Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: New Insights Into the Hidden World of Autism.
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Copied from CNN. I suppose this article will be or already is in Time.

"Her parents, therapists, nutritionists and teachers had spent years preparing the way. They had moved mountains to improve her sense of balance, her sensory perception and her overall health. They sent in truckloads of occupational and physical therapy and emotional support.

But it wasn't until the fall of 2005 that traffic finally began to flow in the other direction.

Hannah, whose speech was limited to snatches of songs, echoed dialogue and unintelligible utterances, is profoundly autistic, and doctors thought she was most likely ***.

But on that October day, after she was introduced to the use of a specialized computer keyboard, Hannah proved them wrong. "Is there anything you'd like to say, Hannah?" asked Marilyn Chadwick, director of training at the Facilitated Communication Institute at Syracuse University.

With Chadwick helping to stabilize her right wrist and her mother watching, a girl thought to be incapable of learning to read or write slowly typed, "I love Mom."

More than 60 years after autism was first described by American psychiatrist Leo Kanner, there are still more questions than answers about this complex disorder. But slowly, steadily, many myths about autism are falling away, and researchers are finding some surprises.

Autism is almost certainly, like cancer, many diseases with many distinct causes. It's well known that there's a wide range in the severity of symptoms --from profound disability to milder forms like Asperger syndrome, in which intellectual ability is generally high but social awareness is low.

Indeed, doctors now prefer the term Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). But scientists suspect there are also distinct subtypes, including an early-onset type and a regressive type that can strike as late as age 2.

Once thought to be mainly a disease of the cerebellum, a region in the back of the brain that integrates sensory and motor activity, autism is increasingly seen as a pervasive problem with the way the brain is wired.

The distribution of white matter, the nerve fibers that link diverse parts of the brain, is abnormal, but it's not clear how much is the cause and how much the result of autism.

The immune system may play a critical role in the development of at least some types of autism. This suggests some new avenues of prevention and treatment.

Many classic symptoms of autism -- spinning, head banging, endlessly repeating phrases -- appear to be coping mechanisms rather than hard-wired behaviors. Other classic symptoms -- a lack of emotion, an inability to love --can now be largely dismissed as artifacts of impaired communication. The same may be true of the supposedly high incidence of mental retardation.

The world of autism therapy continues to be bombarded by cure-of-the-day fads. But therapists are beginning to sort out the best ways to intervene.

And while autism is generally a lifelong struggle, there are some reported cases in which kids who were identified as autistic and treated at an early age no longer exhibit symptoms.

Indeed, most researchers believe autism arises from a combination of genetic vulnerabilities and environmental triggers. An identical twin of a child with autism has a 60 percent to 90 percent chance of also being affected with the disorder. And the sibling of a child with autism has about a 10 percent chance of also having it.

Luckily for Hannah, her voice and thoughts are being heard.

Since learning to type, she has begun to speak a few words reliably -- "yes," "no" and the key word "I" -- to express her desires.

All this seems miraculous to her parents. "I was told to give up and get on with my life," says her mother. Now she and her husband are thinking about saving for college. "

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/07/cover.s...index.html


I particularly liked it when they compared autism with cancer!...

...!
If its a negative article/website we usually break the so as not to increase their traffic via search engines.

Quote:
Autism is almost certainly, like cancer, many diseases with many distinct causes. It's well known that there's a wide range in the severity of symptoms --from profound disability to milder forms like Asperger syndrome, in which intellectual ability is generally high but social awareness is low.

Indeed, doctors now prefer the term Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). But scientists suspect there are also distinct subtypes, including an early-onset type and a regressive type that can strike as late as age 2.

Once thought to be mainly a disease of the cerebellum, a region in the back of the brain that integrates sensory and motor activity, autism is increasingly seen as a pervasive problem with the way the brain is wired.

The distribution of white matter, the nerve fibers that link diverse parts of the brain, is abnormal, but it's not clear how much is the cause and how much the result of autism.

The immune system may play a critical role in the development of at least some types of autism. This suggests some new avenues of prevention and treatment.

Many classic symptoms of autism -- spinning, head banging, endlessly repeating phrases -- appear to be coping mechanisms rather than hard-wired behaviors. Other classic symptoms -- a lack of emotion, an inability to love --can now be largely dismissed as artifacts of impaired communication. The same may be true of the supposedly high incidence of mental retardation.


digusting.  now we're suffering from brain cancer?  that is blantant racism.  what if people called blacks suffering from a skin disease of mellmona?  they would be fired.  just negative about autism and everything...

and saying it strikes people...ugh.  it's actling like autism is nothing good and it turns people into less than human.  cancer, on the other hand is nothing good and hurts people.  i wish they stop comparing autism, a neurogigical variance to cancer, a dsiabling disease.

at least it makes the effort that they are trying to defeat some of the sterotypes...so that we aren't seen as drooling incompetents.

and why is every story always about curebies in the mainstream media?  i hope this isn't to promote that only one type of person is okay...i love varitey.

Actually it was a perfectly reasonable analogy to draw.

Quote:
Autism is almost certainly, like cancer, many diseases with many distinct causes.

What she's saying is this

1)Cancer is a catch-all term for many different diseases with many distinct causes.
2)In a similar way, autism is almost certainly a catch-all term for many different diseases with many distinct causes.


Whether you agree or disagree with the second statement is a different matter altogether, but she is definitely not saying autism == cancer.

NT's don't think that way, they can't take literal meanings from things.  The fact that autism and cancer occur together so much forms an association between the two, and the most salient facts about the better known condition become associated with the lesser unless dispelled.  By its so-frequent proximity to the word "cancer" autism becomes seen as destructive and horrifying.  If the words life-long didn't appear so much as well, it would probably end up being seen as deadly.  

The word cancer is over-used anyway, in connection with anything from illiteracy to toe-fungus.  Anything that somebody dislikes will inevitably be compared to cancer; thus, wherever the word appears, so does the idea that we are discussing something negative, usually extremely so.  

The usage may or may not have been intentional, but it certainly imparts no useful information, and the associations of the word render it not only irrelevant to the discussion, but deleterious to an accurate picture of what autism really is, and should be avoided as bad form.

ConLang Wrote:
NT's don't think that way, they can't take literal meanings from things.

That's because they're idiots and it's our job to point this out to them.  Sometimes at length.  Occasionally with flip charts. :wink:

But seriously, it's a good analogy for the point she was making.  If people don't understand it then they should be educated not pandered to.

[edit]
And I think it does impart useful information.  If you say 'cancer' you can mean a lot of different things.  In the same way if you say 'autism' you can mean a lot of different things.

Amy Wrote:
If its a negative article/website we usually break the so as not to increase their traffic via search engines.


Break how? As in, paragraphs? Sorry I don't get what you mean.

And, to Sanity Assassin:

I understand the comparison to cancer entirely but I don't see why the comparison is necessary. The fact that autism encompasses a wide spectrum of disorders (sorry if that term offends anyone) can be communicated quite easily without making any comparison to cancer - or any comparisons at all.

I overlooked the fact that this is not the entire Time article. I'm interested in reading all of it. On one side much of this seems terribly obvious to me, and not to mention the article reads as if it is written in the most authoritative of manners, but on the other side I must consider the fact that very likely a large ammount of the people reading the article have no clue about autism and Asperger's (and also will probably not consider the cancer comparison to its greatest implications).

Whatever. I have lost my train of thought.

wrathrantone Wrote:

Amy Wrote:
If its a negative article/website we usually break the so as not to increase their traffic via search engines.


Break how? As in, paragraphs? Sorry I don't get what you mean.


break the url when you post it, people can copy and paste it and remove the space to get to the webstie.

wrathrantone Wrote:
I understand the comparison to cancer entirely but I don't see why the comparison is necessary. The fact that autism encompasses a wide spectrum of disorders (sorry if that term offends anyone) can be communicated quite easily without making any comparison to cancer - or any comparisons at all.

Analogy is a tool of writing and she's a writer, go figure.  I'd have a problem if it was a bad analogy but it isn't, it's quite a good one.  Yes, she could have used a less effective analogy,or no analogy at all.  Personally, I don't think we should expect writing to be toned down just for fear of the possibility of offending someone.

Mind you, I'm still not sure why cancer provokes such strong reactions.

Mind you, I'm still not sure why cancer provokes such strong reactions.


Because it is fatal, and autism isn't.
Because it is always negative.
Because it's not a natural state, which autism is for autistics.
Because when newbie parents hear the two together they panic.
Because when newly diagnosed people hear it it's very distressing and worrying for them.
Because it happens so very often, also comparisons with AIDS, polio, and brain diseases.
I think it is wonderful that this girl could find a way to communicate to other people using a keyboard.  

I hate the description given of autism in the second part of the article.

wrathrantone Wrote:
The fact that autism encompasses a wide spectrum of disorders (sorry if that term offends anyone) can be communicated quite easily without making any comparison to cancer - or any comparisons at all.


Yes, the writer could have compared autism to all sorts of things other than diseases: for example, there are many different types of roses, butterflies, etc., which are all part of a broad category with one popular name.

Using the word "cancer" places autism in the same category as a devastating disease and is totally inappropriate for a description of a genetic minority group.  If a journalist were writing a story about the variety among aboriginal tribes, a comparison to cancer would almost surely get the journalist fired.  We deserve the same respect.

And yeah, there are many other terms that we can and should use instead of "disorders," not just to avoid offending one another, but because we are not going to get respect and equal treatment from society as long as we are seen as disordered.

Here are just a few neutral terms that I can think of:

Characteristics
Traits
Conditions
Attributes

Anyone want to add to the list?

varations
diffrences

and you're right.  if autism is compared to cancer, one day they will say it's cancer, leading to eugenics and the such.
http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?title=ti...&tb=1&pb=1

Views from Scientific American magazine about this article.

Sanity Assassin Wrote:
But seriously, it's a good analogy for the point she was making.  If people don't understand it then they should be educated not pandered to.


Since the people who will misunderstand it are in the majority, we'd better pander to them or we will be totally and irrevocably screwed.  Unnecessary and emotional references to cancer and other fatal illnesses increases the chances that any individual autistic will be forced to live in an institution such as the judge Rotenberg center, where they will be subjected to a living hell in order to make them appear more normal.  Such terms prevent rational thought in those who (by no fault of their own) are unused to it.  We are not going to inspire rational thought by ignoring completely the emotional connotations of any comparison.

Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's