Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: AS as a criminal defense?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Trial opens for grad student charged in SoCal SUV vandalism spree

LOS ANGELES - A graduate student was present during an arson spree of sport utility vehicles last year but did not personally carry out the attacks, defense lawyers told jurors Tuesday.

The defense said during its opening statements in federal court that William Jensen Cottrell, 24, had thought the stunt was to graffiti the vehicles and was "shocked" when two friends began hurling Molotov cocktails instead.

"This is not what he expected," attorney Michael Mayock argued.

Cottrell, a physics student at the California Institute of Technology, faces nine counts of arson, conspiracy to commit arson and using a destructive device stemming from the attacks at San Gabriel Valley dealerships and homes. He could received 35 years to life in prison if convicted.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Beverly Reid-O'Connell said that Cottrell knew of plans to firebomb the vehicles. Prosecutors said jurors would hear testimony from a friend who claims Cottrell said he helped fill detergent bottles with gasoline.

The defense sought to explain Cottrell's involvement with claims that he suffered from a type of autism known as Asperger's syndrome. Lawyers said the condition made it difficult for him to understand the intentions of his alleged accomplices and an "easy dupe."

Federal prosecutors last month identified Tyler Johnson and Michie Oe as "fugitive coconspirators" in the case. Johnson graduated from Caltech in June 2003 with a bachelor's degree in physics, a campus spokeswoman said.

Johnson and Oe have not been charged and authorities believe they fled the United States, Mrozek said.

U.S. District Judge Gary Klausner on Tuesday said he would allow testimony about Asperger's syndrome, but only as to whether Cottrell could have foreseen the alleged crimes were going to take place.

The judge denied the defense's motion to bar references to terrorism during the trial.

"Our stance is it is part of the case and it should be allowed," Mrozek said.

The SUV attacks took place Aug. 22, 2003, at car dealerships in West Covina, Duarte and Arcadia and on four privately owned vehicles in Monrovia. The four cities are just east of Pasadena, where Caltech is located and where Cottrell lived.

About 125 vehicles were damaged or destroyed, causing an estimated $2.3 million damage. The hardest hit was a West Covina dealership, where 72 vehicles and a parts warehouse were torched.

The vandals spray-painted on some vehicles "polluter", "smog machine," "SUVterrorism" and "ELF," an acronym for the Earth Liberation Front, a radical environmental group that has claimed responsibility for several acts of arson and vandalism around the United States.

Authorities said they traced a series of e-mails boasting of the attacks to Cottrell. The sender of the e-mails allegedly claimed to be affiliated with the Earth Liberation Front.
He was still going there to vandalise anothers property so he was planning to damage the cars anyway. Aspergers or not, he shouldn't have done it.

If he goes to prison, it's his fault. I think we are going to see a lot more of these sort of cases coming up in the future. Lawyers will jump on any chance they can to get their client off of the hook and Aspergers is like a get out clause. Along with dyslexia, ADHD, horrid childhood etc. I also think that the media will jump at the chance to sensationalise the 'criminal mind of the Aspergic!', just like they do with anything else and it's tough shit for anyone affected by it if they have to carry the stigma for it. No doubt we will be seeing Dont let your unborn become a child of crime; Abort Now! posters spring up from CAN in the near future :roll:
Greetings,

I have mixed feelings about this one.  He went out with the intention to commit a crime - he should pay for what his believed part was going to be.  If he was involved in filling the bottles with petrol then it should be clearly established why he thought he was doing that.

I have an online friend who is schizophrenic and was involved in a similar type of incident where he basically trashed a shop after seeing real furs on sale - but I know that he was not in control of his actions at the time due to issues concerning his medication and the court recognised that.

I dont think theres too much to worry about in the way of sensationalism at this point.  There are alot of causes for 'diminished responsibility' in crimes and we cant deny that AS can easily be one of those in certain cases.  If organisations like CAN want to step up their misrepresentation of us then they are going to cross the slander line sooner or later and its up to us to fight that legally.
If there would have been only ONE attack, I could have believed that this guy might not have known and just got sucked into this. But after the first one, before doing the other three attacks, he knew exactly what was happening, so he doesn't have any valid excuse for those. I say he deserves his just punishment.

And if they traced bragging e-mails to him, well.........I don't think I need to say more.

Ursula
Yes, he did it more than once, so he knew what was happening the next time for sure.
Greetings,

I missed the part about his doing ot more than once Tongue

That also raises the question - what does his trying to use AS as an excuse do for the credibility of the rest of us?  If you ended up on the wrong side of the law for somethign you couldnt help they might just see it as an attempt to get off because of people like him.
A.S. or not I would deal with them just as severly if it was my car. I would be quite aware if I was doing an act like that, I can't believe he wasn't aware of what he was doing, no excuse as far as I'm concerned. Just trying to hide behind a curtain and further smear the asperger's name.

My own opinion, minimum would be prison for these kinds of thugs.
So you're dissing him because he wasn't able to take a hint that they might be committing arson?





What if you were in his shoes? I'm sure your stories would change in no time.
I know I wouldnt go out another two times with them!

Amy Wrote:
I know I wouldnt go out another two times with them!

It has been said that Aspies don't always learn from their mistakes (possibly because of issues with short term memory) but I don't think this would make much difference in court.

It is a bit of a grey area:

An extract from wikipedia says: "The hypothesis that individuals with AS are predisposed to violent or criminal behavior has been investigated and found to be unsupported by data.[1][13] More evidence suggests children with AS are victims rather than victimizers.[14]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome

It's clear that Aspies are not predisposed to criminal behaviour by virtue of being Aspie.

However, being susceptible to bullying, and perhaps more susceptible to peer pressure -- recognising that they don't fit in with their peer group, but wanting to, and being pressured into doing things, by way of 'initiation' or if you don't do this we won't be friends with you anymore...

I guess there's a potential defence in being coerced into being an accomplice in criminal behaviour.

I think that Aspies generally have strong moral values and a heightened sense of right and wrong, they like to stick to rules and regulations.  So to do something in contravention of the law is often as a result of coercion or even bullying.

It's tricky though, how they might present the subtle differences between those arguments in a defence.

I do believe saying:  He's Aspie, therefore he doesn't know right from wrong, or he's criminally inclined, would be outrageous; but arguing that someone might have been roped into being an accomplice, they weren't the instigator of the act, might mean that they were less culpable than the individuals who dreamt up the action, I think that might be reasonable.
It seems people are now co-opting Asperger's Syndrome, as another form of saying "I knew nothing more than a helpless little baby. Pwease feel sowwy for me!"
!YOU! wouldn't, Amy, but you are highly intelligent, this guy may not be.
http://www.autismconnect.org/news.asp?se...ws&id=6254

This guy is highly intelligent - it's a sad story - I don't see the point in putting him in jail for 8 years.
The fine should have been more than enough.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's