I think a prenatal test for being gay is less of a threat because it doesn't have as much of the stigma as autism.
In some places, it has even more, so I think it is a significant threat.
That's why a lot of people fall away from religious practice as they can't reconcile the two things and something "has" to go.
It's like pie in the sky when you die. They prefer the tangible rewards in the here and now. Could be wrong by your reckoning but oh so human of them.
Well, being a lesbian, thinking about a guy and a girl having sex together or two guys is gross to me. Doesn't mean it's intrinsically gross, just that I don't want to think of it much. And I don't give weird looks or anything; it's just an alien concept to me.
I have heard that the San Francisco Bay area is quite tolerant of homosexuality. That's a big "thank you captain obvious for your genius insight" but hey, I've never been there so all I've got is the public opinion on this stuff, in my neck of the woods.
I wonder if perhaps an Aspergia island might be able to work on similar grounds...?
You can actually come to think of people who have the tone of voice and all as kind of cool, because it does not mean they are actually oriented.
And since God has the problem if a gay person acts on feelings, not me, I'd prefer to leave that between the two of them. All the sexual restrictions of Leviticus only make sense to me in a heterosexual perspective.
Sorry, this and a couple other of GuessWho's posts in this thread are making me think to myself... "if only Max the Bear was here..." 
A. putting one's male member where feces come out on a routine basis or
Male members also do the same thing with females, in fact there's some "studies" that claim that the heterosexual version of this act (as seen in your quote) is done more often.
In any event--overall--I don't share GuessWho's highly critical view of homosexuality.
How consenting adults choose to express themselves behind closed doors is not really my greatest concern.
Eww! That's really gross! Plus, I think it would hurt to have it put in the back passage. I think there's better ways to avoid pregnancy than having sausages in the rear end. Truly there is.
GuessWho, it's true that it often hurts for the lady the first time but things can be done to make it a bit more pleasant, such as going in slowly and maybe using a lubricant like KY jelly.
Also, plenty of foreplay is a must eg. kissing. There are plenty of books you can buy which go into more detail here.
I too wonder if Max is going okay. He had a lot of sadness and misfortune to cope with but I hope he will be all right somehow.
Yes, there is harm done. It kills people's souls to act like that.
Some women like anal sex (dare I say, Ripley's Believe It or Not)
I hope Max is OK, too.
Methinks God made the rules too inflexible for the non-heterosexuals amongst us. If you're not a Christian what you think of what God thinks doesn't matter, but I think homosexual believers need to decide where they stand, especially as they cannot negotiate with a book that was written long before any of us were born.
I've read Leviticus and it was written for a lawyer, it's just too damn specific.
Position statement: I can make it and leave it alone:
I believe there is some power and mysticism to the Holy Spirit, but the religion does not tolerate homosexual sexual activity. I wish Christianity had a provision for gay marriage, too, because I think it is only even handed and just to let other people have the same thing we Christians take for granted.
The Bible is too well written however, and the holy book, and therefore the issue, is non negotiable. Any sex outside of or before marriage is a mistake, something to try to talk someone out of, not a sin to laugh at. The entire non-sexual gay rights agenda is probably valid and Christian, and prejudice or discrimination or abusive behavior is not Christian love.
Some women aren't me.
From what you quoted from the Bible, there are no prohibitions against lesbianism and none against non penetrative male homosexual activities.
In the end, the people involved have to make the final decision as to whether or not to take the Bible literally on this matter.
Some men don't like anal sex either. It's like, shit, you know. I would have to get used to vaginal fluid to get over virginity. The recent ex-virgin should stick to one, uh, sensation, at a time.
As long as the lady is clean, there is nothing wrong with vaginal fluid. It is perfectly natural.
I'm surprised that Chris's parents didn't educate him more about the subject. Then again, it is common for parents to not want to mention it because they don't want to be seen as encouraging experimentation, they don't want to believe their child is growing up, or they are too embarrassed to talk about a subject that is often very emotionally charged.
It was rather silly to do that. I'm just very surprised that your dad didn't sit you down one day and have a man to man talk to you about the facts of life. Ignorance is not always bliss. Perhaps somebody from your church could help (but I'm not sure if it would be the best idea to go to a female pastor for this - another man might just be better).
That was only limited sex education. I think the fear aspect was emphasised just a bit too much.
Anal sex isn't something people just go and do because you have to prepare yourself for it so it doesn't hurt too much. A gay man I knew talked about achieving anal orgasm because his prostata was massaged by anal sex. I don't think a majority of gay couples engage in anal sex though.
Groupsex seem like a perfect way to pick up some VD.