04-18-2006, 04:34 AM
I can say with an utmost certain that Aspergia cannot exist, nor should it exist. It is not that the idea does not intrigue me. It is certainly a concept of merit. However it forgets the key ingrediant for a nationstate. That is, a nation. There is no Aspergian culture nation, and therefor cannot be an effective Aspergian Nationstate. There is no Aspergian Language, no Aspergian Cooking, nor Aspergian Folktales, nor Aspergian music. There is no unified Aspergian history nor a tradition of government. All of these things are necessary for a functioning state.
Look at Britain's former colonies. Which of these have been the most successful? Which of these the least? The most successful have been in south/southeast asia. India is nearing Superpower status, Singapore and Malaysia are thriving economies. Africa is the least successful, it is overrun by strife, famine and anarchy. The most succesful regions are in the north such as Egypt. What is the key factor, that allowed some post-colonial states like Korea to take off quickly, while some like the congo to crumble into despair?
Nation. Few consider national Identity to be a key factor in the economic and political growth of a nation, but it is. Its a recognizable pattern. Korea has always been Korea and it always will be. Because of this the people share national heritage, the most powerful and indestructive of human bonds. Because of this, people were able to pull together as a country and quickly turn Korea into one of the worlds leading economies.
Now look at Africa. If you look at a map of Africa from 1936, you will realise it is strikingly similar to the map today. For all of its constant warring, Africa still has the borders drawn up by the great powers when they divided up the continent. Even before then, Africa lacked the concept of Nation (Europe lacked it until the end of feudalism). Only in North Africa, did concepts of National identity form, such as in Egypt. Because of this, their was no cohesive unity in any of the African States, especially the subsahara. It was not lack of material virtues that hindered Africa. It has a vast population, it has bountiful natural resources, it has broad swaths of land to utilize, Korea lacked all these things. However Africa never capatilized on this because they were not truley a nation. Their states rarely shared a common language other then that imposed on them by their colonial oppressors. Nor were their borders drawn along any real ethnic boundary.
Aspergia would be doomed to the same course of political infighting, strife, and ultimate collapse, if the state were ever created. Without a nation or culture to build around, the state is a hollow, empty structure, and can only collapse in on its self.
Look at Britain's former colonies. Which of these have been the most successful? Which of these the least? The most successful have been in south/southeast asia. India is nearing Superpower status, Singapore and Malaysia are thriving economies. Africa is the least successful, it is overrun by strife, famine and anarchy. The most succesful regions are in the north such as Egypt. What is the key factor, that allowed some post-colonial states like Korea to take off quickly, while some like the congo to crumble into despair?
Nation. Few consider national Identity to be a key factor in the economic and political growth of a nation, but it is. Its a recognizable pattern. Korea has always been Korea and it always will be. Because of this the people share national heritage, the most powerful and indestructive of human bonds. Because of this, people were able to pull together as a country and quickly turn Korea into one of the worlds leading economies.
Now look at Africa. If you look at a map of Africa from 1936, you will realise it is strikingly similar to the map today. For all of its constant warring, Africa still has the borders drawn up by the great powers when they divided up the continent. Even before then, Africa lacked the concept of Nation (Europe lacked it until the end of feudalism). Only in North Africa, did concepts of National identity form, such as in Egypt. Because of this, their was no cohesive unity in any of the African States, especially the subsahara. It was not lack of material virtues that hindered Africa. It has a vast population, it has bountiful natural resources, it has broad swaths of land to utilize, Korea lacked all these things. However Africa never capatilized on this because they were not truley a nation. Their states rarely shared a common language other then that imposed on them by their colonial oppressors. Nor were their borders drawn along any real ethnic boundary.
Aspergia would be doomed to the same course of political infighting, strife, and ultimate collapse, if the state were ever created. Without a nation or culture to build around, the state is a hollow, empty structure, and can only collapse in on its self.