03-01-2006, 10:53 PM
OK, I just returned home from a scheduled (routine) parent/teacher meeting at my youngest son’s school (U.S.), and I thought it might be grist for conversation here. First, a little background. This is a private school with a very low teacher to student ratio, and it specializes in helping kids with a variety of learning differences. They utilize a teacher advocate system, whereby one teacher is assigned to be an advocate for my son while he is in school. My wife attended with me, as did my son (he’s 12).
The primary purpose of the meeting was to review my son’s progress, and determine if any changes are needed in his Individual Education Plan. My wife has handled many of these meetings by herself, and she’s pretty tough, but I guess it was my turn to play bad guy today. I missed the first fifteen minutes or so because of a problem at work, but when I got there, the advocate was reviewing the IEP, and saying that my son was doing well overall. The advocate asked my son if there were any concerns that he could think of, and he mentioned a couple of things, one being that he didn’t like it when his classmates rushed him. He gave the example of them calling out “come on, hurry it up”, or something along that line. The advocate then asked him why he thought that happened, and he said that he wasn’t sure. She then said, “could it be that you were taking a long time?“, which eventually led to “what could you do to speed things up?”. He offered up an idea, to which the advocate said, “oh no, that wouldn’t work, how about (something to do with listening, I can’t remember exactly). At about this point I stopped the advocate and said that I was not sure that my son ought to be the expected to make an adjustment based on the kid‘s demands, when slow response (or failure to hear an instruction), is a part of his known behavior. If the others are allowed to “correct” him in this way, he’s going to feel alienated or bullied, and I told her that the others should be told to back off. I told her that this was an important issue, because my son has a history of being corrected by the group, and I would like for him to see that it’s not always a matter for him to fix, that the other kids should be a bit more tolerant. The advocate agreed, but then launched into a speech about it being necessary to adapt, in order to improve his effectiveness (not a quote) later on as an adult.
I don’t entirely disagree with that last statement, but I was seeing a bias, and started giving the advocate my view of pushing behaviors on kids like my son. She then backed up somewhat, and she did tell my son that it was her intention that the other kids not be allowed to do this, and that no matter what they said, he should remember that he is every bit as valued as they are. In the end, I got the impression she new what I was saying, but I’m not sure she really “gets it”.
Please understand that I do think it’s proper for my son to try and make some adjustments in order to “fit in”, I just believe that it’s important that we as parents and teachers also understand the magnitude of what we ask, and ensure that our kids don’t feel like they’re faulty, or that they’re a disappointment to someone, when they don’t always succeed in that task. Comments?
The primary purpose of the meeting was to review my son’s progress, and determine if any changes are needed in his Individual Education Plan. My wife has handled many of these meetings by herself, and she’s pretty tough, but I guess it was my turn to play bad guy today. I missed the first fifteen minutes or so because of a problem at work, but when I got there, the advocate was reviewing the IEP, and saying that my son was doing well overall. The advocate asked my son if there were any concerns that he could think of, and he mentioned a couple of things, one being that he didn’t like it when his classmates rushed him. He gave the example of them calling out “come on, hurry it up”, or something along that line. The advocate then asked him why he thought that happened, and he said that he wasn’t sure. She then said, “could it be that you were taking a long time?“, which eventually led to “what could you do to speed things up?”. He offered up an idea, to which the advocate said, “oh no, that wouldn’t work, how about (something to do with listening, I can’t remember exactly). At about this point I stopped the advocate and said that I was not sure that my son ought to be the expected to make an adjustment based on the kid‘s demands, when slow response (or failure to hear an instruction), is a part of his known behavior. If the others are allowed to “correct” him in this way, he’s going to feel alienated or bullied, and I told her that the others should be told to back off. I told her that this was an important issue, because my son has a history of being corrected by the group, and I would like for him to see that it’s not always a matter for him to fix, that the other kids should be a bit more tolerant. The advocate agreed, but then launched into a speech about it being necessary to adapt, in order to improve his effectiveness (not a quote) later on as an adult.
I don’t entirely disagree with that last statement, but I was seeing a bias, and started giving the advocate my view of pushing behaviors on kids like my son. She then backed up somewhat, and she did tell my son that it was her intention that the other kids not be allowed to do this, and that no matter what they said, he should remember that he is every bit as valued as they are. In the end, I got the impression she new what I was saying, but I’m not sure she really “gets it”.
Please understand that I do think it’s proper for my son to try and make some adjustments in order to “fit in”, I just believe that it’s important that we as parents and teachers also understand the magnitude of what we ask, and ensure that our kids don’t feel like they’re faulty, or that they’re a disappointment to someone, when they don’t always succeed in that task. Comments?

