail time, I don't think they would take very kindly to a bunch of autistics setting up an island there.

Amy Wrote:
Does Greece have islands for sale? I don't think that they would allow man-made islands there.


http://www.privateislandsonline.com/greece.htm

Amy Wrote:
We have been studying laws in the area and have found that homosexuality (their term) is illegal and punishable by prison.
This is of course, entirely unacceptable for aspies and auties to go and live in that climate where many of us are LGBT.

Therefore we will be looking for other regions.


My knowlege of such places is that if you are putting money in ther pockets they tend to look the other way legally. i mean do you believe that some of there rich customers don't engage in homosexual practices while there there.

It matters if it is in public. If someone reports someone else, then an ordinary citizen would not know or care if you happened to be rich.
They would be allowed to report you to the police under their law.

Amy Wrote:
It matters if it is in public. If someone reports someone else, then an ordinary citizen would not know or care if you happened to be rich.
They would be allowed to report you to the police under their law.


whatever. Anyways I don't think that anyone here wants to support a country that has such policies.

Agreed laws like that are simply unacceptable.
I looked up dubai on wikipedia and it doesn't sound good at all.

Quote:
The massive construction projects currently in Dubai have required more construction workers than there are citizens of the city (note: over 80% of Dubai's population consists of expatriates/non-citizens). This has led to massive importation of low-wage workers, especially from India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. [6] Most of these workers are forced to give up their passports upon entering Dubai, making it very difficult to return home. NPR reports that workers "typically live eight to a room, sending home a portion of their salary to their families, whom they don't see for years at a time." Others report that their salary has been withheld to pay back loans, making them little more than indentured servants. [7] The BBC has reported that "local newspapers often carry stories of construction workers allegedly not being paid for months on end. They are not allowed to move jobs and if they leave the country to go home they will almost certainly lose the money they say they are owed. The names of the construction companies concerned are not published in the newspapers for fear of offending the often powerful individuals who own them." [8].

In December 2005, the Indian consulate in Dubai submitted a report to the Government of India detailing labour problems faced by Indian expatriates in the emirate. The report highlighted delayed payment of wages, substitution of employment contracts, premature termination of services and excessive working hours as being some of the challenges faced by Indian workers in the city. [9]

On 21 March 2006, tensions boiled over at the construction site of the Burj Dubai as workers upset over low wages and poor working conditions rioted, damaging cars, offices, computers, and construction tools. A Dubai Interior Ministry official said the rioters caused approximately one million U.S. dollars in damage. On March 22nd most workers returned to work but refused to work. The work stoppage also caused workers building a new terminal at Dubai International Airport to strike. [10]

The alleged labour injustices in Dubai have attracted the attention of various Human Rights groups. Mafi Wasta, for example, is a website created specifically for the purpose of persuading the government of the UAE to sign up to 2 of the ILO's (International Labour Organization) 7 core conventions - namely 87 and 98 - which allows for labour unions. The site lists examples of human rights violations in the country. Human Rights Watch said that the men were treated "less than human".

However, the UAE government has denied any kind of labour injustices and has stated that the watchdog's (Human Rights Watch) accusations were misguided [11]. Towards the end of March 2006, the government announced steps to allow construction unions. UAE labour minister Ali al-Kaabi said: "Labourers will be allowed to form unions."

Drifter Wrote:
I looked up dubai on wikipedia and it doesn't sound good at all.

Quote:
The massive construction projects currently in Dubai have required more construction workers than there are citizens of the city (note: over 80% of Dubai's population consists of expatriates/non-citizens).

This has led to massive importation of low-wage workers, especially from India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. [6] Most of these workers are forced to give up their passports upon entering Dubai, making it very difficult to return home. NPR reports that workers "typically live eight to a room, sending home a portion of their salary to their families, whom they don't see for years at a time."

Others report that their salary has been withheld to pay back loans, making them little more than indentured servants. [7] The BBC has reported that "local newspapers often carry stories of construction workers allegedly not being paid for months on end. They are not allowed to move jobs and if they leave the country to go home they will almost certainly lose the money they say they are owed. The names of the construction companies concerned are not published in the newspapers for fear of offending the often powerful individuals who own them." [8].

In December 2005, the Indian consulate in Dubai submitted a report to the Government of India detailing labour problems faced by Indian expatriates in the emirate. The report highlighted delayed payment of wages, substitution of employment contracts, premature termination of services and excessive working hours as being some of the challenges faced by Indian workers in the city. [9]

On 21 March 2006, tensions boiled over at the construction site of the Burj Dubai as workers upset over low wages and poor working conditions rioted, damaging cars, offices, computers, and construction tools. A Dubai Interior Ministry official said the rioters caused approximately one million U.S. dollars in damage. On March 22nd most workers returned to work but refused to work. The work stoppage also caused workers building a new terminal at Dubai International Airport to strike. [10]

The alleged labour injustices in Dubai have attracted the attention of various Human Rights groups. Mafi Wasta, for example, is a website created specifically for the purpose of persuading the government of the UAE to sign up to 2 of the ILO's (International Labour Organization) 7 core conventions - namely 87 and 98 - which allows for labour unions. The site lists examples of human rights violations in the country. Human Rights Watch said that the men were treated "less than human".

However, the UAE government has denied any kind of labour injustices and has stated that the watchdog's (Human Rights Watch) accusations were misguided [11]. Towards the end of March 2006, the government announced steps to allow construction unions. UAE labour minister Ali al-Kaabi said: "Labourers will be allowed to form unions."

Strangely enough, other people say they can make a lot of money working over there but I would be nervous because to my mind it is simply too dangerous.

Westerners are typically treated relatively well in Middle Eastern sheikdoms, but are required to live separately from the citizens and are generally advised to keep celebrations of Western customs such as Christmas to a minimum and under wraps-Westerners working in the Saudi oil industry are not allowed to decorate homes for Christmas, for example.

Dubai is one of the safest places in the Middle East, they even encourage tourism (mostly by Europeans). They are Wahhabis, but they broke away from the main sect in central Arabia 150 years ago and are generally not violent, nor do they have the virulent hatred of the West that one finds in Saudi Arabia.

The United Arab Emirates was created when the British, who were sick of dealing with the main Wahhabi authority in what is now Riyadh, made separate peaces with the emirs of the villages along the Persian Gulf. Together, these villages were known as the Trucial States. When the Middle East was carved up in 1918, the Trucial States were lumped into a single entity, which eventually became the UAE.

Dubai was a little town until the early 1990s. Then oil money started flowing, and they became richer than God. Dubai is actually nicer than Riyadh, much of which has been allowed to deteriorate.
So why are we discouraged to celebrate Christmas in our own country in fear of upsetting certain minority groups? There have been cases in Australia and the UK where kindergartens have stopped having Santa and putting up Christmas decorations. I'm in full agreement that Christmas is excessively commercialised in Western countries and that when we are in other countries we must respect their laws but I think that this needs to go both ways.
Anyplace with aspie friendly exotic women.
Reference URL's