Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: The Olympic Torch Protests
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

ichtms Wrote:
If the protests among athletes as well as people on the streets around the world are powerful enough maybe the countries that will participate (?) can put some pressure on the Chinese Regime through their diplomats. A boycott of products is trickier as China produces a lot of products very cheap for Westerners in particular. The average factory worker in China is basically enslaved.

The International Olympic Committee has just declared that the Torch Run will go on (joseph goebbels came up with the idea for the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin).


1936=2008.

Korrigan Wrote:

Creasy Redux Wrote:
The world wide protests that are greeting the Olympic torch relay are starting to become a real embarrassment for China. Down here in Australia they're now calling for people to line the streets when the torch comes and then turn their back on it as it passes, in silent protest.


As someone who lives in the only city in the US where the torch visited, I am horrified at the mess.  

The streets all over downtown were a complete disaster, with people being bussed in from both sides.  They were screaming at each other, one side "Free Tibet" and the other side "Lies".  The protests were anything but silent.

The torch was accompanied by both Chinese Police and San Francisco Police in FULL RIOT GEAR.  At one point, the Free Tibet people accosted a tour bus full of people.  They laid down in front of the bus and when that was not enough, began to shake it from side to side.  The police intervened.

The route had to be changed because of public safety.  The mayor, whether or not I agree with his normal politics, did what I consider a really good thing, and changed the route at the last minute and did not inform anyone.  He will suffer some serious political repurcussions on this, and his supervisors are already talking about how unfair it was.

The closing ceremony was cancelled.  

I do not know the reasoning behind all of the protests.  I am going to be honest here.  But I have to believe that this was terribly misplaced.  I would have loved to have seen the torch.   But I could not do it because of all of the protests.  I plan to educate myself so I understand more about it, but I do not think the whole thing was acceptable, no matter what.


Ok. I think I feel very strongly about this. Essentially what is happening is genocide (sterilisation of Tibetans is common) and annexation by stealth. The Tibetan people are being sterilised and evicted from their homes. The Chinese government, for example, actively encourages wealthy Chinese to move to Tibet. Houses become far more expensive and Tibetans can no longer afford it. It really is understandable that people are so angry.

I was listening to the radio a few days ago and there was a speaker on and she said somthing that described this really well, it was:

"A symbol of the very thing these people are being denied of."

there was more before that...  She means, that this torch is a symbol of worldwide peace, unity and freedoom. And the Tibetans are being denied this, so it's rather ironic/ stupid really, that China and everyone are doing the torch thing, but going against what it stands for.

The primeminister/ president of my country is therefore not attending the arrival ceremony, and has to be there at the leaving one but refuses to touch the torch.  The situation is to try to get China to stop it's oppression, but to do so in a way that will not offend China, because it is of great economic importance.

Korrigan Wrote:

Wondering1 Wrote:
Ok. I think I feel very strongly about this. Essentially what is happening is genocide (sterilisation of Tibetans is common) and annexation by stealth. The Tibetan people are being sterilised and evicted from their homes. The Chinese government, for example, actively encourages wealthy Chinese to move to Tibet. Houses become far more expensive and Tibetans can no longer afford it. It really is understandable that people are so angry.


Anger is understandable if what you are saying is what is happening.  I think the people of China may disagree with you about the situation. How much of this is "different" than the invasion of Iraq by the US?  I am not stating an opinion, I am asking one.  

And angry, sure, but the public safety suffered.  And the thought that it would make a difference, well, that, IMHO, is silly.


I have spoken to Chinese people (citizens of the PRC) that are entirely candid about it. Many are aware that it is happening. Simple answer? They do not give a ***. The Tibetans have been demonised and dehumanised for too long.

As to the invasion in Iraq? I do not think it was the intention of the Coalition to destroy a people...it was their intention to destroy their country. The Iraq War was an enormous mistake, but I do not know if the intentions were as devious.

Michael 1 Wrote:
I think the protesters are disgraceful. They would never dare go to China and protest so why abuse their (and our) freedoms to do so peacefully in London, Paris, etc. by being violent. I see most public protest as rather arrogant. They are always a minority. Far more people don't protest than do...But the protesters get all the attention. Why didn't the people protesting the China games do more to promote another city at the time of selection?


Has it occurred to you that the majority of people (working especially) cannot afford the luxury of protest? Many businesses actively discourage it. The assertion that it is "arrogant" is completely erroneous. Yes. Tell that to the people who fought at The Battle of Cable Street. Tell that to the Austrian Social Democrats that actively fought and protested against genocidal fascists. What a ridiculous thing to say. How is it disgraceful? Sometimes violence is a necessity. In this case it most certainly is. You cannot sit there and expect to negotiate, and reasonably, with a fascist dictatorship that is systematically destroying an ethnic group. I'm sorry, but Ghandi and MLK would not have succeeded without the more violent factions.

Korrigan Wrote:

Michael 1 Wrote:
I think the protesters are disgraceful. They would never dare go to China and protest so why abuse their (and our) freedoms to do so peacefully in London, Paris, etc. by being violent. I see most public protest as rather arrogant. They are always a minority. Far more people don't protest than do...But the protesters get all the attention. Why didn't the people protesting the China games do more to promote another city at the time of selection?


Actually that is what a lot of people here in my area are saying.  If you did not want the Olympics there, it is a little late now...


They can't influence the IOC's decision. It's hardly democratic.

Korrigan Wrote:
You should go to sfgate.com and read up on how people felt about things yesterday.  There are many stories, and are an interesting read.


I will. Having been arrested several times in the past I am aware that people take a dim view of protest. For me it is essential. History teaches us that.

Korrigan Wrote:

Wondering1 Wrote:
I will. Having been arrested several times in the past I am aware that people take a dim view of protest. For me it is essential. History teaches us that.


See, I knew you were a criminal sort. Wink

(KIDDING)


I have literally been beaten to the ground by Swiss policeman. I have been tear-gassed. I have been stabbed by a neo-Nazi. No joke.

Honestly, it looks to me like there has been plenty of time to solve the whole China/Tibet thing.  I mean, they have been there since, when, the 50's?

I could be way off on my thinking here, and will probably suffer for it, but does it not seem like Tibet lost and China won?  

I am not sure that what was done to the Native American people was the best thing either, but I do not see anyone from China here protesting about it.

honestjohn Wrote:
The reason why people from China are not pretesting is, they are not allowed to protest. Also, people sometimes feel a strong urge to stnd up for people who can't/aren't allowed or are unable to stand up for themselves.


I mean why are they not HERE protesting.  Maybe they cannot protest there, but they can here.  And they can protest there, but they may die for it, right?  Well if you are not willing to die for a cause, is it worth protesting?

And in all reality, what it comes down to is that they do not care.  They care about themselves and their own country.  The Europeans came in and took the whole darn country for themselves.  The Native Americans gave away huge parts of land for virtually nothing.  They had really no choice, they were under duress.  That sounds like the document that Tibet signed in the 40's or 50's, it was under duress so it is not valid.      

Gareth Wrote:

Quote:
Well if you are not willing to die for a cause, is it worth protesting?


yes


In this case, I am not sure I agree.  I think that if what they are saying is true, i.e., the massacre of millions, genocide, an entire country and its people being eradicated at the hands of China, and if they feel that it is that important, I think they should be willing to sacrifice for it, up to their lives.

I think most of the people protesting (NOT ALL) are protesting for the sake of it.  

I heard some man screaming at a lady to go and look at a torture victim from Tibet.  She was there holding a flag and supporting China.  He screamed and yelled at her.  I am sincerely doubtful he was personally invested in the plight of the people from Tibet and was instead part of a "protesting culture" where you get your thrills from attending with large masses of people and yelling and screaming about it.  

But if course, that is just my opinion.  I still think the people of America should stay the heck out of other countries and try to figure out how to care for their own.  We nearly eradicated an entire people and took their whole country just to get the rights to do so, after all.

Wondering1 Wrote:
I shall be frank.


Nice to meet ya Frank.

Wocka wocka. Wink

The Dalai Lama said he supported the Beijing Olympics and was saddened by recent anti-Chinese protests that marred the traditional torch relay through the streets of London, Paris, and San Francisco. “Everyone knows I support the Olympic Games,” he said, declining to say whether he believed world leaders should attend the opening ceremony scheduled for August 8.

For the full story go to:
http://www.hindu.com/2008/04/15/stories/...881500.htm
I just posted on the thread yesterday because I thought it was interesting that the Dalai Lama supported the Olympics and did not like the protests.  Thought it was a bit ironic.

Sat_Chit_Anand Wrote:
I was born in Camden, London. My father was and still is an anarchist who works for the Animal Liberation Front. My mother's family were immigrants of Austrian and Romany extraction.


Anyone seen the Austin Powers movies?  This sounds faintly like the beginning of the description of Dr. Evil's life....

Giggle Wink

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Reference URL's