Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: The Olympic Torch Protests
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

Creasy Redux Wrote:
The world wide protests that are greeting the Olympic torch relay are starting to become a real embarrassment for China. Down here in Australia they're now calling for people to line the streets when the torch comes and then turn their back on it as it passes, in silent protest.


As someone who lives in the only city in the US where the torch visited, I am horrified at the mess.  

The streets all over downtown were a complete disaster, with people being bussed in from both sides.  They were screaming at each other, one side "Free Tibet" and the other side "Lies".  The protests were anything but silent.

The torch was accompanied by both Chinese Police and San Francisco Police in FULL RIOT GEAR.  At one point, the Free Tibet people accosted a tour bus full of people.  They laid down in front of the bus and when that was not enough, began to shake it from side to side.  The police intervened.

The route had to be changed because of public safety.  The mayor, whether or not I agree with his normal politics, did what I consider a really good thing, and changed the route at the last minute and did not inform anyone.  He will suffer some serious political repurcussions on this, and his supervisors are already talking about how unfair it was.

The closing ceremony was cancelled.  

I do not know the reasoning behind all of the protests.  I am going to be honest here.  But I have to believe that this was terribly misplaced.  I would have loved to have seen the torch.   But I could not do it because of all of the protests.  I plan to educate myself so I understand more about it, but I do not think the whole thing was acceptable, no matter what.

Wondering1 Wrote:
Ok. I think I feel very strongly about this. Essentially what is happening is genocide (sterilisation of Tibetans is common) and annexation by stealth. The Tibetan people are being sterilised and evicted from their homes. The Chinese government, for example, actively encourages wealthy Chinese to move to Tibet. Houses become far more expensive and Tibetans can no longer afford it. It really is understandable that people are so angry.


Anger is understandable if what you are saying is what is happening.  I think the people of China may disagree with you about the situation. How much of this is "different" than the invasion of Iraq by the US?  I am not stating an opinion, I am asking one.  

And angry, sure, but the public safety suffered.  And the thought that it would make a difference, well, that, IMHO, is silly.

Wondering1 Wrote:
I have spoken to Chinese people (citizens of the PRC) that are entirely candid about it. Many are aware that it is happening. Simple answer? They do not give a ***. The Tibetans have been demonised and dehumanised for too long.

As to the invasion in Iraq? I do not think it was the intention of the Coalition to destroy a people...it was their intention to destroy their country. The Iraq War was an enormous mistake, but I do not know if the intentions were as devious.


I am not surprised (the do not give a *** part).  

If you are careless with your actions and run over a child on the street, your intentions are not important. The child is still dead.

honestjohn Wrote:
Korrigan, the reason the public has to be inconvenienced or interfered with, is because unless something directly affects a person -th ey do not react or research (generally speaking).


I am not sure, though, that a tour bus should have been bothered and that public safety should have been at risk.  I do not live in China and have yet to imprison or torture a person from Tibet.  But then again, I am a person who believes in taking care of stuff in my backyard before I comment on the neighbor's landscape.

I am also not sure that half of the people at the protests on either side knew anything about it.  We have a big tendency of people to "jump on the protest bandwagon" here in the Bay Area.

We had a movement here recently regarding bicyclists, the name escapes me at the moment, but they do this "free ride" through the cities regularly in these large packs of bikes.  They wanted some publicity for their cause.  They caused a huge traffic jam, and when a poor older tourist was trying to get through the mess they claimed that he hit one of their bikes.  They were hitting his windshield, yelling at him, etc.  Then the video came out.  The video of one of the protesters/bike riders putting the bike underneath the wheel of the van.

Gareth Wrote:
All tibetans are not autistic, thus it's not an AFF issue.


ah ha ha ha!

Smile

Gareth Wrote:
What's funny there?
It's not an autism rights issue unless it's affecting autistics in particular.


Not funny like it was not true, funny as it was said so concisely and to the point.

Michael 1 Wrote:
I think the protesters are disgraceful. They would never dare go to China and protest so why abuse their (and our) freedoms to do so peacefully in London, Paris, etc. by being violent. I see most public protest as rather arrogant. They are always a minority. Far more people don't protest than do...But the protesters get all the attention. Why didn't the people protesting the China games do more to promote another city at the time of selection?


Actually that is what a lot of people here in my area are saying.  If you did not want the Olympics there, it is a little late now...

You should go to sfgate.com and read up on how people felt about things yesterday.  There are many stories, and are an interesting read.

Wondering1 Wrote:
I will. Having been arrested several times in the past I am aware that people take a dim view of protest. For me it is essential. History teaches us that.


See, I knew you were a criminal sort. Wink

(KIDDING)

Ethel Wrote:
This is difficult... because I'm personally interested in the Tibet situation, so my first reaction is to be supportive of the protests...  BUT I know from personal experience that some protesters don't really know or care what they're fighting for, they're just in it because it's cool, or to cause trouble.  


My husband suggested a good way to figure it out would be to take a World Map and ask the protesters to find Tibet.  LOL

I've been very surprised by the American attitudes here towards the protests and those involved in them.  Maybe this is another cultural thing.  In Europe public protest is regarded as a human right, I would say.  One which the UK government are attempting to take away in their efforts against their so-called war on terror!

So far, from what little I've seen of the news, the protests have been successful.  It is the nature of public protest that people are inconvenienced, shaken up, frightened and maybe injured.  It's maybe a question of whether or not you consider the benefits to outway the costs, or not.
outweigh not outway!
I don't know enough about the situation in Tibet/China to comment, but I kind of take some issue with the comments about the "destruction of ...the British people."  Britishness is an increasingly abstract and out-dated concept, and one the UK government is keen to define and maintain in defiance of increasing confidence in Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish identities.  I'm 40 and I have never described myself as British, despite having a British passport.  My identity is Scottish.

Sat_Chit_Anand Wrote:

Marcia Wrote:
I don't know enough about the situation in Tibet/China to comment, but I kind of take some issue with the comments about the "destruction of ...the British people."  Britishness is an increasingly abstract and out-dated concept, and one the UK government is keen to define and maintain in defiance of increasing confidence in Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish identities.  I'm 40 and I have never described myself as British, despite having a British passport.  My identity is Scottish.


You forgot the English identity, poppet.


Sorry, poppet.  It's been interchangable with the "British" one for so long that I tend to forget! Smile

Simen Wrote:

Marcia Wrote:
I don't know enough about the situation in Tibet/China to comment, but I kind of take some issue with the comments about the "destruction of ...the British people."  Britishness is an increasingly abstract and out-dated concept, and one the UK government is keen to define and maintain in defiance of increasing confidence in Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish identities.  I'm 40 and I have never described myself as British, despite having a British passport.  My identity is Scottish.


And here I was hoping you'd say you didn't base your identity on an accident of birth.


Yeah, or should I say "aye"! Smile You're right, of course.  I was refering to my "national" identity, such as it is.  I was responding a bit too rapidly to the comments about Britishness and how it's being destroyed by immigrants.  I thought there was something a bit sus about our British friend, and having looked back I see he's BNP so I'm not engaging, with him, that is! Wink

Scotland tends to be a bit more welcoming of immigrants than England is.  Unfortunately, asylum and immigration is still dealt with by the UK govt. so we've been unable to make our own, more welcoming, policies.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Reference URL's