06-30-2008, 05:31 PM
I don't find it funny. I find it very sad that people have to resort to a barrage of caustic remarks/insults. It only escalates the hatred, and the differences don't go away.
Why?
Why?
Probably due to your rhetorical tone-deafness and lack of comprehension that language has broad and complex meanings that can't be reduced to exercises in formal logic.
Both I, Illusion and Pikajedi understood the charitable and correct interpretation, yet you keep insisting that your knee-jerk reaction is correct. Even after clarifications. Astonishing.
Ahem. I read the sentence. If you interpret "I went to the mall today" as "I massacred ten people in a mall today", the interpretation isn't correct "for you", it's simply wrong. This was one of those cases where an actual reading of the post in question reveals the real meaning, and reveals that the attributes meaning was wrong.
Why don't you tell Max the same. He was, after all, the one who thought a one-sentence post with the two words "you're wrong" was a valuable contribution to this thread.
Its also why Illusion, just like logical conclusion, will get banned.
I believe you. It is why he will probably get banned. But so far I haven't seen anything ban-worthy, although I haven't been following him closely. But he will probably be banned, because everyone reacts in the way they do, even when there is no reason for them to do so.
Ahem. I read the sentence. If you interpret "I went to the mall today" as "I massacred ten people in a mall today", the interpretation isn't correct "for you", it's simply wrong. This was one of those cases where an actual reading of the post in question reveals the real meaning, and reveals that the attributes meaning was wrong.
Why don't you tell Max the same. He was, after all, the one who thought a one-sentence post with the two words "you're wrong" was a valuable contribution to this thread.

Who cares, Illusion is going to get banned.
Who cares? I care that this forum is so irrational all the time. Maybe you don't.

(yup, double-rolleyes)
I didn't write one-sentence replies that only said "you're wrong". In fact, I just went and read all the posts in that thread and I couldn't even find any instance where I said "you're wrong" to Ethel at all. I'm not even sure the words occur in any of my posts in that thread except to defend the right to say it. I don't understand the antagonism here. You just want to hate someone, is that it?
Specific studies, please. The best would be a direct quote from somewhere. You see, I suffer from the "delusion" that all science about race and intelligence has been proven to be bunk.
The you was plural, and the subject wasn't just me, but others as well. Incidentally, I agree completely about internet hate.

I can not see that Il667 compares homosexuality with pedophilia. I'm not 100% on it though. (He does not use the word pedophilia. I almost missed that he uses the word pedophile; + siamese twins. That is in itself a deviation).
Il667 has by his own admission stated that he thinks that homosexuality is a deviation (from the heterosexual norm I suppose). Someone has implied that Il667 therefore is to be labeled homophobic.
Yours truly--Sem Antics
Nice post.
Directly contradicting what you said in the post I replied "nice post" to. Not very nice.
In the post I quoted, you argued for the same interpretation as I did. Then you say you completely agree with Max, who disagreed with my interpretation. So I'm confused.
Good.