Aspies For Freedom

Full Version: Twin girls with Asperger's given ASBO.
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
This is a front of the article appeared today in "This is Lancashire" newspaper.


"THE mother of identical twins - given an anti-social behaviour order for terrorising neighbours - is set to launch an appeal.

Residents were overjoyed after district judge Peter Ward imposed an ASBO on Ashleigh and Katie Lynch at Reedley Magistrates' Court.

But the twins' mother Sheila, a former nurse at Burnley General Hospital, said she had received no support in dealing with her tearaway girls, who a medical expert say suffer from Asperger's Syndrome."

the rest can be found at: http://www.thisislancashire.co.uk/news/h...appeal.php



I think, it's a disgrace how ignorant this judge appears to be: people with Asperger's are born Autistic and can't help being the way they are (saying inappropriate things). If the girls had no support until now, that means they've had to suffer in silence and being misunderstood and quite probably taunted by unforgiving society. No wonder they'd 'lashed out'. I bet, there wasn't anyone protesting when their poor Mother was 'going it alone' (and where's the girls' father in all of this?) with no support from anybody for their condition! Like a pack of wolves some people are: they reap apart anyone who's "different". And the praying Mantis press folk don't help much either by stirring it even more.
Ditto... do we know what they actually did?   "Terrorising neighbours"?
Oh, I read about that in... erm, I think it was the Manchester Evening News.  But it didn't mentioned Asperger's Syndrome.

The article mentioned that they had a 'condition' but didn't specify which, which meant that they had social problems and problems relating (or words to that effect) and their condition meant they would have problems complying with any Court Order because they didn't necessarily understand consequences... or something, I'm vaguely paraphrasing.
Btw, how old were these girls?
Anti Social Behavior Order
What exactly were they doing to harass and threaten neighbours?
I read the rest of the linked article - the girls are 20 and they were swearing when they got drunk. They now seem to be behaving much better.
The article states they're 20 years old and that they've had a drinking problem. But they don't seem like identical twins, judging from the photo.
What a disgrace...
Those girls deserve the ASBOs, they were threatening other people and being abusive. They needed to be punished otherwise they would continue to behave in that way which others don't deserve to live with. There is a possibility that their behaviour was provokes but it seems unlikely. I don't like how the mother is using the fact that they have Asperger's as a reason to appeal, she claims she just wanted to put it all behind her but then she says she doesn't. That form of nt behaviour irritates me. By her saying that her daughters behaviours should be excused because of Asperger's, gives out the negative impression that Autism causes criminal behaviours, spreading misconception and giving power to organisations like Autism Speaks that want a cure for Autism. Also she won't be paying for the appeal, tax payers will which is an unfair waste of money.

It angers me that the newspaper doesn't explain Asperger's fully and just , because a person who knows nothing about it will form judgements from articles like this.

"who a medical expert say suffer from Asperger's Syndrome."
By 'This Is Lancashire' using the terminology "say" invokes doubt into the sentance implying that they don't really have it and Asperger's is just an excuse that can be used. This is clearly a trashy newspaper that uses cheap tricks to attract readers, they have not taken into account Autistic peoples view points and encourages people to think of people being Autistic as sufferers. I'm going to send them an email complaining and giving them a link to the NAS advice for writting articles that involve Autism
http://www.nas.org.uk/nas/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=243&a=4293

There is a similar story that i read in the metro (newspaper given out free on the trains) last year, about a boy who was 12/13 who was the youngest person to be given an ASBO who had asperger's syndrome.

Also to clear up what an ASBO is for those who don't know what they are. They are a punishment given to people in Britain as a way to monitor criminals. People with an ASBO have a electronic tag and are tracked, they are given certain rules they have to abide by such as a curfew and no criminal activites and if those rules are broken then they go straight to prison. There is discussion over whether they are a good form of punishment because some chavs see them as a cool thing to get.
Theres another article about them
http://www.thisislancashire.co.uk/search...tistic.php

I saw a good comment that explains the twins better than the article

"Having read all the comments posted so far I feel I must respond as these two girls are my nieces. Firstly thank you to those who are understanding of their diagnosis but to those of you who believe they should be locked up...shame on you. Of course we all know that everything you read in the papers is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth therefore what they have been accused of must be true eh? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? I hope none of your family ever get in to trouble with the police. As for their recent diagnosis and as a chairperson of a charity that supports people affected by autism can i kindly request that those of you who have basically said that there is no such thing then please do your research first before condeming the girls. Having worked with young offenders also I can tell you that many persistent offenders are also on the ASD spectrum but have gone undiagnosed. We all know kids that are constantly excluded from school and are classed as trouble makers these are the kids that usually have some underlying problem...it is not an excuse...please please do your research. If you have taken the time to write on the forum then take the time to look up ADHD and Autism and look at what the problems are. Can I also add that locking people up actually cost society more money than it would to give them the appropriate help and support they need to make positive contributions to society. As for blaming the parents I take that as a personal insult as my son is also autistic and he has had nothing but love and support as have the girls you are all so quick to condemn. Their mum is an upstanding member of the community and is a hardworking caring mother as everyone in the community will agree. She works hard and is not a 'druggy or a drunk' nor have the girls been deprived of her love and support. As for 'jumping the queue' to get a diagnosis, surely it is better to find a solution and get the girls appropriate help then to spend tax payers hard earned money on imprisonment which costs more. If many offenders were assessed like the girls the prisons wouldn't be so overcrowded as many would have similar diagnosis. If you want to blame anyone, blame the government who doesn't put enough into supporting people with special needs. The girls, although can be typical teenagers, are decent and loving and would not intentionally do anyone any harm. A final note is that the girls haven't been fasttracked through the Health Authority, they have had a private diagnosis. It amazes me how people can make comments like this on people with disorders (not illness as was previously posted)if they were from an ethnic minority..it would be you being locked up for racist comments..shouldn't the same be applied to disabilities?"

Also if you read other comments on there such as
"Absolute Rubbish, autism is used as an excuse for badly behaved children/teenagers, if their parents had taken more responsibilies for their actions when the twins were younger and helped them to understand the difference between right and wrong then maybe they'd have a chance.

It's a cycle of depravation which hasn't been broken, that's all, no excuses and definately not Autism."

It backs up my earlier statement about my anger at the newspaper for unfair portrayl of Autism, it encourages ignorant views like the person above.

Moo Wrote:
Those girls deserve the ASBOs, they were threatening other people and being abusive. They needed to be punished otherwise they would continue to behave in that way which others don't deserve to live with. There is a possibility that their behaviour was provokes but it seems unlikely

And you know this for a fact do you?  Were you there?  Did you witness the events that led up to confrontations or their anti-social behaviour?  If you weren't then you cannot possibly state this as fact in the way you are doing.  Even the court has adjourned for further medical reports before making any final decision.  If the court, which is in possession of witness statements hasn't passed judgment, how can you?

Moo Wrote:
I don't like how the mother is using the fact that they have Asperger's as a reason to appeal, she claims she just wanted to put it all behind her but then she says she doesn't. That form of nt behaviour irritates me. By her saying that her daughters behaviours should be excused because of Asperger's, gives out the negative impression that Autism causes criminal behaviours, spreading misconception and giving power to organisations like Autism Speaks that want a cure for Autism.

I don't think the articles are necessarily equating Aspies=criminals.  I think the mother is putting forward an argument explaining how situations of confrontation escalated (as a result of AS), which led to behaviour that may be found to be criminal.  I don't think the mother is making excuses, I think she's asking for assistance, tolerance and understanding.  

Who among us hasn't experienced frustrating, frightening situations pre-diagnosis, or before we learned more about AS and how it affects us?  Doesn't learning about AS and being able to explain ourselves to others help to avoid confrontation and difficult situations in future?

Moo Wrote:
Also she won't be paying for the appeal, tax payers will which is an unfair waste of money.

Don't even get me started on how much of a waste of money is the criminal (in)justice system.  Only recently, I read an article about a local authority crackdown on youth anti-social behaviour and the answer was to spend more money on policing and community officers in the hotspot areas.  They always deal with the symptoms, not the cause.  Instead of spending money on policing, why not spend money on youth clubs and sports facilities for young people?

And as for the criminal (in)justice system as it relates to females, I suggest you get hold of a copy of Dame Helena Kennedy QC's 'Eve was framed' in which you can read statistics about how many more women are incarcerated than men for 'minor' non-violent crimes, such as not paying for a television licence, and how females are given much harsher sentences than those given for similar crimes to men.

Criminalising these young women would not solve their problems.  All they would do, if they were locked up, is learn how to commit fraud and other offences.  Prisons are universities of crime.  [moo]It angers me that the newspaper doesn't explain Asperger's fully and just , because a person who knows nothing about it will form judgements from articles like this.[/quote]And it angers me that you don't have clue about how the criminal justice system is misused to criminalise vulnerable people who actually need medical and therapeutic help instead of locking up.  Do you know what proportion of prison inmates have some kind of mental health problem?  Do you know how many people with mental health problems commit suicide while in prison?  Because it is not an appropriate place for them.

[moo]"who a medical expert say suffer from Asperger's Syndrome."
By 'This Is Lancashire' using the terminology "say" invokes doubt into the sentance implying that they don't really have it and Asperger's is just an excuse that can be used. This is clearly a trashy newspaper that uses cheap tricks to attract readers, they have not taken into account Autistic peoples view points and encourages people to think of people being Autistic as sufferers. I'm going to send them an email complaining and giving them a link to the NAS advice for writting articles that involve Autism
http://www.nas.org.uk/nas/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=243&a=4293 [/quote]Nope.  You're wrong.  "say" is a very neutral term, it's factual.  Journalists need to quote their sources and that's a very bland way of doing so.  If they wanted to cast doubt on the veracity of their source, they could have used... off the top of my head "claims" "alleges" or "purports"  To use the word "say" isn't a cheap trick at all.  It's pretty standard, neutral journalism, in fact.

[moo]There is a similar story that i read in the metro (newspaper given out free on the trains) last year, about a boy who was 12/13 who was the youngest person to be given an ASBO who had asperger's syndrome.

Also to clear up what an ASBO is for those who don't know what they are. They are a punishment given to people in Britain as a way to monitor criminals. People with an ASBO have a electronic tag and are tracked, they are given certain rules they have to abide by such as a curfew and no criminal activites and if those rules are broken then they go straight to prison. There is discussion over whether they are a good form of punishment because some chavs see them as a cool thing to get.[/quote]Well, all I can say is that I'm very glad that when I was a teenager in the UK there was no such thing as ASBOs.  As someone who wasn't diagnosed, I was referred to an educational psychologist for being "disruptive" in class.  Luckily for me, I was assessed as having an IQ of 150 and I always scored good grades in exams, so I was a bit of anomaly.  

I'm sure that had I been so confused and frustrated and badly behaved with poor exam results, I would have been treated very differently.  Perhaps I would have been served with ASBOs instead of my headteacher spending a lot of time with me when I was excluded from a particular class due to a personality clash with a teacher.

I'm very alarmed that some bad behaviours that in my teenage years would have been bad behaviour that teenagers are allowed to grow out of and put behind them are now being turned into ASBO-fare that criminalises and stigmatises a young person for life and potentially affects the rest of their life.

I can't find the edit button to sort out the formatting... where is it?
Why is this thread in 'And the good news......' forum?  

ASBOs are a disturbing increase in the power of the state.  By them it intervenes in interpersonal disputes which were previously settled by individuals.  Also I believe that most people who have been given ASBOs are working class/poor.   I would guess that very few middle class people have been given them.
They should be offered help for quitting alcohol and managing whatever led them to start drinking. And not some court-ordered thing they'll sit through sullenly, either...
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's