09-14-2004, 10:12 PM
I try to look at these forums every day, like I do with the forums I'm part of. There's something I've noticed that has come up very often and is annoying me just a little bit.
Call me a spelling nazi, but the plural of NT is NTs! Why does everyone insist that there should be a completely useless and unnecessary apostrophe in there! Is it for decoration or something?
I did a search for NT's to see how often this load of rubbish was being used.
It found 112 matches. Now that doesn't mean there are truely that many instances of the stupid mistake, as someone may be correctly using it, for example:
- When something is being implied to belong to the NT.
- An implication that a letter is missing, eg. NT is becomes NT's
But most are used when it is merely a plural.
Do: NTs are a neurological variant.
Don't: NT's are a neurological variant.
Why? Because when read, it says: NT is are a neurological variant.
Does that make a damn bit of sense to you? No! So why do you keep using it!
That rant is from your AS red dragon, Raeth and that is all he has to say about that.
Call me a spelling nazi, but the plural of NT is NTs! Why does everyone insist that there should be a completely useless and unnecessary apostrophe in there! Is it for decoration or something?
I did a search for NT's to see how often this load of rubbish was being used.
It found 112 matches. Now that doesn't mean there are truely that many instances of the stupid mistake, as someone may be correctly using it, for example:
- When something is being implied to belong to the NT.
- An implication that a letter is missing, eg. NT is becomes NT's
But most are used when it is merely a plural.
Do: NTs are a neurological variant.
Don't: NT's are a neurological variant.
Why? Because when read, it says: NT is are a neurological variant.
Does that make a damn bit of sense to you? No! So why do you keep using it!
That rant is from your AS red dragon, Raeth and that is all he has to say about that.
