I think this is a good idea, as I believe this does not leave you open to the (specious) counter-argument that autism cannot be a culture if it is also a biologically-based condition or disability. It is perfectly possible for an autistic person to have no ties at all with any autistic culture, but still be socially disadvantaged due to their autism. One can even have no awareness at all of their own status as autistic, but still be discriminated against because of that autism, and have an "awareness of subordination" but not understand why it is happening. So I think the idea of a social minority group covers all autistic people who need to be covered by the definition.
One well-known autistic person has been using the word "culturalists" to describe people who she seems to think have a view of autism that conflicts with her own ideas about autism.
I have noticed a few punctuation or spelling errors in the document. Would you like me to point them out?
what about jews?? they have a discernable gentic component and can be found in all races due to a diaspora
I think this is a good idea, as I believe this does not leave you open to the (specious) counter-argument that autism cannot be a culture if it is also a biologically-based condition or disability. It is perfectly possible for an autistic person to have no ties at all with any autistic culture, but still be socially disadvantaged due to their autism. One can even have no awareness at all of their own status as autistic, but still be discriminated against because of that autism, and have an "awareness of subordination" but not understand why it is happening. So I think the idea of a social minority group covers all autistic people who need to be covered by the definition.
One well-known autistic person has been using the word "culturalists" to describe people who she seems to think have a view of autism that conflicts with her own ideas about autism.
I have noticed a few punctuation or spelling errors in the document. Would you like me to point them out?