Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Disturbing article presents fiction as fact
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Autism Nailed

For anyone concerned as to the reason for autism, it should now be known, that autism is caused by a neurotoxin used as a preservative during immunisation.

Injections for babies and youngsters, to protect them against mumps, measles, whooping cough, diphtheria, tetanus, rubella, hepatitis, meningitis etc contain mercury in the form of thimerosal, which is a known nerve poison. It is most toxic to the growing brain. The younger the brain, the worse the damage.

The danger of mercury contained in thimerosal was suspected by the drug industry even before it was so used. Mercury has always been known to cause trouble. Mercury was used in the creation of felt for hats and hence the Mad Hatters and their tea-party.

When I was a boy, a condition in babies called Pink Disease, was found to be due to calomel used as a teething powder. Those babies were exceedingly irritable.

Economic pressures and the desire to profit from the opportunity to create immunity, silenced all pleas for caution. Mercury was used in injections with gay abandon.

As an epidemic of autism became apparent, the vaccines were sent off to a third estate of man and China now has 1.8 million children with autism. Sooner or later this well-kept secret will become common knowledge and then revenge against the West in the form of run away terrorism, will be upon us.

It may not be too late, to wake up and notice the dreadful problems created by an absence of ethics from the subject of economics.


Submitted by: Dr Edward Hamlyn

http://www.pressbox. co.uk/detailed/Health/Autism_Nailed_33007.html

(broken link, remove centre space to access it)
My, my.  He's certainly ill informed, isn't he?  :evil:

Quote:
Submitted by: Dr Edward Hamlyn


Where do all these people get their titles from  :mad:

If he was right, that would mean that everybody who had been given vaccinations containing thimerosal would be autistic. What a silly man. I sincerely hope he is not a medical doctor.
And what about those that didnt get vaccinated (of which I am one)?


Idiots...
I just did a quick search for aitism on that site - from what I can see - its just about selling books.
I noticed that the author of the "article" failed to mention the date when thimoseral or mercury were first used in vaccines. This is a very crucial piece of information, because if autism is actually caused by mercury in vaccinations then the rate of early childhood autism diagnosis should follow the same patten as rates of vaccination with mercury as an ingredient, with a delay of a few years. This is the kind of prediction that could provide solid evidence for or against the theory.

If thimoseral was only used in recent decades in vaccinations that would certainly not explain why one of the elders of our family is such an eccentric old curmudgeon.
"Autism Epidemic"? What a heap of garbage!  :twisted: All that has happened as far as I can see is that the medical profession (in general that is) as become better at diagnosing autism.  :twisted:

Tom C Wrote:

Quote:
Submitted by: Dr Edward Hamlyn


Where do all these people get their titles from  :mad:


I don't know, but this proves degree cannot prove intelligence and wisdom.

I am not even in college yet and I am probably already a lot smarter than him.

tenaciouscj Wrote:
"Autism Epidemic"? What a heap of garbage!  :twisted: All that has happened as far as I can see is that the medical profession (in general that is) as become better at diagnosing autism.  :twisted:


I agree. Is "autism epidemic" not an overused term? The use of it and "obesity epidemic" in the news is already epidemic itself.

I agree Mich. The only reason I can see for an "obesity epidemic" is they've redefined what is "overweight" and "obese" and a lot more people are caught up in these groups than ever before.

There have always been "big" people and I think as a society we're a lot more health-conscious than we used to be.

Another media cliche that really annoys me is the use of "up to" eg. "up to 20% of the population maybe suffer from this or that disorder". Looks impressive until you realise that even if they put in 0% it would still fit the definition.

They rely on people to assume the biggest figure is the true one ie. the 20%. It's a bit like those "up to 50% off sales" where maybe a handful of items have the 50% off and the rest might have just 5% or 10% off.
Reference URL's