Aspies For Freedom

the National Institute of Mental Health threw its categorical support behind the legitimacy of the condition as a psychiatric illness.

But its not classed as a psychiatric illness is it.

I know that ADHD does exist, and in some countries may be overdiagnosed, more so in the past, but it is hard to get such a dx in the UK in my experience.

ADHD - European Criteria
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders
World Health Organization, Geneva, 1992
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contents
F90 Hyperkinetic Disorders
F90.0 Disturbance Of Activity And Attention
F90.1 Hyperkinetic Conduct Disorder

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F90 Hyperkinetic Disorders
This group of disorders is characterized by: early onset; a combination of overactive, poorly modulated behaviour with marked inattention and lack of persistent task involvement; and pervasiveness over situations and persistence over time of these behavioural characteristics.

It is widely thought that constitutional abnormalities play a crucial role in the genesis of these disorders, but knowledge on specific etiology is lacking at present. In recent years the use of the diagnostic term "attention deficit disorder" for these syndromes has been promoted. It has not been used here because it implies a knowledge of psychological processes that is not yet available, and it suggests the inclusion of anxious, preoccupied, or "dreamy" apathetic children whose problems are probably different. However, it is clear that, from the point of view of behaviour, problems of inattention constitute a central feature of these hyperkinetic syndromes.

Hyperkinetic disorders always arise early in development (usually in the first 5 years of life). Their chief characteristics are lack of persistence in activities that require cognitive involvement, and a tendency to move from one activity to another without completing any one, together with disorganized, ill-regulated, and excessive activity. These problems usually persist through school years and even into adult life, but many affected individuals show a gradual improvement in activity and attention.

Several other abnormalities may be associated with these disorders. Hyperkinetic children are often reckless and impulsive, prone to accidents, and find themselves in disciplinary trouble because of unthinking (rather than deliberately defiant) breaches of rules. Their relationships with adults are often socially disinhibited, with a lack of normal caution and reserve; they are unpopular with other children and may become isolated. Cognitive impairment is common, and specific delays in motor and language development are disproportionately frequent.

Secondary complications include dissocial behaviour and low self-esteem. There is accordingly considerable overlap between hyperkinesis and other patterns of disruptive behaviour such as "unsocialized conduct disorder". Nevertheless, current evidence favours the separation of a group in which hyperkinesis is the main problem.

Hyperkinetic disorders are several times more frequent in boys than in girls. Associated reading difficulties (and/or other scholastic problems) are common.

Diagnostic Guidelines
The cardinal features are impaired attention and overactivity: both are necessary for the diagnosis and should be evident in more than one situation (e.g. home, classroom, clinic).

Impaired attention is manifested by prematurely breaking off from tasks and leaving activities unfinished. The children change frequently from one activity to another, seemingly losing interest in one task because they become diverted to another (although laboratory studies do not generally show an unusual degree of sensory or perceptual distractibility). These deficits in persistence and attention should be diagnosed only if they are excessive for the child's age and IQ.

Overactivity implies excessive restlessness, especially in situations requiring relative calm. It may, depending upon the situation, involve the child running and jumping around, getting up from a seat when he or she was supposed to remain seated, excessive talkativeness and noisiness, or fidgeting and wriggling. The standard for judgement should be that the activity is excessive in the context of what is expected in the situation and by comparison with other children of the same age and IQ. This behavioural feature is most evident in structured, organized situations that require a high degree of behavioural self-control.

The associated features are not sufficient for the diagnosis or even necessary, but help to sustain it. Disinhibition in social relationships, recklessness in situations involving some danger, and impulsive flouting of social rules (as shown by intruding on or interrupting others' activities, prematurely answering questions before they have been completed, or difficulty in waiting turns) are all characteristic of children with this disorder.

Learning disorders and motor clumsiness occur with undue frequency, and should be noted separately when present; they should not, however, be part of the actual diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder.

Symptoms of conduct disorder are neither exclusion nor inclusion criteria for the main diagnosis, but their presence or absence constitutes the basis for the main subdivision of the disorder (see below).

The characteristic behaviour problems should be of early onset (before age 6 years) and long duration. However, before the age of school entry, hyperactivity is difficult to recognize because of the wide normal variation: only extreme levels should lead to a diagnosis in preschool children.

Diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder can still be made in adult life. The grounds are the same, but attention and activity must be judged with reference to developmentally appropriate norms. When hyperkinesis was present in childhood, but has disappeared and been succeeded by another condition, such as dissocial personality disorder or substance abuse, the current condition rather than the earlier one is coded.

Differential Diagnosis
Mixed disorders are common, and pervasive developmental disorders take precedence when they are present. The major problems in diagnosis lie in differentiation from conduct disorder: when its criteria are met, hyperkinetic disorder is diagnosed with priority over conduct disorder. However, milder degrees of overactivity and inattention are common in conduct disorder. When features of both hyperactivity and conduct disorder are present, and the hyperactivity is pervasive and severe, "hyperkinetic conduct disorder" (F90.1) should be the diagnosis.

A further problem stems from the fact that overactivity and inattention, of a rather different kind from that which is characteristic of a hyperkinetic disorder, may arise as a symptom of anxiety or depressive disorders. Thus, the restlessness that is typically part of an agitated depressive disorder should not lead to a diagnosis of a hyperkinetic disorder. Equally, the restlessness that is often part of severe anxiety should not lead to the diagnosis of a hyperkinetic disorder. If the criteria for one of the anxiety disorders are met, this should take precedence over hyperkinetic disorder unless there is evidence, apart from the restlessness associated with anxiety, for the additional presence of a hyperkinetic disorder. Similarly, if the criteria for a mood disorder are met, hyperkinetic disorder should not be diagnosed in addition simply because concentration is impaired and there is psychomotor agitation. The double diagnosis should be made only when symptoms that are not simply part of the mood disturbance clearly indicate the separate presence of a hyperkinetic disorder.

Acute onset of hyperactive behaviour in a child of school age is more probably due to some type of reactive disorder (psychogenic or organic), manic state, schizophrenia, or neurological disease (e.g. rheumatic fever).

Excludes:
* anxiety disorders
* mood (affective) disorders
* pervasive developmental disorders
* schizophrenia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F90.0 Disturbance Of Activity And Attention
There is continuing uncertainty over the most satisfactory subdivision of hyperkinetic disorders. However, follow-up studies show that the outcome in adolescence and adult life is much influenced by whether or not there is associated aggression, delinquency, or dissocial behaviour. Accordingly, the main subdivision is made according to the presence or absence of these associated features. The code used should be F90.0 when the overall criteria for hyperkinetic disorder (F90.-) are met but those for F91.- (conduct disorders) are not.

Includes:
* attention deficit disorder or syndrome with hyperactivity
* attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Excludes:
* hyperkinetic disorder associate with conduct disorder (F90.1)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F90.1 Hyperkinetic Conduct Disorder
This coding should be used when both the overall criteria for hyperkinetic disorders (F90.-) and the overall criteria for conduct disorders (F91.-) are met.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ICD-10 copyright © 1992 by World Health Organization.

Quote from article

I have had an interest in the ADHD issue for many years now, and I was following the controversy when this consensus conference was being held in the US. I read the draft edition of this consensus statement published on the internet just after the consensus conference finished, and it was surprisingly honest about the lack of scientific evidence supporting the diagnostic category of AD/HD. Then the final, official edition of the consensus statement came out, I think it was weeks later, and by that time certain interest groups had obviously exercised their influence, and the reservations and scepticism in the draft edition had vanished, never to be seen again.

I observed another interesting episode in the AD/HD controversy when an AD/HD "expert" professor from Columbia University in New York was a guest speaker at an AD/HD symposium held by the Western Australian Health Department. Western Australia has a hugely greater rate of AD/HD drug prescription than any other Australian state, with reports of particularly high prescription rates in mining regions, suggesting that there may be a black market in the drugs which can be used by adult workers to help them to stay alert through long work shifts, as are common in the mining industry.

Anyway, I saw a photo of this Yankee creep professor shaking hands with the head of the Health Department in an Australian newspaper, and I decided to check this guy's history. I checked the recent archives of a New York newspaper to find that Professor Creep had very recently been "up to his elbows" in a medical unethics scandal in New York. His team had been unethically recruiting disadvantaged children as subjects in unethical and unpleasant trials of the drug Fenfluramine, which had been taken off the market at the time as it had been found to have dangerous side-effects after it was (prematurely) released onto the market.

Here are some links that give more info about the scandal:
http://www.greens.org/s-r/19/19-07.html
http ://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/54/9/839


I thought to myself "Why the hell are we paying this overpaid, corrupt c#$* to come over here and tell us what to do with our children? This creep couldn't care less about the welfare of children!" So I've got to admit, I have a jaundiced view of AD/HD experts. There are some very evil people amongst their ranks.