Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Woman sued state for ordering end to 'caging' of AS child
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
$4.1 million claim quickly rejected
Woman sued state for ordering end to 'caging' of autistic child

Thomas Clouse
Spokesman Review
February 3, 2006


In a case that took six years to get to trial and four weeks to argue, a jury Thursday took just two hours – including a lunch break – to rule against a woman seeking $4.1 million from the state, which forced her to stop putting her autistic child in a steel mesh cage.

Rhoda Behrens-Hoisington, who holds a master's degree in developmental psychology, sued in 2000 after the autistic boy she adopted reportedly attacked her several months after a home inspection by Child Protective Services investigator Paul Thurik in March 2000.

During the inspection, Thurik discovered Behrens-Hoisington was using a 6-foot-tall, steel-mesh cage – which had a bucket for use as a toilet – to control her son's outbursts.

Also living in the Nine Mile Falls home with two other developmentally disabled children were about 30 dogs, pot-bellied pigs, a goat and a turkey, which had the run of the bathroom, according to court testimony.

Thurik ordered Behrens-Hoisington to dismantle the steel-mesh cage, which her attorney, Paul Burns, referred to as a "safe room" at the trial. The agency left the child in the woman's care without providing any options for controlling his outbursts.

Burns argued that removing the "safe room" caused the boy's behavior to deteriorate to the point that he attacked Behrens-Hoisington twice in November and left her with brain damage.

Behrens-Hoisington sought $4.1 million to pay for past, present and future medical bills, loss of employment and ruining her quality of life. She had worked previously as a caregiver for disabled children placed in her home by the state.

"If the government is going to tell Ms. Behrens-Hoisington that she must change the way she cares for the child, then the government must bear some responsibility. Dismantling the safe room predictably escalated the behavior of the child," Burns said.

But Assistant Attorney General Jerry Cartwright argued that Thurik was acting like any "right-thinking person" when he ordered that the cage be dismantled, and the government is unable to provide everything a child or family might need.

The trial, which was moved from Stevens County to Spokane, included testimony from several doctors about Behrens-Hoisington's debilitating medical problems. However, a videotape was played to the jury showing Behrens-Hoisington pruning trees and driving in stakes with a sledge hammer.

When Burns totaled the damages he and his client were seeking, one member of the eight-man, four-woman jury rolled her eyes. The jury quickly sided with Cartwright, ruling against the negligence claims.

"The usual case involves the department being sued for either placing a child in an abusive home or – very rarely – removing a child from a non-abusive home," Cartwright said. "In this particular case … it was basically the parents claiming that they were injured by the child, and the state was somehow responsible for that."


Source:  http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/sto...?ID=114703
If it was genuinely a room, rather than a cage, the state may not have intervened.

If they saw the house was in a state where animals were roaming freely and they found it a concern, maybe they should have taken more action, or given the mother more support to help her cope.

They knew she was struggling so it does seem unfair that she never got more support.
Jury rejects lawsuit against state over caging of troubled child

02/03/2006
Associated Press

A jury has rejected a $4.1 million lawsuit by a woman who said she was severely injured by her behaviorally disturbed adopted son after the state ordered her to stop locking him in a steel cage.

After a four-week trial, the Spokane County Superior Court panel deliberated two hours Thursday before ruling against Rhoda Behrens-Hoisington, 55 or 56, of Nine Mile Falls, who has cared for a total of 22 developmentally disabled children and holds a master's degree in developmental psychology.

Behrens-Hoisington cited spinal and brain damage from an attack by Richie "Bud" Hoisington, an autistic boy she adopted when he was 4, and blamed a Child Protective Services order that she stop controlling his outbursts by confining him in a 6-foot-tall cage with a bucket for use as a toilet.

She told investigators a state-paid caregiver gave her the cage as a wedding present in 1998.

Her lawyer, Paul J. Burns, called the device a "safe room" and argued that the agency failed to providing alternatives for controlling the boy, 12 at the time of the attack and diagnosed with autism, fetal alcohol and crack cocaine exposure, attention deficit disorder, Tourette's syndrome and a condition that sometimes leads him to eat glass and nails.

Assistant attorney general Jerry Cartwright countered that the order to dismantle the cage was only what any "right-thinking person" would do.

The case arose after an agency investigator, Paul Thurik, visited the home where Behrens-Hoisington lived with two other developmentally disabled children, about 30 dogs, potbellied pigs, a goat and a turkey which had the run of the bathroom in March 2000, court testimony showed.

After Thurik ordered the cage dismantled, she was attacked twice that November and sued for payment of past, present and future medical bills, loss of employment as a caregiver for disabled children and diminished quality of life.

In early July 2001, authorities said, the boy set a fire, spat on authorities and destroyed a bed in a hospital psychiatric room after Behrens-Hoisington sought advice from a Gonzaga University professor on alternatives for controlling his behavior.

"If the government is going to tell Ms. Behrens-Hoisington that she must change the way she cares for the child, then the government must bear some responsibility. Dismantling the safe room predictably escalated the behavior of the child," Burns asserted.

Cartwright said the government could not be required to provide everything a child or family might need.

Information from: The Spokesman-Review, http://www.spokesmanreview.com
Reference URL's