Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: taken from a Christian site that exposes fake healers
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

M Wrote:
The healing is according to God's will, not the healer's or the person with the "affliction".


Ding, we have a winner.

Luai_lashire Wrote:

tom Wrote:
The funny thing is thta the author of the piece is critisising Parsley, but they are both way off base according to the christians on here. Interesting stuff


I'm not a christian, but I know that prayer healing is at least somewhat effective, because scientific studies have shown that it has an almost "placebo effect"-like effect on the patient (sometimes, but not always).  In short, it doesn't heal on it's own, but it makes the patient feel better and feel like they are getting healthier, which helps them fight off whatever is affecting their health, so it results in improvement.

And you're right, both of the people involved in this piece are wrong in a variety of ways.  Neither one is right about prayer healing, and neither one is right about the way they are approaching the issue of autism.


I'm going to take a risk of starting a flame war, but science will never be able to explain faith.

GuessWho Wrote:
All the things we call diseases and disabillities are proof that when God lets Satan run the world instead of simply annihilating him forthright, Satan can't run the world.


My personal belief is that in order to get rid of all these diseases and disabilities God would have to judge everyone, I think there a resault of the common sin of man.

God does not judge us yet, becuause he loves us and holds hope that we (man) will change.

Luai_lashire Wrote:

TheZach Wrote:

Luai_lashire Wrote:

tom Wrote:
The funny thing is thta the author of the piece is critisising Parsley, but they are both way off base according to the christians on here. Interesting stuff


I'm not a christian, but I know that prayer healing is at least somewhat effective, because scientific studies have shown that it has an almost "placebo effect"-like effect on the patient (sometimes, but not always).  In short, it doesn't heal on it's own, but it makes the patient feel better and feel like they are getting healthier, which helps them fight off whatever is affecting their health, so it results in improvement.

And you're right, both of the people involved in this piece are wrong in a variety of ways.  Neither one is right about prayer healing, and neither one is right about the way they are approaching the issue of autism.


I'm going to take a risk of starting a flame war, but science will never be able to explain faith.


No, of course not.  They're (usually) separate realms.  But science can conclusively say whether or not someone gets better when people pray over them.  Some things we cannot see or measure.  Health is not one of those things.

(now if it were something like, faith helping people come to grips with dying and therefore dying peacefully, that's not something that would be easy to measure scientifically; and of course, we cannot prove or disprove any of the tenets of religion like wether or not god exists, heaven is real, etc.  But we can prove or disprove people's claims of being able to affect this world, such as psychics, faith healers, etc)


When you try and scientifically prove faith, it cancels it out.

M Wrote:
Actually disease being a result of sin is not a Christian doctrine.  Jesus said so when he healed people and if you really want a challenge about learning about suffering, read the book of Job.  I don't have time to research scripture here and I don't think too many people here are interested anyway.  

TheZach Wrote:

GuessWho Wrote:
All the things we call diseases and disabillities are proof that when God lets Satan run the world instead of simply annihilating him forthright, Satan can't run the world.


My personal belief is that in order to get rid of all these diseases and disabilities God would have to judge everyone, I think there a resault of the common sin of man.

God does not judge us yet, becuause he loves us and holds hope that we (man) will change.


If you want to start a seperate thread to debate this topic your more then welcome.

GuessWho Wrote:
Does autism let us see God any better than the NTs can?  Think about that, maybe that has a purpose.  Maybe there is a little bit of divine purpose in the autistic perception.


No.

And what about those of us that believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster? I raise a tin of alphabet spaghetti at you for your blasphemy Zakkie.

pikajedi4 Wrote:

ocampo Wrote:
And what about those of us that believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster? I raise a tin of alphabet spaghetti at you for your blasphemy Zakkie.


All Hail His Noodly Appendage!


When I worked in prison one girl misheard another in talking about the holes in Jesus' hands - she thought she said 'bowls'. So we made up our own religion called the Holy Bowls where communion was a Penguin biscuit and White Lightning cider. We also decided that Britney Spears and David Beckham must be Moses because they had never been seen in the same room together.

Gotta love prison.

ocampo Wrote:

pikajedi4 Wrote:

ocampo Wrote:
And what about those of us that believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster? I raise a tin of alphabet spaghetti at you for your blasphemy Zakkie.


All Hail His Noodly Appendage!


When I worked in prison one girl misheard another in talking about the holes in Jesus' hands - she thought she said 'bowls'. So we made up our own religion called the Holy Bowls where communion was a Penguin biscuit and White Lightning cider. We also decided that Britney Spears and David Beckham must be Moses because they had never been seen in the same room together.

Gotta love prison.


We also found a clip-art of what looked like Coco Pops on Word and sent it to someone else as an email attachment with 'For God so loved the world He said... let there be Coco Pops'

LOVE Douglas Adams.

Does it show? Tongue
I've never read Terry Prachett although its been very much recommended to me.
LMAO! I never thought Soft and Gentle would taste as nice as it smells...

I LOVE The Restaraunt at the End of the Universe. Marvin is my idol.
Yes, Maxine Ashton did a fabulous job with that book!

I am glad that you have seen the light of the sugar-packed processed tomato sauce. Let the E numbers save your humble soul, child.

pikajedi4 Wrote:
Tell me, have you ever read any of the Discworld novels, or The Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy?


Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams are practically a viable religion in and of themselves.  Tongue

Well...I don't know.  The whole "I can't see it or measure it, so it's not there" argument just doesn't hold much weight for me.  It's a bit like quantum physics in that respect.  Think about how much of what we call science is actually just well-supported hypotheses...and think about how much of today's hard science was yesterday's mythology.  There's no telling what our accepted notion of science will be tomorrow.

I've seen too much to say that belief doesn't have any power, regardless of what you believe or don't believe in...if you believe that God is answering your prayers, or that casting a spell will achieve a certain effect, or that everything is entirely dependent on chance and nature, those beliefs could potentially manifest in one way or another.  Belief doesn't necessarily exert a great deal of force - nothing that can be reliably measured at present, if ever - and it's definitely not something we have complete control over.  But I don't think that's any reason to say it's impossible.  

I'm sure a lot of people would argue with me, but I think belief itself is the catalyst (as opposed to what you actually believe in).  I don't think belief and science oppose each other as much as people think...they don't mesh in every respect and probably weren't meant to.  The human mind is equipped to consider both the concrete and the abstract...even from the perspective of evolution, that state wouldn't exist without some definite purpose...but that's just my very abridged way of thinking.  Tongue

Holding up an instance like the one mentioned in the original post and saying "See?  Belief doesn't count for anything!"  is a very jaded, biased perspective.  Especially since faith is different for everyone...there's no gold standard to hold beliefs up to, even if they fall within the same basic lines of a religion.

Yet another sad example of how misunderstood autism is, though.  I can empathize with his son...my parents thought having a "special child" was something to be ashamed of, too.   That was probably what turned me away from Christian faith in the beginning...the mixed messages about love and acceptance (but only for certain people?) were blatant and overwhelming.  In essence that's not at all how Christianity was intended to be, but as a 12-year old I couldn't look beyond my parents' example.

Remember, the last guy who told us all to be nice to each other got nailed to a tree.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Reference URL's